Obstructive Sleep ApneaMIMOSANCT03246477
Long-term Impact of Maxillomandibular Advancement Osteotomy on Sleep Apnea Patients
An observational study of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by AZ Sint-Jan AV.
Trial summary
Background Maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA) has demonstrated high success rates, improving both the apnea-hypopnea index and associated patient' quality of life (QOL), in patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to 31 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients (n=10/12) with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of OSAS, that were treated with an MMA between 01/11/1995 and 01/12/1999 by one surgeon (CDC)
Who may be able to join
- clinically confirmed diagnosis of OSAS
- treated with an MMA between 01/11/1995 and 01/12/1999 by one surgeon (CDC)
Who cannot join
- not following abovementioned criteria
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Long-term Impact of Maxillomandibular Advancement Osteotomy on Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Background Maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA) has demonstrated high success rates, improving both the apnea-hypopnea index and associated patient' quality of life (QOL), in patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). However, clinical relapse has been described in the target population, especially when associated with significant weight gain. Literature reporting the long-term impact of MMA for OSAS is lacking. The surgeons of the Division of Maxillofacial Surgery already started to perform this type of surgery in 1995.
Objectives The investigators aim to evaluate the long-term (minimum 15 years post-surgery) biologic and QOL impact of MMA in patients with OSAS. The biologic impact refers to the stability of hard and soft tissues and polysomnographic results.
Read more
Study design Retrospective study Both pre- en postoperative clinical imaging, polysomnography and quality of life questionnaires will be retrieved from all patients that were surgically treated with an MMA by one surgeon (CDC) between 01/11/1995 and 01/12/1999.
Conclusion Short-term data have shown high success rates for MMA in OSAS patients. However, long-term data are lacking. This retrospective study might provide us with more information about the incidence of clinical relapse fifteen to twenty years after surgery.
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Keywords
- maxillomandibular advancement osteotomy, long-term results, quality of life, polysomnographic measurements, skeletal stability
- Medical subject headings
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
apnea-hypopnea index, as determined through polysomnography
Measured: minimum 15 years postoperative
oxygen saturation values, as determined through polysomnography
Measured: minimum 15 years postoperative
Secondary outcomes (12)
evolution of patient quality of life, through Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Measured: preoperative
Stability of hard and soft head and neck tissue, according to manual anthropometry
Measured: min 15 years postoperative
Evolution of apnea-hypopnea index, as determined through polysomnography
Measured: preoperative
Evolution of apnea-hypopnea index, as determined through polysomnography
Measured: immediately postoperative
oxygen saturation values, as determined through polysomnography
Measured: preoperative
oxygen saturation values, as determined through polysomnography
Measured: immediately postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Measured: immediately postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Measured: minimum 15 years postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through OSAS questionnaire
Measured: preoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through OSAS questionnaire
Measured: immediately postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through OSAS questionnaire
Measured: minimum 15 years postoperative
evaluation of hard and soft head and neck tissue, according to cone-beam CT imaging
Measured: minimum 15 years postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2017
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completion31 Dec 2017
- Study completion31 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Obstructive Sleep ApneaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AZ Sint-Jan AV
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nathalie Neyt, AZ Sint-Jan AV
- Investigators
- Nathalie Neyt, Principal investigator, AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03246477
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016/0876
- Acronym
- MIMOSA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Long-term Impact of Maxillomandibular Advancement Osteotomy on Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03246477
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MIMOSA / 2016/0876
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Keywords
- maxillomandibular advancement osteotomy, long-term results, quality of life, polysomnographic measurements, skeletal stability
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AZ Sint-Jan AVUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Study start
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background Maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA) has demonstrated high success rates, improving both the apnea-hypopnea index and associated patient' quality of life (QOL), in patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). However, clinical relapse has been described in the target population, especially when associated with significant weight gain. Literature reporting the long-term impact of MMA for OSAS is lacking. The surgeons of the Division of Maxillofacial Surgery already started to perform this type of surgery in 1995.
Objectives The investigators aim to evaluate the long-term (minimum 15 years post-surgery) biologic and QOL impact of MMA in patients with OSAS. The biologic impact refers to the stability of hard and soft tissues and polysomnographic results.
Study design Retrospective study Both pre- en postoperative clinical imaging, polysomnography and quality of life questionnaires will be retrieved from all patients that were surgically treated with an MMA by one surgeon (CDC) between 01/11/1995 and 01/12/1999.
Conclusion Short-term data have shown high success rates for MMA in OSAS patients. However, long-term data are lacking. This retrospective study might provide us with more information about the incidence of clinical relapse fifteen to twenty years after surgery.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients (n=10/12) with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of OSAS, that were treated with an MMA between 01/11/1995 and 01/12/1999 by one surgeon (CDC)
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- clinically confirmed diagnosis of OSAS
- treated with an MMA between 01/11/1995 and 01/12/1999 by one surgeon (CDC)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- not following abovementioned criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
apnea-hypopnea index, as determined through polysomnography
Time frame: minimum 15 years postoperative
oxygen saturation values, as determined through polysomnography
Time frame: minimum 15 years postoperative
12 secondary outcomes
evolution of patient quality of life, through Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time frame: preoperative
Stability of hard and soft head and neck tissue, according to manual anthropometry
Time frame: min 15 years postoperative
Evolution of apnea-hypopnea index, as determined through polysomnography
Time frame: preoperative
Evolution of apnea-hypopnea index, as determined through polysomnography
Time frame: immediately postoperative
oxygen saturation values, as determined through polysomnography
Time frame: preoperative
oxygen saturation values, as determined through polysomnography
Time frame: immediately postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time frame: immediately postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time frame: minimum 15 years postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through OSAS questionnaire
Time frame: preoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through OSAS questionnaire
Time frame: immediately postoperative
evolution of patient quality of life, through OSAS questionnaire
Time frame: minimum 15 years postoperative
evaluation of hard and soft head and neck tissue, according to cone-beam CT imaging
Time frame: minimum 15 years postoperative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model Using Peripheral Oxygen Saturation and Ballistocardiography Signals for Predicting Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Supplemental Oxygen for Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Adults With Chronic Opioid Use.
Sleep-disordered Breathing, Chronic Opioid Use
Recruiting
Nightly Wearable Monitoring During Home-Based Submental Electrical Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 1/2
DRonabinol Treatment of OSA
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nathalie Neyt principal investigator
AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by AZ Sint-Jan AV.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
apnea-hypopnea index, as determined through polysomnography (time frame: minimum 15 years postoperative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019.