AzTrials
AzTrials

Alcohol AbuseNCT03247647

Personal Values and Mandated Students

A study testing Enhanced Intervention and Standard Intervention in people with Alcohol Abuse, run by Brown University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to examine the efficacy of an enhanced alcohol intervention among individuals who are mandated to complete an alcohol education activity as part of a university sanction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 24 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Alcohol Abuse
What is being tested?
Enhanced Intervention and Standard Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
486 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
13 Mar 2018to 30 Jan 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 24 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-24 years of age
  • Enrolled in the university's undergraduate four-year degree program
  • Have been mandated for violation of university alcohol policy.

Who cannot join

  • Seniors who will graduate before the final 12-month follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Binghamton University

    Binghamton, New York, 13902

  • Brown University

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02903

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Enhancing the Efficacy and Duration of a Brief Alcohol Intervention Using Self-Affirmation

This study aims to examine the efficacy of an enhanced alcohol intervention among individuals who are mandated to complete an alcohol education activity as part of a university sanction.

Read the detailed description

High volume drinking and related adverse consequences pose significant health concerns at US colleges and universities; drinking behavior often leads to students being sanctioned for violations of campus alcohol policy. Given the widespread use of mandated alcohol interventions for these students, optimizing their initial effects and their duration could substantially mitigate adverse alcohol outcomes. Self-affirmation represents a promising adjunct to brief alcohol interventions, particularly those delivered via computer that are popular but tend to have smaller effects. Basic research shows that when self-affirmation exercises precede the receipt of health information, they decrease defensiveness and resistance to threatening health information and increase acceptance and processing of health messages. Furthermore, the facilitative effects of self-affirmation are strongest among those at higher risk. Because many mandated students display both defensiveness and high drinking severity, use of self-affirmation to enhance information processing and reduce defensive responding could optimize the efficacy of an active alcohol intervention in this at-risk subpopulation. The investigators propose to use a two-group randomized design to investigate the effect of a self-affirmation exercise prior to an empirically supported brief alcohol intervention consisting of computer-delivered personalized normative feedback (PNF). Building on an extensive history of academic-student affairs collaborations, the investigators will recruit 450 mandated students from a large public university over the course of 5 semesters. The primary aim is to examine the additive effects of an initial self-affirmation (SA) manipulation prior to receiving PNF (SA + PNF) relative to Control + PNF on alcohol use and consequences. This study extends prior work by evaluating the ability of self-affirmation exercises to supplement active alcohol interventions (rather than just health messages), and tracking the impact on alcohol use over a longer (12-month) follow-up period. Secondary aims include (a) testing theoretically-derived mediation sequences that explain the SA + PNF effects on alcohol use and alcohol consequences, incorporating mechanisms of action associated with both self-affirmation and brief alcohol interventions, and (b) the examination of theoretical moderators of the effects of SA + PNF on alcohol use and alcohol consequences. The investigators will use latent growth curve modeling analyses to examine direct and indirect intervention effects on alcohol use and consequence trajectories from (pre-intervention) baseline assessment across 1-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-ups. The public health goal of this research is to reduce the acute and chronic effects of alcohol misuse by improving the efficacy of a low intensity brief alcohol intervention. The findings of this study have both practical and theoretical implications. Demonstration of the additive utility of a very brief self-affirmation exercise could improve the efficacy and impact of currently available computer-delivered interventions for mandated students; it may also expand the reach of self-affirmation theory, leading to adaptation of self-affirmation for use with other at-risk populations receiving brief alcohol interventions.

Conditions
Alcohol Abuse
Being tested
Enhanced Intervention, Standard Intervention
Keywords
Alcohol Intervention, College Students
Medical subject headings
Alcoholism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enhanced InterventionBehavioural

    Participants will complete a personal values task immediately before viewing feedback from eCheckUpToGo.

  • Standard InterventionBehavioural

    Participants will write about the food they have eaten in the last 48 hours.

Study groups in NCT03247647
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Enhanced InterventionExperimentalParticipants assigned to this arm will complete a personal values task before reviewing their personalized feedback (eCheckUpToGo).
Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Intervention
Standard InterventionPlacebo comparatorParticipants assigned to this arm will complete a writing task about the food they have eaten in the past 48 hours immediately before reviewing their personalized feedback (eCheckUpToGo).
Receives: Behavioral: Standard Intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Alcohol Consumption

    Average of reports from past 30 days on the number of standard drinks consumed by participant per week.

    Measured: 1 month after baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Alcohol-related consequences

    Participant self-report on the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire

    Measured: 1 month and 3 months after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2017
  2. Study start13 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
486 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03247647
Sponsor's protocol ID
1708001882
Other IDs
1R01AA025643-01
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
7 Aug 2017
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: After all data have been collected and the results of the study have been published, de-identified data will be made available to other qualified investigators upon request. The request will be evaluated by the investigators to ensure that it meets reasonable demands of scientific integrity.

Publications

  • Carey KB, DiBello AM, Magill M, Mastroleo NR. Does self-affirmation augment the effects of a mandated personalized feedback intervention? A randomized controlled trial with heavy drinking college students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Dec;38(8):836-849. doi: 10.1037/adb0000989. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

    PubMed 38236233
  • Hatch MR, Wilson SE, Mastroleo NR, DiBello AM, Carey KB. Values of College Students Mandated to an Alcohol Intervention: A Qualitative Examination. Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(14):2094-2100. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2136492. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

    PubMed 36315498
  • Wilson SE, Feltus SR, Brenman AM, Carey KB, DiBello AM, Mastroleo NR. Comparing Alcohol Use of Pre-COVID-Era and COVID-Era Cohorts of Mandated College Student Drinkers. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Jul;83(4):480-485. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2022.83.480.

    PubMed 35838424

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Enhanced Intervention and Standard Intervention in people with Alcohol Abuse, run by Brown University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Alcohol Consumption (time frame: 1 month after baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03247647, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in