AzTrials
AzTrials

Hidradenitis SuppurativaPhase 2NCT03248531

A Study to Test the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

A Phase 2 study testing Bimekizumab and Adalimumab in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 31 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, long-term skin condition that causes abscesses and scarring on the skin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
What is being tested?
Bimekizumab and Adalimumab
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
90 participants
Where
31 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
22 Sep 2017to 21 Feb 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult subjects (18 to 70 years of age, inclusive) must have a diagnosis of HS for at least
  • 1 year prior to Baseline
  • Stable HS for at least 2 months prior to Screening and also at the Baseline Visit
  • Inadequate response to at least a 3-month study of an oral antibiotic for treatment of HS
  • Total abscess and inflammatory nodule count >=3 at the Baseline Visit
  • Subject must agree to daily use (and throughout the entirety of the study) of 1 pre-specified over-the-counter topical antiseptics on their HS lesions
  • Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or, if of childbearing potential, must be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception up till 20 weeks after last administration of study drug and have a negative pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Screening) and immediately prior to first dose
  • Male subjects must be willing to use a method of contraception when sexually active, up till 20 weeks after the last administration of study medication

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with anti-IL17s or participation in an anti-IL17 study
  • Previously received anti-TNFs
  • Subject requires, or is expected to require, opioid analgesics for any reason (excluding tramadol)
  • Subject received prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to the Baseline Visit
  • Subject received systemic non-biologic therapies for HS with potential therapeutic impact for HS less than 28 days prior to Baseline Visit
  • Draining fistula count >20 at the Baseline Visit
  • Diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than HS

Trial locations and contacts

31 sites in 8 countries.

31 sites in 8 countries

United States11 sites
  • Hs0001 113

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Hs0001 125

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Hs0001 119

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33134

  • Hs0001 123

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033

  • Hs0001 115

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89074

  • Hs0001 121

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Hs0001 126

    Manhasset, New York, 11030

  • Hs0001 120

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37215

  • Hs0001 111

    Orange, Florida, 32073

  • Hs0001 112

    Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328

  • Hs0001 117

    Tampa, Florida, 33624

Other trials in United States

Germany6 sites
  • Hs0001 408

    Berlin

  • Hs0001 405

    Bochum

  • Hs0001 407

    Darmstadt

  • Hs0001 400

    Dessau

  • Hs0001 404

    Erlangen

  • Hs0001 406

    Würzburg

Other trials in Germany

Australia5 sites
  • Hs0001 103

    East Melbourne

  • Hs0001 101

    Fremantle

  • Hs0001 104

    Saint Leonards

  • Hs0001 100

    Westmead

  • Hs0001 102

    Woolloongabba

Other trials in Australia

Russia3 sites
  • Hs0001 901

    Moscow

  • Hs0001 903

    Saint Petersburg

  • Hs0001 900

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

Belgium2 sites
  • Hs0001 203

    Brussels

  • Hs0001 202

    Liège

Other trials in Belgium

Norway2 sites
  • Hs0001 701

    Harstad

  • Hs0001 700

    Tromsø

Other trials in Norway

Denmark1 site
  • Hs0001 300

    Copenhagen

Other trials in Denmark

Greece1 site
  • Hs0001 503

    Athens

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2 Multicenter, Investigator-Blind, Subject-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, long-term skin condition that causes abscesses and scarring on the skin.

Being tested
Bimekizumab, Adalimumab, Placebo
Keywords
Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Bimekizumab, HS, Moderate to Severe HS
Medical subject headings
Hidradenitis Suppurativa

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BimekizumabDrug

    Also called UCB4940

    Bimekizumab in different dosages (dose 1 and 2).

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Also called Humira®

    Adalimumab in different dosages (dose 1, 2 and 3).

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo will be provided matching Bimekizumab.

Study groups in NCT03248531
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BimekizumabExperimentalSubjects will receive one Bimekizumab loading dose 1 and several Bimekizumab dose 2 applications.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab
AdalimumabActive comparatorSubjects will receive one Adalimumab loading (dose 1) and several Adalimumab dose 2 and dose 3 applications.
Receives: Drug: Adalimumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects will receive several placebo applications to keep the blinding.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response as Measured by Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12

    HiSCR was defined as at least a 50 % reduction from Baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, with no increase from Baseline in abscess or draining fistula count. Results were based on a Bayesian logistic regression model where the number of responders were assumed to follow a binomial distribution. Participants with missing data at Week 12 were considered as nonresponders in the analysis. Posterior mean response rates and 95% credible intervals in each group are presented.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (41)
  1. Bimekizumab Plasma Concentration at Day 1 (Prior to First Dose)

    Plasma concentration of Bimekizumab was expressed in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Values Below Limit of Quantification (BLQ) were replaced by value of Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) divided by 2 (75 ng/mL) in calculations of Means and Coefficient of Variations (CVs).

    Measured: Day 1 (Prior to first dose)

  2. Bimekizumab Plasma Concentration at Week 2

    Plasma concentration of Bimekizumab was expressed in ng/mL. Values BLQ were replaced by value of LLOQ/2 (75 ng/mL) in calculations of Means and CVs.

    Measured: Week 2

  3. Bimekizumab Plasma Concentration at Week 4

    Plasma concentration of Bimekizumab was expressed in ng/mL. Values BLQ were replaced by value of LLOQ/2 (75 ng/mL) in calculations of Means and CVs.

    Measured: Week 4

  4. Bimekizumab Plasma Concentration at Week 8

    Plasma concentration of Bimekizumab was expressed in ng/mL. Values BLQ were replaced by value of LLOQ/2 (75 ng/mL) in calculations of Means and CVs.

    Measured: Week 8

  5. Bimekizumab Plasma Concentration at Week 12

    Plasma concentration of Bimekizumab was expressed in ng/mL. Values BLQ were replaced by value of LLOQ/2 (75 ng/mL) in calculations of Means and CVs.

    Measured: Week 12

  6. Bimekizumab Plasma Concentration at Week 30

    Plasma concentration of Bimekizumab was expressed in ng/mL. Values BLQ were replaced by value of LLOQ/2 (75 ng/mL) in calculations of Means and CVs.

    Measured: Week 30

  7. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event During the Study

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

    Measured: From Screening to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  8. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Categorized by Maximum Severity During the Study

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. To record the intensity of an AE Investigator used the following criteria: Mild: the study participant was aware of sign or symptom (syndrome), but it did not interfere with his/her usual activities and/or was of no clinical consequence; Moderate: AE interfered with the usual activities of the study participant or it was of some clinical consequence; Severe: the study participant was unable to work normally or to carry out his/her usual activities, or the AE was of definite clinical consequence.

    Measured: From Screening to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  9. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event During the Study

    A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, was an infection that required treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may have jeopardised the patients, or may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.

    Measured: From Screening to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  10. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event Categorized by Severity During the Study

    A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, was an infection that required treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may have jeopardised the patients, or may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. To record the intensity of an AE Investigator used the following criteria: Mild: study participant was aware of sign or symptom (syndrome), but it did not interfere with his/her usual activities and/or was of no clinical consequence; Moderate: AE interfered with usual activities of study participant or it was of some clinical consequence; Severe: the study participant was unable to work normally or to carry out his/her usual activities, or the AE was of definite clinical consequence.

    Measured: From Screening to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  11. Percentage of Participants That Withdrew Due to Adverse Events During the Study

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

    Measured: From Screening to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  12. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure)

    Blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  13. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Vital Signs (Pulse Rate)

    Pulse rate was measured in beats per minute (beats/min).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  14. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Body Weight

    Body weight was measured in kilograms (kg).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  15. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in ECG Parameters (ECG Mean Heart Rate)

    Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate was measured in beats/min.

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  16. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in ECG Parameters (PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval)

    PR Interval, QRS duration, QT interval and QT corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) Interval were measured in milliseconds (msec).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  17. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Erythrocytes)

    Erythrocytes was measured in number of red blood cells per liter (10^12/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  18. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Hematocrit)

    Hematocrit was measured in volume percentage (%) of red blood cells in blood.

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  19. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Hemoglobin, Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration)

    Hemoglobin, erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin (HGB) concentration were measured in grams per liter (g/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  20. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB))

    Erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin (HGB) was measured in picograms (pg).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  21. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume)

    Erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume was measured in femtoliters (fL).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  22. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Platelets)

    Platelets was measured in number of platelets per liter (10^9/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  23. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Leukocytes, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils)

    Leukocytes, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils were measured in number of white blood cells per liter (10^9/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  24. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Hematology Parameters (Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes, Neutrophils/Leukocytes)

    Basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes and neutrophils/leukocytes were measured in percentages (%).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  25. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Biochemistry Parameters (Bicarbonate, Chloride, Potassium, Sodium, Calcium, Magnesium, Urea Nitrogen, Cholesterol, Glucose)

    Bicarbonate, chloride, potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, urea nitrogen, cholesterol and glucose were measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  26. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Biochemistry Parameters (Creatinine, Bilirubin, Urate)

    Creatinine, bilirubin, and urate were measured in micromols per liter (μmol/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  27. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Biochemistry Parameters (C Reactive Protein High Sensitivity)

    C reactive protein high sensitivity was measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  28. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Biochemistry Parameters (Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase)

    Alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase were measured in units per liter (U/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  29. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Urinalysis Parameters (Urine pH)

    Urine pH was measured on a pH scale.

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  30. Change From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Urinalysis Parameters (Urine Albumin)

    Urine albumin was measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L).

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  31. Number of Participants Who Shifted From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Urinalysis Parameters (Urine Glucose)

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  32. Number of Participants Who Shifted From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Urinalysis Parameters (Urine Leukocyte Esterase)

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  33. Number of Participants Who Shifted From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Urinalysis Parameters (Urine Bacteria)

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  34. Number of Participants Who Shifted From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Urinalysis Parameters (Urine Erythrocytes)

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  35. Number of Participants Who Shifted From Baseline Until Safety Follow-up Visit in Physical Examination

    Measured: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (Week 30)

  36. Percentage of Participants With Positive Bimekizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Concentration at Day 1

    The overall status of a study participant was 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was positive. Percentages were based on the number of study participants with a non-missing measurement, from samples that did not contain BKZ concentration levels above the drug tolerance, at the visit.

    Measured: Day 1

  37. Percentage of Participants With Positive Bimekizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Concentration at Week 2

    The overall status of a study participant was 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was positive. Percentages were based on the number of study participants with a non-missing measurement, from samples that did not contain BKZ concentration levels above the drug tolerance, at the visit.

    Measured: Week 2

  38. Percentage of Participants With Positive Bimekizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Concentration at Week 4

    The overall status of a study participant was 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was positive. Percentages were based on the number of study participants with a non-missing measurement, from samples that did not contain BKZ concentration levels above the drug tolerance, at the visit.

    Measured: Week 4

  39. Percentage of Participants With Positive Bimekizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Concentration at Week 8

    The overall status of a study participant was 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was positive. Percentages were based on the number of study participants with a non-missing measurement, from samples that did not contain BKZ concentration levels above the drug tolerance, at the visit.

    Measured: Week 8

  40. Percentage of Participants With Positive Bimekizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Concentration at Week 12

    The overall status of a study participant was 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was positive. Percentages were based on the number of study participants with a non-missing measurement, from samples that did not contain BKZ concentration levels above the drug tolerance, at the visit.

    Measured: Week 12

  41. Percentage of Participants With Positive Bimekizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Concentration at Week 30

    The overall status of a study participant was 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was positive. Percentages were based on the number of study participants with a non-missing measurement, from samples that did not contain BKZ concentration levels above the drug tolerance, at the visit.

    Measured: Week 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2017
  2. Study start22 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion23 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion21 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03248531
Sponsor's protocol ID
HS0001
Other IDs
2017-000892-10, 2017
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
2 Aug 2017
Last updated
11 Apr 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Glatt S, Jemec GBE, Forman S, Sayed C, Schmieder G, Weisman J, Rolleri R, Seegobin S, Baeten D, Ionescu L, Zouboulis CC, Shaw S. Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Phase 2, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Nov 1;157(11):1279-1288. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2905.

    PubMed 34406364

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Bimekizumab and Adalimumab in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 31 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 31 sites in United States, Germany, Australia, Russia, Belgium and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Feb 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response as Measured by Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03248531, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in