AzTrials
AzTrials

Pilonidal SinusNCT03271996

Fistulectomy vs. Modified Karydakis Procedure for Pilonidal Sinus

A study testing Primary closure and Fistulectomy in people with Pilonidal Sinus, run by Dimitri Christoforidis at 1 site in Switzerland.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study wants to improve patient care affected by pilonidal sinus during and after surgery. Pilonidal sinus excision is a frequent procedure, despite this, there is still not an appropriate surgical technique because of a lack of quality comparative studies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pilonidal Sinus
What is being tested?
Primary closure and Fistulectomy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Apr 2012to Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pilonidal cyst requiring surgery
  • Signed Informed Consent Form

Who cannot join

  • Abnormal lesions
  • Injuries requiring a closing with rotation flap

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Ospedale Regionale di Lugano

    Lugnao, 6900

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Pilinidal Sinus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study wants to improve patient care affected by pilonidal sinus during and after surgery. Pilonidal sinus excision is a frequent procedure, despite this, there is still not an appropriate surgical technique because of a lack of quality comparative studies.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial. The study will compare the healing of the surgical wound and the recurrence rate after excision and primary para-median closure versus narrow orifice excision (fistulectomy)

Group A: excision and paramedian closure according to modified Karydakis technique

Group B: removal / fistulectomy by scalpels or trephines of primary and drainage orifices, healing of the wound by secondary intention

Conditions
Pilonidal Sinus
Being tested
Primary closure, Fistulectomy
Keywords
Pilonidal sinus, Bascom, Cleft lift, Fistulectomy, Karydakis
Medical subject headings
Pilonidal Sinus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Primary closureProcedure or surgery

    Asymmetric skin incision and total excision of the lesion with monopolar scalpel. Accurate hemostasis, creation of a cutaneous-subcutaneous flap, primary closure with non-absorbable sutures, optional aspiration drainage.

  • FistulectomyProcedure or surgery

    Evaluation of the cavity using a 0.5-1 mm metal probe which will be inserted into the skin orifice. Excision of the skin around the orifice and debridement/excision of the cavity by monopolar scalpel or Trephines

Study groups in NCT03271996
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Primary closureExperimentalExcision of sinus and paramedian closure according to modified Karydakis technique
Receives: Procedure: Primary closure
FistulectomyExperimentalRemoval / fistulectomy by scalpels or trephines of primary and drainage orifices and healing of the wound by second intention
Receives: Procedure: Fistulectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete healing

    percentage of complete healing

    Measured: 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time to recovery

    Time to completely recovery

    Measured: 12 months

  2. percentage of relapse

    percentage of relapse after surgery

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2017
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2017
  4. Study completionJun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized controlled study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03271996
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-016
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
17 Aug 2017
Last updated
5 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Popeskou SG, Pravini B, Panteleimonitis S, Vajana AFDT, Vanoni A, Schmalzbauer M, Posabella A, Christoforidis D. Conservative Sinusectomy vs. excision and primary off-midline closure for pilonidal disease: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1193-1199. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03551-9. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

    PubMed 32144531

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Primary closure and Fistulectomy in people with Pilonidal Sinus, run by Dimitri Christoforidis at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete healing (time frame: 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03271996, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in