AzTrials
AzTrials

Psychomotor RetardationNCT03275766

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Motor Symptoms in Psychiatric Disorders

A study testing DLPFC facilitatory, SMA inhibitory and SMA facilitatory in people with Psychomotor Retardation and Psychomotor Slowing, run by University of Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Psychomotor slowing may occur in major psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorders or schizophrenia spectrum disorders. It refers to slowing of fine motor skills, motor planning and gross motor behavior. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
DLPFC facilitatory, SMA inhibitory and SMA facilitatory
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
1 Jun 2016to 15 Jul 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • suffering from major depressive disorder or schizophrenia spectrum disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
  • right handedness
  • normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing

Who cannot join

  • epilepsy
  • history of severe head trauma
  • current abuse of drugs or alcohol; past addiction to drugs or alcohol
  • pregnancy
  • incompatibility to cerebral MRI

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern

    Bern, 3008

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Symptoms of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders

Psychomotor slowing may occur in major psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorders or schizophrenia spectrum disorders. It refers to slowing of fine motor skills, motor planning and gross motor behavior. In major depression and schizophrenia, psychomotor slowing is associated with alterations of premotor cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. This randomized, sham-controlled, prospective trial will test, whether 15 sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may ameliorate psychomotor slowing in schizophrenia or major depression.

Read the detailed description

Psychomotor slowing may occur in major psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorders or schizophrenia spectrum disorders. It refers to slowing of fine motor skills, motor planning and gross motor behavior. In major depression and schizophrenia, psychomotor slowing is associated with alterations of premotor cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. This randomized, sham-controlled, prospective trial will test, whether 15 sessions of rTMS in 3 weeks may ameliorate psychomotor slowing in schizophrenia or major depression.

Eligible participants will be randomized to one of four arms:

Being tested
DLPFC facilitatory, SMA inhibitory, SMA facilitatory, sham TMS
Medical subject headings
Psychomotor Disorders, Schizophrenia, Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DLPFC facilitatoryOther

    Also called rTMS facilitatory DLPFC

    15 Hz stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)(15 sessions/3weeks, 1500 stimuli per session, stimulation intensity 100% of the individual active motor threshold; in total 22500 stimuli

  • SMA inhibitoryOther

    Also called rTMS inhibitory SMA

    1 Hz stimulation of preSMA/SMA (15 sessions/3weeks, 1500 stimuli per session, stimulation intensity 100% of the individual active motor threshold; in total 22500 stimuli

  • SMA facilitatoryOther

    Also called iTBS facilitatory SMA

    Three pulses of stimulation at 50 Hz of preSMA/SMA, repeated every 200 ms. 2 s trains are repeated every 10 s for a total of 190 s (600 pulses, 200 seconds). intensity 80% of individual active motor threshold; in total 9000 stimuli

  • sham TMSOther

    Determination of active motor threshold and subsequent stimulation with the placebo coil, with the same sounds but without effects. 15 sessions in three weeks, duration of 20 mins per session

Study groups in NCT03275766
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DLPFC facilitatoryActive comparatorrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of 15 Hz over left DLPFC usually effective in depression treatment, probably no specific effect on psychomotor slowing
Receives: Other: DLPFC facilitatory
preSMA/SMA inhibitoryExperimentalrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of 1 Hz over preSMA/SMA should inhibit overactive premotor cortices
Receives: Other: SMA inhibitory
preSMA/SMA facilitatoryExperimentalintermittend theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over preSMA/SMA should facilitate neural activity within premotor cortices
Receives: Other: SMA facilitatory
sham TMSSham comparatorsham rTMS with a placebo coil over occipital cortex should have no effect at all (no transcranial magnetic stimulation, only sound)
Receives: Other: sham TMS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Responders at Week 3

    Number of participants with >30% reduction from baseline in the Salpetriere Retardation Rating Scale, last observation carried forward method applied

    Measured: week 3

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change in Salpetriere Retardation Rating Scale Total Score From Baseline to Week 3

    observer based rating scale of the severity of psychomotor slowing, assessment blind to intervention Scores may range from 0 - 60, higher scores indicate worse outcome

    Measured: week 3

  2. Change in Activity Level From Baseline to Week 3

    actigraphically (wrist of the non-dominant arm) assessed motor activity during the wake periods of one day, given in counts/h

    Measured: week 3

  3. Change in Catatonia Severity From Baseline to Week 3

    observer based rating of catatonia severity with the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale, assessment blind to intervention

    Measured: week 3

  4. Change in Fingertapping Score From Baseline to Week 3

    Fingertapping test with the dominant and nondominant index finger for 10 sec, video-taped and blind assessment

    Measured: week 3

  5. Change in Coin Rotation From Baseline to Week 3

    test of manual dexterity in both hands, rotation of a specified coin for 10 seconds, video-taped and blinded evaluation

    Measured: week 3

  6. Change in Hand Gesture Performance From Baseline to Week 3

    videotaped performance of hand gestures according to the Test of Upper Limb Apraxia (TULIA), blind evaluation and rating

    Measured: week 3

  7. Change in SANS Total Score From Baseline to Week 3

    scale for the assessment of negative symptoms, applies to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients, assessment blind to intervention

    Measured: week 3

  8. Change From HAMD Total Score From Baseline to Week 3

    Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 21-item version, applies to depression patients, assessment blind to intervention

    Measured: week 3

  9. Change in CAINS Total Score From Baseline to Week 3

    the clinical assessment interview for negative symptoms, assessment blind to intervention

    Measured: week 3

  10. Change in PANSS Total and Subscores From Baseline to Week 3

    the positive and negative syndrome scale, interview to assess severity of schizophrenia symptoms, applies to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients, assessment blind to intervention

    Measured: week 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03275766
Sponsor's protocol ID
SNCTP610
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
22 Aug 2017
Last updated
12 May 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Walther S, Alexaki D, Schoretsanitis G, Weiss F, Vladimirova I, Stegmayer K, Strik W, Schappi L. Inhibitory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Psychomotor Slowing: A Transdiagnostic, Mechanism-Based Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Schizophr Bull Open. 2020 Apr 22;1(1):sgaa020. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaa020. eCollection 2020 Jan.

    PubMed 42936210

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing DLPFC facilitatory, SMA inhibitory and SMA facilitatory in people with Psychomotor Retardation and Psychomotor Slowing, run by University of Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Responders at Week 3 (time frame: week 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03275766, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in