AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Brain InjuryNCT03278769

Ventilator Settings on Patients With Acute Brain Injury

A study testing Lung protective ventilator settings in people with Acute Brain Injury and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, run by University Hospital of North Norway at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study is an explorative analysis of the relationship between cerebral blood perfusion and oxygenation and lung mechanical variables at different ventilator settings. It is a safety study excluding patients with severe lung injury or brain edema. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Lung protective ventilator settings
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
27 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
1 Jun 2019to 1 Jan 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • • Any tracheally intubated or tracheotomized adult patient with ABI with GCS< 9 on controlled ventilation requiring continuous ICP measurement.
  • Proxy informed consent from relatives.

Who cannot join

  • • ICP > 22 mmHg before treatment of high ICP
  • Acute respiratory failure defined as partial pressure of oxygen/ inspiratory oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ratio < 40 kPa and Xray pathology
  • History of pulmonary disese: Chronic respiratory failure diagnosis stage III and IV in the GOLD classification, pulmectomy, lobectomy or restrictive lung disease.
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35.
  • Known right or biventricular cardiac failure with cardiac index < 2,5 L/min/m2 or ejection fracture < 40 %.
  • Refractory hypovolemia as diagnosed with pulse pressure variation > 12 % with tidal volume 8 ml/predicted bodyweight (intubated on controlled ventilation) or passive leg rise test with > 10 % increase in stroke volume measured by VTI echocardiography or PICCO.
  • Medulla lesion that affect the autonomic nervous system.
  • Patients who has undergone decompressive craniectomy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • University Hospital North Norway

    Tromsø, Troms, 9010

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Relation Between Lung Protective Mechanical Ventilation, Intracranial Pressure, Autoregulation and Brain Oxygenation in Neurointensive Care Patients

The present study is an explorative analysis of the relationship between cerebral blood perfusion and oxygenation and lung mechanical variables at different ventilator settings. It is a safety study excluding patients with severe lung injury or brain edema.

Read the detailed description

The primary goal is to carry out baseline measurements to enable conclusions concerning the safety of lung protective ventilator settings before extending the study to patients with more severe brain and/or lung injury in the future.

The primary objective is to investigate if lung protective ventilator settings (higher Positive end-expiratory pressure and lower tidal volume) as compared with conventional settings.

  1. increase intracranial pressure
  2. diminish cerebral vasoreactive autoregulation as assessed by pressure reactivity index, ie pressure reactivity index will turn positive, which means that it will change the state from intact to impaired autoregulation.

The secondary objective is an exploratory analysis of the relationship between ventilator settings and other well defined respiratory, cerebral, and cardiovascular variables, including transpulmonary pressure.

Being tested
Lung protective ventilator settings
Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lung protective ventilator settingsProcedure or surgery

    Positive end-expiratory pressure 12, Tidal volume 6 milliliter/kilogram predicted body weight

Study groups in NCT03278769
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ventilator settingExperimentalPositive end-expiratory pressure , Tidal volume
Receives: Procedure: Lung protective ventilator settings

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intracranial pressure

    intracranial pressure increase with lung protective setting

    Measured: 120 minutes

  2. pressure reactivity index

    Diminished pressure reactivity index

    Measured: 120 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03278769
Sponsor's protocol ID
Brain-Vent
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
29 Aug 2017
Last updated
23 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Smielewski P, Lavinio A, Timofeev I, Radolovich D, Perkes I, Pickard JD, Czosnyka M. ICM+, a flexible platform for investigations of cerebrospinal dynamics in clinical practice. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:145-51. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2_30.

    PubMed 19388307
  • Koutsoukou A, Katsiari M, Orfanos SE, Kotanidou A, Daganou M, Kyriakopoulou M, Koulouris NG, Rovina N. Respiratory mechanics in brain injury: A review. World J Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 4;5(1):65-73. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.65. eCollection 2016 Feb 4.

    PubMed 26855895
  • Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, Goligher EC, Carteaux G, Rittayamai N, Mojoli F, Chiumello D, Piquilloud L, Grasso S, Jubran A, Laghi F, Magder S, Pesenti A, Loring S, Gattinoni L, Talmor D, Blanch L, Amato M, Chen L, Brochard L, Mancebo J; PLeUral pressure working Group (PLUG-Acute Respiratory Failure section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine). Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1360-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4400-x. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

    PubMed 27334266
  • Beqiri E, Smielewski P, Guerin C, Czosnyka M, Robba C, Bjertnaes L, Frisvold SK. Neurological and respiratory effects of lung protective ventilation in acute brain injury patients without lung injury: brain vent, a single centre randomized interventional study. Crit Care. 2023 Mar 20;27(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04383-z.

    PubMed 36941683

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lung protective ventilator settings in people with Acute Brain Injury and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, run by University Hospital of North Norway at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intracranial pressure (time frame: 120 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03278769, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in