Breast ReductionNCT03280043
Risk of Hematoma After Ketorolac Use in Reduction Mammoplasty.
An observational study of Breast Reduction and Reduction Mammoplasty, run by McMaster University at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The investigators hope to answer the question, "does ketorolac increase the risk of hematoma after reduction mammoplasty?" using a case-control study. All patients who developed a hematoma post reduction mammoplasty (cases) at our institution, and match these with women who had an uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Reduction, Reduction Mammoplasty, Hematoma
- What is being tested?
- Hematoma
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2015to 20 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Medical coders will identify all possible cases of hematoma by searching the key words "hemorrhage," "hematoma," and "plastic surgery". Hematomas post reduction mammoplasty will be manually retrieved and reviewed. Control patients will be randomly pulled from the database of uncomplicated reduction mammoplasties.
Who may be able to join
- Cases:
- Patients who developed hematoma post-reduction mammoplasty requiring repeat surgery
- Controls:
- Uncomplicated bilateral reduction mammoplasty
Who cannot join
- Hematoma patients treated with observation or needle aspiration
- Concomitant surgeries in addition to the reduction mammoplasty
- Allergy/sensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Unilateral reduction mammoplasty
- Male reduction mammoplasty
- Documented bleeding disorders
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N3Z5
About this study
Official title: Does Ketorolac Increase the Risk of Hematoma After Reduction Mammoplasty? A Case-control Study.
The investigators hope to answer the question, "does ketorolac increase the risk of hematoma after reduction mammoplasty?" using a case-control study. All patients who developed a hematoma post reduction mammoplasty (cases) at our institution, and match these with women who had an uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty (controls), and then compare frequency of ketorolac exposure between these two groups as the primary outcome. If ketorolac increases the risk of hematoma, one should expect cases to have been exposed to ketorolac more frequently than controls. Based on previously existing literature, the investigators hypothesize that cases and controls will not differ in their ketorolac exposure, that is, ketorolac does not increase the risk of hematoma.
Read the detailed description
The electronic health record databases of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Hamilton Health Sciences will be searched, using the coding system, for all cases of reduction mammoplasty with post--operative hematoma as a complication. Only hematomas which required return to the operating room for evacuation will be included (i.e. those treated with observation or needle aspiration will be excluded).
Cases are defined as patients suffering a hematoma post reduction mammoplasty will be identified through hospital coding, and matched with controls based on the following criteria: age, body mass index (BMI), pre-existing hypertension, and institution. Controls are defined as patients who had uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty, and will be randomly pulled through retrospective chart review within the same databases, in the same time period (±5 years).
All patient data will be de--identified, and all devices containing patient information will remain on hospital grounds, and be encrypted according to our hospital protocols. The following data will be extracted from patient charts: age, date of surgery, body mass index, surgeon, anesthetist, volume of breast tissue removed per breast, comorbidities, platelet count, coagulation profile, ketorolac and opioid use including dose, timing, frequency, duration, and route of administration of both, time to discharge including length of stay if overnight, comorbidities (including smoking status), American Society of Anesthesiology score, and post--operative usage of drains.
Matching of cases and controls will be performed by the primary investigator (JB), and at the time of matching, the only visible patient information will be the de-identified patient identification (ID) and the four matching variables (ketorolac exposure was not visible).
The frequency of ketorolac exposure between cases and controls will then be reviewed, and the odds ratio (OR) of exposure to ketorolac, with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. A two by two table will be generated from our data. Since the incidence of hematoma formation after reduction mammoplasty is very low, the odds ratio will closely approximate the relative risk. To evaluate the statistical significance of the ORs, a level of significance of 0.05 will be used. Independent samples t-test will be used to compare continuous demographic data, and Chi-square analysis will be used for ordinal or categorical data between cases and controls.
Sample size was calculated using the POWER program, described by Dupont and Plummer in 1990. A sample size of 25 cases matched with 25 controls (total n = 50) was required from the following data:
- p0 = 0.32 (approximate rate of ketorolac exposure amongst breast reduction patients from previous literature from Cawthorn et al.)
- α = 0.05 (chance of type I error)
- P = 0.8 (power)
- m = 1 (matching ratio1:1)
- Ψ = 3.6 (estimated risk ratio of developing hematoma post breast reduction if exposed to ketorolac, Cawthorn et al.)
- Φ = 0.2 (measurable difference)
- Conditions
- Breast Reduction, Reduction Mammoplasty, Hematoma, Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Hematoma
- Keywords
- Breast reduction, Reduction mammoplasty, Hematoma, Hemorrhage, Ketorolac, Toradol
- Medical subject headings
- Hematoma, Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HematomaProcedure or surgery
Hematoma requiring return to operating room.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cases | Women who underwent reduction mammoplasty and then developed a hematoma which required return to the operating room for evacuation. Receives: Procedure: Hematoma | |
| Controls | Women who had uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ketorolac exposure.
Whether or not cases and controls were exposed to ketorolac on the day of surgery will be determined and compiled as a categorical variable (yes/no).
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Secondary outcomes (13)
Year of reduction mammoplasty.
The year of which the reduction mammoplasty occurred will be recorded for cases and controls. The investigators will then calculate the mean year which the reduction mammoplasty surgery occurred for the case and control groups, to ensure that on average, each group is similar in terms of the year the surgeries occurred.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Age of patients in each group will be calculated.
Age, extracted from the medical chart, will be aggregated and mean age for cases and controls will be calculated.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Body mass index compared between cases and controls.
BMI will be calculated for each patient from height and weight available in the medical chart, and mean BMI between case and control groups will be compared.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Volume of breast tissue resected during surgery (in grams) for each patient.
Mean volume of breast tissue resected from each breast, which is a routinely recorded number during reduction mammoplasty, will be extracted for each patient, and mean volumes resected will be compared between cases and controls.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Pre-operative platelet count.
Platelet counts, if available, will be extracted for each patient and means for cases and controls will be compared.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Smoking status.
Active smokers (yes/no) will be determined by reviewing the pre-operative anesthesia records which routinely contain this information.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) score.
This is an ordinal score (ASA 1 through 4) given to all patients pre-operatively, as a general indicator of risk of morbidity and mortality with a general anesthetic. This will be extracted for each patient from the pre-operative anesthesia records and frequencies of patients who are ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3, or ASA 4 will be aggregated and compared between cases and controls.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Specific breast side of hematoma occurrence (left versus right).
In patients who developed a hematoma (cases), the investigators will record whether this occurred on the left, right, or both breasts.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Post-operative opioid consumption.
The investigators will calculate post-operative opioid consumption for each patient in the study. Values will be converted to equivalence of oral morphine, in milligrams, using standard conversion charts. Mean opioid consumption will be compared between patients who received ketorolac and those who did not.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Surgeon's description of bleeding encountered during hematoma take-back.
The investigators will review transcribed dictations of the surgeon for hematoma cases in order to determine what type of bleeding was encountered during take-back surgery. The categorical descriptors will be: pulsatile bleeding, general ooze, or both. The investigators will compare descriptors between patients who received ketorolac and those who did not.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Ketorolac dose.
Amongst cases and controls who received ketorolac, the specific dose of ketorolac given will be recorded in milligrams.
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Ketorolac route given.
Amongst cases and controls who received ketorolac, the route which ketorolac was given will be recorded as a categorical variable (intra-venous, intra-muscular, or oral).
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Timing of ketorolac dose.
Amongst cases and controls who received ketorolac, the timing of the dose given will be recorded (i.e. pre-operative, intra-operative, or post-operative).
Measured: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Sep 2015
- Primary completion20 May 2017
- Study completion20 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast ReductionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McMaster UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Achilleas Thoma, MD, MSc, BSc, Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03280043
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1094-C
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 24 May 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cawthorn TR, Phelan R, Davidson JS, Turner KE. Retrospective analysis of perioperative ketorolac and postoperative bleeding in reduction mammoplasty. Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):466-72. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9682-z. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
PubMed 22434401
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Ketorolac Increase the Risk of Hematoma After Reduction Mammoplasty? A Case-control Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03280043
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1094-C
- Conditions
- Breast Reduction, Reduction Mammoplasty, Hematoma, Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- Breast reduction, Reduction mammoplasty, Hematoma, Hemorrhage, Ketorolac, Toradol
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators hope to answer the question, "does ketorolac increase the risk of hematoma after reduction mammoplasty?" using a case-control study. All patients who developed a hematoma post reduction mammoplasty (cases) at our institution, and match these with women who had an uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty (controls), and then compare frequency of ketorolac exposure between these two groups as the primary outcome. If ketorolac increases the risk of hematoma, one should expect cases to have been exposed to ketorolac more frequently than controls. Based on previously existing literature, the investigators hypothesize that cases and controls will not differ in their ketorolac exposure, that is, ketorolac does not increase the risk of hematoma.
Detailed description
The electronic health record databases of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Hamilton Health Sciences will be searched, using the coding system, for all cases of reduction mammoplasty with post--operative hematoma as a complication. Only hematomas which required return to the operating room for evacuation will be included (i.e. those treated with observation or needle aspiration will be excluded).
Cases are defined as patients suffering a hematoma post reduction mammoplasty will be identified through hospital coding, and matched with controls based on the following criteria: age, body mass index (BMI), pre-existing hypertension, and institution. Controls are defined as patients who had uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty, and will be randomly pulled through retrospective chart review within the same databases, in the same time period (±5 years).
All patient data will be de--identified, and all devices containing patient information will remain on hospital grounds, and be encrypted according to our hospital protocols. The following data will be extracted from patient charts: age, date of surgery, body mass index, surgeon, anesthetist, volume of breast tissue removed per breast, comorbidities, platelet count, coagulation profile, ketorolac and opioid use including dose, timing, frequency, duration, and route of administration of both, time to discharge including length of stay if overnight, comorbidities (including smoking status), American Society of Anesthesiology score, and post--operative usage of drains.
Matching of cases and controls will be performed by the primary investigator (JB), and at the time of matching, the only visible patient information will be the de-identified patient identification (ID) and the four matching variables (ketorolac exposure was not visible).
The frequency of ketorolac exposure between cases and controls will then be reviewed, and the odds ratio (OR) of exposure to ketorolac, with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. A two by two table will be generated from our data. Since the incidence of hematoma formation after reduction mammoplasty is very low, the odds ratio will closely approximate the relative risk. To evaluate the statistical significance of the ORs, a level of significance of 0.05 will be used. Independent samples t-test will be used to compare continuous demographic data, and Chi-square analysis will be used for ordinal or categorical data between cases and controls.
Sample size was calculated using the POWER program, described by Dupont and Plummer in 1990. A sample size of 25 cases matched with 25 controls (total n = 50) was required from the following data:
- p0 = 0.32 (approximate rate of ketorolac exposure amongst breast reduction patients from previous literature from Cawthorn et al.)
- α = 0.05 (chance of type I error)
- P = 0.8 (power)
- m = 1 (matching ratio1:1)
- Ψ = 3.6 (estimated risk ratio of developing hematoma post breast reduction if exposed to ketorolac, Cawthorn et al.)
- Φ = 0.2 (measurable difference)
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cases | – | Procedure: HematomaWomen who underwent reduction mammoplasty and then developed a hematoma which required return to the operating room for evacuation. |
| Controls | – | –Women who had uncomplicated reduction mammoplasty. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Medical coders will identify all possible cases of hematoma by searching the key words "hemorrhage," "hematoma," and "plastic surgery". Hematomas post reduction mammoplasty will be manually retrieved and reviewed. Control patients will be randomly pulled from the database of uncomplicated reduction mammoplasties.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who developed hematoma post-reduction mammoplasty requiring repeat surgery
- Uncomplicated bilateral reduction mammoplasty
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Hematoma patients treated with observation or needle aspiration
- Concomitant surgeries in addition to the reduction mammoplasty
- Allergy/sensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Unilateral reduction mammoplasty
- Male reduction mammoplasty
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HematomaHematoma requiring return to operating room. | Procedure or surgery | Cases |
Primary outcome
Ketorolac exposure.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Whether or not cases and controls were exposed to ketorolac on the day of surgery will be determined and compiled as a categorical variable (yes/no).
13 secondary outcomes
Year of reduction mammoplasty.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Age of patients in each group will be calculated.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Body mass index compared between cases and controls.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Volume of breast tissue resected during surgery (in grams) for each patient.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Pre-operative platelet count.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Smoking status.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) score.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Specific breast side of hematoma occurrence (left versus right).
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Post-operative opioid consumption.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Surgeon's description of bleeding encountered during hematoma take-back.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Ketorolac dose.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Ketorolac route given.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Timing of ketorolac dose.
Time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2017.
- Background: PubMed 22434401Cawthorn TR, Phelan R, Davidson JS, Turner KE. Retrospective analysis of perioperative ketorolac and postoperative bleeding in reduction mammoplasty. Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):466-72. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9682-z. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Reduction
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Phase IIB Trial of Bazedoxifene Plus Conjugated Estrogens
Risk Reduction, Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Night Shift Workers - Implementation of a Personalized Consultation
Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
Recruiting
SPSIP Block for Pain Control After Breast Reduction Surgery
Postoperative Pain Breast Reduction, Mammaplasty
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Serratus Plane Block and Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Reduction Surgery
Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Reduction Surgery, Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
CO2Lift and T-Junction Breakdown Rates Evaluation After Breast Reduction Surgery Pilot Trial
Wound Breakdown, Breast Reduction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Achilleas Thoma, MD, MSc, BSc principal investigator
McMaster University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Reduction and Reduction Mammoplasty, run by McMaster University at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ketorolac exposure. (time frame: Sept 2015 - Aug 2017.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03280043, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.