Knee OsteoarthritisMOSARTNCT03294408
Multimodal Imaging of Subchondral Bone in Knee Osteoarthritis : Predictive Model
A study testing multimodal imaging in people with Knee Osteoarthritis and Joint Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
Predictive factors of osteoarthritis progression are not yet well understood. However, a growing role attaches importance to the subchondral bone. The aim of the present project is to determine predictive factors of progression of osteoarthritis at the knee by a multimodal characterization of subchondral bone by… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Joint Disease, Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- multimodal imaging
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 167 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 29 Nov 2016to 19 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- knee osteoarthritis according to the criteria of knee osteoarthritis of American College of Rheumatology.
- Having felt a painful push in the last 6 months.
- Visual Analogic Scale pain > 4 on a 0 to 10 scale.
- having a Radiographic score of OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International Score) from 2 to 3 whether it is for the presence of a joint space narrowing or the presence of an osteophyte
Who cannot join
- Patello-femoral degenerative osteoarthritis isolated.
- Incapacitated to consider the position in schuss for the realization of the radiography.
- Valgus > in 5 °
- Secondary degenerative osteoarthritis
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Capacity of Multimodal Imaging of Subchondral Bone for the Prediction of Structural Evolution in Knee Osteoarthritis
Predictive factors of osteoarthritis progression are not yet well understood. However, a growing role attaches importance to the subchondral bone. The aim of the present project is to determine predictive factors of progression of osteoarthritis at the knee by a multimodal characterization of subchondral bone by Medical Resonnance Imaging, direct high resolution digitization radiographs and bone texture analysis. At the end of the project, an innovative imaging device, combining semi-automatic softwares for texture analysis, control detection and image registration would be supplied. This will enable on the one hand a more accurate and reproducible way to measure the joint space width of the affected compartment and on the other hand, an assistance to better detect patients at risk of progression of their knee osteoarthritis. Identifying These "progressors" patients might permit their selection in clinical trials at baseline adapted to their severe disease, using for example biologic treatments targeting knee osteoarthritis. The main objective of this study is to analyze the predictive capacities of bone texture parameters measured on the high-resolution radiography of the knee on the structural evolution of the knee osteoarthritis at 3 years.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Joint Disease, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal Disease
- Being tested
- multimodal imaging
- Keywords
- fractal analysis, trabecular bone texture, knee osteoarthritis, subchondral bone, Medical Resonnance Imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Joint Diseases, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
multimodal imagingDiagnostic test
Also called clinical assessment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Imaging | Other | multimodal imaging and clinical assessment Receives: Diagnostic Test: multimodal imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients who have one-point increase in the quality score of OARSI
Patients who over the 3-year follow-up period will have a one-point increase in the quality score of OARSI compared to the initial pinch score (Altman RD et al, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1995).
Measured: 3 years
Proportion of patients whose joint space reduction is greater than the smallest reliable detectable difference.
Patients whose joint space reduction is greater than the smallest reliable detectable difference.
Measured: 3 years
Proportion of patients who have a decrease in joint space of 0.5 mm
Patients who have a decrease in joint space of 0.5 mm or more over the 3-year period (Cooper C et al, CMRO 2012).
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
Proportion of patients who have evolution of medial femoral tibial joint space
Evolution of medial femoral-tibial joint space
Measured: 3 years
Number of particpants who will have evolution of strucutral lesion score
Evolution structural lesion score is OARSI (OsteoArthritis Research Society International score)
Measured: 3 years
Evolution of algo-functional scores (OAKHQOL)
OAKHQOL (OsteoArthritis of Knee and Hip Quality Of Life) scores
Measured: 3 years
Evolution of algo-functional scores (WOMAC)
WOMAC (McMaster Western Ontario questionnaire ) scores
Measured: 3 years
Change From Baseline in quality of life Scores
Short Form 36
Measured: 3 years
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain visual analogical score
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2017
- Study start29 Nov 2016
- Primary completion19 Jun 2023
- Study completion19 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Interventional study among patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis for at least six months. All the patients will benefit from a multimodal imaging and clinical assessment.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 167 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nancy
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric LESPESSAILLES, Dr, Principal investigator, CHR Orléans
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03294408
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHRO-2016-01
- Other IDs
- 2016-A00552-49
- Acronym
- MOSART
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Janvier T, Jennane R, Valery A, Harrar K, Delplanque M, Lelong C, Loeuille D, Toumi H, Lespessailles E. Subchondral tibial bone texture analysis predicts knee osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative: Tibial bone texture & knee OA progression. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Feb;25(2):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PubMed 27742531Arden N, Richette P, Cooper C, Bruyere O, Abadie E, Branco J, Brandi ML, Berenbaum F, Clerc C, Dennison E, Devogelaer JP, Hochberg M, D'Hooghe P, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kanis JA, Laslop A, Leblanc V, Maggi S, Mautone G, Pelletier JP, Petit-Dop F, Reiter-Niesert S, Rizzoli R, Rovati L, Tajana Messi E, Tsouderos Y, Martel-Pelletier J, Reginster JY. Can We Identify Patients with High Risk of Osteoarthritis Progression Who Will Respond to Treatment? A Focus on Biomarkers and Frailty. Drugs Aging. 2015 Jul;32(7):525-35. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0276-7.
PubMed 26085027Woloszynski T, Podsiadlo P, Stachowiak GW, Kurzynski M, Lohmander LS, Englund M. Prediction of progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis using tibial trabecular bone texture. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):688-95. doi: 10.1002/art.33410.
PubMed 21989629Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Felson DT, Brandt KD. Motion for debate: osteoarthritis clinical trials have not identified efficacious therapies because traditional imaging outcome measures are inadequate. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Nov;65(11):2748-58. doi: 10.1002/art.38086. No abstract available.
PubMed 23861096Kraus VB, Feng S, Wang S, White S, Ainslie M, Brett A, Holmes A, Charles HC. Trabecular morphometry by fractal signature analysis is a novel marker of osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3711-22. doi: 10.1002/art.25012.
PubMed 19950282
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Capacity of Multimodal Imaging of Subchondral Bone for the Prediction of Structural Evolution in Knee Osteoarthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03294408
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MOSART / CHRO-2016-01
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Joint Disease, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal Disease
- Keywords
- fractal analysis, trabecular bone texture, knee osteoarthritis, subchondral bone, Medical Resonnance Imaging
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 167 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nancy
- Study start
- 29 Nov 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Predictive factors of osteoarthritis progression are not yet well understood. However, a growing role attaches importance to the subchondral bone. The aim of the present project is to determine predictive factors of progression of osteoarthritis at the knee by a multimodal characterization of subchondral bone by Medical Resonnance Imaging, direct high resolution digitization radiographs and bone texture analysis. At the end of the project, an innovative imaging device, combining semi-automatic softwares for texture analysis, control detection and image registration would be supplied. This will enable on the one hand a more accurate and reproducible way to measure the joint space width of the affected compartment and on the other hand, an assistance to better detect patients at risk of progression of their knee osteoarthritis. Identifying These "progressors" patients might permit their selection in clinical trials at baseline adapted to their severe disease, using for example biologic treatments targeting knee osteoarthritis. The main objective of this study is to analyze the predictive capacities of bone texture parameters measured on the high-resolution radiography of the knee on the structural evolution of the knee osteoarthritis at 3 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Interventional study among patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis for at least six months. All the patients will benefit from a multimodal imaging and clinical assessment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Imaging | Other | Diagnostic Test: multimodal imagingmultimodal imaging and clinical assessment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- knee osteoarthritis according to the criteria of knee osteoarthritis of American College of Rheumatology.
- Having felt a painful push in the last 6 months.
- Visual Analogic Scale pain > 4 on a 0 to 10 scale.
- having a Radiographic score of OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International Score) from 2 to 3 whether it is for the presence of a joint space narrowing or the presence of an osteophyte
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patello-femoral degenerative osteoarthritis isolated.
- Incapacitated to consider the position in schuss for the realization of the radiography.
- Valgus > in 5 °
- Secondary degenerative osteoarthritis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| multimodal imagingAlso: clinical assessment | Diagnostic test | Imaging |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients who have one-point increase in the quality score of OARSI
Time frame: 3 years
Patients who over the 3-year follow-up period will have a one-point increase in the quality score of OARSI compared to the initial pinch score (Altman RD et al, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1995).
Proportion of patients whose joint space reduction is greater than the smallest reliable detectable difference.
Time frame: 3 years
Patients whose joint space reduction is greater than the smallest reliable detectable difference.
Proportion of patients who have a decrease in joint space of 0.5 mm
Time frame: 3 years
Patients who have a decrease in joint space of 0.5 mm or more over the 3-year period (Cooper C et al, CMRO 2012).
6 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients who have evolution of medial femoral tibial joint space
Time frame: 3 years
Number of particpants who will have evolution of strucutral lesion score
Time frame: 3 years
Evolution of algo-functional scores (OAKHQOL)
Time frame: 3 years
Evolution of algo-functional scores (WOMAC)
Time frame: 3 years
Change From Baseline in quality of life Scores
Time frame: 3 years
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Nov 2025.
- Background: PubMed 27742531Janvier T, Jennane R, Valery A, Harrar K, Delplanque M, Lelong C, Loeuille D, Toumi H, Lespessailles E. Subchondral tibial bone texture analysis predicts knee osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative: Tibial bone texture & knee OA progression. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Feb;25(2):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 26085027Arden N, Richette P, Cooper C, Bruyere O, Abadie E, Branco J, Brandi ML, Berenbaum F, Clerc C, Dennison E, Devogelaer JP, Hochberg M, D'Hooghe P, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kanis JA, Laslop A, Leblanc V, Maggi S, Mautone G, Pelletier JP, Petit-Dop F, Reiter-Niesert S, Rizzoli R, Rovati L, Tajana Messi E, Tsouderos Y, Martel-Pelletier J, Reginster JY. Can We Identify Patients with High Risk of Osteoarthritis Progression Who Will Respond to Treatment? A Focus on Biomarkers and Frailty. Drugs Aging. 2015 Jul;32(7):525-35. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0276-7.
- Background: PubMed 21989629Woloszynski T, Podsiadlo P, Stachowiak GW, Kurzynski M, Lohmander LS, Englund M. Prediction of progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis using tibial trabecular bone texture. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):688-95. doi: 10.1002/art.33410.
- Background: PubMed 23861096Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Felson DT, Brandt KD. Motion for debate: osteoarthritis clinical trials have not identified efficacious therapies because traditional imaging outcome measures are inadequate. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Nov;65(11):2748-58. doi: 10.1002/art.38086. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19950282Kraus VB, Feng S, Wang S, White S, Ainslie M, Brett A, Holmes A, Charles HC. Trabecular morphometry by fractal signature analysis is a novel marker of osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3711-22. doi: 10.1002/art.25012.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric LESPESSAILLES, Dr principal investigator
CHR Orléans
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing multimodal imaging in people with Knee Osteoarthritis and Joint Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients who have one-point increase in the quality score of OARSI (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03294408, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2025.