AzTrials
AzTrials

Hearing LossNCT03294681

Collection and Characterization of Objective Measures to Explore the Specificity of Algorithms

An observational study of Hearing Loss, run by Cochlear at 6 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this descriptive study is to collect and describe the characteristics of objective measures to explore the specificity of algorithms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hearing Loss
What is being tested?
Objective measures with CSEP
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
153 participants
Where
6 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
3 Oct 2017to 29 May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Routine patients undergoing a standard cochlear implantation.

Who may be able to join

  • Candidate for cochlear implantation with the CI532 or CI512 devices
  • 18 years of age or older at the time of enrolment
  • Normal cochlea anatomy, established via pre-operative Computer Tomography
  • Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol

Who cannot join

  • Prior cochlear implantation in the ear to be implanted
  • Ossification or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array
  • Abnormal cochlear anatomy on pre-operative Computer Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Additional handicaps that would prevent participation in evaluations
  • Pregnant and breast feeding women, prisoners, or anyone in custody
  • Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 3 countries.

6 sites in 3 countries

Germany3 sites
  • Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

    Erlangen

  • Klinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Goethe-Universität

    Frankfurt am Main

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein - Campus Kiel Klinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie

    Kiel

Other trials in Germany

Spain2 sites
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

  • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra

    Pamplona

Other trials in Spain

Australia1 site
  • HEARing CRC

    Carlton

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Trans-impedance Matrix

The aim of this descriptive study is to collect and describe the characteristics of objective measures to explore the specificity of algorithms.

Conditions
Hearing Loss
Being tested
Objective measures with CSEP
Medical subject headings
Hearing Loss

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Objective measures with CSEPDevice

    Objective measures to be conducted with Custom SoundTM EP 5 software and the CP900 series sound processor in CI532 and CI512 Cochlear Implant recipients

Study groups in NCT03294681
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cochlear Implant RecipientsNot described
Receives: Device: Objective measures with CSEP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Specificity (%) of Transimpedance Measurement to Identify Electrode Fold-over

    Measured with Custom SoundTM EP 5. It took one minute to measure all electrodes in surgery.

    Intraoperative transimpedance measures from 148 ears without fold-overs (as evidenced by radiographic imaging) were analysed to assess the specificity of the algorithm.

    Measured: at surgery, within one minute

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2017
  2. Study start3 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion29 May 2019
  4. Study completion29 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
153 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03294681
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLTD5676
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
15 Sep 2017
Last updated
29 Jun 2020
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Hoppe U, Brademann G, Stover T, Ramos de Miguel A, Cowan R, Manrique M, Falcon-Gonzalez JC, Hey M, Baumann U, Huarte A, Liebscher T, Bennett C, English R, Neben N, Ramos Macias A. Evaluation of a Transimpedance Matrix Algorithm to Detect Anomalous Cochlear Implant Electrode Position. Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(5):347-355. doi: 10.1159/000523784. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

    PubMed 35306487

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hearing Loss, run by Cochlear at 6 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Germany, Spain, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Specificity (%) of Transimpedance Measurement to Identify Electrode Fold-over (time frame: at surgery, within one minute). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03294681, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in