AzTrials
AzTrials

Severe Acute MalnutritionNCT03303131

SAM: Discharge Based on the Use of a MUAC-based Criterion to

An observational study of Severe Acute Malnutrition, run by Epicentre.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Retrospective analysis of routine program data of children aged 6 to 59 months admitted to the MSF therapeutic feeding program with MUAC ≤ 118 mm in Yako and Titao districts of Burkina Faso from 2007-2011. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 59 months
Conditions the study is for
Severe Acute Malnutrition
What is being tested?
Discharge from community-based management
How many people
50,841 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2007to 31 Dec 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: All children admitted to the MSF therapeutic feeding program in Yako and Titao districts from September 2007 to December 2011

Who may be able to join

  • 6 to 59 months old
  • presence of bipedal pitting edema or MUAC ≤ 118 mm

Who cannot join

  • < 6 months old or > 59 months old
  • absence of bipedal pitting edema or MUAC ≥ 118 mm

About this study

Official title: Discharge From Community-based Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition Using Mid Upper Arm Circumference

Retrospective analysis of routine program data of children aged 6 to 59 months admitted to the MSF therapeutic feeding program with MUAC ≤ 118 mm in Yako and Titao districts of Burkina Faso from 2007-2011.

Read the detailed description

Comparison of patient characteristics and treatment outcomes was conducted between two groups: 1) children discharged as recovered from September 2007 to March 2009 with at least 15% of their weight at admission (Period A); and 2) children discharged as recovered from April 2009 to December 2011 with MUAC ≥ 124 mm (Period B).

A total of 50,841 children were admitted with MUAC ≤ 118 mm to the MSF therapeutic feeding program and were included in this analysis: 24,792 children in Period A (2007-2009) and 26,049 children in Period B (2009-2011).

Overall, 89% of admissions were directly into outpatient care and the majority (53%) entered with a MUAC 116-118mm; 48% of children were male and 80% of children < 2 years of age (Table 1).

Compared to children admitted in Period A, children admitted in Period B were statistically more likely to be female, younger, and of better anthropometric status (e.g. higher mean MUAC, WHZ and HAZ).

There was a greater proportion of children admitted directly to inpatient care in Period B than in Period A (10.6% vs 8.0%).

Being tested
Discharge from community-based management
Medical subject headings
Severe Acute Malnutrition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Discharge from community-based managementOther

    Comparison of patient characteristics and treatment outcomes between two groups

Study groups in NCT03303131
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Period AChildren discharged as recovered from September 2007 to March 2009 with at least 15% of their weight at admission
Receives: Other: Discharge from community-based management
Period BChildren discharged as recovered from April 2009 to December 2011 with Children discharged as recovered from September 2007-March 2009 with MUAC ≥ 124 mm
Receives: Other: Discharge from community-based management

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MUAC based criterion

    Use of a discharge criterion of MUAC ≥ 124 mm

    Measured: 52 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2017
  2. Study start1 Sep 2007
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2011
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50,841 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03303131
Sponsor's protocol ID
MUAC 2007-2011
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
2 Oct 2017
Last updated
5 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Severe Acute Malnutrition, run by Epicentre.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MUAC based criterion (time frame: 52 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03303131 | AzTrials