AzTrials
AzTrials

Atherosclerosis of the Peripheral ArteriesTASC CDNCT03315884

Pilot Randomized Clinical Study of the Iliac Arteries and Common Femoral Artery With Stenting and the Iliac Arteries With Stenting and Plasty of the Common Femoral Artery

A study testing Iliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment Common Femoral Artery (CFA) and Iliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic Common Femoral Artery (CFA) patch in people with Atherosclerosis of the Peripheral Arteries, run by Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation at 1 site in Russia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

According to the recommendations of the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) statement and the Russian guidelines for limb ischemia treatment (2010), reconstructive surgery is preferred for type D lesions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 47 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Iliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment Common Femoral Artery (CFA) and Iliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic Common Femoral Artery (CFA) patch
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
1 Dec 2017to Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 47 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with occlusive lesions of C and D type iliac segment and CFA lesion, and with chronic lower limb ischemia (II-IV degree by Fontaine, 4-6 degree by Rutherford), age: 47-75 years old.
  • Patients who consented to participate in this study.

Who cannot join

  • Chronic heart failure of III-IV functional class by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.
  • Decompensated chronic "pulmonary" heart
  • Severe hepatic or renal failure (bilirubin> 35 mmol / l, glomerular filtration rate <60 mL / min);
  • Polyvalent drug allergy
  • Cancer in the terminal stage with a life expectancy less than 6 months;
  • Acute ischemic
  • Expressed aortic calcification tolerant to angioplasty
  • Patient refusal to participate or continue to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vyacheslav Mitrofanov contact

+79139255543

v_mitrofanov@meshalkin.ru

Russia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • NRICP

    Novosibirsk, 630055

    Recruiting

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: Pilot Randomized Clinical Study of the Iliac Arteries and Common Femoral Artery With Stenting Supera and the Iliac Arteries With Stenting and Plasty of the Common Femoral Artery Effectiveness in Patients With the Iliac and CFA Segment Occlusive or Stenosis Disease (TASC C, D)

According to the recommendations of the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) statement and the Russian guidelines for limb ischemia treatment (2010), reconstructive surgery is preferred for type D lesions.

Read the detailed description

According to the recommendations of the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) statement and the Russian guidelines for limb ischemia treatment (2010), reconstructive surgery is preferred for type D lesions. Patients with type C lesions can be managed by either stenting or bypass surgery. Despite the fact that aorta-femoral reconstructions long-term results are better than the diffuse aorta-iliac lesions endovascular treatment results, the surgery risk is significantly higher than the endovascular surgery risk regarding criteria of mortality, complications, and return to normal activity.

All reports of iliac arteries stenosis percutaneous angioplasty indicate that the primary technical and clinical success rate exceeds 90%. The figure reaches 100% in the case of local lesions. The technical success of iliac arteries long occlusions recanalization reaches 80-85%. Improvement of endovascular equipment designed for the total occlusions treatment increases technical success of recanalization. The TASC II materials summarize the several large studies results which present the data on the operated segment artery patency at the level of 70-81% within 5-8 years of follow up. A large number of authors note the actuality of aortic-iliac type C and D segment lesions endovascular treatment recommendations revision according to the TASC II.

Being tested
Iliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment Common Femoral Artery (CFA), Iliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic Common Femoral Artery (CFA) patch
Keywords
TASC C, D, CFA, Supera, iliac arteries, common femoral artery, plasty of the common femoral artery, stenting Supera

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Iliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment Common Femoral Artery (CFA)Procedure or surgery

    Also called Endovascular intervention

    Retrograde femoral access. Brachial access. Standard endovascular access is performed under local anesthesia and affected arterial segment is visualized. Stenosis or artery occlusion is passed with hydrophilic guide. In case of occlusion transluminal or subintimal (often "mixed") artery recanalization is performed. To maximize the preservation of the affected artery initial patency, occlusion recanalization is performed by ante-and retrograde accesses. Then stenosis or occlusion predilation is performed with balloon catheter (balloon catheter diameter is smaller than the affected artery diameter for 1-2 mm). After control angiography stent is installed in the aorta-iliac area throughout the lesion (lesion diameter corresponds to the stenotic arteries diameter). In aorta-iliac zone balloon-expandable and self-expandable stents are used.

  • Iliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic Common Femoral Artery (CFA) patchProcedure or surgery

    Also called Hybrid Intervention

    Standard access to the CFA is performed. Outflow ways and CFA capability for reconstruction are determined. The puncture of the general CFA (retrograde) is performed and the introducer 7Fr. is set. Recanalization of iliac artery occlusion. It is necessary to cross the iliac occlusion in a retrograde fashion first and secure aortic inflow before making the arteriotomy. An ipsilateral, a contralateral and a brachial approaches are used depending on the clinical situation. If the retrograde access to the aorta failed, you use the antegrade crossing of the iliac occlusion with no intention to reenter the lumen in the CFA. After the recanalization and balloon angioplasty of iliac artery we completed the procedure with endarterectomy of CFA, patch closure and iliac stenting. The preference is to perform endarterectomy and patch before iliac stenting because it can be difficult to access the true lumen in a difficult CFA lesion. Controlling angiography were performed. Closing approach.

Study groups in NCT03315884
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Iliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment CFAExperimentalIliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment Common Femoral Artery (CFA)
Receives: Procedure: Iliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic Common Femoral Artery (CFA) patch
Iliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic CFA patchActive comparatorIliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic Common Femoral Artery (CFA) patch
Receives: Procedure: Iliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment Common Femoral Artery (CFA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary patency of the operated segment

    during the whole period of observation. confirmation of patency of the arterial ultrasound of the operated segment. Confirmation patency of artery 24 months after surgery using Multislice computed tomography angiography of the lower extremities

    Measured: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Secondary patency of the operated artery restenosis

    during the whole period of observation. confirmation of patency of the arterial ultrasound of the operated segment. Confirmation patency of artery 24 months after surgery using Multislice computed tomography angiography of the lower extremities

    Measured: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery

  2. reocclusion

    during the whole period of observation. confirmation of patency of the arterial ultrasound of the operated segment. Confirmation patency of artery 24 months after surgery using Multislice computed tomography angiography of the lower extremities

    Measured: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery

  3. postoperative bleeding

    assessment of bleeding within 30 days after surgery. The identification of bleeding with physical examination and ultrasound.Considered bleeding requiring surgical intervention

    Measured: in the early postoperative period. Surveillance is 30 days after surgery

  4. hematoma

    Measured: in the early postoperative period. Surveillance is 30 days after surgery

  5. myocardial infarction

    Measured: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery

  6. mortality

    Measured: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery

  7. limb amputation

    Measured: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery

  8. infection

    Measured: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2017
  2. Study start1 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03315884
Sponsor's protocol ID
NRICP112
Acronym
TASC CD
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
17 Oct 2017
Last updated
28 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Saaya SB, Khomushku DV, Gostev AA, Cheban AV, Osipova OS, Ignatenko PV, Starodubtsev VB, Karpenko AA. [Endovascular versus hybrid interventions for steno-occlusive lesions of the iliofemoral segment (a pilot prospective randomized trial)]. Angiol Sosud Khir. 2025 Sep 30;31(3):102-110. doi: 10.33029/1027-6661-2025-31-3-102-110. Russian.

    PubMed 41805484

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Iliac segment recanalization and stenting Iliac segment Common Femoral Artery (CFA) and Iliac segment recanalization, stenting and plastic Common Femoral Artery (CFA) patch in people with Atherosclerosis of the Peripheral Arteries, run by Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Vyacheslav Mitrofanov (+79139255543, v_mitrofanov@meshalkin.ru), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary patency of the operated segment (time frame: during the whole period of observation. Observation is 24 month after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03315884, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in