AmetropiaNCT03319212
Clinical Characterization of Symptomatic Populations
A study testing senofilcon A contact lenses in people with Ametropia, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This is an unmasked, non-randomized, single arm, stratified, dispensing investigation of symptomatic and asymptomatic subject populations. Subjects will be assigned to a single study lens type to be worn bilaterally for approximately 4 weeks followed by no contact lens wear for 1 week. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ametropia
- What is being tested?
- senofilcon A contact lenses
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 105 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 29 Sep 2017to 15 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
- The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
- Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
- Between 18 and 55 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening.
- Be a current soft contact lens wearer in both eyes with a minimum of 3 days/week wear time over the last 1 month by self-report.
- Have a baseline CLDEQ-8 score of either:
Show all 12Show fewer
- 7 or lower
- 15 or greater
- Subjects must possess a functional / usable pair of spectacles and bring them to the visit (only if applicable - to the investigators discretion).
- Subjects must pass a pre-screening questionnaire.
- Subjects must be willing to discontinue all contact lens wear for approximately 1 week/
- Subjects must present to visit 1 with their habitual lenses on eye for at least 6 hours.
Who cannot join
- Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
- Currently pregnant or lactating, by self-report.
- Any ocular or systemic allergies, disease or use of medication which may interfere with contact lens wear (at the discretion of the investigator).
- Any active ocular abnormalities/conditions that may interfere with contact lens wear (at the discretion of the investigator).
- Any infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), by self-report.
- Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Habitual contact lens wear modality as extended wear (≥1 night per month of extended wear).
- Habitual contact lens is rigid gas permeable, toric, monovision or multi-focal
- Any previous, or planned (during the course of the study) ocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.)
- Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 2 weeks prior to study enrollment.
- Employee or employee's immediate family member of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician).
- Current habitual use of Restasis, Xiidra, ocular steroids, or any medication (RX or OTC) that may interfere with contact lens wear (at the discretion of the investigator).
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Canada1 site
University of Waterloo Center for Contact Lens Research
Waterloo, Ontario
About this study
This is an unmasked, non-randomized, single arm, stratified, dispensing investigation of symptomatic and asymptomatic subject populations. Subjects will be assigned to a single study lens type to be worn bilaterally for approximately 4 weeks followed by no contact lens wear for 1 week.
- Conditions
- Ametropia
- Being tested
- senofilcon A contact lenses
- Medical subject headings
- Refractive Errors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
senofilcon A contact lensesDevice
Senofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Other | Subjects that are between the ages 18-55 and are current spherical soft contact lens wearers will be assigned to a single study lens type to be worn bilaterally for approximately 4 weeks followed by no contact lens wear for 1 week. Receives: Device: senofilcon A contact lenses |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Meibomian Gland Imaging
Meibomian gland imaging was assessed in each each subject eye, at baseline, 4-Week Follow-up (during lens wear) and the the 5-Week Follow-up on subjects' bare eyes. Meibomian gland imaging is expressed interms of area of loss using the following grading scale: Degree 0 ≈ 0%; Degree 1 ≤ 25%; Degree 2 26% - 50%; Degree 3 51% - 75%; Degree 4 ≥ 75%.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Meibomian Gland Expressibility
Meibomian glands were assessed in the three regions of each lower eyelid: temporal, central, and nasal. Approximately five glands are expressed per region with each use of the Meibomian Gland Evaluator. Secretions for each of the 5 glands selected within the three regions were graded using the following secretion grading scale: Grade 0 = No Secretion (Includes capped orifices), Grade 1 = Inspissated (semi-solid, toothpaste-like consistency), Grade 2 = Colored/Cloudy Liquid, Grade 3 = Clear Liquid Oil. The total grades for 5 glands per region was calculated for each subject. The total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score was calculated by adding the grades for the 15 glands assessed. Mean and standard deviation for total grade per region and total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score were reported for each stratum. Total scores range from 0 to 15 were lower score indicate worsening meibomian gland expressability.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Lid Margin Evaluation: Number of Eyes With Abnormal Biomicroscopy Findings
Lid margin evaluation was conducted for upper and lower lids for both left and right eyes. The presence of the following biomicroscopy findings were recorded as No/normal or Yes/abnormal:
- Irregularity: Notching of Margin
- Vascularity of Lid Margin: Telangiectasia
- Meibomian Gland Pouting, Plugging, or Capping
- Lid/Lash Margin Debris Findings.
The number of positive findings (yes) was reported for each group.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy
Horizontal length of staining and sagittal width of staining were graded for both upper and lower lids for each eye. Average grade was calculated separately for upper and lower lids, and the final grade was calculated as the average grade across upper and lower lids. Mean and standard deviation were reported for the final grade by stratum. Subjects were classified according to their final lid wiper epitheliopathy grade for each eye using the following scale: None = 0, Mild = 0.25 - 1.00, Moderate = 1.25 - 2.00, and Severe = 2.25 - 3.00. Final Grades range from 0 to 3, where higher final grades indicate worsening lid wiper epitheliopathy.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Conjunctival Folds
Lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) will be evaluated in the area perpendicular to the temporal and nasal limbus on the bulbar conjunctiva above the lower lid (temporal and nasal LIPCOF, respectively), and classified using the LIPCOF grading scale: 0 = No conjunctival folds, 1 = One permanent and clear parallel fold, 2 = Two permanent and clear parallel folds (normally lower than 0.2mm), and 3 = More than two permanent and clear parallel folds (normally higher than 0.2mm).
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Secondary outcomes (6)
Conjunctival Redness
Limbal and bulbar conjunctival redness were assessed or each quadrant (nasal, temporal, inferior, superior) using the following scale: 0 = Normal, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Conjunctival Staining
Conjunctival staining was assessed for each eye by quadrant (Superior, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal) utilizing the following scale: Grade 0 = None (No conjunctival staining), Grade 1 = Trace (Scattered superficial punctate staining), Grade 2 = Mild (Regional or generalized punctate staining), Grade 3 = Moderate (Significant coalesced punctate staining), Grade 4 = Severe (Patch staining).
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Corneal Staining
Corneal staining was assessed for each eye by region (Central, Superior, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal). Corneal staining type was evaluated using the following the scale: Grade 0 = None, Grade 1 = Micropunctate, Grade 2 = Macropunctate, Grade 3 = Coalesced Macropunctate, and Grade 4 = Patch (>1mm). Corneal staining area was evaluated using the following the scale: Grade 0 = 0% of region covered, Grade 1 = 10% of region covered, Grade 2 = 20% of region covered, Grade 3 = 30% of region covered, Grade 4 = 40% of region covered, Grade 5 = 50% of region covered, Grade 6 = 60% of region covered, Grade 7 = 70% of region covered, Grade 8 = 80% of region covered, Grade 9 = 90% of region covered, and Grade 10 = 100% of region covered. The following scale was used in the grading of corneal staining depth: Grade 0 = None, Grade 0 = Superficial epithelial, Grade 2 = Full epithelial, and Grade 3 = Stromal glow.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness
Tear film lipid layer thickness was measured for each eye using LipiView II. The Review Lipid Images screen provided numerical analysis of the measured lipid layer thickness in nanometers (nm) from 10 (thinnest) to 240 (thickest), with a precision of 1 nm and an accuracy of 10 nm.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Tear Film Stability
Non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) was measured for each eye to indicate the stability of the tear film. NIBUT is measured as the time interval in seconds after the final blink to the first appearance of distortion in the reflected rings; or to the time that the participant has to blink due to discomfort. Three measurements were taken on each eye. The average NIBUT was reported for each group.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Tear Film Lipid Pattern
Tear film lipid pattern was recorded for each eye using the following categories: None, Open Meshwork, Closed (Tight Meshwork), Flow (Wave), Amorphous, Colors, and Other.
Measured: 4-Week Follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Oct 2017
- Study start29 Sep 2017
- Primary completion15 Aug 2018
- Study completion15 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for AmetropiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03319212
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR-5969
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Characterization of Symptomatic Populations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03319212
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR-5969
- Conditions
- Ametropia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 29 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Oct 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an unmasked, non-randomized, single arm, stratified, dispensing investigation of symptomatic and asymptomatic subject populations. Subjects will be assigned to a single study lens type to be worn bilaterally for approximately 4 weeks followed by no contact lens wear for 1 week.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Other | Device: senofilcon A contact lensesSubjects that are between the ages 18-55 and are current spherical soft contact lens wearers will be assigned to a single study lens type to be worn bilaterally for approximately 4 weeks followed by no contact lens wear for 1 week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| senofilcon A contact lensesSenofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses | Device | Active Comparator |
Primary outcome
Meibomian Gland Imaging
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Meibomian gland imaging was assessed in each each subject eye, at baseline, 4-Week Follow-up (during lens wear) and the the 5-Week Follow-up on subjects' bare eyes. Meibomian gland imaging is expressed interms of area of loss using the following grading scale: Degree 0 ≈ 0%; Degree 1 ≤ 25%; Degree 2 26% - 50%; Degree 3 51% - 75%; Degree 4 ≥ 75%.
Meibomian Gland Expressibility
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Meibomian glands were assessed in the three regions of each lower eyelid: temporal, central, and nasal. Approximately five glands are expressed per region with each use of the Meibomian Gland Evaluator. Secretions for each of the 5 glands selected within the three regions were graded using the following secretion grading scale: Grade 0 = No Secretion (Includes capped orifices), Grade 1 = Inspissated (semi-solid, toothpaste-like consistency), Grade 2 = Colored/Cloudy Liquid, Grade 3 = Clear Liquid Oil. The total grades for 5 glands per region was calculated for each subject. The total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score was calculated by adding the grades for the 15 glands assessed. Mean and standard deviation for total grade per region and total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score were reported for each stratum. Total scores range from 0 to 15 were lower score indicate worsening meibomian gland expressability.
Lid Margin Evaluation: Number of Eyes With Abnormal Biomicroscopy Findings
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Lid margin evaluation was conducted for upper and lower lids for both left and right eyes. The presence of the following biomicroscopy findings were recorded as No/normal or Yes/abnormal: * Irregularity: Notching of Margin * Vascularity of Lid Margin: Telangiectasia * Meibomian Gland Pouting, Plugging, or Capping * Lid/Lash Margin Debris Findings. The number of positive findings (yes) was reported for each group.
Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Horizontal length of staining and sagittal width of staining were graded for both upper and lower lids for each eye. Average grade was calculated separately for upper and lower lids, and the final grade was calculated as the average grade across upper and lower lids. Mean and standard deviation were reported for the final grade by stratum. Subjects were classified according to their final lid wiper epitheliopathy grade for each eye using the following scale: None = 0, Mild = 0.25 - 1.00, Moderate = 1.25 - 2.00, and Severe = 2.25 - 3.00. Final Grades range from 0 to 3, where higher final grades indicate worsening lid wiper epitheliopathy.
Conjunctival Folds
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) will be evaluated in the area perpendicular to the temporal and nasal limbus on the bulbar conjunctiva above the lower lid (temporal and nasal LIPCOF, respectively), and classified using the LIPCOF grading scale: 0 = No conjunctival folds, 1 = One permanent and clear parallel fold, 2 = Two permanent and clear parallel folds (normally lower than 0.2mm), and 3 = More than two permanent and clear parallel folds (normally higher than 0.2mm).
6 secondary outcomes
Conjunctival Redness
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Conjunctival Staining
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Corneal Staining
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Tear Film Stability
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Tear Film Lipid Pattern
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ametropia
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Trial With Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus)
Presbyopia, Ametropia
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Two Rotational Alignment Methods for Astigmatism Correction in SMILE Surgery
Myopia, Refractive Ametropia
Recruiting
Comparison of Low- Versus High-Level Angle Kappa Compensation Strategies in SMILE Using the VisuMax 800: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Myopia, Refractive Ametropia
Recruiting
The Impact of 'A Miss Is as Good as a Mile': Is Compensation Necessary for Minimal Ocular Deviation in Myopic Laser Surgery?
Myopia, Refractive Ametropia
Recruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance and Safety of UNICON Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses
Refractive Ametropia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing senofilcon A contact lenses in people with Ametropia, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Meibomian Gland Imaging (time frame: 4-Week Follow-up). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2019.