AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationovERsHOTNCT03324620

Effectiveness Rehabilitation Hematopoietic Transplantation (ovERsHOT)

A study testing Specific program functional and respiratory rehabilitation in people with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the benefits and costs of a comprehensive rehabilitation program (physical, psychological, social and educational) for patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is a prospective longitudinal study with a control group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
What is being tested?
Specific program functional and respiratory rehabilitation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
190 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
12 May 2012to 15 Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with malignant hemopathies candidates for HSCT.
  • controlled pain.
  • who sign informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Severe musculoskeletal or neurological alterations prior to HSCT.
  • Severe psychiatric problems.
  • Language barrier.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Cost-effectiveness of a Functional and Respiratory Rehabilitation Intervention in Patients Who Receive an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT).

The objective of the study is to evaluate the benefits and costs of a comprehensive rehabilitation program (physical, psychological, social and educational) for patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is a prospective longitudinal study with a control group. Patients will be included who will perform a transplant in the hospital environment. The variables of the study will be: number and type of complications, days of hospitalization, readmissions, economic cost of the program, exercise tolerance, assessment of muscular atrophy, health related quality of life, knowledge and self-management of the disease, all of them adjusted for the variables age, sex and hematological disease, as well as comorbidities. The evaluations will be performed before transplantation (between one and three months before), during the conditioning phase (intensive chemotherapy), before discharge, after immediate discharge and after discharge up to one year. The nursing team will perform the patient's therapeutic education, stimulation for physical activity, as well as evaluation and follow-up measures. Early detection of the needs of the rest of the rehabilitation team will be carried out. There will be a support function for the physiotherapist in regard to physical activity. In Spain there is no interdisciplinary team that provides comprehensive care and rehabilitation to this type of patients and few studies are dedicated to rehabilitation beyond physiotherapy as a preventive tool for future disabilities.

Read the detailed description

Working hypothesis

  • 1. Patients who receive a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) who follow a comprehensive rehabilitation program, have fewer post-transplant complications, reduce the number of hospital stay days, and return to their daily lives more quickly.
  • 2. The economic costs derived from the incorporation of the rehabilitation program will be lower than the savings caused by the decrease in complications, hospital stay and consumption of health resources.

Goals

Main objectives

  • To evaluate the quality of life related to health in the hematological patient who has received a HSCT and on which a new preventive functional rehabilitation intervention (other than physiotherapy) is applied.
  • To compare the number and type of respiratory and other complications after HSCT among the intervention group compared to a control group.
  • Estimate the effects of the rehabilitation program on tolerance to exercise in the short, medium and long term, as well as detect the change in lifestyle if this occurred.

Secondary objectives

  • Evaluate and compare the days of hospital stay and the time elapsed in each of the specialized units (insulation, Intensive Care Unit, single room with High Efficiency Particulate Air, (HEPA filter).
  • To qualify the economic costs of the physiotherapy intervention within the rehabilitation program, the complications and the days of hospitalization.
  • To evaluate the incidence of muscular atrophy and the level of tolerance to the effort as indicative of physical deconditioning and sedentary lifestyle.
  • Measure the amount of symptoms, or the frequency of them: pain (measured by visual analog scale for pain (VAS), nausea / vomiting, insomnia, anxiety, anorexia ...)

Methodology

This is a prospective experimental study with a control group prior to the start of the intervention, which will include 190 participants. The sample size was calculated using a 95% confidence level and considering a positive and negative variability of 50% since there are no previous studies applying this methodology and taking into account the high mortality associated with the infection that oscillates between 35 and 50% according to the studies. The subjects will be treated in the hospital setting in airtight rooms with HEPA filters. Patients will be collected correlatively from the moment they enter the transplant program and sign informed consent. The control group will be collected retrospectively, from the day 1 of the startup of the program to 75, after verifying that they do not meet any inclusion criteria. Recruitment and incorporation into the study will be continuous according to the appearance of cases that meet the inclusion criteria.

The study will include patients receiving HSCT for the next 2 years from the study start date and will be followed and evaluated for a period of one year after transplantation.

Outcomes:

Quality of life, post-transplant complications, especially respiratory, capacity for exercise tolerance, muscular atrophy, onset of sleep disorders, days of stay in different hospital units, cost of interventions: physiotherapy, treatment of complications, and program rehabilitation. Mortality related to the transplantation, which covers any lethal complication from the moment of conditioning and without intervening the patient's underlying disease, that is, the progression of the same. Assess adherence to the program and evaluation and knowledge acquired by the patient.

Measurements:

To make the measurements, use:

  • Bioimpedance analysis body composition (BIA), (Quantum X, RJL-Systems instruments™, Mi, USA): This test is performed on the patients in the intervention group at baseline, at discharge from hospital for transplantation, at the month of discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months, in order to assess their body composition, their fat mass and their muscle mass.
  • Six-minute-walk test (to complement the assessment of exercise tolerance): This test is performed on the patients in the intervention group at baseline, at discharge from hospital for transplantation, at the month of discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months, in order to assess the exercise tolerance described in meters traveled, percentage of normality, symptomatology (dyspnea / fatigue of legs), and heart rate recovery. The abrupt weight changes in this population will be decisive for the interpretation of these data.
  • Muscle strength test (handgrip (Jamar™ Dynamometer, Preston, Jackson, Mi, USA) and 1RM): This test is performed on the patients in the intervention group at baseline, at discharge from hospital for transplantation, at the month of discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months, in order to assess the strength in upper limbs at different times of process.
  • Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy questionnaires (FACT) validated in Spanish, to measure quality of life associated with the disease (lymphoma (LYM), leukemia (LEU), multiple myeloma (MM), Bone marrow transplantation (BMT); fatigue, anorexia): This test is performed on the patients in the intervention group at baseline, at discharge from hospital for transplantation, at the month of discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months in order to evaluate subjectively different aspects of health: functional, physical, emotional, as well as other concerns and symptoms associated with the process.
  • Physical activity questionnaire for adult subjects -Modified Baecke Questionnaire™- (to measure the sedentary lifestyle): This test is performed on the patients in the intervention group at baseline, at discharge from the transplant hospital, at the month of discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months, in order to subjectively assess physical activity which subjects can develop during the first year of the transplant, and if there are limitations due to complications or readmissions.
  • Anxiety-depression assessment (HAD) questionnaire. This test is performed on patients in the intervention group at baseline, at discharge from the transplant hospital, at the month of discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months, in order to assess the role of anxiety and depression at different times of the transplant and its follow-up in one year.
  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. This test is performed on the patients in the intervention group at baseline, at discharge from the transplant hospital, at the month of discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months, in order to assess the subjective quality of sleep in these patients during the transplant period and their follow-up for one year. It is intended to evaluate the previous present difficulties, the use of hypnotics or other drugs used, and the need for continuity of treatments, as well as the effectiveness of them. The quality of sleep in hospitalized patients is highly documented, but it is not present in this type of patients nor is there any longitudinal follow-up.
Being tested
Specific program functional and respiratory rehabilitation
Keywords
physiotherapy, nurse, Cost effectiveness, Activities of Daily Living, exercise tolerance, Allogeneic, Quality of Life, Rehabilitation, Physical Activity
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Specific program functional and respiratory rehabilitationOther

    It is a question of introducing a small program of physical activation pre-transplantation of hematopoietic progenitors, to continue developing it during the hospitalization and to use the functional measurements as a measure of its impact, as well as the different quality of life questionnaires.

Study groups in NCT03324620
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
pre active HSCTExperimentalCandidates for transplantation of hematopoietic progenitors since May 12, 2012, regardless of sex and age, who agree to participate in the study and sign informed consent. In the pre-transplantation visit with the physiotherapist: Measures of muscle mass and strength, quality of life questionnaires, program presentation, fitness assessment and lifestyle determination. The exercises will be personalized, stimulating your practice before admission and involving the family. During admission, the team will encourage the patient to remain active by adapting to the symptoms. At discharge, measures of resistance, exercise tolerance and quality of life at discharge, in the month after discharge, 3 months after discharge, 6 months after discharge and 12 months after discharge.
Receives: Other: Specific program functional and respiratory rehabilitation
control groupNo interventionPatients' candidates for transplantation of hematopoietic progenitors prior to May 12, 2012, regardless of gender and age, who meet the inclusion criteria and are collected correlatively until completing 104 subjects. Clinical history review to calculate the days of hospitalization in the different hospitalization units during the transplant. As well as the number and type of complications and the use of health resources. Status vitae. Baseline review of functional tests and exercise tolerance.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cost of interventions assesed by the cost of hospitalization for HSCT

    For the calculation the days of hospitalization in each hospitalization unit care are counted. Then, the total number of days spent in each unit (D): (intensive care unit, ICU (A), isolation chamber (B), single room (C).

    The cost of hospitalization for HSCT: (a: price / day in the ICU, b: price / day in isolation chamber, c: price / day in single room, in euros). Dd = (Aa) + (Bb) + (Cc), in euros.

    Measured: Admission

  2. Cost of interventions assesed by the cost incorporation of a physiotherapist into the team

    To calculate the cost, a physiotherapist will be hired 4 hours / day for the intervention group. Day of hospitalization for the transplant (D) multiplied by the cost per day of the physiotherapist (euros).

    Measured: Admission

  3. Cost of interventions assesed by the number (number), characteristics and incidence of the immediate complications of HSCT

    Incidence expressed as a percentage. Comparison between the two groups (total number and percentage)

    Measured: Admisssion

  4. Cost of interventions assesed by antimicrobials used in infectious complications and chemotherapy conditioning.

    expressed in euros

    Measured: Admission

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Adherence to the program and evaluation of the knowledge acquired by the patient.

    At each visit the patient will be purposely questioned about adherence to the exercise program. Non-adherence data will be collected, such as "I am bored with exercises", "I am very tired or have a lot of symptoms", "I am depressed or sad". In addition, each interview will gather training / information data explained in the previous interview. For example: Visit 1: adherence to treatment. Immunosuppressants. Importance of water intake. Neutropenic diet.

    Measured: Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  2. Referred quality of life: quality of life as assessed by the FACT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy) leukemia questionnaire (Scale info can be included in the description.)

    Initially, the FACT (Functional evaluation of cancer therapy) questionnaire will be used according to the baseline disease: FACT_leukemia; (range 0-176 units on a scale). The highest scores in each category translate into a better quality of life. The questionnaire is divided into 4 sections: physical status (range 0-28 units), family and social environment (range 0-28 units), emotional state (range 0-24 units), operating capacity (range 0-28) and other concerns - leukemia-specific (range 0-68). The total score FACT_leukemia is the sum of all the sections. Also in the subsections the higher the score the better the perceived quality of life. The physical, environmental, emotional and functional capacity is common in all FACT questionnaires used, which allows comparing this aspect between subjects.

    Measured: Admission.

  3. Referred quality of life: quality of life as assessed by the FACT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy) lymfhoma questionnaire (Scale info can be included in the description.)

    Initially, the FACT (Functional evaluation of cancer therapy) questionnaire will be used according to the baseline disease: FACT_lymphoma; (range 0-168 units on a scale). The highest scores in each category translate into a better quality of life.

    The questionnaire is divided into 4 sections: physical status (range 0-28 units), family and social environment (range 0-28 units), emotional state (range 0-24 units), operating capacity (range 0-28) and other concerns - lymfoma-specific (range 0-60). The total score FACT_lymfoma is the sum of all the sections. Also in the subsections the higher the score the better the perceived quality of life. The physical, environmental, emotional and functional capacity is common in all FACT questionnaires used, which allows comparing this aspect between subjects.

    Measured: Admission.

  4. Referred quality of life: quality of life as assessed by the FACT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy) multiple myeloma questionnaire (Scale info can be included in the description.)

    Initially, the FACT (Functional evaluation of cancer therapy) questionnaire will be used according to the baseline disease: FACT_multiple myeloma; (range 0-164 units on a scale). The highest scores in each category translate into a better quality of life.

    The questionnaire is divided into 4 sections: physical status (range 0-28 units), family and social environment (range 0-28 units), emotional state (range 0-24 units), operating capacity (range 0-28) and other concerns - myeloma-specific (range 0-56). The total score FACT_multiple myeloma is the sum of all the sections. Also in the subsections the higher the score the better the perceived quality of life. The physical, environmental, emotional and functional capacity is common in all FACT questionnaires used, which allows comparing this aspect between subjects.

    Measured: Admission.

  5. Referred quality of life: quality of life as assessed by the FACT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy) Bone marrow transplant (Scale info can be included in the description.)

    The questionnaire is divided into 4 sections: physical status (range 0-28 units), family and social environment (range 0-28 units), emotional state (range 0-24 units), operating capacity (range 0-28) and other concerns - bone marrow transplantation (range 0-40). The total score FACT_BMT is the sum of all the sections. Also in the subsections the higher the score the better the perceived quality of life. The physical, environmental, emotional and functional capacity is common in all FACT questionnaires used, which allows comparing this aspect between subjects.

    Measured: Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  6. Referred quality of life: Levels of anxiety and depression will also be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) questionnaire. (Scale info can be included in the description.)

    It is a self-applied questionnaire of 14 items, consisting of two subscales of 7 items, one of anxiety (odd items) and one of depression (even items). The items of the subscale of anxiety avoiding the inclusion of physical symptoms that can be confused by the patient with the symptomatology proper to his physical illness. The items on the depression subscale focus on the area of anhedonia (loss of pleasure) The score range is 0-21 for each subscale, and 0-42 for the overall score. More than 11 points for each subscale show a clinical problem. Global cutoffs are more controversial depending on the underlying disease.

    Measured: Admission. Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  7. Exercise tolerance

    measured by 6 minutes walking test

    Measured: Admission. Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  8. Muscle atrophy: loss or gain of weight; measured by electrical bioimpedance

    Gain or loss of weight with respect to the reference visit in kg.

    Measured: Admission. Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  9. Muscle atrophy: body mass index; measured by electrical bioimpedance

    Body mass index expressed in kg / m². The weight (in kg) and the height (in meters) will be used for the calculation and will be combined in the formula (weight in kg / height in m ^ 2). According to the WHO, it is considered underweight: <18.5; normal weight: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25-29.9; degree of obesity I: 30.0-34; 5; degree of obesity II: 35.0-39.9; obesity grade III:> 40.

    Measured: Admission. Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  10. Muscle atrophy: fat free mass index; measured by electrical bioimpedance

    The fat-free mass index (kg / m²) shall be calculated as non-fat body mass (in kg) x height (in meters) ^ 2. Poor physical fitness is considered in males <18 kg / m², and in females <13.5 Kg / m².

    Measured: Admission. Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  11. Muscular atrophy measured by hand grip

    Strength in the upper limbs expressed in kg.

    Measured: Admission. Prior to hospital discharge or the same day discharge day. 1,3, 6, 12 months post discharge.

  12. Mortality associated to HSCT

    Clinical History review.

    Measured: During the HSCT process, and up to a 2-year post HSCT follow-up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Oct 2017
  2. Study start12 May 2012
  3. Primary completion12 May 2012
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
Mixed study. Retrospective control group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
190 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03324620
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012-7705
Acronym
ovERsHOT
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
19 Sep 2017
Last updated
27 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Specific program functional and respiratory rehabilitation in people with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cost of interventions assesed by the cost of hospitalization for HSCT (time frame: Admission). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in