Non Union FracturePhase 3ORTHOUNIONNCT03325504
A Comparative Study of 2 Doses of BM Autologous H-MSC+Biomaterial vs Iliac Crest AutoGraft for Bone Healing in Non-Union
A Phase 3 study testing Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Autologous iliac crest graft in people with Non Union Fracture, run by Universidad Autonoma de Madrid at 19 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
ORTHOUNION is a multi-centre, open, comparative, randomized, clinical trial with three parallel arms that aims to compare the efficacy of three treatments to enhance bone healing in patients with long bone non-union. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Union Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Autologous iliac crest graft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 5 Sep 2017to 15 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years and older, both sexes
- Traumatic isolated closed or open Gustilo I and II, IIIA and IIIB humerus, tibial or femur diaphyseal or metaphysodiaphyseal fracture with a status of atrophic, oligotrophic or normotrophic non-union.
- Able to understand, accept and sign informed consent
- Medical health coverage
- Able to understand and accept the study constraints
Who cannot join
- Hypertrophic non-unions
- Segmental bone loss requiring specific therapy (bone transport, vascularized graft, large structural allograft, megaprosthesis, etc)
- Unrecovered vascular or neural injury
- Other fractures causing interference with weight bearing
- Visceral injuries or diseases interfering with callus formation (severe cranioencephalic trauma, etc.)
- Active infection of any location and aetiology
Show all 20Show fewer
- Surgical contraindication of any cause
- Pregnancy, breast feeding women and women who are of childbearing age and not practicing adequate birth control.
- Malignant tumour (past history or concurrent disease)(except carcinoma in situ or basalioma in remission)
- History of bone harvesting on iliac crest contraindicating new iliac crest bone graft harvesting or bone marrow collection
- Insulin dependent diabetes
- Any evidence (confirmed by PCR) of active infection with HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection
- Any evidence of Syphilis
- Known allergies to products involved in the production process of MSC
- Corticoid or immunosuppressive therapy more than one week in the three months prior to study inclusion
- Autoimmune inflammatory disease
- Current treatment by biphosphonates not stopped three months prior to study inclusion
- Impossibility to meet at the appointments for the follow up
- Participation in another therapeutic trial in the previous 3 months
- Second non-union in case of bilateral or multiple non-unions (only one non-union per patient will be included in the trial)
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 4 countries.
19 sites in 4 countries
Spain7 sites
Hospital Clínica San Carlos, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Madrid
Hospital U. 12 de Octubre, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Madrid
Hospital U. Gregorio Marañon, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Madrid
Hospital U. La Princesa, Servicio de CirugíaOrtopédica y Traumatología
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid
Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología "A", Hospital La Paz
Madrid
Hospital U. Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Majadahonda, Madrid
France5 sites
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Henri Mondor
Créteil
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHU Nantes
Nantes
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Toulouse University Hospital
Toulouse
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHU Tours
Tours, 37044
Germany4 sites
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery
Frankfurt
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Freiburg im Breisgau
Universitätsklinikum München
Munich
Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, University of Ulm
Ulm, 8907581
Italy3 sites
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, SSD Fisiopatologia Ortopedica e Medicina Rigenerativa
Bologna, 40136
Arienda Spedali Civili di Brescia II Ortopedia e Traumatologia
Brescia
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Chirugia dell´Anca l
Milan
About this study
Official title: A Multi-centre, Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial of Two Doses of Bone Marrow Autologous MSC+ Biomaterial vs Iliac Crest Autologous Graft, for Bone Healing in Non-union After Long Bone Fractures
ORTHOUNION is a multi-centre, open, comparative, randomized, clinical trial with three parallel arms that aims to compare the efficacy of three treatments to enhance bone healing in patients with long bone non-union.
Read the detailed description
Bone injuries represent an important world medical problem producing significant healthcare and societal expenditure. While most bone injuries are not severe and are capable of healing through bone regeneration by natural callus formation with standard treatments, severe bone injuries may not heal, becoming an important unmet clinical need.
Non-unions, or pseudarthrosis, may occur in 5% to 20% of long-bone fractures that fail to heal properly after more than 6 months, with morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased expenses. The most commonly accepted standard augmentation to procure fracture and non-union healing consists of autologous bone grafting, obtained from the same patient in a different surgical site and transplanted to the reconstruction site. However, autologous bone grafting has some drawbacks (such as persistent pain, scar, late recovery, limited amount of bone, etc) and a limited regeneration efficacy (success rate of about 74%) and high societal cost. Culture-expanded autologous MSCs combined with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) biomaterial granules have been claimed as a solid regenerative medicine alternative to autologous bone grafting in non-unions, although current data are limited. In this context, the ORTHOUNION initiative focuses on the opportunity to test the hypothesis of superiority of MSC, the investigational ATMP, versus the currently accepted standard therapy, iliac crest bone autograft to biologically augment surgical treatment of long-bone non-unions.
- Conditions
- Non Union Fracture
- Being tested
- Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Autologous iliac crest graft
- Keywords
- Non-union, Advanced therapies, Mesenchymal stem cells, Long bone
- Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Ununited
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cultured Mesenchymal Stem CellsBiological
Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells obtained from expanded bone marrow
Autologous iliac crest graftProcedure or surgery
Autologous iliac crest grafting
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| hBM-MSCs-Low Dose | Experimental | Autologous Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells +Biomaterial (Low Dose): 100x106 cells Receives: Biological: Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells |
| hBM-MSCs-High Dose | Experimental | Autologous Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells+Biomaterial (High Dose): 200x106 cells Receives: Biological: Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells |
| Autologous iliac crest graft | Active comparator | Autologous Iliac Crest Grafting Receives: Procedure: Autologous iliac crest graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bone consolidation
The percentage of bone consolidation in the comparator treatment arm ( iliac crest autograft) and experimental treatment arm (mesenchymal cells).
Measured: 12 months after treatment
Secondary outcomes (5)
Bone consolidation
To compare bone consolidation between the experimental arms and the comparator
Measured: 6 and 24 months
Radiological Bone consolidation
To compare bone consolidation, using the REBORNE scale, between the experimental arms and the comparator.
The REBORNE scale is an ad-hoc and validated scale, developed by Gomez-Barrena et al. (article currently under preparation) as a modification of the RUST score (Whelan, 2010; Journal of Trauma). In the REBORNE scale, the presence/absence of radiological consolidation is evaluated on a total of 4 cortices. Score range from 0 (no bone callus visible) to 4 (callus present with same density as cortical). The total score will be recorded.
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Level of Pain
To compare level of pain (by Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) between the experimental arms and the comparator.
The NRS is a scale that rates the patient´s pain from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= worst pain), at the time of the visit.
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Complications
To compare the rate of complications between the experimental arms and the comparator
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Health status
To compare the health status (by using the Short Form-36 Health Questionnaire) between treatment arms.
The SF-36 questionnaire is a validated, widely used patient-reported health survey which measures their physical and mental health status. It consists of 36 questions organized in 8 dimensions. The total score will be recorded.
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2017
- Study start5 Sep 2017
- Primary completion17 Oct 2022
- Study completion15 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non Union FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof Enrique Gomez-Barrena, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
- Investigators
- Enrique Gomez-Barrena, Prof, Principal investigator, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03325504
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ORTHOUNION
- Other IDs
- 2015-000431-32, EUCTR2015-000431-32-ES, 2015
- Acronym
- ORTHOUNION
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Gomez-Barrena E, Padilla-Eguiluz NG, Avendano-Sola C, Payares-Herrera C, Velasco-Iglesias A, Torres F, Rosset P, Gebhard F, Baldini N, Rubio-Suarez JC, Garcia-Rey E, Cordero-Ampuero J, Vaquero-Martin J, Chana F, Marco F, Garcia-Coiradas J, Caba-Dessoux P, de la Cuadra P, Hernigou P, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH, Gouin F, Mainard D, Laffosse JM, Kalbitz M, Marzi I, Sudkamp N, Stockle U, Ciapetti G, Donati DM, Zagra L, Pazzaglia U, Zarattini G, Capanna R, Catani F. A Multicentric, Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial of Two Different Doses of Expanded hBM-MSCs Plus Biomaterial versus Iliac Crest Autograft, for Bone Healing in Nonunions after Long Bone Fractures: Study Protocol. Stem Cells Int. 2018 Feb 22;2018:6025918. doi: 10.1155/2018/6025918. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29535772
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-centre, Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial of Two Doses of Bone Marrow Autologous MSC+ Biomaterial vs Iliac Crest Autologous Graft, for Bone Healing in Non-union After Long Bone Fractures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03325504
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ORTHOUNION / ORTHOUNION
- Conditions
- Non Union Fracture
- Keywords
- Non-union, Advanced therapies, Mesenchymal stem cells, Long bone
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de MadridUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ORTHOUNION is a multi-centre, open, comparative, randomized, clinical trial with three parallel arms that aims to compare the efficacy of three treatments to enhance bone healing in patients with long bone non-union.
Detailed description
Bone injuries represent an important world medical problem producing significant healthcare and societal expenditure. While most bone injuries are not severe and are capable of healing through bone regeneration by natural callus formation with standard treatments, severe bone injuries may not heal, becoming an important unmet clinical need.
Non-unions, or pseudarthrosis, may occur in 5% to 20% of long-bone fractures that fail to heal properly after more than 6 months, with morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased expenses. The most commonly accepted standard augmentation to procure fracture and non-union healing consists of autologous bone grafting, obtained from the same patient in a different surgical site and transplanted to the reconstruction site. However, autologous bone grafting has some drawbacks (such as persistent pain, scar, late recovery, limited amount of bone, etc) and a limited regeneration efficacy (success rate of about 74%) and high societal cost. Culture-expanded autologous MSCs combined with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) biomaterial granules have been claimed as a solid regenerative medicine alternative to autologous bone grafting in non-unions, although current data are limited. In this context, the ORTHOUNION initiative focuses on the opportunity to test the hypothesis of superiority of MSC, the investigational ATMP, versus the currently accepted standard therapy, iliac crest bone autograft to biologically augment surgical treatment of long-bone non-unions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| hBM-MSCs-Low Dose | Experimental | Biological: Cultured Mesenchymal Stem CellsAutologous Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells +Biomaterial (Low Dose): 100x106 cells |
| hBM-MSCs-High Dose | Experimental | Biological: Cultured Mesenchymal Stem CellsAutologous Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells+Biomaterial (High Dose): 200x106 cells |
| Autologous iliac crest graft | Active comparator | Procedure: Autologous iliac crest graftAutologous Iliac Crest Grafting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18 years and older, both sexes
- Traumatic isolated closed or open Gustilo I and II, IIIA and IIIB humerus, tibial or femur diaphyseal or metaphysodiaphyseal fracture with a status of atrophic, oligotrophic or normotrophic non-union.
- Able to understand, accept and sign informed consent
- Medical health coverage
- Able to understand and accept the study constraints
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Hypertrophic non-unions
- Segmental bone loss requiring specific therapy (bone transport, vascularized graft, large structural allograft, megaprosthesis, etc)
- Unrecovered vascular or neural injury
- Other fractures causing interference with weight bearing
- Visceral injuries or diseases interfering with callus formation (severe cranioencephalic trauma, etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cultured Mesenchymal Stem CellsCultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells obtained from expanded bone marrow | Biological | hBM-MSCs-High Dose, hBM-MSCs-Low Dose |
| Autologous iliac crest graftAutologous iliac crest grafting | Procedure or surgery | Autologous iliac crest graft |
Primary outcome
Bone consolidation
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
The percentage of bone consolidation in the comparator treatment arm ( iliac crest autograft) and experimental treatment arm (mesenchymal cells).
5 secondary outcomes
Bone consolidation
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Radiological Bone consolidation
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Level of Pain
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Complications
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Health status
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 29535772Gomez-Barrena E, Padilla-Eguiluz NG, Avendano-Sola C, Payares-Herrera C, Velasco-Iglesias A, Torres F, Rosset P, Gebhard F, Baldini N, Rubio-Suarez JC, Garcia-Rey E, Cordero-Ampuero J, Vaquero-Martin J, Chana F, Marco F, Garcia-Coiradas J, Caba-Dessoux P, de la Cuadra P, Hernigou P, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH, Gouin F, Mainard D, Laffosse JM, Kalbitz M, Marzi I, Sudkamp N, Stockle U, Ciapetti G, Donati DM, Zagra L, Pazzaglia U, Zarattini G, Capanna R, Catani F. A Multicentric, Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial of Two Different Doses of Expanded hBM-MSCs Plus Biomaterial versus Iliac Crest Autograft, for Bone Healing in Nonunions after Long Bone Fractures: Study Protocol. Stem Cells Int. 2018 Feb 22;2018:6025918. doi: 10.1155/2018/6025918. eCollection 2018.
- Webpage of the Orthounion StudyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Non Union Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Allograft vs. Autograft Nonunion
Nonunion Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Exactech Proximal Humerus Fracture Plate System Post Market Clinical Follow-up
Proximal Humeral Fracture, Fracture Dislocation
RecruitingObservational study
Safety, Efficacy, & Use of ViviGen Cellular Bone Matrix Allograft in Orthopaedic Fracture Care
Fractures, Bone, Nonunion of Fracture
RecruitingPhase 3
PO vs IV Antibiotics for the Treatment of Infected Nonunion of Fractures After Fixation
Infections, Infected Wound
Active, not recruiting
Modern Methods of Treatment and Diagnosis of Patients With Injuries and Diseases of the Musculoskeletal System
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Fractures, Ununited
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Enrique Gomez-Barrena, Prof principal investigator
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
19 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Autologous iliac crest graft in people with Non Union Fracture, run by Universidad Autonoma de Madrid at 19 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in Spain, France, Germany, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bone consolidation (time frame: 12 months after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03325504, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2024.