Acute Respiratory Failure With HypoxiaPRHOXY-1NCT03326830
Prehospital High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy
A study testing High-flow nasal oxygen and Standard oxygen therapy in people with Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia and Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of the present project is to compare High-Flow Nasal Oxygen therapy with Standard Oxygen therapy, initiated in the prehospital setting in patients with acute hypoxemia respiratory failure, in terms of oxygenation at arrival to the hospital and need of mechanical ventilation during the subsequent 28 days Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Prehospital Setting
- What is being tested?
- High-flow nasal oxygen and Standard oxygen therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 21 Dec 2017to 10 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- First SpO2 on scene <90%
- At least one other sign of respiratory distress defined by (a) respiratory distress with a respiratory rate ≥ 25/min; (b) laboured breathing
- No advance directives or known decisions of Do Not intubate or Do Not Ventilate order.
Who cannot join
- Known COPD or other hypercapnic chronic respiratory failure
- age <18 years
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Anatomical factors precluding the use of a nasal cannula
- Emergency intubation required
- Patients with tracheostomy
- Patient transported to a hospital not involved in the study
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prehospital High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Randomized, Open-label, Bi-center, Pilot Study
The purpose of the present project is to compare High-Flow Nasal Oxygen therapy with Standard Oxygen therapy, initiated in the prehospital setting in patients with acute hypoxemia respiratory failure, in terms of oxygenation at arrival to the hospital and need of mechanical ventilation during the subsequent 28 days
Read the detailed description
Patients with respiratory distress and an SpO2 below 90% in the prehospital setting will be randomized to receive either high-flow nasal oxygen therapy through a dedicated device or standard oxygen therapy through standard devices such as nasal cannula or face mask. Need of mechanical ventilation either invasive or noninvasive from enrollment to day 28 and time course of oxygenation between first SpO2 measured on scene and arrival to the hospital will be the main outcome measures.
- Being tested
- High-flow nasal oxygen, Standard oxygen therapy
- Keywords
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-flow nasal oxygenDevice
oxygen therapy will be delivered through a dedicated system, the Airvo2™ (Fisher\&Paykel, New-Zealand).
Standard oxygen therapyDevice
Oxygen therapy will be delivered using standard devices such as nasal canula or face mask with or without rebreathing bag
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard oxygen therapy | Active comparator | Standard oxygen therapy will be delivered using any device or combination of devices that are part of usual care: nasal oxygen, and mask with or without a reservoir bag and with or without the Venturi system. The flow will be tapered to target an SpO2 ≥ 95% Receives: Device: Standard oxygen therapy |
| High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) | Experimental | Experimental: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) group Device that delivers humidified and warmed high-flow oxygen at flows between 30-60L/min HFNO will be initiated at a flow rate between 30-60 L/min and FiO2 titrated for a target of SpO2 ≥ 95%. Receives: Device: High-flow nasal oxygen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
need of mechanical ventilation
cumulative incidence of the use of tracheal intubation or noninvasive ventilation (whichever comes first) from enrolment to day 28
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (13)
Hypoxemia
Frequency of hypoxemia, defined as sustained (at least 5 min) SpO2 below 90% (SpO2 will be continuously recorded throughout the prehospital medical care period) from the beginning of the intervention period until arrival at Emergency Department or other hospital ward.
Measured: 1 hour
Severe hypoxemia
Frequency of severe hypoxemia, defined as sustained (at least 5 min) SpO2 below 85% from the beginning of the intervention period until arrival at Emergency Department or other hospital ward.
Measured: 1 hour
Survival
Probability of survival from inclusion to day 28
Measured: 28 days
SpO2
Time course of SpO2
Measured: 1 hour
Respiratory rate
Time course of respiratory rate
Measured: 1 hour
Heart rate
Time course of heart rate
Measured: 1 hour
Tracheal intubation
Cumulative incidence of tracheal intubation from inclusion to day 28.
Measured: 28 days
Noninvasive ventilation
Cumulative incidence of noninvasive ventilation use for acute respiratory failure from inclusion to day 28
Measured: 28 days
arterial pH
arterial pH (units) measured at hospital arrival
Measured: 1 hour
arterial PaCO2
arterial PaCO2 (mmHg) measured at hospital arrival
Measured: 1 hour
arterial PaO2
arterial PaO2 (mmHg) measured at hospital arrival
Measured: 1 hour
Dyspnea
Dyspnea intensity as assessed by the patient him/herself at hospital arrival using the following dyspnea score: frank improvement: +2; mild improvement: +1; No change: 0; slight worsening: -1; frank worsening:-2.
Measured: 1 hour
Serious Adverse Events
The number of serious adverse events during the intervention phase of the study
Measured: Day 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2017
- Study start21 Dec 2017
- Primary completion10 Aug 2022
- Study completion10 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Failure With HypoxiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Bi-center, open-label, parallel, randomized trial with 1:2 allocation ratio (2 patients assigned to standard oxygen therapy for 1 patient assigned to High Flow Nasal Oxygen therapy)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mai-Anh Nay, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03326830
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHRO-2017-09
- Other IDs
- 2017-A01922-51, CHRO-2017-09
- Acronym
- PRHOXY-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Prekker ME, Feemster LC, Hough CL, Carlbom D, Crothers K, Au DH, Rea TD, Seymour CW. The epidemiology and outcome of prehospital respiratory distress. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):543-50. doi: 10.1111/acem.12380.
PubMed 24842506Kelly AM, Holdgate A, Keijzers G, Klim S, Graham CA, Craig S, Kuan WS, Jones P, Lawoko C, Laribi S; AANZDEM study group. Epidemiology, prehospital care and outcomes of patients arriving by ambulance with dyspnoea: an observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Sep 22;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0305-5.
PubMed 27658711Stiell IG, Spaite DW, Field B, Nesbitt LP, Munkley D, Maloney J, Dreyer J, Toohey LL, Campeau T, Dagnone E, Lyver M, Wells GA; OPALS Study Group. Advanced life support for out-of-hospital respiratory distress. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2156-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060334.
PubMed 17522399Fontanari P, Burnet H, Zattara-Hartmann MC, Jammes Y. Changes in airway resistance induced by nasal inhalation of cold dry, dry, or moist air in normal individuals. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Oct;81(4):1739-43. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.4.1739.
PubMed 8904594Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, Black R, Carter R, Hughes M. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):938-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PubMed 18540928Li J, Fink JB, Ehrmann S. High-flow nasal cannula for COVID-19 patients: low risk of bio-aerosol dispersion. Eur Respir J. 2020 May 14;55(5):2000892. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00892-2020. Print 2020 May.
PubMed 32299867Leonard S, Strasser W, Whittle JS, Volakis LI, DeBellis RJ, Prichard R, Atwood CW Jr, Dungan GC 2nd. Reducing aerosol dispersion by high flow therapy in COVID-19: High resolution computational fluid dynamics simulations of particle behavior during high velocity nasal insufflation with a simple surgical mask. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jun 11;1(4):578-591. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12158. eCollection 2020 Aug.
PubMed 32838373
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prehospital High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Randomized, Open-label, Bi-center, Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03326830
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRHOXY-1 / CHRO-2017-09
- Keywords
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the present project is to compare High-Flow Nasal Oxygen therapy with Standard Oxygen therapy, initiated in the prehospital setting in patients with acute hypoxemia respiratory failure, in terms of oxygenation at arrival to the hospital and need of mechanical ventilation during the subsequent 28 days
Detailed description
Patients with respiratory distress and an SpO2 below 90% in the prehospital setting will be randomized to receive either high-flow nasal oxygen therapy through a dedicated device or standard oxygen therapy through standard devices such as nasal cannula or face mask. Need of mechanical ventilation either invasive or noninvasive from enrollment to day 28 and time course of oxygenation between first SpO2 measured on scene and arrival to the hospital will be the main outcome measures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Bi-center, open-label, parallel, randomized trial with 1:2 allocation ratio (2 patients assigned to standard oxygen therapy for 1 patient assigned to High Flow Nasal Oxygen therapy)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard oxygen therapy | Active comparator | Device: Standard oxygen therapyStandard oxygen therapy will be delivered using any device or combination of devices that are part of usual care: nasal oxygen, and mask with or without a reservoir bag and with or without the Venturi system. The flow will be tapered to target an SpO2 ≥ 95% |
| High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) | Experimental | Device: High-flow nasal oxygenExperimental: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) group Device that delivers humidified and warmed high-flow oxygen at flows between 30-60L/min HFNO will be initiated at a flow rate between 30-60 L/min and FiO2 titrated for a target of SpO2 ≥ 95%. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- First SpO2 on scene <90%
- At least one other sign of respiratory distress defined by (a) respiratory distress with a respiratory rate ≥ 25/min; (b) laboured breathing
- No advance directives or known decisions of Do Not intubate or Do Not Ventilate order.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Known COPD or other hypercapnic chronic respiratory failure
- age <18 years
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Anatomical factors precluding the use of a nasal cannula
- Emergency intubation required
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-flow nasal oxygenoxygen therapy will be delivered through a dedicated system, the Airvo2™ (Fisher\&Paykel, New-Zealand). | Device | High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) |
| Standard oxygen therapyOxygen therapy will be delivered using standard devices such as nasal canula or face mask with or without rebreathing bag | Device | Standard oxygen therapy |
Primary outcome
need of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 28 days
cumulative incidence of the use of tracheal intubation or noninvasive ventilation (whichever comes first) from enrolment to day 28
13 secondary outcomes
Hypoxemia
Time frame: 1 hour
Severe hypoxemia
Time frame: 1 hour
Survival
Time frame: 28 days
SpO2
Time frame: 1 hour
Respiratory rate
Time frame: 1 hour
Heart rate
Time frame: 1 hour
Tracheal intubation
Time frame: 28 days
Noninvasive ventilation
Time frame: 28 days
arterial pH
Time frame: 1 hour
arterial PaCO2
Time frame: 1 hour
arterial PaO2
Time frame: 1 hour
Dyspnea
Time frame: 1 hour
Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Day 28
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2023.
- Background: PubMed 24842506Prekker ME, Feemster LC, Hough CL, Carlbom D, Crothers K, Au DH, Rea TD, Seymour CW. The epidemiology and outcome of prehospital respiratory distress. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):543-50. doi: 10.1111/acem.12380.
- Background: PubMed 27658711Kelly AM, Holdgate A, Keijzers G, Klim S, Graham CA, Craig S, Kuan WS, Jones P, Lawoko C, Laribi S; AANZDEM study group. Epidemiology, prehospital care and outcomes of patients arriving by ambulance with dyspnoea: an observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Sep 22;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0305-5.
- Background: PubMed 17522399Stiell IG, Spaite DW, Field B, Nesbitt LP, Munkley D, Maloney J, Dreyer J, Toohey LL, Campeau T, Dagnone E, Lyver M, Wells GA; OPALS Study Group. Advanced life support for out-of-hospital respiratory distress. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2156-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060334.
- Background: PubMed 8904594Fontanari P, Burnet H, Zattara-Hartmann MC, Jammes Y. Changes in airway resistance induced by nasal inhalation of cold dry, dry, or moist air in normal individuals. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Oct;81(4):1739-43. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.4.1739.
- Background: PubMed 18540928Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, Black R, Carter R, Hughes M. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):938-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 32299867Li J, Fink JB, Ehrmann S. High-flow nasal cannula for COVID-19 patients: low risk of bio-aerosol dispersion. Eur Respir J. 2020 May 14;55(5):2000892. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00892-2020. Print 2020 May.
- Background: PubMed 32838373Leonard S, Strasser W, Whittle JS, Volakis LI, DeBellis RJ, Prichard R, Atwood CW Jr, Dungan GC 2nd. Reducing aerosol dispersion by high flow therapy in COVID-19: High resolution computational fluid dynamics simulations of particle behavior during high velocity nasal insufflation with a simple surgical mask. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jun 11;1(4):578-591. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12158. eCollection 2020 Aug.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia
Recruiting
Automated Oxygen Titration With the EMILY.AI Device in a Respiratory Intermediate Care Unit
Chronic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Failure
Active, not recruiting
Automated Quantification of Radiologic Pulmonary Alteration During Acute Respiratory Failure: Application to the COVID-19 Pandemic
SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia
Recruiting
Awake Prone Positioning in Spontaneous Breathing Patients With Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Due to Pneumonia
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Weaning From High Flow Nasal Oxygen in Acute Respiratory Failure : a Target Trial Emulation
Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia, Respiratory Failure, ICU
RecruitingObservational study
PEEP in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mai-Anh Nay, MD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High-flow nasal oxygen and Standard oxygen therapy in people with Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia and Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
need of mechanical ventilation (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03326830, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2023.