Anisometropic AmblyopiaATS19NCT03342235
Excimer Laser Surgery for Anisometropic Amblyopia
A study testing Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Patching 2 hours per day and Excimer Laser System in people with Anisometropic Amblyopia and Refractive Errors, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research.
Trial summary
Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response. Synopsis of Study Design The study consists of two phases: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 7 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anisometropic Amblyopia, Refractive Errors
- What is being tested?
- Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Patching 2 hours per day and Excimer Laser System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2020to Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 7 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age 3 to <8 years
- Best-corrected amblyopic-eye VA using the ATS single-surround HOTV letter protocol (ATS-HOTV) meeting the following criteria:
- If age 3 to <5 years, 20/80 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/80)
- If age 5 to <8 years, 20/63 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/63)
- Note: For participants who require a re-test (as specified above), the better of the test and re-test acuities must meet the eligibility criteria for the amblyopic eye and will serve as the enrollment VA.
- Best-corrected fellow-eye VA meeting the following criteria by ATS-HOTV:
Show all 30Show fewer
- If age 3 years, 20/50 or better
- If age 4 to 5 years, 20/40 or better
- If age 6 to 7 years, 20/32 or better
- Best-corrected inter-ocular acuity difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines by ATS-HOTV
- Refractive error meeting the following criteria (based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 4 months old):
- Refractive error in the amblyopic eye must be greater than the fellow eye.
- If the amblyopic eye is myopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between -3.00D and -12.00D, inclusive.
- If the amblyopic eye is hyperopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between +3.00D and +6.00D, inclusive, if <=1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye; and between +3.00D and +5.00D, inclusive, if >1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye.
- Astigmatism less than or equal to 3.50D in the amblyopic eye.
- SE refractive error in the fellow eye between -4.00D and +3.00D, inclusive, with no astigmatism limits.
- For participants 3 to <5 years of age, at least 5.00D of SE anisometropic difference between the two eyes by cycloplegic refraction; for subjects 5 to <8 years of age, at least 3.00D SE anisometropic difference
- No more than 3.00D of difference in cylinder power between the two eyes
- Target postoperative refractive error (if participant becomes eligible for randomization) must be achievable with PRK as defined in Table 3 and must be within 2.00D of the fellow eye.
- Prior to enrollment into the Patching Run-In Phase, must have had patching and/or optical penalization with atropine or Bangerter filters prescribed for at least 6 months and optical correction of refractive error prescribed for at least 6 months. Prior treatment does not have to be continuous. Compliance with prescribed treatment does not influence eligibility but the best effort at compliance is expected from both the patient and provider.
- Corneal thickness >500 microns (>510 microns within the previous 7 months, or corneal thickness between 500 and 510 microns within the last 2 months).
- Central corneal thickness must be enough to allow the treatment dose needed while leaving a residual corneal thickness of ≥ 375 microns.
- IOP ≤ 22 mm Hg within 7 months of enrollment
- Investigator believes that the participant has achieved maximum improvement in amblyopic-eye VA with conventional treatment.
- Investigator is willing to prescribe patching, and parent and child are willing to attempt patching for at least 8 weeks for 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) in the Patching Run-In Phase.
- No rigid gas permeable lens (including OrthoK) worn in the past 2 months
- Soft contact lens is currently worn, has been attempted within the past 4 months, or a contact lens fitting exam (paid for by the study) is scheduled or the investigator does the contact lens fitting on the same day as enrollment.
- Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization (if child meets eligibility criteria after Patching Run-In Phase).
- Parent has a phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff or other study staff during the next 36 months.
- Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study without the next 36 months is not anticipated.
Who cannot join
- Non-refractive ocular cause for reduced VA in the amblyopic eye (example: cataract, posterior staphyloma, extensive myelinated nerve fiber layer, optic nerve anomaly, macular scar, corneal opacity); or any cause of previous form deprivation.
- Prior penetrating ocular surgery or injury
- Prior strabismus surgery within 60 days preceding enrollment
- Diagnosis of collagen vascular disease, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other disorder of collagen synthesis
- Previous ocular condition that may predispose the eye to be treated for future complications, for example:
- Corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, keratoconus or suspicion of keratoconus based upon family history, slit lamp exam, retinoscopy, or corneal topography (if able), recurrent erosion syndrome, corneal melt, or corneal dystrophy)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Established diagnosis of glaucoma
- Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong corneal epithelial healing
- History of significant eye rubbing or dry eye symptoms
- History of retinopathy of prematurity resulting in macular ectopia
- Down syndrome (trisomy 21)
About this study
Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response.
Synopsis of Study Design
Read more
The study consists of two phases:
- A Patching Run-In Phase during which all participants are treated for at least 8 weeks with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) until no further improvement over 2 consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart or the vision no longer meets eligibility criteria.
- A Randomized Trial Phase, beginning after no further VA improvement in the patching run-in phase and qualifying amblyopia is still present, during which the participant is assigned to either surgery with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day or to non-surgical treatment with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 2 hours per day.
Read the detailed description
The study is evaluating the efficacy of surgical treatment with PRK versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment. The primary analysis will be a treatment group comparison of the change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at the 8-month primary outcome visit. For participants wearing a contact lens, the BCVA will be the visual acuity tested in the contact lens rather than in spectacles (or trial frames).
- Conditions
- Anisometropic Amblyopia, Refractive Errors
- Being tested
- Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Patching 2 hours per day, Excimer Laser System
- Keywords
- Excimer Laser Surgery, Photorefractive Keratectomy, Anisometropic Amblyopia, Visual Acuity, Refractive Surgical Procedures, PRK
- Medical subject headings
- Amblyopia, Refractive Errors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)Procedure or surgery
Also called PRK Surgery
Subjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization.
Patching 2 hours per dayOther
Also called Patching
Patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
Excimer Laser SystemDevice
Excimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical Group | Experimental | Participants randomized to PRK surgery will be referred to a study surgical center. The participant will have a preoperative exam within 7 days prior to surgery and surgery within 60 days after randomization. Participants will continue prescribed 2 hours per day of patching between randomization and the day of surgery. Receives: Procedure: Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK); Device: Excimer Laser System |
| Non-surgical Control Group | Active comparator | For participants assigned to the non-surgical control group, patching will be prescribed for 2 hours per day with optical correction, and will continue until the 8-month primary outcome visit. Receives: Other: Patching 2 hours per day |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye
Treatment group comparison of the change in Best-Corrected ATS-HOTV VA (BCVA) in the amblyopic eye at 8 months after randomization.
ATS-HOTV = ATS single-surround HOTV testing protocol
Measured: from randomization to the 8-month primary outcome visit
Secondary outcomes (8)
Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Outcomes by Treatment Group
The distribution of Randot Preschool stereoacuity at randomization and the 8-month primary outcome visit will be tabulated separately for each treatment group. Change in stereoacuity from randomization to the 8-month visit will be tabulated for each group and compared between treatment groups using the exact Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Measured: At 8 months after randomization
Refractive Error Outcomes in Surgery Group
The distribution of change in refractive error in each eye at 7 months after randomization will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics. The difference between the 7-month refractive error and the target refractive error will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics.
Measured: At 7 months after randomization
Visual Acuity Outcomes
A point estimate and corresponding 95% confidence interval will be calculated for the mean change in BCVA for the amblyopic-eye 8 months after baseline, adjusted for minimization covariates of age and VA at baseline as well as anisometropia type (hyperopia, myopia). The analyses will include data completed within the pre-specified analysis window for the 8-month visit after baseline and will follow a modified intent-to-treat principle as outlined for the primary analysis.
Measured: At 8 months
Distribution of refractive error outcomes
The distribution of refractive error outcomes at 7 months after baseline will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics.
Measured: At 7 months after baseline
Distribution in Randot Preschool stereoacuity level
The distribution in Randot Preschool stereoacuity level at baseline and 8 months after baseline and the change in stereoacuity for this interval will be tabulated and compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Measured: at baseline and 8 months
Visual Acuity Outcomes at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
The distribution of the level and change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at 12 and 24 months after surgery will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics.
Measured: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Stereoacuity at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
The distribution of Randot Preschool stereoacuity and change in stereoacuity at the 12- and 24-month post-surgery visits will be tabulated separately for each treatment group
Measured: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Refractive Error at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
The distribution of change in refractive error in each eye at 12 and 24 months after surgery will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics. The difference between the refractive errors at these visits and the target refractive error will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics.
Measured: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2017
- Study startJun 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2024 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Study not started due to lack of recruitment potential.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Anisometropic AmblyopiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- * Surgical Group: treatment with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able. o Surgery will be performed within 60 days of randomization * Non-surgical Control Group: patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Evelyn A Paysse, MD, Study chair, Baylor College of MedicineDavid K Wallace, MD, MPH, Study chair, Duke Eye Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03342235
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ATS19
- Other IDs
- 2U10EY011751
- Acronym
- ATS19
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 20 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: In accordance with the NIH data sharing policy, a de-identified database is placed in the public domain on the PEDIG public website after the completion of each protocol and publication of the primary manuscript.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Excimer Laser Surgery for Anisometropic Amblyopia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03342235
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ATS19 / ATS19
- Conditions
- Anisometropic Amblyopia, Refractive Errors
- Keywords
- Excimer Laser Surgery, Photorefractive Keratectomy, Anisometropic Amblyopia, Visual Acuity, Refractive Surgical Procedures, PRK
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study not started due to lack of recruitment potential.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Study start
- Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response.
Synopsis of Study Design
The study consists of two phases:
- A Patching Run-In Phase during which all participants are treated for at least 8 weeks with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) until no further improvement over 2 consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart or the vision no longer meets eligibility criteria.
- A Randomized Trial Phase, beginning after no further VA improvement in the patching run-in phase and qualifying amblyopia is still present, during which the participant is assigned to either surgery with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day or to non-surgical treatment with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 2 hours per day.
Detailed description
The study is evaluating the efficacy of surgical treatment with PRK versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment. The primary analysis will be a treatment group comparison of the change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at the 8-month primary outcome visit. For participants wearing a contact lens, the BCVA will be the visual acuity tested in the contact lens rather than in spectacles (or trial frames).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- * Surgical Group: treatment with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able. o Surgery will be performed within 60 days of randomization * Non-surgical Control Group: patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical Group | Experimental | Procedure: Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Device: Excimer Laser SystemParticipants randomized to PRK surgery will be referred to a study surgical center. The participant will have a preoperative exam within 7 days prior to surgery and surgery within 60 days after randomization. Participants will continue prescribed 2 hours per day of patching between randomization and the day of surgery. |
| Non-surgical Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Patching 2 hours per dayFor participants assigned to the non-surgical control group, patching will be prescribed for 2 hours per day with optical correction, and will continue until the 8-month primary outcome visit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 7 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Age 3 to <8 years
- Best-corrected amblyopic-eye VA using the ATS single-surround HOTV letter protocol (ATS-HOTV) meeting the following criteria:
- Best-corrected fellow-eye VA meeting the following criteria by ATS-HOTV:
- Best-corrected inter-ocular acuity difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines by ATS-HOTV
- Refractive error meeting the following criteria (based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 4 months old):
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Non-refractive ocular cause for reduced VA in the amblyopic eye (example: cataract, posterior staphyloma, extensive myelinated nerve fiber layer, optic nerve anomaly, macular scar, corneal opacity); or any cause of previous form deprivation.
- Prior penetrating ocular surgery or injury
- Prior strabismus surgery within 60 days preceding enrollment
- Diagnosis of collagen vascular disease, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other disorder of collagen synthesis
- Previous ocular condition that may predispose the eye to be treated for future complications, for example:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)Also: PRK SurgerySubjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization. | Procedure or surgery | Surgical Group |
| Patching 2 hours per dayAlso: PatchingPatching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able. | Other | Non-surgical Control Group |
| Excimer Laser SystemExcimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy. | Device | Surgical Group |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye
Time frame: from randomization to the 8-month primary outcome visit
Treatment group comparison of the change in Best-Corrected ATS-HOTV VA (BCVA) in the amblyopic eye at 8 months after randomization. ATS-HOTV = ATS single-surround HOTV testing protocol
8 secondary outcomes
Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Outcomes by Treatment Group
Time frame: At 8 months after randomization
Refractive Error Outcomes in Surgery Group
Time frame: At 7 months after randomization
Visual Acuity Outcomes
Time frame: At 8 months
Distribution of refractive error outcomes
Time frame: At 7 months after baseline
Distribution in Randot Preschool stereoacuity level
Time frame: at baseline and 8 months
Visual Acuity Outcomes at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Stereoacuity at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Refractive Error at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. In accordance with the NIH data sharing policy, a de-identified database is placed in the public domain on the PEDIG public website after the completion of each protocol and publication of the primary manuscript.
Related trials for Anisometropic Amblyopia
Not yet recruiting
Non-invasive Induction of Metaplasticity for Amblyopia
Amblyopia, Amblyopia Unilateral
Recruiting
Augmented Reality-Based Binocular Therapy for Visual Rehabilitation in Adults With Amblyopia
Amblyopia, Anisometropic Amblyopia
Recruiting
Combining Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Augmented Reality-based Dichoptic Therapy for Treating Amblyopic Adults
Amblyopia, Anisometropic Amblyopia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Valproate for the Treatment of Residual Amblyopia
Amblyopia, Amblyopia Unilateral
Recruiting
A Study on the Efficacy and User Experience of Gamified Intervention for Children With Anisometropic Amblyopia
Amblyopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Evelyn A Paysse, MD study chair
Baylor College of Medicine
David K Wallace, MD, MPH study chair
Duke Eye Center
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Patching 2 hours per day and Excimer Laser System in people with Anisometropic Amblyopia and Refractive Errors, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 30 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye (time frame: from randomization to the 8-month primary outcome visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2020.