AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary TuberculosisScreenTBNCT03350048

Evaluation of Host Biomarker-based Point-of-care Tests for Targeted Screening for Active TB

An observational study of Pulmonary Tuberculosis, run by Prof Gerhard Walzl at 10 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Title: Evaluation of host biomarker-based point-of-care tests for targeted screening for active TB (Screen TB) Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) places severe pressure on health care services of the developing world. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
What is being tested?
Trans-Dot point-of-care test
How many people
969 participants
Where
10 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
1 Apr 2016to 31 Jul 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult participants with suspected active TB disease will be recruited in South Africa, the Gambia, Uganda, Namibia and Ethiopia. Each site will recruit approximately 160 participants with suspected TB, until the desired overall total of about 800 participants is reached. In South Africa, up to 300 participants will be recruited from primary health care clinics (Adriaanse, Elsiesriver, Uitsig, Ravensmead, Fisantekraal, Durbanville and Dunoon) in Cape Town. Patients presenting to the health care facility with symptomatic pulmonary disease and a high likelihood of having tuberculosis will be enrolled and followed up for outcome classification. Participants who had previous TB, extra-pulmonary TB in addition to pulmonary TB, drug resistance detected on GeneXpert or culture or other concomitant diseases, will not be excluded from enrolment. Both HIV positive and HIV negative individuals will be enrolled.

Who may be able to join

  • Symptoms suggestive of TB disease: cough for more than two weeks with fever, malaise, weight loss, night sweats, haemoptysis, chest pain or loss of appetite.
  • Willingness to give consent to take part in the study.
  • Willingness to undergo HIV testing or be willing to have their HIV infection status disclosed to the study field workers.
  • Eighteen years or older and aged 70 years or younger.

Who cannot join

  • Permanent residence in study area for less than 3 months or with no permanent address.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • HB<9g/l
  • On TB treatment currently or in the last ninety days.
  • HIV positive patients currently on INH prophylaxis, or in the last ninety days.
  • Known quinolone or aminoglicozide antibiotic use reported in the past 60 days.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 8 countries.

10 sites in 8 countries

Germany2 sites
  • LINQ Management GmbH

    Berlin, 14057

  • European Research and Project Office GmbH

    Saarbrücken, Saarland, 66123

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands2 sites
  • Leiden University Medical Center (Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden, LUMC)

    Leiden, 2333 ZA

  • The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership Association (EDCTP)

    The Hague, South Holland, 2593 HW

Other trials in Netherlands

Ethiopia1 site
  • Armauer Hansen Research Institute

    Addis Ababa

Other trials in Ethiopia

Namibia1 site
  • University of Namibia

    Windhoek, 13301

South Africa1 site
  • Stellenbosch University

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7505

Other trials in South Africa

The Gambia1 site
  • Medical Research Council The Gambia

    Banjul

Other trials in The Gambia

Uganda1 site
  • Makerere University

    Kampala

Other trials in Uganda

United Kingdom1 site
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

    London, WC1E 7HT

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Title: Evaluation of host biomarker-based point-of-care tests for targeted screening for active TB (Screen TB)

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) places severe pressure on health care services of the developing world. Despite the introduction of the highly sensitive and specific GeneXpert MTB/RIF (GeneXpert) test [1] with a potential turn-around time of two hours, many people in high TB prevalence areas still do not have access to efficient TB diagnostic services due to logistical constraints in these settings. A cost effective, rapid, point-of-care screening test with high sensitivity would identify people with a high likelihood for active TB and would prioritize them for testing with more expensive, technically or logistically demanding assays including GeneXpert or liquid culture, facilitating cost-effective diagnostic work-up in resource-limited settings. A serum cytokine signature for active TB disease, discovered in the AE-TBC project, with a sensitivity of 89% (CI 78 - 95%) and specificity of 76% (CI 68 - 83%), will be optimised and utilized in a point-of-care format (TransDot) to rapidly test for TB disease in symptomatic people.

Read more

Hypothesis: The TransDot test will achieve a sensitivity of > 90% for TB disease, in a training set of people suspected of having TB disease, and be validated (achieve similarly high sensitivity) subsequently in a prospective test set of people suspected of having TB disease, when compared to a composite gold standard of sputum culture, smear, GeneXpert, chest X-ray, TB symptoms and TB treatment response.

Objectives: The overall objective of the study is to incorporate a six-marker serum signature into a multiplex UCP-LFA format, referred to as TransDot, for finger-prick blood testing. The end point of the study is the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the UCP-LFA TransDot test on finger-prick blood for active TB and will be prospectively compared against gold standard composite diagnostic criteria (GeneXpert, MGIT culture, TB sputum smear, CXR, TB symptom screen and response to TB treatment).

Primary: The primary outcome of interest will be accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the TransDot finger-prick test when compared with the composite gold standard tests.

Read the detailed description

Protocol Summary Title: Evaluation of host biomarker-based point-of-care tests for targeted screening for active TB (Screen TB)

Population: A total of 800 people presenting at primary health care clinics with presumed active pulmonary tuberculosis, aged 18 to 70 years, male or female gender, will be recruited. They should be willing to give informed, written consent, including consent for HIV testing. They should have symptoms that could be compatible with active TB (cough > two weeks, plus at least one of the following: fever, weight loss, haemoptysis and night sweats). Participants should not have been on TB treatment for the past 90 days and should not have received immune suppressive therapy, be known with alcohol of drug abuse, have a haemoglobin level <9g/dl or be pregnant or breastfeeding. HIV co-infection is not an exclusion criterion. Participants will be recruited from primary health care clinics in Cape Town, South Africa, Windhoek in Namibia, Addis Ababa in Ethiopia, Banjul in The Gambia and Kampala in Uganda.

Number of Sites: Five sites

Study Duration: 3 years

Subject Duration: 18 months for TB cases, 2 months for non-TB cases

Objectives:

The overall objective of the study is to incorporate a six-marker serum signature into a multiplex UCP-LFA format, referred to as TransDot, for finger-prick blood testing. The end point of the study is the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the UCP-LFA TransDot test on finger-prick blood for active TB and will be prospectively compared against gold standard composite diagnostic criteria (GeneXpert, MGIT culture, TB sputum smear, CXR, TB symptom screen and response to TB treatment).

Being tested
Trans-Dot point-of-care test
Keywords
Tuberculosis, Point-of-care test, Diagnostics, Biomarkers
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Tuberculosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Trans-Dot point-of-care testDiagnostic test

    Training set participants will be recruited and receive investigations for TB. Blood samples will also be collected from them for performance of ELISAs and laboratory-based TransDot tests. These blood samples will be drawn at baseline, week 8 and week 24 at end of treatment for confirmed TB cases and at baseline for non-TB cases.

    Test set participants will be recruited and receive investigations for TB. A POC TransDot test will be performed on fingerprick blood at baseline, and at week 8 and week 24 in participants on TB treatment, as well as a laboratory based TransDot test on serum at baseline. The week 8 and week 24 TransDot tests will be used to investigate the test's utility as an indicator of treatment response.

Study groups in NCT03350048
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Training SetFirst 500 participants recruited for the Training Set: * Blood collection for optimization and validation (vs ELISA) of TransDot point-of-care test at LUMC and later for lab-based TransDot at local site laboratory * Blood, sputum, saliva and urine collection for secondary objectives and repository
Test SetSubsequent 300 participants to be used for the Test Set: * Fingerprick TransDot point-of-care test performed at field site after symptom screen and clinical evaluation and before CXR * Blood, sputum, saliva and urine collection for secondary objectives and repository
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Trans-Dot point-of-care test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic performance of the TransDot finger-prick test

    The primary outcome of interest will be accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the TransDot finger-prick test when compared with the composite gold standard tests.

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. POC TransDOT test versus lab-based tests

    To evaluate the agreement between the POC TransDot test and laboratory based ELISAs first (both on serum), and subsequently between POC TransDot (on fingerprick blood) and laboratory based TransDot (on serum).

    Measured: 3 years

  2. TransDOT as treatment response marker

    To investigate the utility of a TransDot test at month 2 and month 6 as a marker of treatment response.

    Measured: 3 years

  3. Identification of additional host marker signatures

    To identify additional host marker signatures that can be utilized for future improvement of diagnostic tests in the TransDot format or other point-of care tests that might become available in the future

    Measured: 3 years

  4. Evaluation of the serum signature's underlying biological processes

    To evaluate the biological processes (cell-based immune profile and components) underlying the six-marker serum signature model during TB disease and treatment response. In parallel, the peripheral profile will compare this to the corresponding profile at the lung infection site.

    Measured: 3 years

  5. Optimisation of ultra-sensitive TB culture techniques

    To refine and optimise ultra-sensitive TB culture techniques on sputum and compare these to standard techniques and the TransDot test results, at baseline and month 6.

    Measured: 3 years

  6. Biomarker Biorepository Samples

    To collect appropriate additional host samples for future biomarker research

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2017
  2. Study start1 Apr 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2019
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
969 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03350048
Sponsor's protocol ID
N16/05/070
Acronym
ScreenTB
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
17 Nov 2017
Last updated
1 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Tuberculosis, run by Prof Gerhard Walzl at 10 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Germany, Netherlands, Ethiopia, Namibia, South Africa and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic performance of the TransDot finger-prick test (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in