Lung NeoplasmsNCT03357094
Pulmonary Ventilation/Perfusion Imaging for the Prediction of Postoperative Residual Pulmonary Function
An observational study of Lung Neoplasms, run by Beijing Tongren Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world and with the highest incidence in China. Surgery is the most effective therapeutic method for primary lung cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Neoplasms
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2017to 1 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Newly diagnosed and pre-therapeutic patients with primary lung cancer.
Inclusion criteria: age 30-80 years old; newly diagnosis of primary lung cancer with radiological or pathological evidence; SPECT/CT scan was performed before surgery; written and informed consent with signature before the study.
Exclusion criteria: with other tumor in addition to primary lung caner; receive surgery prior to SPECT/CT scan; failed to complete preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests; failed to perform scans; pregnancy, lactation, and impaired renal or liver function; poorly controlled diabetes; poor compliance; contrary to the standard operating procedures; not suitable for clinical trials (for example with mental illness);
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Tongren Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality
Shuang Wang, MD, 010-58268056, wangs198801@126.com
About this study
Official title: Pulmonary Ventilation/Perfusion Imaging With SPECT/CT for the Prediction of Postoperative Residual Pulmonary Function in Patients With Primary Lung Cancer: A Multi-center Clinical Study
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world and with the highest incidence in China. Surgery is the most effective therapeutic method for primary lung cancer. Accurate prediction of residual postoperative pulmonary function in patients, especially those with borderline pulmonary function, is crucial for proper qualification for surgery. According to the 3rd American College of Chest Physicians(ACCP) evidence-based clinical practice guideline (2013), both predictive postoperative (ppo) FEV1.0% and ppoDLCO% are greater than 60% predicted are required as a first standard of lobectomy for patients with primary lung cancer. And, according to the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guideline, patients with ppoFEV1.0% and ppoDLco% less than 40% have high a risk for surgery. Pulmonary ventilation / perfusion SPECT/CT has recently become available for prediction of lung function, and it can be used to forecast pulmonary function in consideration of the pulmonary circulation as well as effective residual lung function. Traditionally, prediction of postoperative lung function was based on planar method in anterior and posterior projections of lung scintigraphy. However, SPECT/CT enables measurement of ventilation / perfusion uptake in each lobe of the lungs in a three dimensional way, which may avoid underestimating ppoFEV1.0% and provide confidence in suggesting lobectomy or pneumonectomy.
This experiment is intended to explore the use of Q.lung, a volume-based software to semi-quantitatively calculate pulmonary ventilation/perfusion functional uptake and volume by SPECT/CT. We hope it can get a more accurate prediction of postoperative residual pulmonary function to provide better management for clinical surgery.
Read the detailed description
- Newly diagnosed and pre-therapeutic patients with primary lung cancer
- Study sample: the optimal study sample is expected to be >50 cases
- Inclusion criteria: age 30-80 years old; newly diagnosis of primary lung cancer with radiological or pathological evidence; SPECT/CT scan was performed before surgery; written and informed consent with signature before the study
- Exclusion criteria: with other tumor in addition to primary lung caner; receive surgery prior to SPECT/CT scan; failed to complete preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests; failed to perform scans; pregnancy, lactation, and impaired renal or liver function; poorly controlled diabetes; poor compliance; contrary to the standard operating procedures; not suitable for clinical trials (for example with mental illness);
Study protocol:
- Examination time
- Preoperative lung function test was performed within a month prior to surgery
- Preoperative pulmonary ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT were performed within a month prior to surgery
- Postoperative pulmonary function test as well as follow-up were performed within three months after surgery 2. Pulmonary function test including but not limited to: forced expiratory volume in 1s(FEV1), diffusing capacity carbon monoxide(DLCO), forced vital capacity(FVC), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), peak expiratory flow(PEFR), vital capacity(VC), total lung capacity(TLC) 3. Pulmonary ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT imaging: acquisition protocol according to EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy. Part 1. Using Technegas for ventilation imaging and 99mTc-MAA for perfusion imaging.
- Image analysis:
- Ventilation / perfusion SPECT/CT data were registered, processed and reconstructed in GE Xeleris Workstation, quantitative measurements were using Q.lung software.
- Results including ventilation / perfusion uptake and volume (in counts and mL and respective percentage) of each pulmonary lobar.
- Data analysis:
- Predicted postoperative FEV1 (as well as other pulmonary function values) were calculated according to the following formula: FEV1 fore-v = FEV1 pre × (1- Volume%); FEV1 fore-cv = FEV1 pre × (1- Counts%v); FEV1 fore-cp = FEV1 pre × (1- Counts%p). *fore-v represents predicted postoperative value using volume; fore-cv represents predicted postoperative value using ventilation uptake; fore-cp represents predicted postoperative value using perfusion uptake; pre represents preoperative pulmonary test value.
- A graphical method of the Bland-Altman plot was used to compare FEV1 (as well as other pulmonary function values) obtained from predictions and post-operative measurements (with certain systematic and random errors). Intervals of agreement were drawn as the mean difference between predicted and measured values plus and minus 1.96 times the standard deviation of the differences. Strength of linear relationship between predicted and measured FEV1 values was quantified by the Pearson correlation coefficients with significance based on t-statistics. P < 0.05 is statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Lung Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Pulmonary ventilation, Pulmonary perfusion, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
compare actual postoperative lung function values to predicted values using residual pulmonary lobar volume by SPECT/CT
using pulmonary lobar volume to calculate predicted postoperative pulmonary test values and compare them with actual postoperative values.
Measured: 1 month
compare actual postoperative lung function values to predicted values using residual ventilation uptake by SPECT/CT
using ventilation uptake (in counts) to calculate predicted postoperative pulmonary test values and compare them with actual postoperative values.
Measured: 1 month
compare actual postoperative lung function values to predicted values using residual perfusion uptake by SPECT/CT
using perfusion uptake (in counts) to calculate predicted postoperative pulmonary test values and compare them with actual postoperative values.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2017
- Study start30 Sep 2017
- Primary completion1 Nov 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Beijing Tongren HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tongren Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, West China Hospital, Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Tumor Hospital, RenJi Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03357094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- tr12345
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pulmonary Ventilation/Perfusion Imaging With SPECT/CT for the Prediction of Postoperative Residual Pulmonary Function in Patients With Primary Lung Cancer: A Multi-center Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03357094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tr12345
- Conditions
- Lung Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Pulmonary ventilation, Pulmonary perfusion, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tongren HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, West China Hospital, Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Tumor Hospital, RenJi Hospital
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world and with the highest incidence in China. Surgery is the most effective therapeutic method for primary lung cancer. Accurate prediction of residual postoperative pulmonary function in patients, especially those with borderline pulmonary function, is crucial for proper qualification for surgery. According to the 3rd American College of Chest Physicians(ACCP) evidence-based clinical practice guideline (2013), both predictive postoperative (ppo) FEV1.0% and ppoDLCO% are greater than 60% predicted are required as a first standard of lobectomy for patients with primary lung cancer. And, according to the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guideline, patients with ppoFEV1.0% and ppoDLco% less than 40% have high a risk for surgery. Pulmonary ventilation / perfusion SPECT/CT has recently become available for prediction of lung function, and it can be used to forecast pulmonary function in consideration of the pulmonary circulation as well as effective residual lung function. Traditionally, prediction of postoperative lung function was based on planar method in anterior and posterior projections of lung scintigraphy. However, SPECT/CT enables measurement of ventilation / perfusion uptake in each lobe of the lungs in a three dimensional way, which may avoid underestimating ppoFEV1.0% and provide confidence in suggesting lobectomy or pneumonectomy.
This experiment is intended to explore the use of Q.lung, a volume-based software to semi-quantitatively calculate pulmonary ventilation/perfusion functional uptake and volume by SPECT/CT. We hope it can get a more accurate prediction of postoperative residual pulmonary function to provide better management for clinical surgery.
Detailed description
- Newly diagnosed and pre-therapeutic patients with primary lung cancer
- Study sample: the optimal study sample is expected to be >50 cases
- Inclusion criteria: age 30-80 years old; newly diagnosis of primary lung cancer with radiological or pathological evidence; SPECT/CT scan was performed before surgery; written and informed consent with signature before the study
- Exclusion criteria: with other tumor in addition to primary lung caner; receive surgery prior to SPECT/CT scan; failed to complete preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests; failed to perform scans; pregnancy, lactation, and impaired renal or liver function; poorly controlled diabetes; poor compliance; contrary to the standard operating procedures; not suitable for clinical trials (for example with mental illness);
Study protocol:
- Examination time
- Preoperative lung function test was performed within a month prior to surgery
- Preoperative pulmonary ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT were performed within a month prior to surgery
- Postoperative pulmonary function test as well as follow-up were performed within three months after surgery 2. Pulmonary function test including but not limited to: forced expiratory volume in 1s(FEV1), diffusing capacity carbon monoxide(DLCO), forced vital capacity(FVC), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), peak expiratory flow(PEFR), vital capacity(VC), total lung capacity(TLC) 3. Pulmonary ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT imaging: acquisition protocol according to EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy. Part 1. Using Technegas for ventilation imaging and 99mTc-MAA for perfusion imaging.
- Image analysis:
- Ventilation / perfusion SPECT/CT data were registered, processed and reconstructed in GE Xeleris Workstation, quantitative measurements were using Q.lung software.
- Results including ventilation / perfusion uptake and volume (in counts and mL and respective percentage) of each pulmonary lobar.
- Data analysis:
- Predicted postoperative FEV1 (as well as other pulmonary function values) were calculated according to the following formula: FEV1 fore-v = FEV1 pre × (1- Volume%); FEV1 fore-cv = FEV1 pre × (1- Counts%v); FEV1 fore-cp = FEV1 pre × (1- Counts%p). *fore-v represents predicted postoperative value using volume; fore-cv represents predicted postoperative value using ventilation uptake; fore-cp represents predicted postoperative value using perfusion uptake; pre represents preoperative pulmonary test value.
- A graphical method of the Bland-Altman plot was used to compare FEV1 (as well as other pulmonary function values) obtained from predictions and post-operative measurements (with certain systematic and random errors). Intervals of agreement were drawn as the mean difference between predicted and measured values plus and minus 1.96 times the standard deviation of the differences. Strength of linear relationship between predicted and measured FEV1 values was quantified by the Pearson correlation coefficients with significance based on t-statistics. P < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Newly diagnosed and pre-therapeutic patients with primary lung cancer.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
compare actual postoperative lung function values to predicted values using residual pulmonary lobar volume by SPECT/CT
Time frame: 1 month
using pulmonary lobar volume to calculate predicted postoperative pulmonary test values and compare them with actual postoperative values.
compare actual postoperative lung function values to predicted values using residual ventilation uptake by SPECT/CT
Time frame: 1 month
using ventilation uptake (in counts) to calculate predicted postoperative pulmonary test values and compare them with actual postoperative values.
compare actual postoperative lung function values to predicted values using residual perfusion uptake by SPECT/CT
Time frame: 1 month
using perfusion uptake (in counts) to calculate predicted postoperative pulmonary test values and compare them with actual postoperative values.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2017.
Related trials for Lung Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Neoplasms, run by Beijing Tongren Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact wang shuang, master (010-58268056, wangs198801@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
compare actual postoperative lung function values to predicted values using residual pulmonary lobar volume by SPECT/CT (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2017.