Interventions to Enhance Emergency Health CareNCT03369678
EQUIP Emergency: Promoting Health Equity for Indigenous and Non-Indigenous People in Emergency Departments
An observational study of Interventions to Enhance Emergency Health Care, run by University of British Columbia at 3 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Emergency Departments (EDs) in Canada often operate over-capacity and are under significant pressures. In this environment, particular groups of people experience inadequate and inequitable treatment in EDs, including Indigenous people, racialized newcomers, people with mental illnesses, those living in unstable… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Interventions to Enhance Emergency Health Care
- How many people
- 5,439 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 28 Nov 2017to 15 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients of three participating emergency departments. Staff members of three participating emergency departments.
Who may be able to join
- PATIENT SURVEYS
- Age 19 or over, or emancipated youth (16-19 years old)*
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Patient presenting for care at a participating ED site when survey recruitment is being conducted * Patients between age 16 and 19 will only be included if they no longer live with a parent or guardian.
- STAFF SURVEYS
- Age 19 or over
- Able to understand, read and write in English
- Staff member or health professional working in a participating ED site
Who cannot join
- Individuals not meeting the inclusion criteria listed above will be excluded from participation.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Canada3 sites
University Hospital of Northern British Columbia
Prince George, British Columbia, V2M 1S2
Surrey Memorial Hospital
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
About this study
Official title: Promoting Health Equity for Indigenous and Non-Indigenous People in Emergency Departments
Emergency Departments (EDs) in Canada often operate over-capacity and are under significant pressures. In this environment, particular groups of people experience inadequate and inequitable treatment in EDs, including Indigenous people, racialized newcomers, people with mental illnesses, those living in unstable housing or facing homelessness, experiencing interpersonal violence or using substances, and people involved in sex work. Stigma and discrimination in health care deter people from accessing care, interfering with effective care delivery, increasing reliance on EDs, and increasing human and financial costs. This project will develop and test a framework for health equity interventions to promote the provision of equity-oriented care in EDs.
Read the detailed description
This study examines the feasibility, process, and impacts of implementing an evidence-informed framework for interventions to enhance the capacity of Emergency Departments to provide high-quality care to people at greatest risk of experiencing health and health care inequities. The framework integrates evidence-based strategies to mitigate discrimination and racism experienced by Indigenous people, and stigma and discrimination faced by people of all ethnicities related to substance use, housing instability, sex work, gender, or mental illnesses. The study tests organizational interventions that incorporate principles of equity-oriented care, trauma- and violence-informed care, harm reduction, and cultural safety to optimize care first for Indigenous people, and then for a range of people who commonly face stigma and discrimination.
Approaching EDs as complex adaptive systems, the study aims to:
- Engage EDs in a participatory process to enhance capacity for equity-oriented care
- Examine impacts of equity-oriented interventions on processes of care, patient experiences of care and short-term outcomes, staff attitudes, confidence, behaviours and job satisfaction, and cost
- Analyze the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of implementing the interventions and scale-up potential in other contexts.
This mixed-methods study incorporates administrative data, survey data with standardized tools, in-depth interviews, analysis of policy and organizational structures, and observational data. The study is divided into multiple phases of data collection. This phase focuses on surveys of ED staff members and patients. The structured surveys use standardized tools and measures, and aim to capture staff and patients' experiences of ED care. Surveys will be conducted at three to four timepoints.
PATIENT SURVEYS will draw on patient self-reports to measure changes over time in processes of care and perceived quality of care. These indicators will be measured through structured, researcher-facilitated surveys conducted with a sample of 250-300 patients at each site at up to four points in time, providing pre- and post-intervention comparisons.
At each data collection point, all patients who are able to provide informed consent (in the languages available - see below) will be invited to participate as they present for care or during the course of their visit at each emergency unit. Researchers will circulate throughout the emergency department, inviting participation by all patients who are conscious and able to consent.
Recruitment will occur over a period of 1-3 weeks in 6 hour blocks. The blocks will span all 24 hours, and as many days of the week as possible.
Surveys will not delay or interrupt provision of care.
Section 1 of the survey can be completed at any time during the patient's Emergency visit; Section 2 will be completed after the patient has been cleared for discharge from the Emergency (discharged to community or admitted). The system for notifying the researchers of discharge status will align with the usual procedures at each ED. If at all possible, Section 2 will be completed before the patient leaves the hospital, in a private space close to the ED. If the patient is unable or prefers not to complete Section 2 in hospital, then a phone follow up will be offered; if the patient does not have a phone and is willing and able to do so, they will be invited to drop in at a specified outpatient or community clinic in the following 5 days.
Recruitment and data collection will continue until target samples of 250-300 completed surveys per site per time point are achieved. Every effort will be made to recruit participation of people from diverse ethnocultural groups. Given the research objectives of this study, recruitment will be prioritized for people who self-identify as Indigenous as well as individuals who are at risk of experiencing stigma and discrimination (e.g., those with diagnoses related to mental illness, HIV, substance use).
Researchers will work in pairs during each time block conducting recruitment and interviewing simultaneously. Following processes already in use at one of the partnering ED sites and prior practices, researchers will collect data directly on tablets using structured survey instruments.
A team of trained researchers will work with ED staff members (e.g., triage staff, unit clerk, charge nurse, etc.), to invite participation by those patients who meet the established eligibility criteria. In urgent cases, participants will be told about the study by staff after their immediate/urgent health concerns have been addressed. Researchers will approach potential participants to explain the study and seek consent to participate. Once consent is obtained, the researcher will enroll the participant in the study, complete Section 1 of the survey, and collect minimal contact information (i.e., name and phone number - see Patient Survey Guide) to be used for follow up in the event that patients elect to be interviewed by phone or off-site at a later time.
The brief structured survey (10-15 minutes per section) will be facilitated by a researcher with patients who consent. Both sections will be completed within a maximum of 5 days of the ED visit in a private area close to the ED, where participants' responses cannot be overheard by others and confidentiality can be maintained, or by phone or at an agreed upon drop-in location within the hospital. Patients will be provided with an honorarium for completing each section of the survey. Transportation and childcare expenses will be reimbursed for those who choose an in-person follow up to complete the survey. A detailed safety protocol, adapted from previous studies, will be used to guide all interactions.
Structured surveys conducted in all waves will be facilitated by a trained researcher, following an established Patient Survey Guide and using a computer-assisted data platform (UBC Survey Tool) on a tablet device. This tablet interface will allow the participant and researcher to view questions and select responses together on the screen.
STAFF SURVEYS All staff members at each partnering ED site will be invited to complete a survey questionnaire, which will include measures aligned with the theoretical principles underlying the equity-oriented framework being tested (i.e., cultural safety, trauma- and violence-informed care, and harm reduction).
Staff members will be invited to complete a structured questionnaire (see Staff Survey Guide), to be administered online or completed on paper. To facilitate this, copies of the survey will be available within each emergency department. In addition, in-person sessions will be held at each emergency department. Light refreshments will be provided and researchers will be on-hand to answer any questions about the study and the survey itself. Participants will be encouraged to attend these sessions on their break or at shift-end, and can choose to complete the surveys independently on paper or directly on a study tablet.
A preamble to the survey will explain the study and include the consent form. Completion of the survey - either online or on paper - will imply consent.
Staff assessments will be conducted at three to four time points, to coincide with milestones in the implementation of the intervention being tested. When possible, staff will be encouraged to complete the survey outside of work hours, during breaks, or at the start or end of their shifts.
- Keywords
- Cultural Safety, Discrimination, Emergency Departments, Health Equity, Indigenous Populations, Marginalized Populations, Patient Experiences of Care, Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care, Staff Engagement, Harm Reduction
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies, Wounds and Injuries, Harm Reduction
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in patients' overall rating of care post-intervention
Change in self-reported rating of care, measured on a scale from 0 to 10, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: immediately following intervention period (14-15 months post-baseline #2)
Change from baseline in patients' overall rating of care at 6-11 months post-intervention
Change in self-reported rating of care, measured on a scale from 0 to 10, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: 6-11 months after intervention period (21-25 months post-baseline #2)
Change from baseline in staff perception of patient care post-intervention
Change in staff members' self-reported perception of the patient care provided by their work unit/team, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: Immediately following intervention period (12 months post-baseline)
Change from baseline in staff perception of patient care at 6-12 months post-intervention
Change in staff members' self-reported perception of the patient care provided by their work unit/team, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: 18-25 months post-baseline
Change from baseline in staff perception of patient care at 17 months post-intervention
Change in staff members' self-reported perception of the patient care provided by their work unit/team, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: 29 months post-baseline
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change from baseline in Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale post-intervention
Change in patients' self-reported experiences of discrimination in the emergency department, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: immediately following intervention period (at 14 - 15 months post-baseline #2)
Change from baseline in Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale at 6-11 months post-intervention
Change in patients' self-reported experiences of discrimination in the emergency department, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: 6-11 months after intervention period (21-25 months post-baseline #2)
Change from baseline in staff satisfaction and engagement post-intervention
Change in staff members' self-reported satisfaction and engagement with their job and workplace, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: Immediately following intervention period (12 months post-baseline)
Change from baseline in staff satisfaction and engagement at 6-12 months post-intervention
Change in staff members' self-reported satisfaction and engagement with their job and workplace, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: 18-25 months post-baseline
Change from baseline in staff satisfaction and engagement at 17 months post-intervention
Change in staff members' self-reported satisfaction and engagement with their job and workplace, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Measured: 29 months post-baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2017
- Study start28 Nov 2017
- Primary completion15 Mar 2021
- Study completion15 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Interventions to Enhance Emergency Health CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 5,439 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Colleen Varcoe, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Colleen Varcoe, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03369678
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H17-01548
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 6 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Varcoe C, Browne AJ, Bungay V, Wathen N, Wilson E, Byres D, Stones C, Dolan S, Slemon A, Black A, Cater C, Comber S, Smye V, Price ER. How to cultivate equity-oriented health care at an organizational level: lessons from a process evaluation of EQUIP emergency. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 Jun 10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-14919-y. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42271368Varcoe C, Browne AJ, Perrin N, Wilson E, Bungay V, Byres D, Wathen N, Stones C, Liao C, Price ER. EQUIP emergency: can interventions to reduce racism, discrimination and stigma in EDs improve outcomes? BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08475-4.
PubMed 36050677Varcoe C, Bungay V, Browne AJ, Wilson E, Wathen CN, Kolar K, Perrin N, Comber S, Blanchet Garneau A, Byres D, Black A, Price ER. EQUIP Emergency: study protocol for an organizational intervention to promote equity in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 10;19(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4494-2.
PubMed 31601199
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Promoting Health Equity for Indigenous and Non-Indigenous People in Emergency Departments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03369678
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H17-01548
- Keywords
- Cultural Safety, Discrimination, Emergency Departments, Health Equity, Indigenous Populations, Marginalized Populations, Patient Experiences of Care, Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5,439 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 28 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Emergency Departments (EDs) in Canada often operate over-capacity and are under significant pressures. In this environment, particular groups of people experience inadequate and inequitable treatment in EDs, including Indigenous people, racialized newcomers, people with mental illnesses, those living in unstable housing or facing homelessness, experiencing interpersonal violence or using substances, and people involved in sex work. Stigma and discrimination in health care deter people from accessing care, interfering with effective care delivery, increasing reliance on EDs, and increasing human and financial costs. This project will develop and test a framework for health equity interventions to promote the provision of equity-oriented care in EDs.
Detailed description
This study examines the feasibility, process, and impacts of implementing an evidence-informed framework for interventions to enhance the capacity of Emergency Departments to provide high-quality care to people at greatest risk of experiencing health and health care inequities. The framework integrates evidence-based strategies to mitigate discrimination and racism experienced by Indigenous people, and stigma and discrimination faced by people of all ethnicities related to substance use, housing instability, sex work, gender, or mental illnesses. The study tests organizational interventions that incorporate principles of equity-oriented care, trauma- and violence-informed care, harm reduction, and cultural safety to optimize care first for Indigenous people, and then for a range of people who commonly face stigma and discrimination.
Approaching EDs as complex adaptive systems, the study aims to:
- Engage EDs in a participatory process to enhance capacity for equity-oriented care
- Examine impacts of equity-oriented interventions on processes of care, patient experiences of care and short-term outcomes, staff attitudes, confidence, behaviours and job satisfaction, and cost
- Analyze the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of implementing the interventions and scale-up potential in other contexts.
This mixed-methods study incorporates administrative data, survey data with standardized tools, in-depth interviews, analysis of policy and organizational structures, and observational data. The study is divided into multiple phases of data collection. This phase focuses on surveys of ED staff members and patients. The structured surveys use standardized tools and measures, and aim to capture staff and patients' experiences of ED care. Surveys will be conducted at three to four timepoints.
PATIENT SURVEYS will draw on patient self-reports to measure changes over time in processes of care and perceived quality of care. These indicators will be measured through structured, researcher-facilitated surveys conducted with a sample of 250-300 patients at each site at up to four points in time, providing pre- and post-intervention comparisons.
At each data collection point, all patients who are able to provide informed consent (in the languages available - see below) will be invited to participate as they present for care or during the course of their visit at each emergency unit. Researchers will circulate throughout the emergency department, inviting participation by all patients who are conscious and able to consent.
Recruitment will occur over a period of 1-3 weeks in 6 hour blocks. The blocks will span all 24 hours, and as many days of the week as possible.
Surveys will not delay or interrupt provision of care.
Section 1 of the survey can be completed at any time during the patient's Emergency visit; Section 2 will be completed after the patient has been cleared for discharge from the Emergency (discharged to community or admitted). The system for notifying the researchers of discharge status will align with the usual procedures at each ED. If at all possible, Section 2 will be completed before the patient leaves the hospital, in a private space close to the ED. If the patient is unable or prefers not to complete Section 2 in hospital, then a phone follow up will be offered; if the patient does not have a phone and is willing and able to do so, they will be invited to drop in at a specified outpatient or community clinic in the following 5 days.
Recruitment and data collection will continue until target samples of 250-300 completed surveys per site per time point are achieved. Every effort will be made to recruit participation of people from diverse ethnocultural groups. Given the research objectives of this study, recruitment will be prioritized for people who self-identify as Indigenous as well as individuals who are at risk of experiencing stigma and discrimination (e.g., those with diagnoses related to mental illness, HIV, substance use).
Researchers will work in pairs during each time block conducting recruitment and interviewing simultaneously. Following processes already in use at one of the partnering ED sites and prior practices, researchers will collect data directly on tablets using structured survey instruments.
A team of trained researchers will work with ED staff members (e.g., triage staff, unit clerk, charge nurse, etc.), to invite participation by those patients who meet the established eligibility criteria. In urgent cases, participants will be told about the study by staff after their immediate/urgent health concerns have been addressed. Researchers will approach potential participants to explain the study and seek consent to participate. Once consent is obtained, the researcher will enroll the participant in the study, complete Section 1 of the survey, and collect minimal contact information (i.e., name and phone number - see Patient Survey Guide) to be used for follow up in the event that patients elect to be interviewed by phone or off-site at a later time.
The brief structured survey (10-15 minutes per section) will be facilitated by a researcher with patients who consent. Both sections will be completed within a maximum of 5 days of the ED visit in a private area close to the ED, where participants' responses cannot be overheard by others and confidentiality can be maintained, or by phone or at an agreed upon drop-in location within the hospital. Patients will be provided with an honorarium for completing each section of the survey. Transportation and childcare expenses will be reimbursed for those who choose an in-person follow up to complete the survey. A detailed safety protocol, adapted from previous studies, will be used to guide all interactions.
Structured surveys conducted in all waves will be facilitated by a trained researcher, following an established Patient Survey Guide and using a computer-assisted data platform (UBC Survey Tool) on a tablet device. This tablet interface will allow the participant and researcher to view questions and select responses together on the screen.
STAFF SURVEYS All staff members at each partnering ED site will be invited to complete a survey questionnaire, which will include measures aligned with the theoretical principles underlying the equity-oriented framework being tested (i.e., cultural safety, trauma- and violence-informed care, and harm reduction).
Staff members will be invited to complete a structured questionnaire (see Staff Survey Guide), to be administered online or completed on paper. To facilitate this, copies of the survey will be available within each emergency department. In addition, in-person sessions will be held at each emergency department. Light refreshments will be provided and researchers will be on-hand to answer any questions about the study and the survey itself. Participants will be encouraged to attend these sessions on their break or at shift-end, and can choose to complete the surveys independently on paper or directly on a study tablet.
A preamble to the survey will explain the study and include the consent form. Completion of the survey - either online or on paper - will imply consent.
Staff assessments will be conducted at three to four time points, to coincide with milestones in the implementation of the intervention being tested. When possible, staff will be encouraged to complete the survey outside of work hours, during breaks, or at the start or end of their shifts.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients of three participating emergency departments. Staff members of three participating emergency departments.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- PATIENT SURVEYS
- Age 19 or over, or emancipated youth (16-19 years old)*
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Patient presenting for care at a participating ED site when survey recruitment is being conducted * Patients between age 16 and 19 will only be included if they no longer live with a parent or guardian.
- STAFF SURVEYS
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Individuals not meeting the inclusion criteria listed above will be excluded from participation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in patients' overall rating of care post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: immediately following intervention period (14-15 months post-baseline #2)
Change in self-reported rating of care, measured on a scale from 0 to 10, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Change from baseline in patients' overall rating of care at 6-11 months post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: 6-11 months after intervention period (21-25 months post-baseline #2)
Change in self-reported rating of care, measured on a scale from 0 to 10, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Change from baseline in staff perception of patient care post-intervention
Time frame: Immediately following intervention period (12 months post-baseline)
Change in staff members' self-reported perception of the patient care provided by their work unit/team, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Change from baseline in staff perception of patient care at 6-12 months post-intervention
Time frame: 18-25 months post-baseline
Change in staff members' self-reported perception of the patient care provided by their work unit/team, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
Change from baseline in staff perception of patient care at 17 months post-intervention
Time frame: 29 months post-baseline
Change in staff members' self-reported perception of the patient care provided by their work unit/team, comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention
5 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: immediately following intervention period (at 14 - 15 months post-baseline #2)
Change from baseline in Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale at 6-11 months post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: 6-11 months after intervention period (21-25 months post-baseline #2)
Change from baseline in staff satisfaction and engagement post-intervention
Time frame: Immediately following intervention period (12 months post-baseline)
Change from baseline in staff satisfaction and engagement at 6-12 months post-intervention
Time frame: 18-25 months post-baseline
Change from baseline in staff satisfaction and engagement at 17 months post-intervention
Time frame: 29 months post-baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42271368Varcoe C, Browne AJ, Bungay V, Wathen N, Wilson E, Byres D, Stones C, Dolan S, Slemon A, Black A, Cater C, Comber S, Smye V, Price ER. How to cultivate equity-oriented health care at an organizational level: lessons from a process evaluation of EQUIP emergency. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 Jun 10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-14919-y. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36050677Varcoe C, Browne AJ, Perrin N, Wilson E, Bungay V, Byres D, Wathen N, Stones C, Liao C, Price ER. EQUIP emergency: can interventions to reduce racism, discrimination and stigma in EDs improve outcomes? BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08475-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31601199Varcoe C, Bungay V, Browne AJ, Wilson E, Wathen CN, Kolar K, Perrin N, Comber S, Blanchet Garneau A, Byres D, Black A, Price ER. EQUIP Emergency: study protocol for an organizational intervention to promote equity in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 10;19(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4494-2.
- EQUIP Health Care website. Click for more info about the EQUIP Emergency study.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Colleen Varcoe principal investigator
University of British Columbia
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Interventions to Enhance Emergency Health Care, run by University of British Columbia at 3 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in patients' overall rating of care post-intervention (time frame: Pre-intervention: baseline & 6-9 months; Post-intervention: immediately following intervention period (14-15 months post-baseline #2)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03369678, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2021.