AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal PolypNCT03373136

Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial

A study testing Polypectomy in people with Colorectal Polyp, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this randomized control trial the investigators aim to compare the bleeding complication between cold snaring and hot snaring polypectomy with a large sample size. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Polyp
What is being tested?
Polypectomy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4,270 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
7 Feb 2018to 30 Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Candidate has the target lesion, polyp sized 4 to 10 mm, at colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who are less than 40 years old and has contraindication will be excluded from this study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University

    Taipei, 100

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial

In this randomized control trial the investigators aim to compare the bleeding complication between cold snaring and hot snaring polypectomy with a large sample size.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will enroll subjects who receive screening or surveillance colonoscopy with small colorectal polyp, 4 to10 mm in size, from multiple centers in Taiwan. Subjects who are less than 40 years old and has contraindication will be excluded from this study. All the candidates for enrollment will sign the inform consent at the outpatient clinic. Once the candidate has the target lesion, polyp sized 4 to 10 mm, at colonoscopy will be randomized into either cold snaring or hot snaring polypectomy group. In the group with cold snaring, polypectomy will be done without electrocautery. In the hot snaring group, the polypectomy will be performed with electrocautery. The bowel preparation and colonoscopy insertion are the same in both groups as conventional colonoscopy method. The colonoscopy will be performed by experienced endoscopies who performed more than 100 polypectomies per year.

Being tested
Polypectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PolypectomyDevice

    Polypectomy during colonoscopy is considered effective to reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer

Study groups in NCT03373136
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cold snaringExperimentalPolypectomy will be done without electrocautery
Receives: Device: Polypectomy
Hot snaringActive comparatorPolypectomy will be performed with electrocautery
Receives: Device: Polypectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Delayed bleeding rate

    Anal bleeding with spontaneously stop; drop of Hb more than 2 gm/dl in comparison with baseline; transfusion needed; hemostasis by : colonoscopy, angiography, surgery

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Dec 2017
  2. Study start7 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion14 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
4,270 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03373136
Sponsor's protocol ID
201707022RINB
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
29 Nov 2017
Last updated
14 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Raad D, Tripathi P, Cooper G, Falck-Ytter Y. Role of the cold biopsy technique in diminutive and small colonic polyp removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):508-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.038. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

    PubMed 26545637
  • Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

    PubMed 24125514
  • Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Matsuura N, Ito T, Fujii M, Nagai K, Matsui F, Akasaka T, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Iishi H, Ishihara R, Thorlacius H, Uedo N. Feasibility of cold snare polypectomy in Japan: A pilot study. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov 25;7(17):1250-6. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1250.

    PubMed 26634041
  • Tseng CH, Chang LC, Wu JL, Chang CY, Chen CY, Chen PJ, Shun CT, Hsu WF, Chen YN, Chen CC, Huang TY, Tu CH, Chen MJ, Chou CK, Lee CT, Chen PY, Lin JT, Wu MS, Chiu HM. Bleeding Risk of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Measuring 10 mm or Less: Subgroup Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 1;119(11):2233-2240. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002847. Epub 2024 May 9.

    PubMed 38775310
  • Chang LC, Chang CY, Chen CY, Tseng CH, Chen PJ, Shun CT, Hsu WF, Chen YN, Chen CC, Huang TY, Tu CH, Chen MJ, Chou CK, Lee CT, Chen PY, Wu MS, Chiu HM. Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps : A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2023 Mar;176(3):311-319. doi: 10.7326/M22-2189. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

    PubMed 36802753
  • Chen YN, Chang LC, Chang CY, Chen PJ, Chen CY, Tseng CH, Chiu HM. Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z.

    PubMed 29980220

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Polypectomy in people with Colorectal Polyp, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Delayed bleeding rate (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03373136, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in