SuicideeBridgeNCT03380117
Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students
A study testing eBridge Online Counseling in people with Suicide and Depression, run by University of Michigan at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge) is an online intervention that screens students for mental health concerns that include elevated suicide risk and facilitates their linkage to mental health (MH) services. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Suicide, Depression
- What is being tested?
- eBridge Online Counseling
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6,241 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Nov 2014to 7 May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- at least 18 years old
- currently enrolled full- or part-time at a participating university
Who cannot join
- not currently living in the university community (e.g., completing a study abroad semester)
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Nevada-Reno
Reno, Nevada, 89557
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge)
Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge) is an online intervention that screens students for mental health concerns that include elevated suicide risk and facilitates their linkage to mental health (MH) services. EBridge is designed to work on computers, tablets, and smartphones (iOS, Android) and is easily adaptable to evolving technologies in the future. It incorporates motivational interviewing (MI) principles and draws from health behavior models that emphasize autonomy and self-determination. Following a web-based screen using standardized scales to identify students at elevated risk, eBridge offers students options for personalized feedback (provided online in a conversational format adherent with motivational interviewing) and corresponding online with professionals trained in motivational interviewing and knowledgeable about university and community resources. Ebridge is being conducted at four universities: the University of Michigan, the University of Nevada-Reno, the University of Iowa, and Stanford University.
Read the detailed description
This randomized controlled trial will examine the efficacy of the intervention, Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge), in a large-scale, multi-university trial involving students at the University of Michigan, the University of Iowa, the University of Nevada-Reno, and Stanford University. Subject recruitment will take place in the fall academic semester during each year of data collection. All 6-month follow-up assessments will occur 5 to 6 months later and before many students leave campus for a spring or summer break. The study team will send recruitment emails between late September and October, and five to six-month follow-up emails in March or April. Student email addresses will be obtained from the registrar database of each participating university, per the standard Institutional Review Board and administrative process for obtaining such directory information for research studies. Furthermore, this process uses methods to maximize the security and confidentiality of the students' data, such as giving them unique identifiers to log into the web site (rather than identifiers that contain their name or email address) and using state-of-the-art security software to protect the website from having information intercepted. The planned number of student names and email addresses for possible participation will be randomly drawn. The study team will then send emails inviting students into the study, with up to 3 reminders spaced by 3-4 days for those who have yet to respond. The emails will note that students can reply and decline participation (and any further reminders). For those interested in participating, the email will contain a link to a secure web site where they can view the informed consent and decide whether to participate. The eBridge invitation email, screening, and all subsequent contacts via the Internet are confidential.
Personalized Feedback (PF) will be delivered online and provide feedback to students about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. This report is a briefer, modified version of the Personalized Feedback Report used in COMBINE, the multi-site clinical trial conducted to study the efficacy of treatments for alcohol dependence. The report highlights personal data and specifies links between our key screening variables and risk of negative outcomes. In the eBridge condition, PF is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by MI-adherent statements. In addition, students in the eBridge condition have the option of viewing or not viewing their PF, and of choosing to observe their PF in one or more domain.
Students' communications with eBridge counselors (MI-trained mental health professionals) will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure web site. The total duration of the exchanges is expected to be brief, in keeping with MI approaches used in medical settings to consider behavior change and/or treatment recommendations and as found in our R34 study. Students will be able to communicate with eBridge counselors using asynchronized communication (with email notification that response has been posted on secure website) at any time.
Personalized Feedback (PF) will also be delivered online to students in the control condition, providing information to students about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. As for students in the eBridge condition, it will highlight their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students (e.g., www.ulifeline.org). All students in the control condition receive their PF immediately upon completing their screening survey (automatic next screen).
Each student, regardless of study condition, will see a list of campus and community resources for mental health and alcohol/substance abuse treatment, and for crisis services. These will be presented on each webpage of both the screening survey and the PF report. The resource information list has been uploaded to this application as an additional document.
The research team will collect quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data will be collected from subjects using brief questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks, and six months. A subset of questions from the baseline questionnaire will serve as the screen that determines whether subjects are eligible for randomization. The baseline questionnaire will be programmed such that, once determined that a subject does not meet criteria for randomization, he or she will not be asked any more questions. The measures will be brief, requiring approximately 2-10 minutes for completion (5-6 minutes at 4-weeks), because brevity is a determinant of response rates for Internet surveys.
Students will be assessed at 4 weeks because a subset may derive benefit from the online intervention itself. This assessment occurs following exposure to eBridge, yet before participants are likely to have started using services. This will help to ascertain whether some reduction in risk factors is due to the web-based intervention itself rather than to linkage to services. This brief assessment will consist of the three suicidal ideation/behavior items, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the PHQ-10 (single item), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), mental health service utilization items, and the readiness scale (see below). A full outcome assessment will be conducted at 6 months.
Participants will be remunerated for involvement in the study. A random drawing will take place for all who have received an invitation to participate. In addition a 4-week pre-incentive will be distributed to encourage students to participate. Finally, 4-week and 6-month incentives will be distributed upon completion of each assessment.
- Conditions
- Suicide, Depression
- Being tested
- eBridge Online Counseling
- Keywords
- Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempt, Risk Screening, Online Intervention, Online Counseling, College Students, Motivational Interviewing, Linkage to Care
- Medical subject headings
- Suicide, Depression, Suicidal Ideation, Suicide, Attempted
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eBridge Online CounselingBehavioural
In eBridge, students take an online screen and receive personalized feedback about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. Students are randomly assigned to either the eBridge or control condition. In the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students' communications with eBridge counselors will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website. In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| eBridge Online Counseling | Experimental | In the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students have the opportunity to engage with eBridge counselors via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website. Receives: Behavioral: eBridge Online Counseling |
| Control | No intervention | In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in mental health service utilization
Change in the number of participants accessing mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by yes/no response for 4-week period.
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Measured: 4 weeks
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by total # of sessions for 4-week period.
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Measured: 4 weeks
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by yes/no response for 6-month period.
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Measured: 6 months
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by total # of sessions for 6-month period.
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in suicidal thoughts
Assessed using one item from the National Comorbidity Survey asking about serious suicidal thoughts at Baseline, 4-week, and 6-month intervals. "Have you ever felt so low you thought about committing suicide?" (Yes/No)
Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in suicidal thoughts
Assessed using one item from the National Comorbidity Survey asking about serious suicidal thoughts at Baseline, 4-week, and 6-month intervals. "Has there ever been a period of 2 weeks or more when you felt like you wanted to die?" (Yes/No).
Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in suicide attempts
Two items from the National Comorbidity Survey assess number of suicide attempts at Baseline, 4-week, and 6-month intervals. At Baseline, "How many times have you attempted suicide in your lifetime?" (open-text). At 4-week, and 6-month intervals, "In the past month, have you ever attempted suicide" (Yes/No)
Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in depression, as measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item scale based on Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV criteria for a major depressive episode. The instrument asks the respondent to indicate the frequency of various symptoms over the past two weeks and, following standard interpretation algorithms, categorizes participants as screening positive for major depression or not.
Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in substance misuse
Substance misuse will be assessed using five questions about recent drug use activity, using a list of commonly abused prescription drugs and illegal. The scale response options include never, once or twice, monthly, weekly, daily, or almost daily.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Change in alcohol misuse
Alcohol misuse will be assessed using the 10-item AUDIT, which asks about frequency of any drinking, average amount per day, and frequency of binge drinking (6 or more drinks on one occasion). It is scored on a 0-12 scale, and a screen cutoff score of 8 is considered optimal to identify students at higher risk.
Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2017
- Study start11 Nov 2014
- Primary completion7 May 2019
- Study completion7 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SuicideStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- In eBridge, students take an online screen and receive personalized feedback about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. Students are randomly assigned to either the eBridge or control condition. In the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students' communications with eBridge counselors will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website. In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6,241 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cheryl A. King, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Cheryl King, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03380117
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01MH103244
- Acronym
- eBridge
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bornheimer LA, Czyz E, Koo HJ, Li Verdugo J, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher RC, Coryell W, Favorite T, King CA. Suicide risk profiles and barriers to professional help-seeking among college students with elevated risk for suicide. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Aug;152:305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
PubMed 35772258Horwitz AG, McGuire T, Busby DR, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher R, Coryell W, King CA. Sociodemographic differences in barriers to mental health care among college students at elevated suicide risk. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jun 15;271:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.115. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
PubMed 32479307Horwitz AG, Berona J, Busby DR, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher R, Coryell W, Favorite T, Walloch JC, King CA. Variation in Suicide Risk among Subgroups of Sexual and Gender Minority College Students. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Oct;50(5):1041-1053. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12637. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
PubMed 32291833
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03380117
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- eBridge / R01MH103244
- Conditions
- Suicide, Depression
- Keywords
- Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempt, Risk Screening, Online Intervention, Online Counseling, College Students, Motivational Interviewing, Linkage to Care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6,241 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Nov 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge) is an online intervention that screens students for mental health concerns that include elevated suicide risk and facilitates their linkage to mental health (MH) services. EBridge is designed to work on computers, tablets, and smartphones (iOS, Android) and is easily adaptable to evolving technologies in the future. It incorporates motivational interviewing (MI) principles and draws from health behavior models that emphasize autonomy and self-determination. Following a web-based screen using standardized scales to identify students at elevated risk, eBridge offers students options for personalized feedback (provided online in a conversational format adherent with motivational interviewing) and corresponding online with professionals trained in motivational interviewing and knowledgeable about university and community resources. Ebridge is being conducted at four universities: the University of Michigan, the University of Nevada-Reno, the University of Iowa, and Stanford University.
Detailed description
This randomized controlled trial will examine the efficacy of the intervention, Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge), in a large-scale, multi-university trial involving students at the University of Michigan, the University of Iowa, the University of Nevada-Reno, and Stanford University. Subject recruitment will take place in the fall academic semester during each year of data collection. All 6-month follow-up assessments will occur 5 to 6 months later and before many students leave campus for a spring or summer break. The study team will send recruitment emails between late September and October, and five to six-month follow-up emails in March or April. Student email addresses will be obtained from the registrar database of each participating university, per the standard Institutional Review Board and administrative process for obtaining such directory information for research studies. Furthermore, this process uses methods to maximize the security and confidentiality of the students' data, such as giving them unique identifiers to log into the web site (rather than identifiers that contain their name or email address) and using state-of-the-art security software to protect the website from having information intercepted. The planned number of student names and email addresses for possible participation will be randomly drawn. The study team will then send emails inviting students into the study, with up to 3 reminders spaced by 3-4 days for those who have yet to respond. The emails will note that students can reply and decline participation (and any further reminders). For those interested in participating, the email will contain a link to a secure web site where they can view the informed consent and decide whether to participate. The eBridge invitation email, screening, and all subsequent contacts via the Internet are confidential.
Personalized Feedback (PF) will be delivered online and provide feedback to students about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. This report is a briefer, modified version of the Personalized Feedback Report used in COMBINE, the multi-site clinical trial conducted to study the efficacy of treatments for alcohol dependence. The report highlights personal data and specifies links between our key screening variables and risk of negative outcomes. In the eBridge condition, PF is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by MI-adherent statements. In addition, students in the eBridge condition have the option of viewing or not viewing their PF, and of choosing to observe their PF in one or more domain.
Students' communications with eBridge counselors (MI-trained mental health professionals) will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure web site. The total duration of the exchanges is expected to be brief, in keeping with MI approaches used in medical settings to consider behavior change and/or treatment recommendations and as found in our R34 study. Students will be able to communicate with eBridge counselors using asynchronized communication (with email notification that response has been posted on secure website) at any time.
Personalized Feedback (PF) will also be delivered online to students in the control condition, providing information to students about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. As for students in the eBridge condition, it will highlight their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students (e.g., www.ulifeline.org). All students in the control condition receive their PF immediately upon completing their screening survey (automatic next screen).
Each student, regardless of study condition, will see a list of campus and community resources for mental health and alcohol/substance abuse treatment, and for crisis services. These will be presented on each webpage of both the screening survey and the PF report. The resource information list has been uploaded to this application as an additional document.
The research team will collect quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data will be collected from subjects using brief questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks, and six months. A subset of questions from the baseline questionnaire will serve as the screen that determines whether subjects are eligible for randomization. The baseline questionnaire will be programmed such that, once determined that a subject does not meet criteria for randomization, he or she will not be asked any more questions. The measures will be brief, requiring approximately 2-10 minutes for completion (5-6 minutes at 4-weeks), because brevity is a determinant of response rates for Internet surveys.
Students will be assessed at 4 weeks because a subset may derive benefit from the online intervention itself. This assessment occurs following exposure to eBridge, yet before participants are likely to have started using services. This will help to ascertain whether some reduction in risk factors is due to the web-based intervention itself rather than to linkage to services. This brief assessment will consist of the three suicidal ideation/behavior items, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the PHQ-10 (single item), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), mental health service utilization items, and the readiness scale (see below). A full outcome assessment will be conducted at 6 months.
Participants will be remunerated for involvement in the study. A random drawing will take place for all who have received an invitation to participate. In addition a 4-week pre-incentive will be distributed to encourage students to participate. Finally, 4-week and 6-month incentives will be distributed upon completion of each assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- In eBridge, students take an online screen and receive personalized feedback about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. Students are randomly assigned to either the eBridge or control condition. In the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students' communications with eBridge counselors will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website. In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| eBridge Online Counseling | Experimental | Behavioral: eBridge Online CounselingIn the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students have the opportunity to engage with eBridge counselors via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website. |
| Control | No intervention | –In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- at least 18 years old
- currently enrolled full- or part-time at a participating university
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- not currently living in the university community (e.g., completing a study abroad semester)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eBridge Online CounselingIn eBridge, students take an online screen and receive personalized feedback about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. Students are randomly assigned to either the eBridge or control condition. In the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students' communications with eBridge counselors will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website. In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students. | Behavioural | eBridge Online Counseling |
Primary outcome
Change in mental health service utilization
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in the number of participants accessing mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by yes/no response for 4-week period.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by total # of sessions for 4-week period.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by yes/no response for 6-month period.
Time frame: 6 months
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
Adherence to mental health services, as measured by total # of sessions for 6-month period.
Time frame: 6 months
Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.
6 secondary outcomes
Change in suicidal thoughts
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in suicidal thoughts
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in suicide attempts
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in depression, as measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Change in substance misuse
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in alcohol misuse
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35772258Bornheimer LA, Czyz E, Koo HJ, Li Verdugo J, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher RC, Coryell W, Favorite T, King CA. Suicide risk profiles and barriers to professional help-seeking among college students with elevated risk for suicide. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Aug;152:305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32479307Horwitz AG, McGuire T, Busby DR, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher R, Coryell W, King CA. Sociodemographic differences in barriers to mental health care among college students at elevated suicide risk. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jun 15;271:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.115. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32291833Horwitz AG, Berona J, Busby DR, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher R, Coryell W, Favorite T, Walloch JC, King CA. Variation in Suicide Risk among Subgroups of Sexual and Gender Minority College Students. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Oct;50(5):1041-1053. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12637. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Related trials for Suicide
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
SERENE Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Cognitive Control
Suicidal Ideation, Cognitive Control
Not yet recruiting
A MRT to Optimize a JITAI for Alcohol Craving and Suicide Ideation
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Suicide Ideation
Enrolling by invitation
Pilot Study of a Modified Safety Planning Intervention for Elementary School-Aged Children - Main Study
Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Behaviors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cheryl King, Ph.D. principal investigator
Professor
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing eBridge Online Counseling in people with Suicide and Depression, run by University of Michigan at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in mental health service utilization (time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03380117, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2019.