Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 2NCT03381118
Haploidentical Lymphocytes With Nivolumab/Ara-C as Consolidation in Elderly AML Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Cytarabine, Nivolumab and G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSC in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University at 1 site in Russia.
Trial summary
A phase II trial to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and intermediate dose cytarabine with or without haploidentical lymphocyte infusion. To identify the role of haploidentical lymphocytes in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in older adults. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Cytarabine, Nivolumab and G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSC
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRussia
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2017to 30 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with the confirmed first or second complete remission
- ≥ 55 years of age
- Not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation as decided by the panel of hematologists at the transplant center
- Patients with a HLA-haploidentical donor who should be able to provide informed consent for peripheral blood apheresis
- No severe concurrent illness that limits life expectancy to less than 2 years
Who cannot join
- Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of enrollment
- Karnofsky index <70%
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Other tumor requiring treatment at the time of enrollment
- Active or prior documented autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment
- Somatic or psychiatric disorder making the patient unable to sign informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Study of Haploidentical Lymphocytes With Nivolumab and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Versus Nivolumab and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Treatment in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
A phase II trial to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and intermediate dose cytarabine with or without haploidentical lymphocyte infusion. To identify the role of haploidentical lymphocytes in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in older adults. The patients will be stratified based on the remission number (first or second)
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Being tested
- Cytarabine, Nivolumab, G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSC
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CytarabineDrug
Also called Ara-C
Cytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid IV infusion on D-4, -3, -2
NivolumabDrug
Also called Opdivo
Nivolumab 40 mg IV infusion on D+5
CytarabineDrug
Also called Ara-C
Cytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid IV infusion on D+1, +2, +3
NivolumabDrug
Also called Opdivo
Nivolumab 40 mg IV infusion on D+1
G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSCBiological
G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cells IV infusion on D0
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ara-C+HaploLymphocyte+Nivo | Experimental | Patients treated with nivolumab, intermediate dose cytarabine and haploidentical lymphocyte infusion:
[Cytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid D-4, -3, -2 + G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cells infusion D0
+ Nivolumab 40 mg D+5] х 2-3 cycles Receives: Drug: Cytarabine; Drug: Nivolumab; Biological: G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSC |
| Ara-C+ Nivo | Experimental | Patients treated with nivolumab and intermediate dose cytarabine:
[Cytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid D+1, +2, +3 + Nivolumab 40 mg D+1] х 2-3 cycles Receives: Drug: Cytarabine; Drug: Nivolumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease-free survival
DFS will be assessed with Kaplan-Meier method from the date of last remission before randomization until the date of relapse or the date of death
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall survival
OS will be assessed with Kaplan-Meier method from the date of last remission before randomization until the date of death from any cause
Measured: 2 years
Incidence of graft-versus-host disease
Incidence of acute GVHD, grades I-IV
Measured: up to 12 months
Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.03
Toxicity parameters based on NCI CTCAE 4.03 grades: hematological toxicity (CBC), hepatotoxicity (liver function tests), nephrotoxicity (creatinine), neurotoxicity (attending physician assessment), fatigue (attending physician assessment), rash (attending physician assessment), colitis (attending physician assessment), pneumonitis (attending physician assessment), autoimmune disorders (level of hormones, presence of autoimmune antibodies, attending physician assessment).
Measured: up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2017
- Study start30 Jun 2017
- Primary completion30 Sep 2018
- Study completion30 Sep 2018
Why it stopped: Unexpected toxicity
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ivan S Moiseev, St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03381118
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 31/17-n
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Study of Haploidentical Lymphocytes With Nivolumab and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Versus Nivolumab and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Treatment in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03381118
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 31/17-n
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Unexpected toxicity
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A phase II trial to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and intermediate dose cytarabine with or without haploidentical lymphocyte infusion. To identify the role of haploidentical lymphocytes in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in older adults. The patients will be stratified based on the remission number (first or second)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ara-C+HaploLymphocyte+Nivo | Experimental | Drug: Cytarabine, Drug: Nivolumab, Biological: G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSCPatients treated with nivolumab, intermediate dose cytarabine and haploidentical lymphocyte infusion: [Cytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid D-4, -3, -2 + G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cells infusion D0 + Nivolumab 40 mg D+5] х 2-3 cycles |
| Ara-C+ Nivo | Experimental | Drug: Cytarabine, Drug: NivolumabPatients treated with nivolumab and intermediate dose cytarabine: [Cytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid D+1, +2, +3 + Nivolumab 40 mg D+1] х 2-3 cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with the confirmed first or second complete remission
- ≥ 55 years of age
- Not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation as decided by the panel of hematologists at the transplant center
- Patients with a HLA-haploidentical donor who should be able to provide informed consent for peripheral blood apheresis
- No severe concurrent illness that limits life expectancy to less than 2 years
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of enrollment
- Karnofsky index <70%
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Other tumor requiring treatment at the time of enrollment
- Active or prior documented autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CytarabineAlso: Ara-CCytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid IV infusion on D-4, -3, -2 | Drug | Ara-C+HaploLymphocyte+Nivo |
| NivolumabAlso: OpdivoNivolumab 40 mg IV infusion on D+5 | Drug | Ara-C+HaploLymphocyte+Nivo |
| CytarabineAlso: Ara-CCytarabine 500-1000 mg/m2 bid IV infusion on D+1, +2, +3 | Drug | Ara-C+ Nivo |
| NivolumabAlso: OpdivoNivolumab 40 mg IV infusion on D+1 | Drug | Ara-C+ Nivo |
| G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSCG-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cells IV infusion on D0 | Biological | Ara-C+HaploLymphocyte+Nivo |
Primary outcome
Disease-free survival
Time frame: 2 years
DFS will be assessed with Kaplan-Meier method from the date of last remission before randomization until the date of relapse or the date of death
3 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years
Incidence of graft-versus-host disease
Time frame: up to 12 months
Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.03
Time frame: up to 12 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Unexpected toxicity). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cytarabine, Nivolumab and G-CSF mobilized HLA-haploidentical donor PBSC in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University at 1 site in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Unexpected toxicity). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease-free survival (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2019.