Overactive BladderNCT03385460
Delivery of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Using Low Energy Shock Waves in Treatment of Overactive Bladder: A Feasibility Study
A study testing ESWL BOTOX in people with Overactive Bladder and Botulinum Toxin, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
We hypothesize that LESWs might temporarily increase urothelial permeability and facilitate delivery of intravesical botulinum toxin without the need for injection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Overactive Bladder, Botulinum Toxin, Intravesical
- What is being tested?
- ESWL BOTOX
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 24 Jan 2017to 1 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- OAB refractory to treatment with antimuscarinics for 2 months
Who cannot join
- Sensitivity to botox
- Neurogenic detrusor overactivity
- Active UTI
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
We hypothesize that LESWs might temporarily increase urothelial permeability and facilitate delivery of intravesical botulinum toxin without the need for injection.
Read the detailed description
High energy extracorporeal shock wave thrapy has been used to disintegrate urolithiasis for 30 years (Chaussy et al., 1982). Low energy shock wave LESWs are used clinically to improve tissue regeneration at tendon- bone junctions (Wang et al., 2003) , ischemic cardiovascular disorders (Dimeglio et al., 2012) and erectile dysfunctions (Vardi et al., 2012).
Furthermore, shock waves have been shown to temporarily increase tissue permeability (Lauer et al., 1997, Kodama et al., 2002) and increase mediated molecular and drug delivery into cells without consequent cytotoxicity. Kodama et al., 2002 suggested that shock waves could cause shear force generated by the movement of liquid relative to cells to temporarily affect the permeability of the plasma memberance. Shock waves can deliver molecules to 2,000,000 molecular weight into the cystoplasm of cells without toxicity (Lauer et al., 1997).
Instillation of drugs in the bladder provides the opportunity to locally increase drug concentration with a low risk of systemic side effects (Kuo et al., 2010, Hsu et al., 2013). Intravesical pharmacotherapy has been used to treat refractory overactive bladder and interstitial cystitis/ painful bladder syndrome (smith et al., 2004; Grannantoni et al., 2008; Boy et al., 2006). However, drug delivery to bladder tissues by intravesical route is constrained by urothelial impermeability. The watertight barrier is generally located at the umbrella cells, which are the superficial layers of bladder epithelium augmented by glycosaminoglycans and uroplakins (Hsu et al., 2013; Birder et al., 2005).
Transient permeabilization of cell membranes accomplished by shock waves can deliver macromolecular drugs in the bladder without toxicity (Lower et al., 1997; Kodama et al., 2002).
Chuang et al., (2016) demonstrated that contrast enhanced MRI can detect increased rat bladder permeability after LESWs. Recently, Towner et al (2015) reported increased urothelial permeability and contrast leakage on bladder MRI after intravesical promtamine sulfate instillation.
Chen et al., (2014) found that LESWs treatment 3 and 24 hours after cyclophosphamide administration could attenuate cyclophosphamide induced acute cystitis in rats by decreasing inflammation and oxidative stress.
In a recent study, Chuang et al., (2016) investigated the feasibiblity of using LESWs for intravesical botulinum toxin A delivery. They evaluated the efficacy for acetic acid included bladder hyperactivity in rats. They concluded that LESWs increased urothelial permeability, facilitate intravesical botulinum toxin A delivery and block acetic acid included hyperactive bladder. These results support LESWs as a promising method to deliver botulinum toxin A without the need for injection.
Overactive bladder (OAB) is a condition characterized by presence of urinary urgency, usually accompanied by frequency and nocturia, with or without urgency urinary incontinence [UUI], in the absence of urinary tract infection (UTI) or other obvious pathology (Haylen BT et al 2010). OAB is a common problem that impair the quality of life (QOL).The prevalence of OAB ranged from 11.8% in a population-based survey conducted across five European countries ( Irwin DE et al, 2008 ) to 16.9% according to Epidemiological studies from North America and the prevalence increases with age rising to 30.9% in those over the age of 65 years.( Stewart WF et al 2001) Treatment goals are to reduce the occurrence of bothersome symptoms, and provide benefits that are perceived by patients as meaningful (Brubaker L et al, 2006). Several treatment options are available for OAB including bladder and behavioral training , pharmacologic treatment , and surgical therapies (Wein AJ et al, 2006).
Antimuscarinics are well established as pharmacotherapy for reducing OAB symptoms and improving QOL (Andersson KE et al, 2009). However, their use is limited in some patients by insufficient response to treatment "refractory OAB", or intolerable side effects such as dry mouth ,blurred vision, constipation, and cognitive impairment (Benner JS et al, 2010).
After a trial of pharmacotherapy, if the patient has not had an adequate improvement in symptoms, intra-vesical injection of Botox (BTX) can be offered as the next step. Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin, it contains a heavy chain that binds to the presynaptic terminal of the neuromuscular junction , and this then acts by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic vesicles at the axon terminal of the motor end plate , that then result in the muscle that is innervated becoming flaccidly paralyzed. BTX is available in different preparations, each of which is a distinct chemical entity. The current commercially utilized type is BTX type A.
Currently, there is cumulative data supporting use of BTX in cases of refractory Deturosr overactivity. Intradetrusal injection of BTX is followed by a significant improvements in the number of voiding episodes over 24 h, incontinence episodes, urodynamic variables and quality-of -life scores (Mangera A et al, 2011). There is a reduction in episodes of urgency and incontinence by 80% and 60%, respectively. The efficacy peaks at 4 weeks ,with the effect lasting typically up to 9 months , and repeated treatment efficacy has been shown in up to 10 treatment cycles. Patients should be counseled about the risk of an increased postvoid residual volume, occurring in 20-40% of individuals, and the need to use self-catheterization, with the attendant risk of UTI (14-40%) (Mangera A et al, 2011). The risk of general muscular weakness is considered very rare.
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder, Botulinum Toxin, Intravesical, ESWL
- Being tested
- ESWL BOTOX
- Keywords
- Overactive bladder, Botulinum Toxin, low energy shock waves, Intravesical
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ESWL BOTOXOther
ESWL after intrravesical BOTOX
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ESWL BOTOX | Experimental | Each patient will be subjected to Low Energy Shock Waves.The target dose of low energy shock waves will be 3000 shock delivered into SP region in 3 horizontal points at SP transverse crease . all patients will be catheterized using nylaton catheter 16 ch, the study group will be injected with 100 IU botulinium toxin A. vial will be dissolved in saline half of the estimated bladder capacity. All patients will be kept for 2 hours without micturation giving a chance of BOTOX absorption . Receives: Other: ESWL BOTOX |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Delivery Using Low Energy Shock Waves for management of OAB: Pressure flow urodynamics measured in cm/H2O
pressure flow urodynamics will be measured in cm/H2O
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Impact of the new technique on the quality of life based on QOL score
OAB symptoms score
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2017
- Study start24 Jan 2017
- Primary completion1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Overactive BladderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohammed Nageib, Mansoura University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03385460
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BOTOX-SWL
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Delivery of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Using Low Energy Shock Waves in Treatment of Overactive Bladder: A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03385460
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BOTOX-SWL
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder, Botulinum Toxin, Intravesical, ESWL
- Keywords
- Overactive bladder, Botulinum Toxin, low energy shock waves, Intravesical
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We hypothesize that LESWs might temporarily increase urothelial permeability and facilitate delivery of intravesical botulinum toxin without the need for injection.
Detailed description
High energy extracorporeal shock wave thrapy has been used to disintegrate urolithiasis for 30 years (Chaussy et al., 1982). Low energy shock wave LESWs are used clinically to improve tissue regeneration at tendon- bone junctions (Wang et al., 2003) , ischemic cardiovascular disorders (Dimeglio et al., 2012) and erectile dysfunctions (Vardi et al., 2012).
Furthermore, shock waves have been shown to temporarily increase tissue permeability (Lauer et al., 1997, Kodama et al., 2002) and increase mediated molecular and drug delivery into cells without consequent cytotoxicity. Kodama et al., 2002 suggested that shock waves could cause shear force generated by the movement of liquid relative to cells to temporarily affect the permeability of the plasma memberance. Shock waves can deliver molecules to 2,000,000 molecular weight into the cystoplasm of cells without toxicity (Lauer et al., 1997).
Instillation of drugs in the bladder provides the opportunity to locally increase drug concentration with a low risk of systemic side effects (Kuo et al., 2010, Hsu et al., 2013). Intravesical pharmacotherapy has been used to treat refractory overactive bladder and interstitial cystitis/ painful bladder syndrome (smith et al., 2004; Grannantoni et al., 2008; Boy et al., 2006). However, drug delivery to bladder tissues by intravesical route is constrained by urothelial impermeability. The watertight barrier is generally located at the umbrella cells, which are the superficial layers of bladder epithelium augmented by glycosaminoglycans and uroplakins (Hsu et al., 2013; Birder et al., 2005).
Transient permeabilization of cell membranes accomplished by shock waves can deliver macromolecular drugs in the bladder without toxicity (Lower et al., 1997; Kodama et al., 2002).
Chuang et al., (2016) demonstrated that contrast enhanced MRI can detect increased rat bladder permeability after LESWs. Recently, Towner et al (2015) reported increased urothelial permeability and contrast leakage on bladder MRI after intravesical promtamine sulfate instillation.
Chen et al., (2014) found that LESWs treatment 3 and 24 hours after cyclophosphamide administration could attenuate cyclophosphamide induced acute cystitis in rats by decreasing inflammation and oxidative stress.
In a recent study, Chuang et al., (2016) investigated the feasibiblity of using LESWs for intravesical botulinum toxin A delivery. They evaluated the efficacy for acetic acid included bladder hyperactivity in rats. They concluded that LESWs increased urothelial permeability, facilitate intravesical botulinum toxin A delivery and block acetic acid included hyperactive bladder. These results support LESWs as a promising method to deliver botulinum toxin A without the need for injection.
Overactive bladder (OAB) is a condition characterized by presence of urinary urgency, usually accompanied by frequency and nocturia, with or without urgency urinary incontinence [UUI], in the absence of urinary tract infection (UTI) or other obvious pathology (Haylen BT et al 2010). OAB is a common problem that impair the quality of life (QOL).The prevalence of OAB ranged from 11.8% in a population-based survey conducted across five European countries ( Irwin DE et al, 2008 ) to 16.9% according to Epidemiological studies from North America and the prevalence increases with age rising to 30.9% in those over the age of 65 years.( Stewart WF et al 2001) Treatment goals are to reduce the occurrence of bothersome symptoms, and provide benefits that are perceived by patients as meaningful (Brubaker L et al, 2006). Several treatment options are available for OAB including bladder and behavioral training , pharmacologic treatment , and surgical therapies (Wein AJ et al, 2006).
Antimuscarinics are well established as pharmacotherapy for reducing OAB symptoms and improving QOL (Andersson KE et al, 2009). However, their use is limited in some patients by insufficient response to treatment "refractory OAB", or intolerable side effects such as dry mouth ,blurred vision, constipation, and cognitive impairment (Benner JS et al, 2010).
After a trial of pharmacotherapy, if the patient has not had an adequate improvement in symptoms, intra-vesical injection of Botox (BTX) can be offered as the next step. Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin, it contains a heavy chain that binds to the presynaptic terminal of the neuromuscular junction , and this then acts by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic vesicles at the axon terminal of the motor end plate , that then result in the muscle that is innervated becoming flaccidly paralyzed. BTX is available in different preparations, each of which is a distinct chemical entity. The current commercially utilized type is BTX type A.
Currently, there is cumulative data supporting use of BTX in cases of refractory Deturosr overactivity. Intradetrusal injection of BTX is followed by a significant improvements in the number of voiding episodes over 24 h, incontinence episodes, urodynamic variables and quality-of -life scores (Mangera A et al, 2011). There is a reduction in episodes of urgency and incontinence by 80% and 60%, respectively. The efficacy peaks at 4 weeks ,with the effect lasting typically up to 9 months , and repeated treatment efficacy has been shown in up to 10 treatment cycles. Patients should be counseled about the risk of an increased postvoid residual volume, occurring in 20-40% of individuals, and the need to use self-catheterization, with the attendant risk of UTI (14-40%) (Mangera A et al, 2011). The risk of general muscular weakness is considered very rare.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ESWL BOTOX | Experimental | Other: ESWL BOTOXEach patient will be subjected to Low Energy Shock Waves.The target dose of low energy shock waves will be 3000 shock delivered into SP region in 3 horizontal points at SP transverse crease . all patients will be catheterized using nylaton catheter 16 ch, the study group will be injected with 100 IU botulinium toxin A. vial will be dissolved in saline half of the estimated bladder capacity. All patients will be kept for 2 hours without micturation giving a chance of BOTOX absorption . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- OAB refractory to treatment with antimuscarinics for 2 months
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Sensitivity to botox
- Neurogenic detrusor overactivity
- Active UTI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ESWL BOTOXESWL after intrravesical BOTOX | Other | ESWL BOTOX |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Delivery Using Low Energy Shock Waves for management of OAB: Pressure flow urodynamics measured in cm/H2O
Time frame: 1 year
pressure flow urodynamics will be measured in cm/H2O
1 secondary outcome
Impact of the new technique on the quality of life based on QOL score
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Dec 2017.
Related trials for Overactive Bladder
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Mirabegron Response in Women With Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ESWL BOTOX in people with Overactive Bladder and Botulinum Toxin, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Delivery Using Low Energy Shock Waves for management of OAB: Pressure flow urodynamics measured in cm/H2O (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2017.