AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteosarcomaPhase 2NCT03390946

Feasibility Study of Interval Compressed Regimen Using Four-drugs for Osteosarcoma

A Phase 2 study testing Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy and Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy in people with Osteosarcoma and Feasibility, run by Byung-Kiu Park at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to test the feasibility of four-drug, interval-compressed regimen in osteosarcoma. Primary objective is to explore the toxicity and mortality related to treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 40 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteosarcoma, Feasibility, Treatment Response
What is being tested?
Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy and Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Feb 2018to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Newly diagnosed osteosarcoma patients under age 40 years.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who don't meet the organ function criteria as follows;
  • renal function : CCr or GFR or eGFR ≥ 70 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • liver function : AST/ALT ≤ 5 x upper limit, total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age
  • cardiac function : shortening fraction ≥ 24% or ejection fraction ≥ 50% (Echo)
  • lung function : No dyspnea on rest, If dyspnea exists, SpO2 95% or more in room air by pulse oximetry,
  • hematologic : ANC ≥ 750/uL and platelet ≥ 75,000/uL

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Byung-Kiu Park, M.D., Ph.D. contact

82-31-920-1240

bkpark@ncc.re.kr

South Korea1 site
  • National Cancer Center

    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10408

    Byung-Kiu Park, M.D., Ph.D., 82-31-920-1240, bkpark@ncc.re.kr

    Mi Mi Kwon, RN, 82-31-920-1240, rnjsalal@ncc.re.kr

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

The aim of the study is to test the feasibility of four-drug, interval-compressed regimen in osteosarcoma.

Primary objective is to explore the toxicity and mortality related to treatment. Secondary objectives are to examine tumor necrosis rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and to evaluate the usefulness of circulating cell-free DNA, survivin, or transforming growth factor-beta1 levels as well as programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in tumor specimen as a predictive or prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma patients.

Read the detailed description

In this study, the investigators will investigate the feasibility of interval compressed regimen using four-drugs in newly-diagnosed osteosarcoma patients. Four drugs will be adriamycin, high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin, ifosfamide. All these drugs will be given preoperatively in an interval-compressed schedule, but postoperatively at a regular interval. Neoadjuvant therapy will be composed of two courses, and adjuvant therapy of two or three courses depending on necrosis rates following neoadjuvant therapy.

Being tested
Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy, Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy
Keywords
four-drugs, interval-compression
Medical subject headings
Osteosarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapyDrug

    Also called PR adjuvant four-drug interval-compressed regimen

    Poor responder group (necrosis ≤ 90%)

    : week 0, 7 and 14, doxorubicin; week 2, 9 and 16, ifosfamde, week 4, 11, 18 and 19, methotrexate; wk 5, 12 and 20

    1. Resection of tumor
    2. Adjuvant chemotherapy
    3. Poor responder group (necrosis ≤ 90%)
    • week 0, 7 and 14, doxorubicin; week 2, 9 and 16, ifosfamde, week 4, 11, 18 and 19, methotrexate; wk 5, 12 and 20
    1. Good responder group (necrosis > 90%)
    • week 0 and 8, doxorubicin; week 2 and 10, ifosfamide; week 4, 5, 12 and 13, methotrexate; week 6 and 14, cisplatin
  • Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapyDrug

    Also called GR adjuvant four-drug interval-compressed regimen

    Good responder group (necrosis > 90%)

    : week 0 and 8, doxorubicin; week 2 and 10, ifosfamide; week 4, 5, 12 and 13, methotrexate; week 6 and 14, cisplatin

Study groups in NCT03390946
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
four-drug interval-compressed regimenExperimentalInterventions for 'four-drug interval-compressed regimen': Drug: methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin, ifosfamide. Newly diagnosed oseteosarcoma patients under 40 years are eligible. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four drugs in an interval-compressed schedule will be done as a single arm. Duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be 10 weeks like that of conventional three-drug regimen, although four-drugs are employed in the current protocol. After tumor resection operation, participants will be divided to poor responder group and good responder group based on 90% necrosis rate of a tumor specimen. Poor responder group and will be assigned to 'Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy' and good responder will be assigned to 'Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy'.
Receives: Drug: Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy; Drug: Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Toxicity determined according to CTCAE

    treatment-related toxicity (organ dysfunction, neutropenic fever, infection, mortality, et al.)

    Measured: Until study completion, an average of 3 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. tumor necrosis rate

    necrosis rate of the excised tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Measured: Until study completion, an average of 3years

  2. Predictive or prognostic biomarker

    Usefulness of circulating cell-free DNA, survivin, transforming growth factor-beta1 levels and programmed cell death 1 expression in tumor specimen as a biomarker

    Measured: Until study completion, an average of 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jan 2018
  2. Study start1 Feb 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03390946
Sponsor's protocol ID
NCC-OSA-1601
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
11 Dec 2017
Last updated
9 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Clinical data of individual participants can be shared without personal information. Each participating center will submit the clinical data to the principal investigation center, after eliminating personal data.

Publications

  • Lewis IJ, Nooij MA, Whelan J, Sydes MR, Grimer R, Hogendoorn PC, Memon MA, Weeden S, Uscinska BM, van Glabbeke M, Kirkpatrick A, Hauben EI, Craft AW, Taminiau AH; MRC BO06 and EORTC 80931 collaborators; European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. Improvement in histologic response but not survival in osteosarcoma patients treated with intensified chemotherapy: a randomized phase III trial of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jan 17;99(2):112-28. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk015.

    PubMed 17227995
  • Marina NM, Smeland S, Bielack SS, Bernstein M, Jovic G, Krailo MD, Hook JM, Arndt C, van den Berg H, Brennan B, Brichard B, Brown KLB, Butterfass-Bahloul T, Calaminus G, Daldrup-Link HE, Eriksson M, Gebhardt MC, Gelderblom H, Gerss J, Goldsby R, Goorin A, Gorlick R, Grier HE, Hale JP, Hall KS, Hardes J, Hawkins DS, Helmke K, Hogendoorn PCW, Isakoff MS, Janeway KA, Jurgens H, Kager L, Kuhne T, Lau CC, Leavey PJ, Lessnick SL, Mascarenhas L, Meyers PA, Mottl H, Nathrath M, Papai Z, Randall RL, Reichardt P, Renard M, Safwat AA, Schwartz CL, Stevens MCG, Strauss SJ, Teot L, Werner M, Sydes MR, Whelan JS. Comparison of MAPIE versus MAP in patients with a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma (EURAMOS-1): an open-label, international, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1396-1408. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30214-5. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

    PubMed 27569442

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy and Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy in people with Osteosarcoma and Feasibility, run by Byung-Kiu Park at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Byung-Kiu Park, M.D., Ph.D. (82-31-920-1240, bkpark@ncc.re.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Toxicity determined according to CTCAE (time frame: Until study completion, an average of 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03390946, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in