AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive ImpairmentPRIMoGenITANCT03393130

Perioperative Research Into Memory, Genomics in the Intensive Therapy Unit: Alzheimer's

An observational study of Cognitive Impairment and Apolipoprotein E, Deficiency or Defect of, run by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current central dogma of long-term cognitive impairment after intensive care admission suggests an underlying neuroinflammatory dysregulation affecting neuronal function. This pathological process has not been fully elucidated and there has been little research into its genetic associations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years
What is being tested?
APOE genotyping
How many people
150 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Feb 2018to 1 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult

Study population: Consenting young adults who suffered a severe burn injury necessitating intensive care admission 5-10 years previously.

Who may be able to join

  • Consenting individual
  • Burn injury >15% total body surface area
  • Admission to a Burns Intensive Care Unit between Jan 2007- Jan 2012
  • Intubated and ventilated during the admission

Who cannot join

  • Patients admitted to BICU with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Syndrome or Steven-Johnson Syndrome
  • Head trauma
  • Currently held under the 2007 Mental Health Act (UK) or Section 5150 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code (USA).
  • Currently receiving formal psychiatric treatment (including involvement in a Personality Disorder Unit, being under voluntary section, current re-occurrence of chronic self-harm)
  • Current imprisonment
  • Current substance abuse (within two weeks of assessment)
  • Patients unable to understand plain verbal and written English.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Marcela P Vizcaychipi, MD PhD contact

+44 20 3215 8024

m.vizcaychipi@imperial.ac.uk

About this study

Official title: Perioperative Research Into Memory GENomics in the Intensive Therapy Unit: Alzheimer's (PRIMoGenITA): The Genomics of Cognitive Impairment After Admission to a Burns Intensive Care Unit

The current central dogma of long-term cognitive impairment after intensive care admission suggests an underlying neuroinflammatory dysregulation affecting neuronal function. This pathological process has not been fully elucidated and there has been little research into its genetic associations.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes cognitive impairment through a process of abnormal beta amyloid deposition and neuronal death through localised activation of the innate immune system. It is the most prevalent disease affecting cognition. The Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is implicated in the progression of late-onset Alzheimer's disease and is a recognised neuroinflammatory modulator. It is possible that young individuals exposed to high levels of inflammation may experience an acceleration of this process. This study sets out to look for an association between APOE-∈4 possession and poor cognitive outcome after a major burn injury and intensive care admission.

Read the detailed description

Long-lasting post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is now a well-recognised complication of surgery, anaesthesia and critical care. It has been shown that cognitive impairment in critical care survivors can be worse than cohorts diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment and approaching those suffered moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. POCD most significantly impacts upon the elderly, comorbid and those with pre-existing cognitive impairment, and has a socially and psychologically significant impact on quality of life.

The current central dogma suggests an underlying neuroinflammatory dysregulation affecting neuronal function. However, the underlying pathological processes have not yet been fully elucidated. Although some risk factors have been recognised we cannot accurately predict outcome, suggesting other unidentified determinants. The discovery of further risk factors would allow new insights into the underlying mechanism, and open up future avenues of investigation and potential interventions.

Thus far, little work has been performed looking into the impact of genomics on cognitive outcome after critical care. There are an estimated 20,000 protein coding genes in the human genome. Such large numbers of whole exome sequence variables necessitate using either an extremely large population or testing a small number of candidate genes. Critical Care research is hampered by small population sizes, ruling out whole genome analysis. The ideal candidate gene would be a known modulator of neuroinflammation, synthesised in the central nervous system (or able to traverse the blood-brain barrier) and have a known association with cognitive impairment. In terms of feasibility it should have relatively high incidence allele proportions, and be modifiable for in order to test any association for causality.

The most common gene associated with cognitive impairment is APOE, which codes for apolipoprotein E (ApoE). There are three common alleles of the APOE gene: APOE-∈2, APOE-∈3 and APOE-∈4. Possession of an APOE-∈4 allele increases the risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer's Disease. ApoE demonstrates immunomodulatory properties both systemically and in the central nervous system. It is secreted by astrocytes and oligodendrocytes after brain injury and is implicated in the cholesterol distribution necessary for membrane growth after axonal injury. ApoE-deficient murine glial cultures express more nitric oxide (NO) and Tissue Necrosis Factor α (TNFα) after simulated injury (LPS / closed head injury) than wild-type cells. Incubating the deficient glial cultures in recombinant apoE suppresses the TNF-α expression. This suppression occurred to a much greater extent with recombinant apoE-∈3 and apoE-∈2 than with apoE-∈4. Finally, microglia treated with secreted amyloid precursor protein α (sAPP-α, a secreted derivative of β amyloid precursor protein (β-APP)) will produce higher levels of activation markers and enhance the production of neurotoxins. This effect can be blocked by prior incubation apoE3, but not with apoE4. Administration of peripheral ApoE mimetic peptide (a truncated protein able to traverse the blood brain barrier) suppresses systemic and brain Il-6 and TNFα levels. Lastly, ApoE isoforms also have different affects on cholinergic neuron destruction, through increased synthesis and reduced elimination of amyloid beta.

Critical care patients typically experience systemic inflammation secondary to sepsis, surgery or trauma, or a combination of the three. Central nervous system (CNS) ApoE mRNA expression is upregulated in wild-type mice exposed to repeated restraint stress. As such, it is possible that APOE genotype may influence cognitive outcome through mediation of the neuroinflammatory response. The APOE-∈4 allele is known to increase the risk of POD after surgery and to increase the duration of delirium in the intensive care unit (ITU). The presence and duration of post-operative delirium (POD) are recognised predictors of long-term cognitive impairment (LTCI). Neither the incidence of delirium nor LTCI according to APOE genotype have been investigated in critical care patients.

More recently, burns intensive care (BICU) survivors have also been shown to develop LTCI following discharge with an associated reduction in quality of life.

The incidence of cognitive impairment amongst severe burns patients is comparable to ARDS cohorts, but in a younger and less comorbid group. Patients with severe burns develop large magnitude systemic inflammatory reactions secondary to their injury. This is perpetuated by multiple surgeries and a high incidence of nosocomial infections. This cohort provides a unique group of relatively young individuals with comparable injuries and minimal pre-morbid comorbidity or cognitive impairment. As such, they represent a less varied population than general adult ITUs. It is also unusual to find evidence of AD, vascular dementia or Parkinson's dementia in younger age brackets. This reduces the confounding factors that typically impede critical care clinical research and any association between APOE-∈4 and ITU LTCI may therefore infer a common pathological process.

We hypothesise that severe burn patients who possess an APOE ε4 allele are more susceptible to long term cognitive impairment following their injuries, and that this will impact significantly on their quality of life.

With this study we aim to: assess neurocognitive function following a severe burn; more specifically processing speed, executive function, working memory, immediate recall and delayed recall; assess our sample population APOE genotype; and investigate the association between APOE genotype and cognitive function.

Being tested
APOE genotyping
Keywords
Burns, Young Adult, Cognitive Impairment, Apolipoprotein E, Deficiency or Defect of, Intensive Care Neurological Disorder, Quality of Life, Inflammation, Brain
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction, Apolipoprotein E, Deficiency or Defect of, Critical Illness, Burns, Encephalitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • APOE genotypingDiagnostic test

    Also called Neurocognitive testing

    APOE genotyping and broad cognitive assessment expressed as a median T-score of the following tests (with cognitive domains assessed in brackets) Trail Making Part A (processing speed), Trail Making Part B (executive function), One Back test (working memory), List Learning Task (Immediate recall, visual learning, delayed recall and recognition discrimination).

Study groups in NCT03393130
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Participants possessing APOE-ε4Young adults who have suffered a severe burn injury necessitating intensive care admission 5 to 10 years previously, who possess at least one copy of the APOE-ε4 allele.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: APOE genotyping
Participants not possessing APOE-ε4Young adults who have suffered a severe burn injury necessitating intensive care admission 5 to 10 years previously, who do not possess a copy of the APOE-ε4 allele.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: APOE genotyping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. APOE genotype

    Possession of an APOE-ε4 allele

    Measured: Twelve month recruitment window

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Cognitive impairment

    Above or below the median cognitive score

    Measured: Twelve month recruitment window

  2. Short Form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly score

    Estimate of premorbid cognitive function (confounder)

    Measured: Twelve month

  3. Adapted American Psychiatric Association National Institute on Drug Abuse Modified Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (APA NM-ASSIST)

    Substance misuse index

    Measured: Twelve month

  4. Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI-3) score

    Quality of life index

    Measured: Twelve month

  5. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) score

    Depression index

    Measured: Twelve month

  6. Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD 7) score

    Anxiety index

    Measured: Twelve month

  7. Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) score

    Post-traumatic stress index

    Measured: Twelve month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2018
  2. Study start1 Feb 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03393130
Sponsor's protocol ID
C&W17/059
Acronym
PRIMoGenITA
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
11 Dec 2017
Last updated
8 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cognitive Impairment and Apolipoprotein E, Deficiency or Defect of, run by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Edward JR Watson, BMBS ((+44)7815 946 461, edward.watson@chelwest.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

APOE genotype (time frame: Twelve month recruitment window). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in