AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory InsufficiencyCAREHEMANCT03399149

Systematic Evaluation by an Intensivist of Hematological Malignancy Patients Presenting With Acute Respiratory or Hemodynamic Failure

An observational study of Respiratory Insufficiency and Hematologic Malignancy, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 2 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Over the last two decades, the number of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) admitted to the ICU increased and their mortality has dropped sharply. Patients with HMs increasingly require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for life-threatening events related to the malignancy and/or treatments, with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Systematic evaluation by an intensivist
How many people
221 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
13 Feb 2017to 1 Mar 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients with haematological malignacies, presenting acute respiratory and/or hemodynamic failure

Who may be able to join

  • Patients hospitalized in a hematology unit
  • Patients presenting with criteria for critical respiratory and/or hemodynamic condition and worsening during the next 4 hours
  • Respiratory : oxygen saturation <90 % and/or O2 >3l/min, with either a worsening of saturation or increased oxygen needs within 4h
  • Hemodynamic : systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg and remaining < 90 mmHg within 4h despite ≥ 1l of crystalloid administration, or becoming < 80 mmHg no matter the quantity of fluid (even if no fluid administration).

Who cannot join

  • therapeutic limitations decided hematological investigators (moribund patients, uncontrolled allogenic graft,...)
  • Do-not-reanimate directives
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Hematologic unit - Hospital Grenoble Alpes

    Grenoble

  • Intensive Care Unit - Hospital Grenoble-Alpes

    Grenoble

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Systematic Evaluation by an Intensivist of Hematological Malignancy Patients Presenting With Acute Respiratory or Hemodynamic Failure: Impact on Prognosis: A Monocentric Observational Before-after Study

Over the last two decades, the number of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) admitted to the ICU increased and their mortality has dropped sharply. Patients with HMs increasingly require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for life-threatening events related to the malignancy and/or treatments, with immunosuppression being a major contributor. Whether the increase in ICU admissions is related to increased referrals by hematologists and/or to increased admissions by intensivists is unknown. The criteria used for ICU referral and admission decisions have not been extensively evaluated. Finally, the links between admission policies and treatment-limitation decisions are unclear, but ICUs with broad admission policies may change the treatment goals based on the response to several days of full-code management.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a systematic evaluation by an intensivist of HMs patients presenting with acute respiratory and/or hemodynamic failure.

Being tested
Systematic evaluation by an intensivist
Keywords
Respiratory Insufficiency, Hematologic Malignancy, Intensive Care Unit
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency, Hematologic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Systematic evaluation by an intensivistOther

    implementation of a standardized procedure for patient care in ICU

Study groups in NCT03399149
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
"Before phase"Retrospective study of ICU admissions of hematology patients for respiratory and hemodynamic reasons Time period: January 2012 to March 2017
"After Phase": Systematic evaluation by an intensivistCorresponding to the period after the implementation of a systematic intensivist evaluation Daily screening of systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation and oxygen requirements of all patients hospitalized in hematology wards. Systematic evaluation of any patient presenting the inclusion criteria by an intensivist and collegial care planning. Time period: From March 2017 to end of study
Receives: Other: Systematic evaluation by an intensivist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. delta Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score

    difference between the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score between 48h and 72h after ICU admission and the SOFA score during the first 24h.

    SOFA score ranges from 0 to 20 delta SOFA= SOFA day 3 - SOFA day1

    Measured: up to 72 hours

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. survival status after one year

    survival status (alive/dead) at one year after ICU admission

    Measured: one year after ICU admission

  2. survival status at the end of the ICU stage

    survival status (alive/dead) at the end of the ICU stage

    Measured: up to Day 45

  3. survival status at the end of the hospitalization

    survival status (alive/dead) at the end of the hospitalization

    Measured: up to Day 120

  4. ICU admission

    Delay between the start of critical care illness and ICU admission Delay is measured in minutes

    Measured: up to 72h

  5. Invasive mechanical ventilation

    Number of days with mechanical ventilation

    Measured: up to Day 45

  6. Non-invasive ventilation

    Number of days with non-invasive ventilation

    Measured: up to Day 45

  7. Vasopressive support

    Number of days with vasopressive support

    Measured: up to Day 45

  8. renal replacement therapy

    Number of days with renal replacement therapy

    Measured: up to Day 45

  9. hematological disease evolution

    status of hematological primary disease at death or after one year of evolution if the patient is still alive. Possible status of hematology disease : complete remission, partial remission, stability, relapsed/refractory.

    Measured: up to one year

  10. Life quality for patients

    EQ5-D assessment of patients' quality of life one year after Intensive care unit admission

    Measured: up to one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2018
  2. Study start13 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
221 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03399149
Sponsor's protocol ID
CARE HEMA (38RC16.238)
Other IDs
2017-A00411-52
Acronym
CAREHEMA
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
1 Dec 2017
Last updated
7 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Respiratory Insufficiency and Hematologic Malignancy, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

delta Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (time frame: up to 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in