Chronic Refractory Neuropathic PainEMOPAINNCT03399942
Combined Cingulate and Thalamic DBS for Chronic Refractory Chronic Pain
A study testing Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior in people with Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sensory thalamus has been proposed for 40 years to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain, but its efficacy remains partial and unpredictable. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 6 Apr 2018to 2 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients (age 18-70 years old) suffering from chronic (duration >1 year) unilateral neuropathic pain
- severe (VAS score >6/10)
- with high emotional impact (HAD subscores > 10) considered as resistant to medication specific to neuropathic pain at sufficient doses and durations (including at least antiepileptics and antidepressants) and not sufficiently improved by rTMS and relevant surgical solutions.
- Non inclusion criteria:
- previous history of stroke,
- cognitive impairment (MMSE score <24),
Show all 9Show fewer
- DSMIV axis I psychiatric disorder,
- contra-indication to surgery, anesthesia or MRI;
- patient responder to rTMS,
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain by Combined Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Cingulum and Sensory Thalamus: a Feasibility and Safety Study
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sensory thalamus has been proposed for 40 years to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain, but its efficacy remains partial and unpredictable. Recently, bilateral DBS of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region involved in the integration of the affective and cognitive aspects of pain, has been successively proposed to treat few patients suffering from refractory chronic pain, by decreasing the emotional impact of their chronic pain. ACC-DBS could be an alternative or complementary approach to thalamic DBS in these patients, but the consequences of chronic dACC-DBS on cognition and affects have not been studied specifically.
The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of bilateral ACC-DBS combined with unilateral thalamic DBS in patients suffering from chronic unilateral pain, refractory to medical treatment. Secondary objective will evaluate the efficacy of this combined DBS compared to thalamic DBS only.
Read the detailed description
Chronic pain represents a major personal and societal burden, especially for medically resistant patients. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sensory thalamus has been proposed for 40 years to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain, but its efficacy remains partial and unpredictable. Recently, bilateral DBS of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region involved in the integration of the affective, emotional and cognitive aspects of pain, has been successively proposed to treat few patients suffering from refractory chronic pain. In a pilot study, 16 patients treated by ACC-DBS experienced a significant improvement of their quality of life despite a slight decrease of their pain intensity, by improving the affective and emotional impacts of their chronic pain. ACC-DBS could be an alternative or complementary approach to thalamic DBS in these patients. However the consequences of chronic dACC-DBS on cognition and affects have not been studied specifically.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of bilateral ACC-DBS combined with unilateral thalamic DBS in patients suffering from chronic unilateral pain, refractory to medical treatment. Secondary objective will evaluate the efficacy of this combined DBS compared to thalamic DBS only
- Conditions
- Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain
- Being tested
- Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anteriorProcedure or surgery
The Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior is alternatively ON and OFF while Thalamic stimulation is ON
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DBS-ACC ON | Experimental | Start of stimulation of the DBS-ACC: On the first period, between M4 and M7, the DBS-ACC is ON and the second period, between M7 and M10 is OFF Receives: Procedure: Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior |
| DBS-ACC OFF | Experimental | Start of stimulation of the DBS-ACC: On the first period, between M4 and M7, the DBS-ACC is OFF and the second period, between M7 and M10 is ON Receives: Procedure: Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Occurence of serious adverse events.
description of serious adverse events
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Feasibility of ACC-DBS: success the process of surgical intervention
Feasibility of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by the proportion of patients undergoing with success the process of surgical intervention Safety will be evaluated by neurological examination
Measured: Day 0
Feasibility of ACC-DBS : neurological success of the process of chronic stimulation
neurological success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the neurological examination
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Feasibility of ACC-DBS : psychiatric success of the process of chronic stimulation
psychiatric success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the psychiatric assessment
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Feasibility of ACC-DBS : cognitive success of the process of chronic stimulation
cognitive success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the cognitive assessment
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Secondary outcomes (5)
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of pain intensity
Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by pain intensity (VAS)
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of pain intensity
Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory)
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of pain intensity
Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by pain intensity (McGill Pain Questionnaire)
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of quality of life by SF-36
Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by quality of life (SF36).
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of quality of life by EQ-5D
Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by quality of life (EQ5D).
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2018
- Study start6 Apr 2018
- Primary completion17 Apr 2023
- Study completion2 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Refractory Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Denys FONTAINE, Principal investigator, fontaine.d@chu-nice.fr
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03399942
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-AOIP-01
- Acronym
- EMOPAIN
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Fontaine D, Leplus A, Donnet A, Darmon N, Balossier A, Giordana B, Simonet B, Isan P, Regis J, Lanteri-Minet M. Safety and feasibility of deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate and thalamus in chronic refractory neuropathic pain: a pilot and randomized study. J Headache Pain. 2025 Feb 17;26(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01967-8.
PubMed 39962366Leplus A, Isan P, Balossier A, Mouffok S, Donnet A, Papadopoulo T, Lanteri-Minet M, Regis J, Fontaine D. Somatotopy of the sensory thalamus: inputs from directional deep brain stimulation in pain patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Jun;11(6):1502-1513. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52067. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
PubMed 38668642
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain by Combined Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Cingulum and Sensory Thalamus: a Feasibility and Safety Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03399942
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMOPAIN / 16-AOIP-01
- Conditions
- Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sensory thalamus has been proposed for 40 years to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain, but its efficacy remains partial and unpredictable. Recently, bilateral DBS of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region involved in the integration of the affective and cognitive aspects of pain, has been successively proposed to treat few patients suffering from refractory chronic pain, by decreasing the emotional impact of their chronic pain. ACC-DBS could be an alternative or complementary approach to thalamic DBS in these patients, but the consequences of chronic dACC-DBS on cognition and affects have not been studied specifically.
The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of bilateral ACC-DBS combined with unilateral thalamic DBS in patients suffering from chronic unilateral pain, refractory to medical treatment. Secondary objective will evaluate the efficacy of this combined DBS compared to thalamic DBS only.
Detailed description
Chronic pain represents a major personal and societal burden, especially for medically resistant patients. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sensory thalamus has been proposed for 40 years to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain, but its efficacy remains partial and unpredictable. Recently, bilateral DBS of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region involved in the integration of the affective, emotional and cognitive aspects of pain, has been successively proposed to treat few patients suffering from refractory chronic pain. In a pilot study, 16 patients treated by ACC-DBS experienced a significant improvement of their quality of life despite a slight decrease of their pain intensity, by improving the affective and emotional impacts of their chronic pain. ACC-DBS could be an alternative or complementary approach to thalamic DBS in these patients. However the consequences of chronic dACC-DBS on cognition and affects have not been studied specifically.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of bilateral ACC-DBS combined with unilateral thalamic DBS in patients suffering from chronic unilateral pain, refractory to medical treatment. Secondary objective will evaluate the efficacy of this combined DBS compared to thalamic DBS only
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DBS-ACC ON | Experimental | Procedure: Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anteriorStart of stimulation of the DBS-ACC: On the first period, between M4 and M7, the DBS-ACC is ON and the second period, between M7 and M10 is OFF |
| DBS-ACC OFF | Experimental | Procedure: Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anteriorStart of stimulation of the DBS-ACC: On the first period, between M4 and M7, the DBS-ACC is OFF and the second period, between M7 and M10 is ON |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- adult patients (age 18-70 years old) suffering from chronic (duration >1 year) unilateral neuropathic pain
- severe (VAS score >6/10)
- with high emotional impact (HAD subscores > 10) considered as resistant to medication specific to neuropathic pain at sufficient doses and durations (including at least antiepileptics and antidepressants) and not sufficiently improved by rTMS and relevant surgical solutions.
- previous history of stroke,
- cognitive impairment (MMSE score <24),
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anteriorThe Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior is alternatively ON and OFF while Thalamic stimulation is ON | Procedure or surgery | DBS-ACC OFF, DBS-ACC ON |
Primary outcome
Occurence of serious adverse events.
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
description of serious adverse events
Feasibility of ACC-DBS: success the process of surgical intervention
Time frame: Day 0
Feasibility of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by the proportion of patients undergoing with success the process of surgical intervention Safety will be evaluated by neurological examination
Feasibility of ACC-DBS : neurological success of the process of chronic stimulation
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
neurological success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the neurological examination
Feasibility of ACC-DBS : psychiatric success of the process of chronic stimulation
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
psychiatric success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the psychiatric assessment
Feasibility of ACC-DBS : cognitive success of the process of chronic stimulation
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
cognitive success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the cognitive assessment
5 secondary outcomes
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of pain intensity
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of pain intensity
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of pain intensity
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of quality of life by SF-36
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of quality of life by EQ-5D
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 39962366Fontaine D, Leplus A, Donnet A, Darmon N, Balossier A, Giordana B, Simonet B, Isan P, Regis J, Lanteri-Minet M. Safety and feasibility of deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate and thalamus in chronic refractory neuropathic pain: a pilot and randomized study. J Headache Pain. 2025 Feb 17;26(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01967-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 38668642Leplus A, Isan P, Balossier A, Mouffok S, Donnet A, Papadopoulo T, Lanteri-Minet M, Regis J, Fontaine D. Somatotopy of the sensory thalamus: inputs from directional deep brain stimulation in pain patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Jun;11(6):1502-1513. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52067. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
Related trials for Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain
Recruiting
Insula Neuromodulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Neuropathic Pain, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Assessing the Efficacy of a High-Dose Lidocaine-Tetracaine Cream for the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Neuropathic Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Chronic Pain
Spinal Cord Injuries, Nerve Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Location of Motor Cortical Stimulation Electrodes in Chronic Neuropathic Refractory Patients
Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Analgesic Efficacy of Capsaicin 8% Patch (QUTENZA®) in Coccygodygnia
Coccyx Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Denys FONTAINE principal investigator
fontaine.d@chu-nice.fr
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior in people with Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Occurence of serious adverse events. (time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03399942, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2026.