Group B Streptococcus Carrier in ChildbirthPhase 3OPSiPNCT03407157
Oral Probiotic Supplementation in Pregnancy to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization
A Phase 3 study testing Probiotic supplementation in people with Group B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This is a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial that will investigate whether the use of three specific species of probiotics taken orally in pregnancy from 25 weeks gestation will reduce the incidence of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Group B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth
- What is being tested?
- Probiotic supplementation
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 168 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 16 Jan 2020to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant with a singleton
- Gestational age between 23 and 25+0 weeks
- Over the age of 18
- Registered for delivery, at one of the participating centres
- Under the care of a regulated maternity care provider (midwife, obstetrician (OB), or family physician).
Who cannot join
- Unable to provide consent
- Fetus has known major anomalies
- Significant immunosuppression
- Type I or Type II diabetes (non-gestational)
- Previous infant with GBS (these women will automatically be advised to be treated with IV antibiotic therapy)
- GBS bacteriuria diagnosed in present pregnancy (reasoning as per above)
- Plans to use oral or vaginal probiotic supplementation/therapy (capsules/tablets/lozenges/drinks) during their pregnancy (outside of natural food sources; yogurt, kimchi, kombucha etc)
- Enrolled in another study that involves the administration of a drug/product
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
BC Women's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
About this study
This is a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial that will investigate whether the use of three specific species of probiotics taken orally in pregnancy from 25 weeks gestation will reduce the incidence of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization. Participants will take 2 capsules and 1 lozenge per day of either probiotic or placebo from 25 weeks gestation. The primary outcome will be the study-specific vaginal/rectal swab collected after 35 weeks gestation and before delivery. A reduction in women testing positive for GBS would lead to a decrease risk to infants of GBS infection and a reduction in the use of antibiotics leading to less maternal and neonatal antibiotic exposure.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Group B streptococcus (GBS) infection of the newborn is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in North America. Up to 30% of pregnant women are colonized with GBS. Half of the babies born to colonized mothers will become colonized themselves, and of those, about 1-2% may develop early onset GBS infection (EOGBS), which is associated with significant mortality (between 5% and 20%) and morbidity (71% bacteremia, 11% meningitis, 19% pneumonia). The current recommendation is for routine administration of IPA to women who test positive for GBS at term. Although IPA therapy may reduce the incidence of neonatal GBS infection, it can increase the risk of other infections such as E. Coli, neonatal thrush, and ampicillin resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
There is also accumulating evidence linking antibiotics in pregnancy with childhood asthma, childhood obesity, and obesity in later life. IPA is also associated with antibiotic resistance, diarrhoea (including Clostridium difficile), and fungal infections. There is a growing worldwide interest in utilizing probiotics to enhance and manipulate the human microbiome in order to reduce a wide range of communicable and non-communicable diseases. Probiotics have been studied extensively in pregnant women and are considered safe and well tolerated when ingested or used vaginally.
Probiotics in pregnancy may reduce GBS colonization and the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis through a number of mechanisms. Some probiotics produce antibacterial substances and film-like barriers to pathogens. By adhering to vaginal epithelial cells, probiotics also displace pathogens such as GBS. S. salivarius K12 has been shown to inhibit several GBS strains, including disease-implicated isolates from newborns and colonizing isolates from the vaginal tract of pregnant women. In vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate its ability to adhere to the vaginal epithelium and directly impair the growth and adherence of GBS.
Several pilot randomized trials of L. reuteri and L. rhamnosus show promise in their their ability to reduce GBS colonization and have been shown to be safe. In vivo and in vitro studies of various lactobacillus strains, including rhamnosus and reuteri, have demonstrated an inhibitory effect on GBS.
Preliminary research to date suggests the administration of probiotic supplements to women in pregnancy may reduce the incidence of GBS colonization, thus reducing the need to administer intravenous prophylactic antibiotics (IPA) to women during labour. The specific species of probiotics chosen for this trial create a combination of inhibitory and antibacterial effects that may result in a greater reduction of GBS colonization than shown in previous trials.
The study:
The OPSiP study is a three-year, two-centre, double blind randomized placebo controlled trial. The aim of this study is to assess if a combined daily oral supplementation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus reuteri and Streptococcus salivarius beginning from 25 weeks gestation and continued until delivery will reduce vaginal/rectal group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization rates. Secondary aims include reduction of maternal and neonatal antibiotic exposure, and maternal vaginal and urinary tract infections.
450 healthy pregnant women receiving care from a regulated maternity care professional and registered at either St. Paul's or BC Women's Hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia will be recruited. Women will be introduced to the study through posters and flyers and information from their maternity care provider. Women will be provided with verbal and written information on the study and provide written consent to participate before being entered into the study. Women will be entered into the study following initial screening to confirm their eligibility to participate in the study and then randomized to the intervention or control group.
Women randomized to the intervention group will receive a daily combination of one lozenge and two capsules of oral probiotic supplements comprised of three probiotic species; Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus reuteri (Urex Plus VCap-5) and Streptococcus salivarius K12 (Blis K12). The control arm will receive identical placebos administered using the same route and regimen as the active probiotic. Both groups will begin taking their daily study lozenges and capsules at 25 weeks gestation until delivery.
Five study-specific swabs will be collected, three vaginal/rectal and two oral swabs. The first vaginal/rectal swab and the first oral swab will be obtained at intake, after randomization and prior to the start of the intervention. The second vaginal/rectal swab will be obtained at mid-point, between 29-33 weeks gestational age. The third vaginal/rectal swab and second oral swab will be collected between 35 weeks and delivery.
The primary outcome will be vaginal/rectal GBS status, ascertained from the last study-specific vaginal/rectal swab. Statistical analysis will be on the basis of intention to treat. Treatment effect will be estimated using logistic regression. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 will be considered significant.
Secondary analysis will be performed on last observation moving forward, protocol-compliant groups and with adjustment for care-provider type and use of other dietary probiotic sources.
- Being tested
- Probiotic supplementation, Placebo
- Keywords
- Probiotics, Pregnancy, GBS, Group B Streptococcus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Probiotic supplementationDietary supplement
Participants will take two capsules daily of Urex Plus VCap-5 (each containing 2.5 billion CFUs of L. rhamnosus and L. reuteri) and one lozenge of Blis K12 (1 billion CFUs of streptococcus Salivarius)
PlaceboOther
Participants will be asked to take 2 placebo capsules and 1 placebo lozenge daily from 25 weeks pregnancy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Probiotic supplementation Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic supplementation |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome will be vaginal/rectal GBS colonization status at delivery
Measured using the study-specific rectal/vaginal swab
Measured: Last vaginal/rectal swab taken after 35 weeks gestation and prior to delivery
Secondary outcomes (4)
Maternal antibiotic exposure
Women will be asked in each questionnaire if they have had any antibiotics prescribed and if so for the name of the antibiotic. Information will also be collected on antibiotics prescribed from medical records
Measured: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (6 weeks post-birth)
Maternal urinary tract infections
Women will be asked in each questionnaire if they have been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and if so, if antibiotics were prescribed. Information will also be collected from medical records
Measured: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (6 weeks post-birth)
Maternal bacterial vaginosis infections
Women will be asked in each questionnaire if they have been diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis and if so, if treatment was prescribed. Information will also be collected from medical records
Measured: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (6 weeks post-birth)
Maternal vaginal candida infections
Women will be asked in each questionnaire if they have been diagnosed with vaginal candida (yeast) infection and if so, if treatment was prescribed. Information will also be collected from medical records
Measured: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (4-6 weeks postpartum)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2018
- Study start16 Jan 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Group B Streptococcus Carrier in ChildbirthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomisation will be centrally controlled using iSTAR, a web-based computerised randomisation platform at the BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, run by the PRE-EMPT (Pre-eclampsia Eclampsia Monitoring Prevention and Treatment) research group, UBC. PRE-EMPT will provide the randomisation platform, and web-linked drug supply management system. Randomisation will occur in random blocks of 2 and 4. Women will be randomised on a 1:1 ratio to probiotic:placebo.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dublin City University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michelle Butler, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Michelle M Butler, PhD, RM, Principal investigator, Dublin City UniversityPatricia Janssen, PhD, Principal investigator, UBC School of Population and Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03407157
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H17-02189
- Acronym
- OPSiP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pending approval from the REC and once all final results have been published, de-identified data will be made available upon request for secondary use of data. Any proposed projects for secondary use must be approved by the study working group and the local REB.
Publications
Bizzarro MJ, Dembry LM, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Changing patterns in neonatal Escherichia coli sepsis and ampicillin resistance in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):689-96. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2171.
PubMed 18381532Cox LM, Blaser MJ. Antibiotics in early life and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015 Mar;11(3):182-90. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.210. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
PubMed 25488483de Vrese M. Health benefits of probiotics and prebiotics in women. Menopause Int. 2009 Mar;15(1):35-40. doi: 10.1258/mi.2009.009008.
PubMed 19237621Glasgow TS, Young PC, Wallin J, Kwok C, Stoddard G, Firth S, Samore M, Byington CL. Association of intrapartum antibiotic exposure and late-onset serious bacterial infections in infants. Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):696-702. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2421.
PubMed 16140710Hanson L, Vandevusse L, Duster M, Warrack S, Safdar N. Feasibility of oral prenatal probiotics against maternal group B Streptococcus vaginal and rectal colonization. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014 May-Jun;43(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12308. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
PubMed 24754328Elias J, Bozzo P, Einarson A. Are probiotics safe for use during pregnancy and lactation? Can Fam Physician. 2011 Mar;57(3):299-301.
PubMed 21402964Money D, Allen VM; INFECTIOUS DISEASES COMMITTEE. The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30818-5.
PubMed 24165063Mueller NT, Whyatt R, Hoepner L, Oberfield S, Dominguez-Bello MG, Widen EM, Hassoun A, Perera F, Rundle A. Prenatal exposure to antibiotics, cesarean section and risk of childhood obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Apr;39(4):665-70. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.180. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
PubMed 25298276Ohlsson A, Shah VS. Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD007467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007467.pub3.
PubMed 23440815PHAC (2011) Steptococcus Agalactiae, Pathogen Safety Data Sheet. Public Health Agency of Canada. Available at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/lab-bio/res/psds-ftss/streptococcus-agalactiae-eng.php
Stensballe LG, Simonsen J, Jensen SM, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H. Use of antibiotics during pregnancy increases the risk of asthma in early childhood. J Pediatr. 2013 Apr;162(4):832-838.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.09.049. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
PubMed 23140881Juarez Tomas MS, Ocana VS, Nader-Macias ME. Viability of vaginal probiotic lactobacilli during refrigerated and frozen storage. Anaerobe. 2004 Feb;10(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.01.002.
PubMed 16701493Reid G. Probiotic and prebiotic applications for vaginal health. J AOAC Int. 2012 Jan-Feb;95(1):31-4. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.sge_reid.
PubMed 22468339Kaewsrichan J, Peeyananjarassri K, Kongprasertkit J. Selection and identification of anaerobic lactobacilli producing inhibitory compounds against vaginal pathogens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006 Oct;48(1):75-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00124.x.
PubMed 16965354Ortiz L, Ruiz F, Pascual L, Barberis L. Effect of two probiotic strains of Lactobacillus on in vitro adherence of Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Staphylococcus aureus to vaginal epithelial cells. Curr Microbiol. 2014 Jun;68(6):679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0524-9. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
PubMed 24469557
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Oral Probiotic Supplementation in Pregnancy to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03407157
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPSiP / H17-02189
- Keywords
- Probiotics, Pregnancy, GBS, Group B Streptococcus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dublin City University
- Study start
- 16 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial that will investigate whether the use of three specific species of probiotics taken orally in pregnancy from 25 weeks gestation will reduce the incidence of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization. Participants will take 2 capsules and 1 lozenge per day of either probiotic or placebo from 25 weeks gestation. The primary outcome will be the study-specific vaginal/rectal swab collected after 35 weeks gestation and before delivery. A reduction in women testing positive for GBS would lead to a decrease risk to infants of GBS infection and a reduction in the use of antibiotics leading to less maternal and neonatal antibiotic exposure.
Detailed description
Background:
Group B streptococcus (GBS) infection of the newborn is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in North America. Up to 30% of pregnant women are colonized with GBS. Half of the babies born to colonized mothers will become colonized themselves, and of those, about 1-2% may develop early onset GBS infection (EOGBS), which is associated with significant mortality (between 5% and 20%) and morbidity (71% bacteremia, 11% meningitis, 19% pneumonia). The current recommendation is for routine administration of IPA to women who test positive for GBS at term. Although IPA therapy may reduce the incidence of neonatal GBS infection, it can increase the risk of other infections such as E. Coli, neonatal thrush, and ampicillin resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
There is also accumulating evidence linking antibiotics in pregnancy with childhood asthma, childhood obesity, and obesity in later life. IPA is also associated with antibiotic resistance, diarrhoea (including Clostridium difficile), and fungal infections. There is a growing worldwide interest in utilizing probiotics to enhance and manipulate the human microbiome in order to reduce a wide range of communicable and non-communicable diseases. Probiotics have been studied extensively in pregnant women and are considered safe and well tolerated when ingested or used vaginally.
Probiotics in pregnancy may reduce GBS colonization and the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis through a number of mechanisms. Some probiotics produce antibacterial substances and film-like barriers to pathogens. By adhering to vaginal epithelial cells, probiotics also displace pathogens such as GBS. S. salivarius K12 has been shown to inhibit several GBS strains, including disease-implicated isolates from newborns and colonizing isolates from the vaginal tract of pregnant women. In vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate its ability to adhere to the vaginal epithelium and directly impair the growth and adherence of GBS.
Several pilot randomized trials of L. reuteri and L. rhamnosus show promise in their their ability to reduce GBS colonization and have been shown to be safe. In vivo and in vitro studies of various lactobacillus strains, including rhamnosus and reuteri, have demonstrated an inhibitory effect on GBS.
Preliminary research to date suggests the administration of probiotic supplements to women in pregnancy may reduce the incidence of GBS colonization, thus reducing the need to administer intravenous prophylactic antibiotics (IPA) to women during labour. The specific species of probiotics chosen for this trial create a combination of inhibitory and antibacterial effects that may result in a greater reduction of GBS colonization than shown in previous trials.
The study:
The OPSiP study is a three-year, two-centre, double blind randomized placebo controlled trial. The aim of this study is to assess if a combined daily oral supplementation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus reuteri and Streptococcus salivarius beginning from 25 weeks gestation and continued until delivery will reduce vaginal/rectal group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization rates. Secondary aims include reduction of maternal and neonatal antibiotic exposure, and maternal vaginal and urinary tract infections.
450 healthy pregnant women receiving care from a regulated maternity care professional and registered at either St. Paul's or BC Women's Hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia will be recruited. Women will be introduced to the study through posters and flyers and information from their maternity care provider. Women will be provided with verbal and written information on the study and provide written consent to participate before being entered into the study. Women will be entered into the study following initial screening to confirm their eligibility to participate in the study and then randomized to the intervention or control group.
Women randomized to the intervention group will receive a daily combination of one lozenge and two capsules of oral probiotic supplements comprised of three probiotic species; Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus reuteri (Urex Plus VCap-5) and Streptococcus salivarius K12 (Blis K12). The control arm will receive identical placebos administered using the same route and regimen as the active probiotic. Both groups will begin taking their daily study lozenges and capsules at 25 weeks gestation until delivery.
Five study-specific swabs will be collected, three vaginal/rectal and two oral swabs. The first vaginal/rectal swab and the first oral swab will be obtained at intake, after randomization and prior to the start of the intervention. The second vaginal/rectal swab will be obtained at mid-point, between 29-33 weeks gestational age. The third vaginal/rectal swab and second oral swab will be collected between 35 weeks and delivery.
The primary outcome will be vaginal/rectal GBS status, ascertained from the last study-specific vaginal/rectal swab. Statistical analysis will be on the basis of intention to treat. Treatment effect will be estimated using logistic regression. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 will be considered significant.
Secondary analysis will be performed on last observation moving forward, protocol-compliant groups and with adjustment for care-provider type and use of other dietary probiotic sources.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomisation will be centrally controlled using iSTAR, a web-based computerised randomisation platform at the BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, run by the PRE-EMPT (Pre-eclampsia Eclampsia Monitoring Prevention and Treatment) research group, UBC. PRE-EMPT will provide the randomisation platform, and web-linked drug supply management system. Randomisation will occur in random blocks of 2 and 4. Women will be randomised on a 1:1 ratio to probiotic:placebo.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Probiotic supplementationProbiotic supplementation |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant with a singleton
- Gestational age between 23 and 25+0 weeks
- Over the age of 18
- Registered for delivery, at one of the participating centres
- Under the care of a regulated maternity care provider (midwife, obstetrician (OB), or family physician).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Unable to provide consent
- Fetus has known major anomalies
- Significant immunosuppression
- Type I or Type II diabetes (non-gestational)
- Previous infant with GBS (these women will automatically be advised to be treated with IV antibiotic therapy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic supplementationParticipants will take two capsules daily of Urex Plus VCap-5 (each containing 2.5 billion CFUs of L. rhamnosus and L. reuteri) and one lozenge of Blis K12 (1 billion CFUs of streptococcus Salivarius) | Dietary supplement | Intervention |
| PlaceboParticipants will be asked to take 2 placebo capsules and 1 placebo lozenge daily from 25 weeks pregnancy | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome will be vaginal/rectal GBS colonization status at delivery
Time frame: Last vaginal/rectal swab taken after 35 weeks gestation and prior to delivery
Measured using the study-specific rectal/vaginal swab
4 secondary outcomes
Maternal antibiotic exposure
Time frame: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (6 weeks post-birth)
Maternal urinary tract infections
Time frame: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (6 weeks post-birth)
Maternal bacterial vaginosis infections
Time frame: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (6 weeks post-birth)
Maternal vaginal candida infections
Time frame: Questionnaires administered at intake (22-25 weeks), mid-term (29-33 weeks), term (35-37 weeks) and chart review (4-6 weeks postpartum)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 18381532Bizzarro MJ, Dembry LM, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Changing patterns in neonatal Escherichia coli sepsis and ampicillin resistance in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):689-96. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2171.
- Background: PubMed 25488483Cox LM, Blaser MJ. Antibiotics in early life and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015 Mar;11(3):182-90. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.210. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
- Background: PubMed 19237621de Vrese M. Health benefits of probiotics and prebiotics in women. Menopause Int. 2009 Mar;15(1):35-40. doi: 10.1258/mi.2009.009008.
- Background: PubMed 16140710Glasgow TS, Young PC, Wallin J, Kwok C, Stoddard G, Firth S, Samore M, Byington CL. Association of intrapartum antibiotic exposure and late-onset serious bacterial infections in infants. Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):696-702. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2421.
- Background: PubMed 24754328Hanson L, Vandevusse L, Duster M, Warrack S, Safdar N. Feasibility of oral prenatal probiotics against maternal group B Streptococcus vaginal and rectal colonization. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014 May-Jun;43(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12308. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
- Background: PubMed 21402964Elias J, Bozzo P, Einarson A. Are probiotics safe for use during pregnancy and lactation? Can Fam Physician. 2011 Mar;57(3):299-301.
- Background: PubMed 24165063Money D, Allen VM; INFECTIOUS DISEASES COMMITTEE. The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30818-5.
- Background: PubMed 25298276Mueller NT, Whyatt R, Hoepner L, Oberfield S, Dominguez-Bello MG, Widen EM, Hassoun A, Perera F, Rundle A. Prenatal exposure to antibiotics, cesarean section and risk of childhood obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Apr;39(4):665-70. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.180. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 23440815Ohlsson A, Shah VS. Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD007467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007467.pub3.
- BackgroundPHAC (2011) Steptococcus Agalactiae, Pathogen Safety Data Sheet. Public Health Agency of Canada. Available at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/lab-bio/res/psds-ftss/streptococcus-agalactiae-eng.php
- Background: PubMed 23140881Stensballe LG, Simonsen J, Jensen SM, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H. Use of antibiotics during pregnancy increases the risk of asthma in early childhood. J Pediatr. 2013 Apr;162(4):832-838.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.09.049. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
- Background: PubMed 16701493Juarez Tomas MS, Ocana VS, Nader-Macias ME. Viability of vaginal probiotic lactobacilli during refrigerated and frozen storage. Anaerobe. 2004 Feb;10(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.01.002.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pending approval from the REC and once all final results have been published, de-identified data will be made available upon request for secondary use of data. Any proposed projects for secondary use must be approved by the study working group and the local REB.
Related trials for Group B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Serosurveillance Study of Maternally Derived Anti-GBS Antibody
Group B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth, Group B Streptococcal Infection, Late-Onset
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michelle M Butler, PhD, RM principal investigator
Dublin City University
Patricia Janssen, PhD principal investigator
UBC School of Population and Public Health
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Probiotic supplementation in people with Group B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome will be vaginal/rectal GBS colonization status at delivery (time frame: Last vaginal/rectal swab taken after 35 weeks gestation and prior to delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03407157, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.