AzTrials
AzTrials

Acquired Aplastic AnemiaPhase 3NCT03413306

Eltrombopag+hATG+CsA vs. hATG+CsA in Children With Severe AA

A Phase 3 study testing Eltrombopag and IST (ATG + CsA) in people with Acquired Aplastic Anemia, run by Federal Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology at 1 site in Russia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The analysis of our own clinical data suggests that majority of the hematologic responses observed after the course of h-ATG/CsA is partial, and about 10% tend to have cyclosporine dependence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Acquired Aplastic Anemia
What is being tested?
Eltrombopag and IST (ATG + CsA)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
10 Dec 2016to 20 Oct 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of severe and very severe Aplastic anemia
  • 2 - 18 years old
  • Written informed consent signed by a parent or legal guardian prior to initiation of any study specific procedure.
  • Absence of HLA-identical family member

Who cannot join

  • 1. myelodysplastic syndrome 4. Prior immunosuppressive therapy 5. Patients with hepatic, renal or cardiac failure, or any other life- threatening concurrent disease 6. hypersensitivity to any of the component medications 7. Creatinine >2.5 mg/dL× the upper limit of normal, 8. Total bilirubin >1.5 × the upper limit of normal mg/dL , 9. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3-5 × the upper limit of normal

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology

    Moscow, 117198

    Zhanna Shekhovtsova, 4956647078, zhanna.shekhovtsova@fccho-moscow.ru

    Eugene Pashanov, Prof. PhD, +79262205578, e.pashanov@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study of Eltrombopag Combined With Cyclosporine and hATG Versus hATG and CsA as First Line Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Severe Acquired Aplastic Anemia

The analysis of our own clinical data suggests that majority of the hematologic responses observed after the course of h-ATG/CsA is partial, and about 10% tend to have cyclosporine dependence.

The aim of the current study is to improve the rate and the quality of hematologic response as well as to prevent delayed complications such as relapse and clonal progression by means of adding eltrombopag to standard immunosuppressive therapy

Read the detailed description

This trial will evaluate safety and efficacy of combination eltrombopag with standard hATG/CSA as first line therapy in patients with SAA. The primary endpoint is going to be estimating the rate of complete hematologic response at the point in four months after the end of the treatment. Secondary endpoints are probability of relapse, hematologic blood count recovery in 6 and 12 months after the treatment, survival, clonal evolution into myelodysplasia and leukemia

Aplastic anemia can be treated effectively with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy with horse anti-thymocyte globulin (h-ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA), allowing to achieve a comparable long-term survival about 80%. However, one third of the patients treated with h-ATG/CsA, does not respond, and 25-30% of the responders relapse. The analysis of our clinical data suggests that majority of the hematologic responses observed following initial h-ATG/CsA are partial, with only a few patients achieving normal blood counts, and about 10% tend to have cyclosporine dependence. Although horse ATG/CsA provides represented a major advance in the treatment of SAA, such condition as refractory course of the disease, incomplete response, relapse, and clonal evolution limit the success of this treatment. Thus, new regimens are needed to overcome these limitations and provide a better alternative to stem cell transplantation.

One option of improving the quality of hematologic responses is influencing underlying stem cell function. Previous attempts to improve response by hematopoietic cytokines, including erythropoietin and G-CSF, have failed. Thrombopoietin is the principal endogenous regulator of platelet production. In addition, TPO also has stimulatory effects onto primitive multilineage progenitors and stem cells in vitro and animal models. Eltrombopag (Revolade), an oral 2nd generation small molecule TPO-agonist, is approved for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura and SAA who had insufficient response to immunosuppressive therapy. Eltrombopag increases platelets in healthy subjects and in thrombocytopenic patients, and recently has showed clinically significant hematologic responses in refractory SAA patients. The aim of this tudy to improve hematologic response rate and its quality, as well as to prevent late complications such as relapse and clonal progression, by adding eltrombopag into standard immunosuppressive therapy This trial evaluates safety and efficacy of combining eltrombopag with standard hATG/CSA as the first line of therapy in patients with SAA. The primary endpoint is going to be estimation of the rate of complete hematologic response in 4 months. Secondary endpoints are probability of relapse, robust hematologic blood count recovery in 6 and 12 months after the treatment, survival, clonal evolution to myelodysplasia and leukemia.

This is a trial aiming to increase 4 months overall response rate. The sample size is calculated on the hypothesis that the experimental treatment will increase the 4 months response rate in 20% in comparison with standard IST treatment arm. Under these assumptions, the sample size to reject the null hypothesis is n=100 patients, 50 patients in each treatment arm; alpha-error 0.05; power 0.75.

Being tested
Eltrombopag, IST (ATG + CsA)
Keywords
aplastic anemia, immunosupressive therapy, ATG, eltrombopag
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Aplastic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EltrombopagDrug

    Also called Revolade

    Eltrombopag is an oral mimetic thrombopoietin selectively binding transmembrane and juxtamembrane domains of the thrombopoietin receptor different from the binding site of thrombopoietin. Therefore it does not compete for binding with the native molecule. It is promoting thrombopoiesis and release platelets from mature megakaryocytes. Also it promotes more primitive multilineage progenitors and hematopoietic stem cells to proliferate and differentiate into thrombocytes, erythrocytes and leukocytes.

  • IST (ATG + CsA)Drug

    Also called controle

Study groups in NCT03413306
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eltrombopag + IST (ATG + CsA)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Eltrombopag; Drug: IST (ATG + CsA)
IST (ATG + CsA)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: IST (ATG + CsA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ORR (CR + PR)

    The primary objective of this trial is to investigate whether Eltrombopag added to standard immunosupressive treatment hATG and CsA increases the overal (partial + complete) response rate at four months in untreated children with severe aquired aplastic anemia.

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Platelet count

    Measured: 4 and 6 months

  2. Hemoglobin

    Measured: 4 and 6 months

  3. Neutrophil count

    Measured: 4 and 6 months

  4. Cumulative incidence of response

    Measured: 4 and 6 months

  5. Duration of hematologic response

    Time from the date of the start of response to the date of relapse defined as again meeting criteria for severe or moderate aplastic anemia

    Measured: 2 years

  6. Overall survival

    Measured: 2 years

  7. Event-free survival

    Measured: 2 years

  8. Cumulative incidence of relapse

    Measured: 2 years

  9. Cumulative incidences of clonal evolution

    Measured: 2 years

  10. Cumulative incidence of PNH population occurrence and clinical hemolytic PNH occurrence

    Measured: 2 years

  11. Cumulative incidence of adverce effects

    Number of participants with severe adverse events (3-5 stage CTCAE v.4.0) associated with assessment of eltrombopag usage in patients with severe aplastic anemia in 4 months after first day of treatment. Death before evidence of adverce event is competing event.

    Measured: 4 months

  12. Cumulative incidence of adverce effects

    Number of participants with severe adverse events (3-5 stage CTCAE v.4.0) associated with assessment of eltrombopag dose in patients with severe aplastic anemia in 4 months after first day of treatment. Death before evidence of adverce event is competing event.

    Measured: 4 months

  13. Comparison of cumulative incidence of adverce effects in two arms

    comparison between two arms of number of participants with severe adverse events (3-5 stage CTCAE v.4.0) associated with treatment in patients with severe aplastic anemia in 2 years after first day of treatment with death before evidence of adverce event as a competing event.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2018
  2. Study start10 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion20 Oct 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion20 Oct 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03413306
Sponsor's protocol ID
NCPHOI-2016-01
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
22 Dec 2017
Last updated
15 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Goronkova O, Novichkova G, Salimova T, Kalinina I, Baidildina D, Petrova U, Antonova K, Sadovskaya M, Suntsova E, Evseev D, Matveev V, Venyov D, Khachatryan L, Litvinov D, Pshonkin A, Ovsyannikova G, Kotskaya N, Gobadze D, Olshanskaya Y, Popov A, Raykina E, Mironenko O, Voronin K, Purbueva B, Boichenko E, Dinikina Y, Guseynova E, Sherstnev D, Kalinina E, Mezentsev S, Streneva O, Yudina N, Plaksina O, Erega E, Maschan M, Maschan A. Efficacy of combined immunosuppression with or without eltrombopag in children with newly diagnosed aplastic anemia. Blood Adv. 2023 Mar 28;7(6):953-962. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006716.

    PubMed 35446936

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Eltrombopag and IST (ATG + CsA) in people with Acquired Aplastic Anemia, run by Federal Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Olga Goronkova, MD (+7-495-287-65-70 ext. 5527, goronkova@yandex.ru), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ORR (CR + PR) (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03413306, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in