Allogeneic Stem Cell TransplantNCT03419078
Nutrition and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)
An observational study of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Graft Versus Host Disease, run by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
Trial summary
Retrospective case-note review to determine if nutrition via the enteral compared to the parenteral route results in better outcomes after haematopoietic cell transplantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 17 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant, Graft Versus Host Disease, Hematologic Malignancy
- How many people
- 484 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 17 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients aged 17 or above who underwent their first HCT for hematologic malignancy at Hammersmith Hospital, using a sibling or unrelated donor between January 2000 and December 2014
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing their first HCT for a hematologic malignancy
- Undergoing HCT using a sibling or unrelated donor
- Undergoing HCT infusion between January 2000 and December 2014
Who cannot join
- HCT using umbilical cord blood donors
- HCT using haploidentical donors
About this study
Official title: Route and Adequacy of Nutrition and Outcomes of Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Haematological Neoplasms
Retrospective case-note review to determine if nutrition via the enteral compared to the parenteral route results in better outcomes after haematopoietic cell transplantation.
Read the detailed description
This is a retrospective case-note review of adults undergoing haematopoietic cell transplantation to treat a haematological malignancy who have been admitted to Hammersmith Hospital from 2000 to 2014. All patients receiving an allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant from a matched sibling or identically matched unrelated donor will be included. We will record the route and assess the broad adequacy of nutritional intakes to determine if nutrition via the enteral compared to the parenteral route results in better outcomes after haematopoietic cell transplantation. Our outcomes are graft versus host disease incidence and severity, transplant related (early) mortality and overall survival.
- Conditions
- Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant, Graft Versus Host Disease, Hematologic Malignancy, Stem Cell Transplant Complications
- Keywords
- enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, artificial nutrition support, non-relapse mortality, survival
- Medical subject headings
- Graft vs Host Disease, Hematologic Neoplasms, Hyperphagia
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD) at Any Site (Grade II or Above) and Acute GvHD of the Gut of Any Grade
Occurrence of acute GvHD at any site (grade II or above) and acute GvHD of the gut of any grade (graded according to standard criteria). Standard criteria to grade the severity of acute GvHD are quantification of rash, serum bilirubin and diarrhoea. These standard criteria have been developed and used for > 20 years by most transplant centres to improve comparability between publications.
Measured: 100 days after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
Non Relapse Mortality
Defined as death without previous relapse
Measured: 100 days after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
Secondary outcomes (2)
Graft Versus Host Disease-free and Relapse-free Survival
GvHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Events in GRFS included grade 3-4 acute GvHD, systemic therapy-requiring chronic GvHD, relapse, or death
Measured: 5 years after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
5 Year Survival
Measured: 5 years after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2018
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionNov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Allogeneic Stem Cell TransplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 484 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, JBeckerson, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03419078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15HH2638
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Route and Adequacy of Nutrition and Outcomes of Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Haematological Neoplasms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03419078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15HH2638
- Conditions
- Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant, Graft Versus Host Disease, Hematologic Malignancy, Stem Cell Transplant Complications
- Keywords
- enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, artificial nutrition support, non-relapse mortality, survival
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 484 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Oct 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Retrospective case-note review to determine if nutrition via the enteral compared to the parenteral route results in better outcomes after haematopoietic cell transplantation.
Detailed description
This is a retrospective case-note review of adults undergoing haematopoietic cell transplantation to treat a haematological malignancy who have been admitted to Hammersmith Hospital from 2000 to 2014. All patients receiving an allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant from a matched sibling or identically matched unrelated donor will be included. We will record the route and assess the broad adequacy of nutritional intakes to determine if nutrition via the enteral compared to the parenteral route results in better outcomes after haematopoietic cell transplantation. Our outcomes are graft versus host disease incidence and severity, transplant related (early) mortality and overall survival.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 17 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients aged 17 or above who underwent their first HCT for hematologic malignancy at Hammersmith Hospital, using a sibling or unrelated donor between January 2000 and December 2014
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients undergoing their first HCT for a hematologic malignancy
- Undergoing HCT using a sibling or unrelated donor
- Undergoing HCT infusion between January 2000 and December 2014
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- HCT using umbilical cord blood donors
- HCT using haploidentical donors
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD) at Any Site (Grade II or Above) and Acute GvHD of the Gut of Any Grade
Time frame: 100 days after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
Occurrence of acute GvHD at any site (grade II or above) and acute GvHD of the gut of any grade (graded according to standard criteria). Standard criteria to grade the severity of acute GvHD are quantification of rash, serum bilirubin and diarrhoea. These standard criteria have been developed and used for > 20 years by most transplant centres to improve comparability between publications.
Non Relapse Mortality
Time frame: 100 days after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
Defined as death without previous relapse
2 secondary outcomes
Graft Versus Host Disease-free and Relapse-free Survival
Time frame: 5 years after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
5 Year Survival
Time frame: 5 years after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study to Determine Drug Metabolism Phenotype and Appropriate Germline Source DNA in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Leukemia, Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Thiotepa + TBI + Fludarabine + Etoposide for Allo-HSCT in Patients With R/R or High-risk Acute Leukemia
Acute Leukemia, High Risk, Acute Leukemia Refractory
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of Pacritinib, A JAK2/IRAK1/CSF1R Inhibitor, in Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Graft vs Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Graft Versus Host Disease, run by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD) at Any Site (Grade II or Above) and Acute GvHD of the Gut of Any Grade (time frame: 100 days after the date of hematopoietic cell infusion). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2019.