Short Bowel SyndromeNCT03419156
Effect of a Short Message Service Intervention on Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome
A study testing Text Message Arm Intervention in people with Short Bowel Syndrome, run by St. Louis University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators will be using a text messaging intervention to identify potentially dangerous and re- admission causing symptoms in patients with Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) on Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Short Bowel Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Text Message Arm Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2018to 21 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients under the age of 18
- Patients with a diagnosis of short bowel syndrome and who are treated with total parenteral nutrition
- Patients able to understand English or have a caregiver who understands English.
- Patients must have caregiver who has access to a phone (landline or cell phone)
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not have access to a phone (landline or cell phone), and patients who are not mentally able to consent to the study.
- Patients who are not treated with total parenteral nutrition.
- Patients who do no have a short bowel syndrome diagnosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63104
About this study
The investigators will be using a text messaging intervention to identify potentially dangerous and re- admission causing symptoms in patients with Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) on Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN). Each consented patient will receive weekly text messages inquiring about potentially harmful symptoms identified by a team of physicians. If the patient screens positive via text message, an alert will be sent to the medical team. All patients with SBS on TPN will receive text messages. The investigators will be monitoring response rates to text messages screening for potentially harmful symptoms and compare the text- message response rate to historical rates of successful calls by nurses.
All patients with SBS on TPN will receive text messages instead of weekly phone calls from a nurse. If the patient does not respond to the text messages or the text message responses suggest that the patient may be presenting with potentially harmful symptoms, the nurse will call the patient to inquire about more information.
Read the detailed description
Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) is a condition that results from a host of different conditions, the most common of which is Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Patients who have SBS are often Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) dependent. TPN is a carefully formulated intravenous nutrition that is utilized either alone or in conjunction with gastrointestinal feeds in patients who fail to achieve adequate caloric intake enterally. According to the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 360,000 hospital visits required usage of TPN in 2009. Short and long-term use of TPN is associated with catheter infections, cholestasis, liver failure, refeeding-syndrome, hyperglycemia, bone demineralization, and death (1). Thus careful and comprehensive monitoring of patients on TPN, especially after hospital discharge is essential (1-3). Some hospitals have introduced resource intensive support teams consisting of various health care professionals to manage these costly patients (1).
Using a variety of definitions, the incidence of SBS has been estimated at approximately 0.02 to 0.1 percent among all live births (4, 5), 0.5 to 2.0 percent among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (4, 5), and 0.7 percent among very low birthweight infants (6). Approximately 80 percent of pediatric SBS cases develop during the neonatal period.
The average cost of care in the US for a single pediatric patient with SBS is $550,250 +/- $248, 398 for the first year of care alone (7). These costs were attributable to prolonged requirements for intensive care resources, numerous surgical procedures, multiple readmissions, TPN and home care during the first year of diagnosis. Interestingly, Spencer et al. suggested that hospital-based costs steadily declined in subsequent years, but home-care services increased every year for the first 5 y of diagnosis (7). This increasing cost was attributable to increasing complications of TPN, especially infectious complications (something our application will specifically try to identify). The mean total cost of care per child over a 5-y period was US$1,619,851 +/- US$1,028,985 (7).
At Cardinal Glenon, a significant amount of time (about 10 hours per week) is spent by nurses calling these patients. This automated system will allow nurses to spend a portion of these 10 hours performing other activities, significantly reducing the costs attributed to SBS patients. Also, most of the mothers of patients who have SBS are between the ages of 15-30. This generation of millennials often have an aversion to phone calls and prefer texts [8]. Text- messages can be answered at a convenient time for the parent while the parent must be present and available to answer a phone call. Multiple prior text message or application intervention studies have reported high response rates, high satisfaction, and improvement in outcomes (9-12). For example, Devitto et al. reported that the estimated odds of reporting critical care symptoms of application group was 8.9 times that of control and showed slightly higher adherence to the prescribed regimen (OR 1.64, 95% CI [1.01, 2.66]) (9). Martinez et al. reported that 16 patients would have returned to the hospital without photos of surgical sites prompting health care team intervention (12). Our automated texting system may improve response rates from these young parents.
For this project, the investigators will be examining the effect of an Epharmix text messaging intervention on identifying potentially dangerous and re-admission causing symptoms with SBS patients on TPN.
- Conditions
- Short Bowel Syndrome
- Being tested
- Text Message Arm Intervention
- Keywords
- text message, telemedicine
- Medical subject headings
- Short Bowel Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Text Message Arm InterventionOther
Patients in the Text Message Arm will receive a weekly set of text messages inquiring about the patients' symptoms instead of a weekly phone call from the nurse team (standard of care). Potentially harmful symptoms identified by the automated system will generate an alert that will be sent to the medical team. The alert will be immediately sent via email to the nursing team. The nurse will be able to contact the patient to decide the best further treatment. The nurses will check patient response rates daily. If a patient does not respond to their weekly message, then the patient will be called.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Text Message Arm | Experimental | Patients in the Text Message Arm will receive a weekly set of text messages inquiring about the patients' symptoms instead of a weekly phone call from the nurse team (standard of care). Potentially harmful symptoms identified by the automated system will generate an alert that will be sent to the medical team. The alert will be immediately sent via email to the nursing team. The nurse will be able to contact the patient to decide the best further treatment. The nurses will check patient response rates daily. If a patient does not respond to their weekly message, then the patient will be called. Receives: Other: Text Message Arm Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response rate
The primary outcome for this study will be comparing response rates to automated text messages vs historical weekly nurse call success rates. The investigators will compare these values using a chi-square.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Specificity and Sensitivity
Specificity and sensitivity of the alerts generated by the automated system
Measured: 6 months
Cost savings
Cost saved in terms of nurse time required without automated text message intervention
Measured: 6 months
Clinic visits
Number of clinic visits by SBS patients
Measured: 6 months
Readmissions
30 day readmission of SBS patients
Measured: 6 months
Days spent in the hospital
Number of days spent in the hospital
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2018
- Study start20 Feb 2018
- Primary completion24 Dec 2018
- Study completion21 Mar 2019
Why it stopped: Study ended after review
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Short Bowel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All patients with SBS on TPN at Cardinal Glennon will receive text messages inquiring about their symptoms instead of weekly phone calls from a nurse. There will be no randomization. All patients will be sent text-messages from the automated system for 6 months to assess response rates and the amount of time saved by the nurse staff. If the patient does not respond to the text messages or the text message responses suggest that the patient may be presenting with potentially harmful symptoms, the nurse will call the patient to inquire about more information.The text messages are designed to help target calls made by the nursing staff.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Louis University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Epharmix, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yosef Greenspon, MD, St. Louis University
- Investigators
- Josef Greenspon, MD, Principal investigator, St. Louis University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03419156
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 28143
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hartl WH, Jauch KW, Parhofer K, Rittler P; Working group for developing the guidelines for parenteral nutrition of The German Association for Nutritional Medicine. Complications and monitoring - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 11. Ger Med Sci. 2009 Nov 18;7:Doc17. doi: 10.3205/000076.
PubMed 20049074Duro D, Kamin D, Duggan C. Overview of pediatric short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Aug;47 Suppl 1:S33-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181819007.
PubMed 18667916Uko V, Radhakrishnan K, Alkhouri N. Short bowel syndrome in children: current and potential therapies. Paediatr Drugs. 2012 Jun 1;14(3):179-88. doi: 10.2165/11594880-000000000-00000.
PubMed 22452596Salvia G, Guarino A, Terrin G, Cascioli C, Paludetto R, Indrio F, Lega L, Fanaro S, Stronati M, Corvaglia L, Tagliabue P, De Curtis M; Working Group on Neonatal Gastroenterology of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Neonatal onset intestinal failure: an Italian Multicenter Study. J Pediatr. 2008 Nov;153(5):674-6, 676.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
PubMed 18589446Wales PW, de Silva N, Kim J, Lecce L, To T, Moore A. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: population-based estimates of incidence and mortality rates. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 May;39(5):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.036.
PubMed 15137001Cole CR, Hansen NI, Higgins RD, Ziegler TR, Stoll BJ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Very low birth weight preterm infants with surgical short bowel syndrome: incidence, morbidity and mortality, and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):e573-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3449.
PubMed 18762491Spencer AU, Kovacevich D, McKinney-Barnett M, Hair D, Canham J, Maksym C, Teitelbaum DH. Pediatric short-bowel syndrome: the cost of comprehensive care. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1552-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26007.
PubMed 19064515https://www.forbes.com/sites/larryalton/2017/05/11/how-do-millennials-prefer-to- communicate/#58cc85d16d6f
DeVito Dabbs A, Song MK, Myers BA, Li R, Hawkins RP, Pilewski JM, Bermudez CA, Aubrecht J, Begey A, Connolly M, Alrawashdeh M, Dew MA. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Health Intervention to Promote Self-Management After Lung Transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2016 Jul;16(7):2172-80. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13701. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
PubMed 26729617Carrier G, Cotte E, Beyer-Berjot L, Faucheron JL, Joris J, Slim K; Groupe Francophone de Rehabilitation Amelioree apres Chirurgie (GRACE). Post-discharge follow-up using text messaging within an enhanced recovery program after colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg. 2016 Aug;153(4):249-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
PubMed 27423211Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, Mendoza TR, Wright SL, Berry MD, Malveaux D, Shah PK, Gning I, Hofstetter WL, Putnam JB Jr, Vaporciyan AA. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):994-1000. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8315. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
PubMed 21282546Martinez-Ramos C, Cerdan MT, Lopez RS. Mobile phone-based telemedicine system for the home follow-up of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Telemed J E Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(6):531-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0003.
PubMed 19566396
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of a Short Message Service Intervention on Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03419156
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 28143
- Conditions
- Short Bowel Syndrome
- Keywords
- text message, telemedicine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study ended after review
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Louis UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Epharmix, Inc.
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will be using a text messaging intervention to identify potentially dangerous and re- admission causing symptoms in patients with Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) on Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN). Each consented patient will receive weekly text messages inquiring about potentially harmful symptoms identified by a team of physicians. If the patient screens positive via text message, an alert will be sent to the medical team. All patients with SBS on TPN will receive text messages. The investigators will be monitoring response rates to text messages screening for potentially harmful symptoms and compare the text- message response rate to historical rates of successful calls by nurses.
All patients with SBS on TPN will receive text messages instead of weekly phone calls from a nurse. If the patient does not respond to the text messages or the text message responses suggest that the patient may be presenting with potentially harmful symptoms, the nurse will call the patient to inquire about more information.
Detailed description
Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) is a condition that results from a host of different conditions, the most common of which is Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Patients who have SBS are often Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) dependent. TPN is a carefully formulated intravenous nutrition that is utilized either alone or in conjunction with gastrointestinal feeds in patients who fail to achieve adequate caloric intake enterally. According to the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 360,000 hospital visits required usage of TPN in 2009. Short and long-term use of TPN is associated with catheter infections, cholestasis, liver failure, refeeding-syndrome, hyperglycemia, bone demineralization, and death (1). Thus careful and comprehensive monitoring of patients on TPN, especially after hospital discharge is essential (1-3). Some hospitals have introduced resource intensive support teams consisting of various health care professionals to manage these costly patients (1).
Using a variety of definitions, the incidence of SBS has been estimated at approximately 0.02 to 0.1 percent among all live births (4, 5), 0.5 to 2.0 percent among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (4, 5), and 0.7 percent among very low birthweight infants (6). Approximately 80 percent of pediatric SBS cases develop during the neonatal period.
The average cost of care in the US for a single pediatric patient with SBS is $550,250 +/- $248, 398 for the first year of care alone (7). These costs were attributable to prolonged requirements for intensive care resources, numerous surgical procedures, multiple readmissions, TPN and home care during the first year of diagnosis. Interestingly, Spencer et al. suggested that hospital-based costs steadily declined in subsequent years, but home-care services increased every year for the first 5 y of diagnosis (7). This increasing cost was attributable to increasing complications of TPN, especially infectious complications (something our application will specifically try to identify). The mean total cost of care per child over a 5-y period was US$1,619,851 +/- US$1,028,985 (7).
At Cardinal Glenon, a significant amount of time (about 10 hours per week) is spent by nurses calling these patients. This automated system will allow nurses to spend a portion of these 10 hours performing other activities, significantly reducing the costs attributed to SBS patients. Also, most of the mothers of patients who have SBS are between the ages of 15-30. This generation of millennials often have an aversion to phone calls and prefer texts [8]. Text- messages can be answered at a convenient time for the parent while the parent must be present and available to answer a phone call. Multiple prior text message or application intervention studies have reported high response rates, high satisfaction, and improvement in outcomes (9-12). For example, Devitto et al. reported that the estimated odds of reporting critical care symptoms of application group was 8.9 times that of control and showed slightly higher adherence to the prescribed regimen (OR 1.64, 95% CI [1.01, 2.66]) (9). Martinez et al. reported that 16 patients would have returned to the hospital without photos of surgical sites prompting health care team intervention (12). Our automated texting system may improve response rates from these young parents.
For this project, the investigators will be examining the effect of an Epharmix text messaging intervention on identifying potentially dangerous and re-admission causing symptoms with SBS patients on TPN.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All patients with SBS on TPN at Cardinal Glennon will receive text messages inquiring about their symptoms instead of weekly phone calls from a nurse. There will be no randomization. All patients will be sent text-messages from the automated system for 6 months to assess response rates and the amount of time saved by the nurse staff. If the patient does not respond to the text messages or the text message responses suggest that the patient may be presenting with potentially harmful symptoms, the nurse will call the patient to inquire about more information.The text messages are designed to help target calls made by the nursing staff.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Text Message Arm | Experimental | Other: Text Message Arm InterventionPatients in the Text Message Arm will receive a weekly set of text messages inquiring about the patients' symptoms instead of a weekly phone call from the nurse team (standard of care). Potentially harmful symptoms identified by the automated system will generate an alert that will be sent to the medical team. The alert will be immediately sent via email to the nursing team. The nurse will be able to contact the patient to decide the best further treatment. The nurses will check patient response rates daily. If a patient does not respond to their weekly message, then the patient will be called. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients under the age of 18
- Patients with a diagnosis of short bowel syndrome and who are treated with total parenteral nutrition
- Patients able to understand English or have a caregiver who understands English.
- Patients must have caregiver who has access to a phone (landline or cell phone)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who do not have access to a phone (landline or cell phone), and patients who are not mentally able to consent to the study.
- Patients who are not treated with total parenteral nutrition.
- Patients who do no have a short bowel syndrome diagnosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Text Message Arm InterventionPatients in the Text Message Arm will receive a weekly set of text messages inquiring about the patients' symptoms instead of a weekly phone call from the nurse team (standard of care). Potentially harmful symptoms identified by the automated system will generate an alert that will be sent to the medical team. The alert will be immediately sent via email to the nursing team. The nurse will be able to contact the patient to decide the best further treatment. The nurses will check patient response rates daily. If a patient does not respond to their weekly message, then the patient will be called. | Other | Text Message Arm |
Primary outcome
Response rate
Time frame: 6 months
The primary outcome for this study will be comparing response rates to automated text messages vs historical weekly nurse call success rates. The investigators will compare these values using a chi-square.
5 secondary outcomes
Specificity and Sensitivity
Time frame: 6 months
Cost savings
Time frame: 6 months
Clinic visits
Time frame: 6 months
Readmissions
Time frame: 6 months
Days spent in the hospital
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Study ended after review). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 20049074Hartl WH, Jauch KW, Parhofer K, Rittler P; Working group for developing the guidelines for parenteral nutrition of The German Association for Nutritional Medicine. Complications and monitoring - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 11. Ger Med Sci. 2009 Nov 18;7:Doc17. doi: 10.3205/000076.
- Background: PubMed 18667916Duro D, Kamin D, Duggan C. Overview of pediatric short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Aug;47 Suppl 1:S33-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181819007.
- Background: PubMed 22452596Uko V, Radhakrishnan K, Alkhouri N. Short bowel syndrome in children: current and potential therapies. Paediatr Drugs. 2012 Jun 1;14(3):179-88. doi: 10.2165/11594880-000000000-00000.
- Background: PubMed 18589446Salvia G, Guarino A, Terrin G, Cascioli C, Paludetto R, Indrio F, Lega L, Fanaro S, Stronati M, Corvaglia L, Tagliabue P, De Curtis M; Working Group on Neonatal Gastroenterology of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Neonatal onset intestinal failure: an Italian Multicenter Study. J Pediatr. 2008 Nov;153(5):674-6, 676.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 15137001Wales PW, de Silva N, Kim J, Lecce L, To T, Moore A. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: population-based estimates of incidence and mortality rates. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 May;39(5):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.036.
- Background: PubMed 18762491Cole CR, Hansen NI, Higgins RD, Ziegler TR, Stoll BJ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Very low birth weight preterm infants with surgical short bowel syndrome: incidence, morbidity and mortality, and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):e573-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3449.
- Background: PubMed 19064515Spencer AU, Kovacevich D, McKinney-Barnett M, Hair D, Canham J, Maksym C, Teitelbaum DH. Pediatric short-bowel syndrome: the cost of comprehensive care. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1552-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26007.
- Backgroundhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/larryalton/2017/05/11/how-do-millennials-prefer-to- communicate/#58cc85d16d6f
- Background: PubMed 26729617DeVito Dabbs A, Song MK, Myers BA, Li R, Hawkins RP, Pilewski JM, Bermudez CA, Aubrecht J, Begey A, Connolly M, Alrawashdeh M, Dew MA. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Health Intervention to Promote Self-Management After Lung Transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2016 Jul;16(7):2172-80. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13701. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
- Background: PubMed 27423211Carrier G, Cotte E, Beyer-Berjot L, Faucheron JL, Joris J, Slim K; Groupe Francophone de Rehabilitation Amelioree apres Chirurgie (GRACE). Post-discharge follow-up using text messaging within an enhanced recovery program after colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg. 2016 Aug;153(4):249-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 21282546Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, Mendoza TR, Wright SL, Berry MD, Malveaux D, Shah PK, Gning I, Hofstetter WL, Putnam JB Jr, Vaporciyan AA. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):994-1000. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8315. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 19566396Martinez-Ramos C, Cerdan MT, Lopez RS. Mobile phone-based telemedicine system for the home follow-up of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Telemed J E Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(6):531-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0003.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Short Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of PJ009 in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome Requiring Parenteral Nutrition
Short Bowel Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Efficacy and Safety of TRA16 Administered Orally in Patients With Enteric Hyperoxaluria (EH).
Enteric Hyperoxaluria
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy And Safety Evaluation of Glepaglutide in Treatment of SBS
Short Bowel Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Registry for Participants With Short Bowel Syndrome
Short Bowel Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Josef Greenspon, MD principal investigator
St. Louis University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Text Message Arm Intervention in people with Short Bowel Syndrome, run by St. Louis University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Study ended after review). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response rate (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03419156, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2019.