Ischemia LesionsREPLACENCT03430076
Polytetrafluoroethylen (PTFE) Vascular Prostheses With Heparin Bonded Luminal Surfaces vs Crude ePTFE
A study testing revascularization, Propaten® and Crude PTFE in people with Ischemia Lesions, run by Nantes University Hospital at 21 sites in France.
Trial summary
Open repair could be recommended in a first line of treatment to revascularize critical limb ischemia patients or performed in a second line of treatment in case of failure of endovascular repair. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemia Lesions
- What is being tested?
- revascularization, Propaten® and Crude PTFE
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 228 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 13 Feb 2018to 29 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient ≥18 years
- Patient presented critical limb ischemia (Rutherford classification: 4-6)
- Indication of below the knee bypass with an artificial graft
- Absence of an suitable autologous vein
- Patient is affiliated to the Social Security or equivalent system
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure
- Patient agrees to undergo all protocol required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site
Who cannot join
- No atheromatous disease
- Female of child bearing potential
- Patient has a history of coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions
- Patient is receiving or scheduled to receive anticancer therapy for malignancy within 1 year prior to or after the procedure
- Severe concomitant disease with life expectation < one year
- Known allergy to heparin
Show all 10Show fewer
- Indication for ipsilateral major amputation
- Patient is not able to give informed consent
- Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have become commercially suitable since then, are not considered investigational trials
- In the Investigator's opinion patient has (a) co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, compliance with follow-up requirements or impact the scientific integrity of the study
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 1 country.
21 sites in 1 country
France21 sites
Angers University Hospital
Angers, 49 933
Besançon University Hospital
Besançon, 25 000
Bordeaux University Hospital - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33000
Ambroise Paré university Hospital
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100
Brest University Hospital
Brest, 29200
Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital
Clermont-Ferrand, 63 003
Dijon University Hospital
Dijon, 21079
Lille University Hospital
Lille, 59037
Lyon University Hospital - Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69003
Timone hospital
Marseille, 13005
Nancy University Hospital
Nancy, 54500
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, 44800
Hopital Pasteur
Nice, 06000
Saint Joseph Hospital
Paris, 75014
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, 75015
Bichat Hospital
Paris, 75018
Poitiers University Hospital
Poitiers, 86000
Reims university Hospital
Reims, 51092
Saint Etienne University Hospital
Saint-Etienne, 42270
Nouvel Hopital Civil
Strasbourg, 67091
Valenciennes University Hospital
Valenciennes, 59322
About this study
Official title: Polytetrafluoroethylen (PTFE) Vascular Prostheses With Heparin Bonded Luminal Surfaces vs Crude ePTFE in the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia Lesions in the Absence of a Suitable Autologous Vein
Open repair could be recommended in a first line of treatment to revascularize critical limb ischemia patients or performed in a second line of treatment in case of failure of endovascular repair. A good quality vein is one of the main factors that influence the clinical success of open revascularization for below-knee popliteal. In the absence of an suitable autologous vein, prosthesis such as polytetrafluoroethylen (PTFE) graft could be an option but demonstrated worse clinical and morphological results compared to autologous greater saphenous vein. Consequently, there is still a room for improvement in CLI patients in the absence of an suitable autologous vein in whom endovascular repair failed.
Recently, PTFE with heparin-bound to the luminal surface (Hb-PTFE) significantly reduced the overall risk of primary graft failure by 37%, in particular, risk reduction was 50% in femoropopliteal bypass cases in cases with critical ischemia (58% Primary patency for crude ePTFE versus 80% primary patency for PROPATEN at 1 year follow-up) (Lindholt, et. al. 2011).
Read more
Additionally, a weighted average from the literature suggests a 76% primary patency for below knee bypasses performed with PROPATEN at one year follow-up, whereas a published meta-analysis suggests a 59% primary patency for below knee crude ePTFE at one year follow-up. At two year follow-up using the same approach, the average primary patency for PROPATEN was 67% versus 43% for standard ePTFE.
The aim of this study is to assess PTFE with heparin-bound to the luminal surface as an alternative to crude PTFE in absence of good venous conduit in patients with CLI.
Read the detailed description
Patient inclusion in this study will be proposed 60 to 1-days period preceding the surgical procedure. The patient will be randomized in the crude PTFE or in the Propaten groups. Regarding the intervention, the technique used during the therapeutic procedure shall be left to the operator's discretion, except the type of the graft. Demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data will be collected prospectively. Patient will be assessed and followed up according a current care. The cost difference between both groups will be identified.
- Conditions
- Ischemia Lesions
- Being tested
- revascularization, Propaten®, Crude PTFE
- Keywords
- vascular prostheses, heparin, ischemia lesions, vascular, critical limb ischemia lesions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
revascularizationProcedure or surgery
open revascularization for below-knee popliteal in the absence of an suitable autologous vein with PTFE.
Propaten®Device
Propaten®
Crude PTFEDevice
Crude PTFE
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Revascularization by (Propaten)® | Experimental | Revascularization by PTFE with heparin bonded luminal surface (Propaten)® Receives: Procedure: revascularization; Device: Propaten® |
| Revascularization by Crude PTFE | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: revascularization; Device: Crude PTFE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary patency at 1 year:
It was defined as a patent graft without any intervention to open up or prevent a graft occlusion. Demonstrably patent graft should be by a duplex ultrasound color-flow scan.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (15)
Technical success defined as a patent bypass without stenosis of the proximal and the distal anastomoses.
Stenosis was defined as >30% diameter stenosis noted on intraoperative arteriography.
Measured: 2 years
Perioperative complications
defined as any general complications or local complications that caused or prolonged hospitalization and/or re-intervention, lymphorrhea of more than 3-days and post-operative paresthesia that required drugs. The general complications included death from any cause, MACE. Local complications included MALE, hematoma, active bleeding, local infection, thrombosis, delayed wound healing and false aneurysm
Measured: 2 years
Primary sustained clinical improvement
defined as a wound healing and rest pain resolution for patients in CLI, without the need for repeated graft it self or anastomoses in surviving patients.
Measured: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
defined as primary sustained clinical improvement including the need for repeated graft it self or anastomoses.
Measured: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Primary patency
defined as a patent graft without any intervention to open up or prevent a graft occlusion. Demonstrably patent graft should be by a duplex ultrasound color-flow scan.
Measured: 1 and 24 months post procedure
Major adverse cardiovascular events
defined as MACEs including all cardiac deaths, Q wave infarction, stroke
Measured: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event)-free survival rates in subjects with CLI randomized to Propaten vs. crude ePTFE.
MALE is defined as above-ankle amputation of the index limb or major reintervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy/ thrombolysis).
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
Limb salvage defined as freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb
Measured: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Secondary patency
secondary patency in which graft patency is lost (occlusion) and restored by thrombectomy, thrombolysis, or transluminal angioplasty, and/or any problems with the graft itself or one of its anastomoses require revision or reconstruction. Demonstrably patent graft should be by a duplex ultrasound color-flow scan.
Measured: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Assisted patency
: Assisted patency at 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure, in which patency was never lost but maintained by prophylactic intervention. Demonstrably patent graft should be by a duplex ultrasound color-flow scan.
Measured: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Death
Death (all cause)
Measured: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Ankle brachial index
Post-operative assessment (clinical, morphological, hemodynamic criteria)
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Quality of life at inclusion, .
assessed according the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire
Measured: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 24 months
Cost utility analysis (CUA)
In CUA, the outcomes of an intervention are evaluated in terms of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs). QALYs are a numerical index that encompasses both the length of life and the health-related quality-of-life.
Measured: 2 years
cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)
The Measure of outcome for CEA will be the number of Life Years Gained (LYG) at 2 years
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2018
- Study start13 Feb 2018
- Primary completion29 Jan 2024
- Study completion29 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ischemia LesionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nantes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 228 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- W.L.Gore & Associates
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yann Gouëffic, Pr, Principal investigator, Saint Joseph Hospital Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03430076
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC17_0205
- Acronym
- REPLACE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Polytetrafluoroethylen (PTFE) Vascular Prostheses With Heparin Bonded Luminal Surfaces vs Crude ePTFE in the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia Lesions in the Absence of a Suitable Autologous Vein
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03430076
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REPLACE / RC17_0205
- Conditions
- Ischemia Lesions
- Keywords
- vascular prostheses, heparin, ischemia lesions, vascular, critical limb ischemia lesions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 228 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- W.L.Gore & Associates
- Study start
- 13 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Open repair could be recommended in a first line of treatment to revascularize critical limb ischemia patients or performed in a second line of treatment in case of failure of endovascular repair. A good quality vein is one of the main factors that influence the clinical success of open revascularization for below-knee popliteal. In the absence of an suitable autologous vein, prosthesis such as polytetrafluoroethylen (PTFE) graft could be an option but demonstrated worse clinical and morphological results compared to autologous greater saphenous vein. Consequently, there is still a room for improvement in CLI patients in the absence of an suitable autologous vein in whom endovascular repair failed.
Recently, PTFE with heparin-bound to the luminal surface (Hb-PTFE) significantly reduced the overall risk of primary graft failure by 37%, in particular, risk reduction was 50% in femoropopliteal bypass cases in cases with critical ischemia (58% Primary patency for crude ePTFE versus 80% primary patency for PROPATEN at 1 year follow-up) (Lindholt, et. al. 2011).
Additionally, a weighted average from the literature suggests a 76% primary patency for below knee bypasses performed with PROPATEN at one year follow-up, whereas a published meta-analysis suggests a 59% primary patency for below knee crude ePTFE at one year follow-up. At two year follow-up using the same approach, the average primary patency for PROPATEN was 67% versus 43% for standard ePTFE.
The aim of this study is to assess PTFE with heparin-bound to the luminal surface as an alternative to crude PTFE in absence of good venous conduit in patients with CLI.
Detailed description
Patient inclusion in this study will be proposed 60 to 1-days period preceding the surgical procedure. The patient will be randomized in the crude PTFE or in the Propaten groups. Regarding the intervention, the technique used during the therapeutic procedure shall be left to the operator's discretion, except the type of the graft. Demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data will be collected prospectively. Patient will be assessed and followed up according a current care. The cost difference between both groups will be identified.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Revascularization by (Propaten)® | Experimental | Procedure: revascularization, Device: Propaten®Revascularization by PTFE with heparin bonded luminal surface (Propaten)® |
| Revascularization by Crude PTFE | Active comparator | Procedure: revascularization, Device: Crude PTFE |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient ≥18 years
- Patient presented critical limb ischemia (Rutherford classification: 4-6)
- Indication of below the knee bypass with an artificial graft
- Absence of an suitable autologous vein
- Patient is affiliated to the Social Security or equivalent system
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- No atheromatous disease
- Female of child bearing potential
- Patient has a history of coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions
- Patient is receiving or scheduled to receive anticancer therapy for malignancy within 1 year prior to or after the procedure
- Severe concomitant disease with life expectation < one year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| revascularizationopen revascularization for below-knee popliteal in the absence of an suitable autologous vein with PTFE. | Procedure or surgery | Revascularization by (Propaten)®, Revascularization by Crude PTFE |
| Propaten®Propaten® | Device | Revascularization by (Propaten)® |
| Crude PTFECrude PTFE | Device | Revascularization by Crude PTFE |
Primary outcome
Primary patency at 1 year:
Time frame: 1 year
It was defined as a patent graft without any intervention to open up or prevent a graft occlusion. Demonstrably patent graft should be by a duplex ultrasound color-flow scan.
15 secondary outcomes
Technical success defined as a patent bypass without stenosis of the proximal and the distal anastomoses.
Time frame: 2 years
Perioperative complications
Time frame: 2 years
Primary sustained clinical improvement
Time frame: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
Time frame: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Primary patency
Time frame: 1 and 24 months post procedure
Major adverse cardiovascular events
Time frame: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event)-free survival rates in subjects with CLI randomized to Propaten vs. crude ePTFE.
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
Limb salvage defined as freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb
Time frame: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Secondary patency
Time frame: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Assisted patency
Time frame: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Death
Time frame: 1, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Ankle brachial index
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure
Quality of life at inclusion, .
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 24 months
Cost utility analysis (CUA)
Time frame: 2 years
cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ischemia Lesions
Recruiting
Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Mission 48-mm Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions
Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
ADVA ACE Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Disease Patients (ADVANCE)
Coronary Artery Disease, De Novo Stenosis Lesion
Not yet recruiting
TRADENT Scoring Balloon Versus Non-scoring Balloon for Lesion Preparation in DCB-Based Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment of Primary Coronary Artery Vascular Lesions With Biolimus Coated Coronary Balloon Dilation Catheter
Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruiting
Safety and Clinical Performance of the Freesolve Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold System in the Treatment of Subjects With Long de Novo Lesions
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis of Coronary Artery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yann Gouëffic, Pr principal investigator
Saint Joseph Hospital Paris
21 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing revascularization, Propaten® and Crude PTFE in people with Ischemia Lesions, run by Nantes University Hospital at 21 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary patency at 1 year: (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.