AzTrials
AzTrials

Task PerformanceNCT03433209

Electrosurgery Wars;Ligasure or Enseal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

A study testing Ligasure device and Articulating Enseal in people with Task Performance, run by Antalya Training and Research Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The effect of two different bipolar instruments were compared in terms of operative time, total operative time, intra-operative blood loss and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Task Performance
What is being tested?
Ligasure device and Articulating Enseal
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
134 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jun 2016to 2 Feb 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 or older
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Suspected malignancy

About this study

Official title: Electrosurgery Wars;Ligasure or Enseal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The effect of two different bipolar instruments were compared in terms of operative time, total operative time, intra-operative blood loss and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Devices included the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC).

Read the detailed description

This study is a single-center, single-blinded, randomized control trial that was conducted at the University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital.

The study was single-blinded in that the patient was not informed of their group assignment; it is impossible to blind the surgeon using the devices.

Methods and Procedures:

Patients were recruited from outpatient clinics and informed about the study before enrollment. Women aged over 18 years scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications between June 2016 and November 2017 were included in the study after obtaining written consent.

Women who had given consent were randomized one day before surgery to one of two groups:

Group 1: The Ligasure device used during the hysterectomy. Group 2: The articulating Enseal device used during the hysterectomy.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Suspected malignancy

Surgical technique:

All laparoscopic procedures were performed under general anesthesia. An experienced surgeon, who has an experience of over 100 cases of TLH with both LigaSure and Enseal, performed all the procedures. Because both devices have long been used in the operations, they are always ready for use in our operation rooms. During the study, the first assistant was always a second or a third year assistant surgeon and the second assistant holding the uterine manipulator was a first year assistant surgeon. Operative time was recorded in minutes with a digital watch by a first year resident by dictation of the primary surgeon of the start and stop times.

After positioning the patient in lithotomy position and placement of a Foley catheter, a Rumi II (CooperSurgical, Inc, Trumbull, CT, USA) uterine manipulator with Koh cup (Bard Medical, Covington, GA, USA) of appropriate size was placed. The first assistant stood on the right side of the patient and held the camera. The second assistant held the uterine manipulator. The abdominal cavity was entered by direct trocar insertion. The site of insertion varied, being the umbilicus or Lee-Huang point, according to the size of the uterus. After pneumoperitoneum was obtained, the patient was positioned in the Trendelenburg position and three additional trocars, all 5 mm in size, were inserted from both inguinal regions and suprapubic region. Following exploration of the abdominal cavity, adhesiolysis was performed where necessary. The round ligaments were sealed and transected, the bladder peritoneum was opened, the utero-ovarian ligaments were sealed and cut, the bladder peritoneum was dissected from the vagina, the uterine vessels were skeletonized, sealed and dissected followed by sacro-uterine ligament dissection and finally the vaginal wall on the rim of the vaginal part of the uterine manipulator was cut by Harmonic AceTM. The uterus was removed vaginally in all operations but in case of large uteri, either a Chardonnen's morcellation knife (Karl Storz GmBH, Tuttlingen, Germany) or a power morcellator was used for uterine section before retrieval. The vaginal cuff was closed by laparoscopic stitching with number 1 Vicryl suture. In cases where bilateral or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was also indicated, the procedure was performed after removal of the uterus in order to prevent interference with operative time which was our primary outcome measure. To seal and transect uterine attachments, the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA), using the ForceTriadTM Energy Platform (Covidien, Boulder, CO, USA) was used in one group and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) using the Ethicon GEN11TM generator (Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) was used in the other group.

Follow-up was performed on postoperative day 7, and then at 1 month.Patients were also seen at our clinic if they developed symptoms between follow-up visits and complications recorded.

Being tested
Ligasure device, Articulating Enseal
Keywords
Advanced bipolar energy devices, ENSEAL, LigaSure, Operative time, Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ligasure deviceDevice

    Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy

  • Articulating EnsealDevice

    Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy

Study groups in NCT03433209
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ligasure deviceActive comparatorThis group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the Ligasure energy device
Receives: Device: Ligasure device
Articulating EnsealActive comparatorThis group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the articulating Enseal energy device
Receives: Device: Articulating Enseal

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative time

    Defined as time from start of sealing and transection of the round ligament until start of colpotomy, was the primary endpoint.

    Measured: 16 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Total operative time

    Time from placement of the first trocar until removal of all trocars

    Measured: 16 months

  2. Intra-operative estimated blood loss

    Calculated by subtracting total volume of irrigated fluid from the amount measured in the aspiration bag after positioning the patient in reverse Trendelenburg position at the end of the operation

    Measured: 16 months

  3. Intra-operative complications

    Visceral or vascular injury, hemorrhage, conversion to laparotomy, mechanical or functional device failure

    Measured: 16 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2018
  2. Study start1 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion2 Feb 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03433209
Sponsor's protocol ID
9-1
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
8 Feb 2018
Last updated
15 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ligasure device and Articulating Enseal in people with Task Performance, run by Antalya Training and Research Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operative time (time frame: 16 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in