Task PerformanceNCT03433209
Electrosurgery Wars;Ligasure or Enseal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
A study testing Ligasure device and Articulating Enseal in people with Task Performance, run by Antalya Training and Research Hospital.
Trial summary
The effect of two different bipolar instruments were compared in terms of operative time, total operative time, intra-operative blood loss and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Task Performance
- What is being tested?
- Ligasure device and Articulating Enseal
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2016to 2 Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 or older
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy
Who cannot join
- Under 18 years of age
- Suspected malignancy
About this study
Official title: Electrosurgery Wars;Ligasure or Enseal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
The effect of two different bipolar instruments were compared in terms of operative time, total operative time, intra-operative blood loss and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Devices included the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC).
Read the detailed description
This study is a single-center, single-blinded, randomized control trial that was conducted at the University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital.
The study was single-blinded in that the patient was not informed of their group assignment; it is impossible to blind the surgeon using the devices.
Methods and Procedures:
Patients were recruited from outpatient clinics and informed about the study before enrollment. Women aged over 18 years scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications between June 2016 and November 2017 were included in the study after obtaining written consent.
Women who had given consent were randomized one day before surgery to one of two groups:
Group 1: The Ligasure device used during the hysterectomy. Group 2: The articulating Enseal device used during the hysterectomy.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or older
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years of age
- Suspected malignancy
Surgical technique:
All laparoscopic procedures were performed under general anesthesia. An experienced surgeon, who has an experience of over 100 cases of TLH with both LigaSure and Enseal, performed all the procedures. Because both devices have long been used in the operations, they are always ready for use in our operation rooms. During the study, the first assistant was always a second or a third year assistant surgeon and the second assistant holding the uterine manipulator was a first year assistant surgeon. Operative time was recorded in minutes with a digital watch by a first year resident by dictation of the primary surgeon of the start and stop times.
After positioning the patient in lithotomy position and placement of a Foley catheter, a Rumi II (CooperSurgical, Inc, Trumbull, CT, USA) uterine manipulator with Koh cup (Bard Medical, Covington, GA, USA) of appropriate size was placed. The first assistant stood on the right side of the patient and held the camera. The second assistant held the uterine manipulator. The abdominal cavity was entered by direct trocar insertion. The site of insertion varied, being the umbilicus or Lee-Huang point, according to the size of the uterus. After pneumoperitoneum was obtained, the patient was positioned in the Trendelenburg position and three additional trocars, all 5 mm in size, were inserted from both inguinal regions and suprapubic region. Following exploration of the abdominal cavity, adhesiolysis was performed where necessary. The round ligaments were sealed and transected, the bladder peritoneum was opened, the utero-ovarian ligaments were sealed and cut, the bladder peritoneum was dissected from the vagina, the uterine vessels were skeletonized, sealed and dissected followed by sacro-uterine ligament dissection and finally the vaginal wall on the rim of the vaginal part of the uterine manipulator was cut by Harmonic AceTM. The uterus was removed vaginally in all operations but in case of large uteri, either a Chardonnen's morcellation knife (Karl Storz GmBH, Tuttlingen, Germany) or a power morcellator was used for uterine section before retrieval. The vaginal cuff was closed by laparoscopic stitching with number 1 Vicryl suture. In cases where bilateral or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was also indicated, the procedure was performed after removal of the uterus in order to prevent interference with operative time which was our primary outcome measure. To seal and transect uterine attachments, the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA), using the ForceTriadTM Energy Platform (Covidien, Boulder, CO, USA) was used in one group and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) using the Ethicon GEN11TM generator (Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) was used in the other group.
Follow-up was performed on postoperative day 7, and then at 1 month.Patients were also seen at our clinic if they developed symptoms between follow-up visits and complications recorded.
- Conditions
- Task Performance
- Being tested
- Ligasure device, Articulating Enseal
- Keywords
- Advanced bipolar energy devices, ENSEAL, LigaSure, Operative time, Total laparoscopic hysterectomy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ligasure deviceDevice
Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy
Articulating EnsealDevice
Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ligasure device | Active comparator | This group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the Ligasure energy device Receives: Device: Ligasure device |
| Articulating Enseal | Active comparator | This group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the articulating Enseal energy device Receives: Device: Articulating Enseal |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Operative time
Defined as time from start of sealing and transection of the round ligament until start of colpotomy, was the primary endpoint.
Measured: 16 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Total operative time
Time from placement of the first trocar until removal of all trocars
Measured: 16 months
Intra-operative estimated blood loss
Calculated by subtracting total volume of irrigated fluid from the amount measured in the aspiration bag after positioning the patient in reverse Trendelenburg position at the end of the operation
Measured: 16 months
Intra-operative complications
Visceral or vascular injury, hemorrhage, conversion to laparotomy, mechanical or functional device failure
Measured: 16 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2016
- Primary completion30 Nov 2017
- Study completion2 Feb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Task PerformanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Antalya Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Burak Karadag, MD, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03433209
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electrosurgery Wars;Ligasure or Enseal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03433209
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9-1
- Conditions
- Task Performance
- Keywords
- Advanced bipolar energy devices, ENSEAL, LigaSure, Operative time, Total laparoscopic hysterectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Antalya Training and Research HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The effect of two different bipolar instruments were compared in terms of operative time, total operative time, intra-operative blood loss and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Devices included the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC).
Detailed description
This study is a single-center, single-blinded, randomized control trial that was conducted at the University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital.
The study was single-blinded in that the patient was not informed of their group assignment; it is impossible to blind the surgeon using the devices.
Methods and Procedures:
Patients were recruited from outpatient clinics and informed about the study before enrollment. Women aged over 18 years scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications between June 2016 and November 2017 were included in the study after obtaining written consent.
Women who had given consent were randomized one day before surgery to one of two groups:
Group 1: The Ligasure device used during the hysterectomy. Group 2: The articulating Enseal device used during the hysterectomy.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or older
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years of age
- Suspected malignancy
Surgical technique:
All laparoscopic procedures were performed under general anesthesia. An experienced surgeon, who has an experience of over 100 cases of TLH with both LigaSure and Enseal, performed all the procedures. Because both devices have long been used in the operations, they are always ready for use in our operation rooms. During the study, the first assistant was always a second or a third year assistant surgeon and the second assistant holding the uterine manipulator was a first year assistant surgeon. Operative time was recorded in minutes with a digital watch by a first year resident by dictation of the primary surgeon of the start and stop times.
After positioning the patient in lithotomy position and placement of a Foley catheter, a Rumi II (CooperSurgical, Inc, Trumbull, CT, USA) uterine manipulator with Koh cup (Bard Medical, Covington, GA, USA) of appropriate size was placed. The first assistant stood on the right side of the patient and held the camera. The second assistant held the uterine manipulator. The abdominal cavity was entered by direct trocar insertion. The site of insertion varied, being the umbilicus or Lee-Huang point, according to the size of the uterus. After pneumoperitoneum was obtained, the patient was positioned in the Trendelenburg position and three additional trocars, all 5 mm in size, were inserted from both inguinal regions and suprapubic region. Following exploration of the abdominal cavity, adhesiolysis was performed where necessary. The round ligaments were sealed and transected, the bladder peritoneum was opened, the utero-ovarian ligaments were sealed and cut, the bladder peritoneum was dissected from the vagina, the uterine vessels were skeletonized, sealed and dissected followed by sacro-uterine ligament dissection and finally the vaginal wall on the rim of the vaginal part of the uterine manipulator was cut by Harmonic AceTM. The uterus was removed vaginally in all operations but in case of large uteri, either a Chardonnen's morcellation knife (Karl Storz GmBH, Tuttlingen, Germany) or a power morcellator was used for uterine section before retrieval. The vaginal cuff was closed by laparoscopic stitching with number 1 Vicryl suture. In cases where bilateral or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was also indicated, the procedure was performed after removal of the uterus in order to prevent interference with operative time which was our primary outcome measure. To seal and transect uterine attachments, the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA), using the ForceTriadTM Energy Platform (Covidien, Boulder, CO, USA) was used in one group and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) using the Ethicon GEN11TM generator (Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) was used in the other group.
Follow-up was performed on postoperative day 7, and then at 1 month.Patients were also seen at our clinic if they developed symptoms between follow-up visits and complications recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ligasure device | Active comparator | Device: Ligasure deviceThis group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the Ligasure energy device |
| Articulating Enseal | Active comparator | Device: Articulating EnsealThis group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the articulating Enseal energy device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 or older
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Under 18 years of age
- Suspected malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ligasure deviceVessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy | Device | Ligasure device |
| Articulating EnsealVessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy | Device | Articulating Enseal |
Primary outcome
Operative time
Time frame: 16 months
Defined as time from start of sealing and transection of the round ligament until start of colpotomy, was the primary endpoint.
3 secondary outcomes
Total operative time
Time frame: 16 months
Intra-operative estimated blood loss
Time frame: 16 months
Intra-operative complications
Time frame: 16 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2018.
Related trials for Task Performance
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Acute Nicotine Gum and Auditory Brain Responses in Adults With Chronic Tinnitus
Tinnitus, Chronic Subjective Tinnitus
Not yet recruiting
Neuromodulation Combined With Dual FES Cycling and Cognitive Training After Stroke
Stroke
Recruiting
Neurocognitive Enrichment During Functional Performance Testing in Chronic Ankle Instability
Chronic Ankle Instability, CAI
Recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation Combined With Tai Chi for Mild Cognitive Impairment
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Task Core Stabilization Training in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ligasure device and Articulating Enseal in people with Task Performance, run by Antalya Training and Research Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Operative time (time frame: 16 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2018.