AzTrials
AzTrials

NeuropathyNCT03436680

Home-Based Neurofeedback Program in Treating Participants With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

A study testing Best Practice, Neurofeedback and Quality-of-Life Assessment in people with Neuropathy, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial studies how well a home-based neurofeedback program works in treating participants with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage that affects motor function). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neuropathy
What is being tested?
Best Practice, Neurofeedback and Quality-of-Life Assessment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must have the ability to understand and read English, sign a written informed consent, and be willing to follow protocol requirements.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
  • Neuropathic pain score >= 4 on a 0-10 numeric pain scale (numeric rating scale [NRS]) and/or grade 3 or higher neuropathic symptoms according to the National Cancer Institute's 4 point grading scale.
  • Neuropathic symptoms must be related to chemotherapy (in the opinion of the treating physician).
  • Patients must have had neuropathic symptoms for a minimum of 3 months.
  • No plans to change pain medication regimen during the course of the study.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Off active chemotherapy treatment for minimum of 6 months.
  • Hormonal (e.g., tamoxifen or arimidex, etc.) and targeted (tarceva and avastin, etc.) therapies allowed as long as they will be continued during the course of the study.
  • Willing to come to MD Anderson for the intake and follow up data acquisition and to receive their equipment.
  • Willing to allow research staff to come to their homes or to return the equipment to MD Anderson (MDA) in the case of equipment malfunction.
  • Have had a diagnosis of cancer treated with chemotherapy.
  • Live within a 50 mile radius of MD Anderson's main campus.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are taking any antipsychotic medications.
  • Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) disease, such as clinically-evident metastases or leptomeningeal disease, dementia, or encephalopathy.
  • Patients who have ever been diagnosed with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.
  • Patients with known, previously diagnosed peripheral neuropathy from causes other than chemotherapy.
  • Patients who have a history of head injury or who have known seizure activity.

About this study

Official title: Feasibility of Home-Based Neurofeedback to Treat Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

This trial studies how well a home-based neurofeedback program works in treating participants with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage that affects motor function). Neurofeedback training is a type of therapy that uses an electroencephalograph and a computer software program to measure brain wave activity. It may help teach participants how to change their own brain waves to lower their perception of pain symptoms and improve overall quality of life.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Examine the feasibility of using a home-based neurofeedback system and dry electroencephalography (EEG) cap to treat chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Estimate the effects of home-based neurofeedback (HBNF) on symptoms of (CIPN) versus a wait list (WL) control group in cancer patients.

II. Estimate the effects of home-based neurofeedback (HBNF), versus WL, on the cortical and subcortical brain regions associated with CIPN.

III. Estimate the effects of a HBNF on other aspects of pain, cancer-related symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and mental health.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Participants complete at least neurofeedback training sessions over 30 minutes 2 times a week for up to 5 weeks.

GROUP II: Participants receive standard of care.

After completion of study, participants are followed up at 1 week for Group I and 6 weeks for Group II.

Conditions
Neuropathy
Being tested
Best Practice, Neurofeedback, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Best PracticeOther

    Also called standard of care, standard therapy

    Receive standard of care

  • NeurofeedbackBehavioural

    Also called EEG biofeedback

    Complete neurofeedback training sessions

  • Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther

    Also called Quality of Life Assessment

    Ancillary studies

  • Questionnaire AdministrationOther

    Ancillary studies

Study groups in NCT03436680
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group I (neurofeedback)ExperimentalParticipants complete at least neurofeedback training sessions over 30 minutes 2 times a week for up to 5 weeks.
Receives: Other: Best Practice; Behavioral: Neurofeedback; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration
Group II (standard of care)Active comparatorParticipants receive standard of care.
Receives: Other: Best Practice; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of a Home-Based Neurofeedback (HBNF) System

    HBNF intervention feasible if the average number of HBNF sessions completed across patients in the HBNF arm is >= 15.0 (or on average the proportion of sessions completed is >= 75%).

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Effects of Home-Based Neurofeedback (HBNF) on Symptoms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) Versus a Waitlist (WL) Control Group in Cancer Patients

    Summary statistics and 90% confidence intervals calculated for the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) rated from 0 - 10 by study arm at baseline and at the end of treatment.

    Measured: Baseline and at 6 weeks

  2. Effects of Neurofeedback on the Cortical and Subcortical Brain Regions Associated with Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) and Effects of Home-Based Neurofeedback (HBNF) versus Waitlist (WL) Control Group determined by EEG,

    Measured: Baseline and at 6 weeks

  3. Effects of Home-Based Neurofeedback (HBNF) on Other Aspects of Cancer-Related Symptoms Using Patient Surveys

    Measured: Baseline and within 7 days of the conclusion of treatment.

  4. Effects of Home-Based Neurofeedback (HBNF) on Symptoms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) Versus a Waitlist (WL) Control Group in Cancer Patients

    Summary statistics and 90% confidence intervals calculated for the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI) by study arm at baseline and at the end of treatment.

    Measured: Baseline and at 6 weeks

  5. Effects of Neurofeedback on the Cortical and Subcortical Brain Regions Associated with CIPN Determined by Changes in EEG as Measured by Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA).

    Measured: Baseline and at 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Feb 2018
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Due to lack of funds, time, and staff cannot activate the study.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03436680
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017-0309
Other IDs
NCI-2018-01049, 2017-0309, P30CA016672
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
26 Jan 2018
Last updated
4 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Best Practice, Neurofeedback and Quality-of-Life Assessment in people with Neuropathy, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of a Home-Based Neurofeedback (HBNF) System (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in