AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid LeukemiaMTSANCT03439371

Micro-transplantation in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A study testing HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation after induction chemotherapy in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 7 sites in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims at evaluating the safety and the tolerance of the micro-transplantation in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible to conventional allogeneic transplantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
What is being tested?
HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation after induction chemotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
7 sitesFrance
Study dates
8 Jan 2019to 4 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient affiliated to a social security regimen or beneficiary of the same
  • Signed written informed consent form
  • Patient, ≥ 60 years-old - < 75 years-old, with established diagnosis of de novo or secondary AML with intermediate-risk or adverse-risk cytogenetic profile, or with established myelodysplasic syndromes (RAEB), in pathologically confirmed complete remission following anti-leukemic induction therapy (<5% blasts)
  • Contra-indication to conditioning regimen in conventional allogeneic transplantation

Who cannot join

  • Patient with established diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with standard-risk cytogenetic profile
  • Promyelocytic leukemia t(15;17)
  • CBF-AML t(8;21) or inv(16)
  • Normal karyotype with a favorable molecular profile: NPM1+ and FLT3-; NPM1+, FLT3- and double mutation CEBPα or chronic myeloid leukemia in blastic phase
  • Patient under guardianship or deprived of his liberty or any condition that may affect the patient's ability to understand and sign the informed consent
  • Refusing participation

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

France7 sites
  • CHU Estaing

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble

    Grenoble

  • CHRU de Lille

    Lille

  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

    Lyon

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy

    Nancy

  • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière

    Paris

  • CHU de Saint-Etienne

    Saint-Etienne, 42055

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Multicenter, Open Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and the Tolerance of Micro-transplantation in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (MTSA)

This study aims at evaluating the safety and the tolerance of the micro-transplantation in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible to conventional allogeneic transplantation.

Read the detailed description

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years. Outcomes of AML in elderly population remain unsatisfactory with low rates of complete remission, poor disease-free and overall survival. Therapeutic management of older patients with AML deals with patient-related features (i.e. comorbid conditions and performance status) as well as disease-related prognostic factors (i.e. cytogenetics and molecular genetics). Even if allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation provides the strongest antineoplasic effect, this treatment option remains limited for older patients owing to toxicities, the development of significant graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and logistics of donor availability. More recently, micro-transplantation has emerged as an alternative strategy based on the infusion of mobilized HLA-mismatched related donor cells after induction chemotherapy, thus exerting a graft-versus-leukemia effect without substantial donor engraftment and GVHD. Therefore, there is much of interest in investigating the efficacy and the safety of this method for older patients with AML who are not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Being tested
HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation after induction chemotherapy
Keywords
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Micro-transplantation, Elderly, Graft-versus-leukemia
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation after induction chemotherapyOther

    HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation after induction chemotherapy

Study groups in NCT03439371
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HLA-mismatched micro-transplantationExperimentalHLA-mismatched micro-transplantation
Receives: Other: HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation after induction chemotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of overall survival

    Rate of overall survival will be reported.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Hematopoietic recovery

    Number of platelets will be reported.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Hematopoietic recovery

    Number of neutrophils will be reported.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Hematopoietic recovery

    Percentage of leukaemic blasts will be reported.

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Rate of complete remission

    Rate of complete remission :

    Measured: 2 years

  5. GVHD (graft versus host disease)

    Presence of graft versus host disease will be reported.

    Measured: 2 years

  6. Median overall survival

    Median overall survival will be calculated.

    Measured: 2 years

  7. Median progression-free survival

    Median progression-free survival will be calculated.

    Measured: 2 years

  8. Microchimerism

    Presence of microchimerism will be reported.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2018
  2. Study start8 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion10 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion4 Jul 2024

Why it stopped: Inclusion is proceeding too slowly

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03439371
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017-1201
Other IDs
2017-A03572-51
Acronym
MTSA
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
5 Feb 2018
Last updated
13 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation after induction chemotherapy in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 7 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Inclusion is proceeding too slowly). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of overall survival (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in