AzTrials
AzTrials

Regional AnesthesiaNCT03442036

Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Catheter Designs for Popliteal Nerve Blocks

A study testing Suture-Method Technique and Through-the-Needle Technique in people with Regional Anesthesia and Sciatic Nerve Block, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Following painful surgical procedures, postoperative analgesia is often provided with a single-injection peripheral nerve block. Hothe investigatorsver, even with the longest-acting FDA-approved local anesthetic currently available-bupivacaine-the block duration is measured in hours, while the surgical pain may… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Regional Anesthesia, Sciatic Nerve Block
What is being tested?
Suture-Method Technique and Through-the-Needle Technique
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Apr 2018to 5 Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing ambulatory foot or ankle surgery with a popliteal perineural catheter for postoperative analgesia.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to communicate with research staff
  • Incarceration
  • Clinically apparent neuropathy in the operative extremity
  • Chronic high dose opioid use
  • History of opioid abuse
  • Concurrent surgery outside the block distribution
  • Patients with nerves deeper than 5 cm from the skin

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UCSD Medical Center

    San Diego, California, 92103

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Observer-Masked, Controlled, Parallel-Arm, Clinical Trial Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Perineural Catheter Designs for Continuous Popliteal-Sciatic Nerve Blocks

Following painful surgical procedures, postoperative analgesia is often provided with a single-injection peripheral nerve block. Hothe investigatorsver, even with the longest-acting FDA-approved local anesthetic currently available-bupivacaine-the block duration is measured in hours, while the surgical pain may persist for days. A continuous peripheral nerve block allows a prolonged block, consisting of a percutaneously-inserted catheter with its orifice adjacent to a target nerve/plexus through which local anesthetic may be administered. Two basic perineural catheter designs currently exist: (1) catheters that are inserted either through or over a straight hollow-bore needle; and, (2) catheters that are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve ("suture-method" design). To date, a comparison of the relative risks and benefits of these two designs have not been investigated. The investigators therefore propose a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, parallel-arm, clinical trial to compare these two catheter designs when used to provide post-surgical analgesia following foot and ankle surgery.

Read the detailed description

This investigation will be a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, parallel-arm, human-subjects clinical trial. Of note, the investigators will be using standard-of-care perineural catheters and local anesthetic under their FDA-approved purpose and do not plan to research a possible change of indication or use of these drugs as part of this research project.

Consenting adults undergoing surgery with a planned popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter placement will be offered enrollment. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD IRB-approved ICF.

Following written, informed consent, the investigators will collect baseline anthropomorphic information (age, sex, height, and the investigatorsight). Subjects will be then be randomized using a computer-generated list and opaque, sealed envelopes to one of two treatment groups (blocks of 4, no stratification): perineural catheter insertion using (1) through-the-needle technique or (2) suture technique. All catheters will be placed by a regional anesthesia fellow or resident under the direct supervision and guidance of a regional anesthesia attending (or by the attending him/herself).

All subjects will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned prone. Midazolam and fentanyl (IV) will be titrated for patient comfort, while ensuring that patients remain responsive to verbal cues. The area that will be subsequently covered by the catheter dressing will be clipped of hair, if necessary. The ultrasound will be placed to visualize the short axis (cross-section) of the sciatic nerve to identify the sciatic nerve bifurcation which will subsequently be marked, as well as the location 5 cm cephalad to the bifurcation. The area will be cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. The ultrasound probe will be placed to visualize the short-axis (cross-section) of the target nerve(s) and the target for the catheter to intercept the nerve may be anywhere between the bifurcation and 5 cm cephalad to the bifurcation. All catheters will be placed using standard UCSD ultrasound-guided perineural catheter techniques as previously described. Normal saline 5-20 mL will be administered via the needle and/or catheter to allow catheter insertion and/or testing of catheter location (viewed with ultrasound).

Local anesthetic (20 mL, lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000-400,000) will be administered via the catheter. A "successful" catheter insertion will be defined as sensory-block onset in the tibial nerve distribution within 30 minutes following the local anesthetic injection. If the nerve block fails, the catheter will be replaced or the patient removed from further study.

An infusion pump will be attached to the patient's perineural catheter and initiated within the recovery room. The pump will provide ropivacaine 0.2% at a 6 mL/h basal rate infusion and a 4 mL patient-controlled bolus with a 30 minute lockout (standard at UCSD). Subjects will be discharged with a prescription for oxycodone 5 mg tablets for supplementary analgesia. Subjects will be contacted via phone for 4 days following surgery to collect study outcome measures: worst, average, least, and current surgical pain (Numeric Rating Scale of 0 to 10, with "0" being no pain and "10" being the worst pain ever experienced), analgesic use (oral opioids and infusion boluses), sleep disturbances, opioid and local anesthetic infusion side effects, local anesthetic leakage, gross catheter dislodgement, sensory and motor block, and satisfaction with pain control. Subjects or their caretakers will remove the catheters at home.

Primary endpoint:

Hypothesis 1: Surgical pain will be noninferior within the first 2 days following foot/ankle surgery with a suture-method compared with a through-the-needle perineural catheter when used for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block to provide postoperative analgesia (the mean "average" pain measured daily with a Numeric Rating Scale).

Hypothesis 2: Opioid consumption will be noninferior within the first 2 days following foot/ankle surgery with a suture-method compared with a through-the-needle perineural catheter when used for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block to provide postoperative analgesia (cumulative dose).

Being tested
Suture-Method Technique, Through-the-Needle Technique
Keywords
Regional Anesthesia, Sciatic Nerve Block, Continuous Nerve Block, Perineural Catheter

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Suture-Method TechniqueDevice

    Perineural catheters are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve

  • Through-the-Needle TechniqueDevice

    Perineural catheters are inserted through a straight hollow-bore needle

Study groups in NCT03442036
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Through-the-Needle TechniqueActive comparatorPerineural catheters are inserted through a straight hollow-bore needle. The perineural catheter will then be used to infuse local anesthetic directly onto the nerve to provide postoperative pain control.
Receives: Device: Through-the-Needle Technique
Suture-Method TechniqueExperimentalPerineural catheters are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve. The perineural catheter will then be used to infuse local anesthetic directly onto the nerve to provide postoperative pain control.
Receives: Device: Suture-Method Technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average Pain

    Pain evaluated using a numeric rating scale with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain

    Measured: first two postoperative days combined

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Opioid Consumption

    Cumulative opioid consumption (oxycodone) measured in milligrams

    Measured: first two postoperative days

  2. Worst Pain

    The worst pain score for the day evaluated using a numeric rating scale with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain

    Measured: Postoperative Days 1 and 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Feb 2018
  2. Study start6 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2019
  4. Study completion5 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Subjects will be randomized using a computer-generated list and opaque, sealed envelopes to one of two treatment groups (blocks of 4, no stratification): perineural catheter insert using (1) through-the-needle technique or (2) suture technique.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03442036
Sponsor's protocol ID
Suture vs Standard Catheters
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
15 Feb 2018
Last updated
17 Feb 2021
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Suture-Method Technique and Through-the-Needle Technique in people with Regional Anesthesia and Sciatic Nerve Block, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average Pain (time frame: first two postoperative days combined). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in