Regional AnesthesiaNCT03442036
Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Catheter Designs for Popliteal Nerve Blocks
A study testing Suture-Method Technique and Through-the-Needle Technique in people with Regional Anesthesia and Sciatic Nerve Block, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Following painful surgical procedures, postoperative analgesia is often provided with a single-injection peripheral nerve block. Hothe investigatorsver, even with the longest-acting FDA-approved local anesthetic currently available-bupivacaine-the block duration is measured in hours, while the surgical pain may… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Regional Anesthesia, Sciatic Nerve Block
- What is being tested?
- Suture-Method Technique and Through-the-Needle Technique
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Apr 2018to 5 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing ambulatory foot or ankle surgery with a popliteal perineural catheter for postoperative analgesia.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Inability to communicate with research staff
- Incarceration
- Clinically apparent neuropathy in the operative extremity
- Chronic high dose opioid use
- History of opioid abuse
- Concurrent surgery outside the block distribution
- Patients with nerves deeper than 5 cm from the skin
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Observer-Masked, Controlled, Parallel-Arm, Clinical Trial Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Perineural Catheter Designs for Continuous Popliteal-Sciatic Nerve Blocks
Following painful surgical procedures, postoperative analgesia is often provided with a single-injection peripheral nerve block. Hothe investigatorsver, even with the longest-acting FDA-approved local anesthetic currently available-bupivacaine-the block duration is measured in hours, while the surgical pain may persist for days. A continuous peripheral nerve block allows a prolonged block, consisting of a percutaneously-inserted catheter with its orifice adjacent to a target nerve/plexus through which local anesthetic may be administered. Two basic perineural catheter designs currently exist: (1) catheters that are inserted either through or over a straight hollow-bore needle; and, (2) catheters that are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve ("suture-method" design). To date, a comparison of the relative risks and benefits of these two designs have not been investigated. The investigators therefore propose a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, parallel-arm, clinical trial to compare these two catheter designs when used to provide post-surgical analgesia following foot and ankle surgery.
Read the detailed description
This investigation will be a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, parallel-arm, human-subjects clinical trial. Of note, the investigators will be using standard-of-care perineural catheters and local anesthetic under their FDA-approved purpose and do not plan to research a possible change of indication or use of these drugs as part of this research project.
Consenting adults undergoing surgery with a planned popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter placement will be offered enrollment. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD IRB-approved ICF.
Following written, informed consent, the investigators will collect baseline anthropomorphic information (age, sex, height, and the investigatorsight). Subjects will be then be randomized using a computer-generated list and opaque, sealed envelopes to one of two treatment groups (blocks of 4, no stratification): perineural catheter insertion using (1) through-the-needle technique or (2) suture technique. All catheters will be placed by a regional anesthesia fellow or resident under the direct supervision and guidance of a regional anesthesia attending (or by the attending him/herself).
All subjects will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned prone. Midazolam and fentanyl (IV) will be titrated for patient comfort, while ensuring that patients remain responsive to verbal cues. The area that will be subsequently covered by the catheter dressing will be clipped of hair, if necessary. The ultrasound will be placed to visualize the short axis (cross-section) of the sciatic nerve to identify the sciatic nerve bifurcation which will subsequently be marked, as well as the location 5 cm cephalad to the bifurcation. The area will be cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. The ultrasound probe will be placed to visualize the short-axis (cross-section) of the target nerve(s) and the target for the catheter to intercept the nerve may be anywhere between the bifurcation and 5 cm cephalad to the bifurcation. All catheters will be placed using standard UCSD ultrasound-guided perineural catheter techniques as previously described. Normal saline 5-20 mL will be administered via the needle and/or catheter to allow catheter insertion and/or testing of catheter location (viewed with ultrasound).
Local anesthetic (20 mL, lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000-400,000) will be administered via the catheter. A "successful" catheter insertion will be defined as sensory-block onset in the tibial nerve distribution within 30 minutes following the local anesthetic injection. If the nerve block fails, the catheter will be replaced or the patient removed from further study.
An infusion pump will be attached to the patient's perineural catheter and initiated within the recovery room. The pump will provide ropivacaine 0.2% at a 6 mL/h basal rate infusion and a 4 mL patient-controlled bolus with a 30 minute lockout (standard at UCSD). Subjects will be discharged with a prescription for oxycodone 5 mg tablets for supplementary analgesia. Subjects will be contacted via phone for 4 days following surgery to collect study outcome measures: worst, average, least, and current surgical pain (Numeric Rating Scale of 0 to 10, with "0" being no pain and "10" being the worst pain ever experienced), analgesic use (oral opioids and infusion boluses), sleep disturbances, opioid and local anesthetic infusion side effects, local anesthetic leakage, gross catheter dislodgement, sensory and motor block, and satisfaction with pain control. Subjects or their caretakers will remove the catheters at home.
Primary endpoint:
Hypothesis 1: Surgical pain will be noninferior within the first 2 days following foot/ankle surgery with a suture-method compared with a through-the-needle perineural catheter when used for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block to provide postoperative analgesia (the mean "average" pain measured daily with a Numeric Rating Scale).
Hypothesis 2: Opioid consumption will be noninferior within the first 2 days following foot/ankle surgery with a suture-method compared with a through-the-needle perineural catheter when used for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block to provide postoperative analgesia (cumulative dose).
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia, Sciatic Nerve Block
- Being tested
- Suture-Method Technique, Through-the-Needle Technique
- Keywords
- Regional Anesthesia, Sciatic Nerve Block, Continuous Nerve Block, Perineural Catheter
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Suture-Method TechniqueDevice
Perineural catheters are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve
Through-the-Needle TechniqueDevice
Perineural catheters are inserted through a straight hollow-bore needle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Through-the-Needle Technique | Active comparator | Perineural catheters are inserted through a straight hollow-bore needle.
The perineural catheter will then be used to infuse local anesthetic directly onto the nerve to provide postoperative pain control. Receives: Device: Through-the-Needle Technique |
| Suture-Method Technique | Experimental | Perineural catheters are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve.
The perineural catheter will then be used to infuse local anesthetic directly onto the nerve to provide postoperative pain control. Receives: Device: Suture-Method Technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average Pain
Pain evaluated using a numeric rating scale with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain
Measured: first two postoperative days combined
Secondary outcomes (2)
Opioid Consumption
Cumulative opioid consumption (oxycodone) measured in milligrams
Measured: first two postoperative days
Worst Pain
The worst pain score for the day evaluated using a numeric rating scale with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain
Measured: Postoperative Days 1 and 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2018
- Study start6 Apr 2018
- Primary completion1 Apr 2019
- Study completion5 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Regional AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Subjects will be randomized using a computer-generated list and opaque, sealed envelopes to one of two treatment groups (blocks of 4, no stratification): perineural catheter insert using (1) through-the-needle technique or (2) suture technique.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ferrosan Medical Devices, Roskilde, Denmark
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego
- Investigators
- John J Finneran IV, MD, Study director, UC San DiegoBrian M Ilfeld, MD, MS, Principal investigator, UC San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03442036
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Suture vs Standard Catheters
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Observer-Masked, Controlled, Parallel-Arm, Clinical Trial Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Perineural Catheter Designs for Continuous Popliteal-Sciatic Nerve Blocks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03442036
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Suture vs Standard Catheters
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia, Sciatic Nerve Block
- Keywords
- Regional Anesthesia, Sciatic Nerve Block, Continuous Nerve Block, Perineural Catheter
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San DiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ferrosan Medical Devices, Roskilde, Denmark
- Study start
- 6 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Following painful surgical procedures, postoperative analgesia is often provided with a single-injection peripheral nerve block. Hothe investigatorsver, even with the longest-acting FDA-approved local anesthetic currently available-bupivacaine-the block duration is measured in hours, while the surgical pain may persist for days. A continuous peripheral nerve block allows a prolonged block, consisting of a percutaneously-inserted catheter with its orifice adjacent to a target nerve/plexus through which local anesthetic may be administered. Two basic perineural catheter designs currently exist: (1) catheters that are inserted either through or over a straight hollow-bore needle; and, (2) catheters that are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve ("suture-method" design). To date, a comparison of the relative risks and benefits of these two designs have not been investigated. The investigators therefore propose a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, parallel-arm, clinical trial to compare these two catheter designs when used to provide post-surgical analgesia following foot and ankle surgery.
Detailed description
This investigation will be a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, parallel-arm, human-subjects clinical trial. Of note, the investigators will be using standard-of-care perineural catheters and local anesthetic under their FDA-approved purpose and do not plan to research a possible change of indication or use of these drugs as part of this research project.
Consenting adults undergoing surgery with a planned popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter placement will be offered enrollment. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD IRB-approved ICF.
Following written, informed consent, the investigators will collect baseline anthropomorphic information (age, sex, height, and the investigatorsight). Subjects will be then be randomized using a computer-generated list and opaque, sealed envelopes to one of two treatment groups (blocks of 4, no stratification): perineural catheter insertion using (1) through-the-needle technique or (2) suture technique. All catheters will be placed by a regional anesthesia fellow or resident under the direct supervision and guidance of a regional anesthesia attending (or by the attending him/herself).
All subjects will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned prone. Midazolam and fentanyl (IV) will be titrated for patient comfort, while ensuring that patients remain responsive to verbal cues. The area that will be subsequently covered by the catheter dressing will be clipped of hair, if necessary. The ultrasound will be placed to visualize the short axis (cross-section) of the sciatic nerve to identify the sciatic nerve bifurcation which will subsequently be marked, as well as the location 5 cm cephalad to the bifurcation. The area will be cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. The ultrasound probe will be placed to visualize the short-axis (cross-section) of the target nerve(s) and the target for the catheter to intercept the nerve may be anywhere between the bifurcation and 5 cm cephalad to the bifurcation. All catheters will be placed using standard UCSD ultrasound-guided perineural catheter techniques as previously described. Normal saline 5-20 mL will be administered via the needle and/or catheter to allow catheter insertion and/or testing of catheter location (viewed with ultrasound).
Local anesthetic (20 mL, lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000-400,000) will be administered via the catheter. A "successful" catheter insertion will be defined as sensory-block onset in the tibial nerve distribution within 30 minutes following the local anesthetic injection. If the nerve block fails, the catheter will be replaced or the patient removed from further study.
An infusion pump will be attached to the patient's perineural catheter and initiated within the recovery room. The pump will provide ropivacaine 0.2% at a 6 mL/h basal rate infusion and a 4 mL patient-controlled bolus with a 30 minute lockout (standard at UCSD). Subjects will be discharged with a prescription for oxycodone 5 mg tablets for supplementary analgesia. Subjects will be contacted via phone for 4 days following surgery to collect study outcome measures: worst, average, least, and current surgical pain (Numeric Rating Scale of 0 to 10, with "0" being no pain and "10" being the worst pain ever experienced), analgesic use (oral opioids and infusion boluses), sleep disturbances, opioid and local anesthetic infusion side effects, local anesthetic leakage, gross catheter dislodgement, sensory and motor block, and satisfaction with pain control. Subjects or their caretakers will remove the catheters at home.
Primary endpoint:
Hypothesis 1: Surgical pain will be noninferior within the first 2 days following foot/ankle surgery with a suture-method compared with a through-the-needle perineural catheter when used for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block to provide postoperative analgesia (the mean "average" pain measured daily with a Numeric Rating Scale).
Hypothesis 2: Opioid consumption will be noninferior within the first 2 days following foot/ankle surgery with a suture-method compared with a through-the-needle perineural catheter when used for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block to provide postoperative analgesia (cumulative dose).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Subjects will be randomized using a computer-generated list and opaque, sealed envelopes to one of two treatment groups (blocks of 4, no stratification): perineural catheter insert using (1) through-the-needle technique or (2) suture technique.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Through-the-Needle Technique | Active comparator | Device: Through-the-Needle TechniquePerineural catheters are inserted through a straight hollow-bore needle. The perineural catheter will then be used to infuse local anesthetic directly onto the nerve to provide postoperative pain control. |
| Suture-Method Technique | Experimental | Device: Suture-Method TechniquePerineural catheters are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve. The perineural catheter will then be used to infuse local anesthetic directly onto the nerve to provide postoperative pain control. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients undergoing ambulatory foot or ankle surgery with a popliteal perineural catheter for postoperative analgesia.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Inability to communicate with research staff
- Incarceration
- Clinically apparent neuropathy in the operative extremity
- Chronic high dose opioid use
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Suture-Method TechniquePerineural catheters are attached to the back of a hollow suture-shaped needle that pulls the catheter adjacent to the target nerve | Device | Suture-Method Technique |
| Through-the-Needle TechniquePerineural catheters are inserted through a straight hollow-bore needle | Device | Through-the-Needle Technique |
Primary outcome
Average Pain
Time frame: first two postoperative days combined
Pain evaluated using a numeric rating scale with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain
2 secondary outcomes
Opioid Consumption
Time frame: first two postoperative days
Worst Pain
Time frame: Postoperative Days 1 and 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Regional Anesthesia
Recruiting
Impact of Communication Delays on Anesthesia Response to Medical Emergencies and Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia
Regional Anesthesia, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
Not yet recruiting
Classic Versus Interfascial Axillary Block in Hand, Wrist, and Forearm Surgery
Nerve Block, Regional Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
Neurological Events and Unforeseen Risks After Locoregional-anesthesia
Regional Anesthesia, Regional Anesthesia Block
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulfate With Standard Combined Costoclavicular-Suprascapular Block for Pain Relief After Shoulder Arthroscopy.
Shoulder Arthroscopy, Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Intravenous Dexamethasone Added to Dexmedetomidine After Superior Trunk Block
Postoperative Pain, Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John J Finneran IV, MD study director
UC San Diego
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS principal investigator
UC San Diego
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Suture-Method Technique and Through-the-Needle Technique in people with Regional Anesthesia and Sciatic Nerve Block, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average Pain (time frame: first two postoperative days combined). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.