StrokeNCT03444688
Development and Evaluation of a Novel Portable Robotic Gait Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke
A study testing Conventional Gait Training and Gait rehabilitation with walker in people with Stroke, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
The aims of this study is to test the training effects of the robotic walker. This study will compare the effectiveness of 2 different types of gait training protocols in chronic stroke patients, 1) conventional gait training (CT, control group), and 2) gait rehabilitation with the new walker modified after 1st stage… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Conventional Gait Training and Gait rehabilitation with walker
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 2 Apr 2018to 10 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is aged 50 years to 90 years old
- More than 6 months from first ever stroke but within 5 years confirmed by CT or MRI Brain
- Mild to severe unilateral motor weakness (hemiparesis has to be severe with lower extremity strength graded as 3 or less on the Medical Research Council scale in more than 2 muscle groups) and severity should be between 5 and 25 calculated according to National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
- Significant gait deficits ( Functional Ambulation Category , FAC ≤ 4 )
- Able to understand instructions and participate in rehabilitation
- Spasticity: Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) less than 4
- Independent trunk control
- Comfortable to walk without a walking aid
Who cannot join
- Patient undergoing any formal rehabilitation program
- Multiple stroke
- Intracranial bleeds
- Any chronic disabling pathologies
- Spasticity limiting lower extremity ROM to less than 80 %
- Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score < 24
Show all 14Show fewer
- Significant sensory deficit/ hemisensory neglect
- Any recent surgeries including orthopedic
- Active cancers or any other terminal illness
- Significant orthostatic hypotension
- Hip, knee and ankle arthrodesis
- Severe vascular disorders in lower limbs
- Having permanent pacemakers or ventriculoperitoneal shunt
- Subject's weight > 75kg
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074
Pang, 66013288, aileen_pang@nuhs.edu.sg
About this study
Official title: Development and Evaluation of a Novel Portable Robotic Gait Rehabilitation Platform in Older Chronic Stroke Survivors (Phase 2)
The aims of this study is to test the training effects of the robotic walker. This study will compare the effectiveness of 2 different types of gait training protocols in chronic stroke patients, 1) conventional gait training (CT, control group), and 2) gait rehabilitation with the new walker modified after 1st stage (WT, experimental group).
Read the detailed description
This will be a prospective single blind randomized control trial where investigators propose to recruit a maximum of 100 older chronic stroke patients (age 50 years to 90 years old) with mild to severe lower limb motor function impairment.
Recruited subjects will have 19 study visits. The recruited 100 subjects will be divided into 2 groups of 50 each through a simple randomization scheme; 1) Conventional gait training (CT, control group) and 2) Gait rehabilitation with the new walker modified after 1st stage (WT, experimental group). Each subject will undergo training programs consisting of 45 minutes training session (excluding rest periods), 3 days (alternate) a week for 6 consecutive weeks.
Subjects allocated to the CT group will receive physiotherapy program, including active assisted or passive range of motion and conventional gait and balance training. The subjects will first perform active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. Subjects will then perform conventional gait and balance therapy based on the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) concept for 15 minutes. Among the PNF techniques, investigators will facilitate pelvic motion to improve control and mobility of the subjects. Subjects will be given a 5 minutes rest. Finally, the CT subjects will undergo the over-ground gait training with or without aid or orthoses and with manual assistance from senior physiotherapist for 15 minutes, depending on the individual subject's abilities.
For WT group, subjects will first go through active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. The main therapy consists of 2 parts with 5 minutes rest in between. During part 1, subjects will be trained on the robotic walker with the help of active body weight support (BWS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for 15 minutes with pelvic motion support function and lateral balance function being continuously provided. The level of BWS will be provided as much as the subjects can support his or her residual body weight (10% to 30% BWS). The BWS force will be gradually reduced as soon as the subjects can support his or her full body weight. The clinical criterion for the reduction is that the subjects show the ability to move his or her hips and are able to support his or her own body weight sufficiently on the affected lower limb and straighten their legs during the single-leg stance phase. Therapists will be able to control the level of BWS force according to the criteria mentioned above. FES will be used to stimulate the peroneal nerve in the affected side, and the intensity of the device will be painlessly controlled by allowing sufficient dorsiflexion and eversion during the swing phase. FES will be set to synchronize with the inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors and the stimulation timing for the common peroneal nerve will based on the detected gait phase by IMU sensors. During part 2, subjects will also receive resistance/assistance forces on top of the BWS and FES training for 15 minutes. The decision on providing resistance or assistance modes will be made according to the subjects' functional ambulation category (FAC) level. For subjects with FAC level less than 3, the assistive function will be implemented, otherwise resistive function will be applied. The assistance and resistance forces will be applied proportional to the BW of the subjects (2% to 7% of BW), which is determined by therapists. The rationale of dividing the WT group into 2 parts of different training is that the 1st part is to provide basic locomotive function with persistent and repetitive sensory stimulation while the 2nd part is to add task-specificity to improve weight-bearing, aerobic, functional strengthening and balance for the neurologically challenged patients by implementing a variety of walking tasks. Investigators expect that the repetitive and persistent walking with task-specific gait training will promote better functional outcomes than the conventional gait therapy.
During the session, subjects can request for a rest anytime if they experience discomfort or fatigue. Additionally, investigators will provide them with a 5 - 15 minutes of rest time. The rest period given depends on individual subjects' needs. Investigators will seek their opinion whether subjects have enough rest and are well to continue with the session. Longer rest period will be given to the subjects who require them. During the resting period and also the period where subjects are not required to participate, a chair will be provided for the subject to sit and rest.
The session will be conducted under the supervision/assistance of senior physiotherapist, research assistants and engineering group. Clinical symptoms/adverse clinical developments will be closely monitored.
Outcomes will be measured before (T0), immediately after (T1) and 1 month after the end of treatment (T2) of 6 weeks therapy session by an independent senior physiotherapist to ensure blinding.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Conventional Gait Training, Gait rehabilitation with walker
- Keywords
- Robotic Walker
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional Gait TrainingOther
Subjects allocated to the CT group will first perform active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. They will then perform conventional gait and balance therapy based on the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) concept for 15 minutes. They will be given a 5 minutes rest. Finally, the CT subjects will undergo the over-ground gait training with or without aid or orthoses and with manual assistance from senior physiotherapist for 15 minutes, depending on the individual subject's abilities.
Gait rehabilitation with walkerDevice
For WT group, subjects will first go through active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. The main therapy consists of 2 parts with 5 minutes rest in between. During part 1, subjects will be trained on the robotic walker with the help of active body weight support (BWS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for 15 minutes with pelvic motion support function and lateral balance function being continuously provided. During part 2, subjects will also receive resistance/assistance forces on top of the BWS and FES training for 15 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CT, Control Group | Active comparator | Conventional Gait Training Receives: Other: Conventional Gait Training |
| WT, Experimental Group | Experimental | Gait rehabilitation with walker Receives: Device: Gait rehabilitation with walker |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching. It is a quick and easy measure that can help assess the efficacy of treatment.
MAS is performed in the supine position (this will garner the most accurate and the lowest score as any tension anywhere in the body will increase spasticity).
Scoring 0 = Normal tone, no increase in tone 1 = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension
1+ = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2 = More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved 3 = Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult 4 = Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Measured: 3 minutes
Medical Research Council (MRC) grading
The muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle.
Measured: 5 minutes
Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)
FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability.
Measured: 2 minutes
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
NIHSS is a tool used by healthcare providers to objectively quantify the impairment caused by a stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0.
Measured: 12 minutes
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
TUG is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance.
Measured: 8 minutes
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was developed to measure balance among older people with impairment in balance function by assessing the performance of functional tasks. It is a valid instrument used for evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions and for quantitative descriptions of function in clinical practice and research.
Description:
14-item scale designed to measure balance of the older adult in a clinical setting.
Equipment needed:
Ruler, two standard chairs (one with arm rests, one without), footstool or step, stopwatch or wristwatch, 15 ft walkway
Completion:
Time: 15-20 minutes Scoring: A five-point scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function. Total Score = 56
Interpretation:
41-56 = low fall risk 21-40 = medium fall risk 0 -20 = high fall risk
A change of 8 points is required to reveal a genuine change in function between 2 assessments.
Measured: 15 minutes
Clinical Outcomes Variables Score (COVS)
The COVS assesses functional mobility across a broad range of neurologic conditions.
Measured: 20 minutes
6 minute walk test
The 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
Measured: 6 minutes
Temporal spatial gait analysis (Part 1)
Gait analysis is assessed by Tekscan Strideway which can provide temporospatial parameters including step length (cm), step width (cm), step time (s), step velocity (cm/s) and stride length (cm).
Measured: 10 minutes
Temporal spatial gait analysis (Part 2)
Gait analysis is assessed by Tekscan Strideway which can provide temporospatial parameters including stride time (s), gait cycle time (s), stance time (s), swing time (s), single support time (s), and double support time (s).
Measured: 10 minutes
Electromyography (EMG)
Electromyography (EMG) is evaluated by Delsys Trigno Wireless System which is a non-invasive method to detect muscle activity in mircoamperes. EMG sensors will be placed on Rectus Femoris, Tibilatis Anterior, Biceps Femoris, and lateral Gastrocnemius.
Measured: 10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (4)
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is an 18-item of physical, psychological and social function. The tool is used to assess a patient's level of disability as well as change in patient status in response to rehabilitation or medical intervention.
Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7.
- - Total assistance with helper
- - Maximal assistance with helper
- - Moderate assistance with helper
- - Minimal assistance with helper
- - Supervision or setup with helper
- - Modified independence with no helper
- - Complete independence with no helper
Total score for the FIM motor subscale (the sum of the individual motor subscale items) will be a value between 13 and 91.
Total score for the FIM cognition subscale (the sum of the individual cognition subscale items) will be a value between 5 and 35.
Total score for the FIM instrument (the sum of the motor and cognition subscale scores) will be a value between 18 and 126.
Measured: 8 minutes
Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA)
rNSA is a sensory assessment.
Measured: 15 minutes
Number of falls
In the whole study, if there is more than 20% fall incidence, then the study will be compromised.
Measured: 1 year
Patient's attitudes towards the robotic walker using visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) ranging from 0 (negative) to 10 (positive).
EQ-5D VAS is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. The EQ-5D VAS essentially consists of 2 parts: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).
The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The subject is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.
The EQ VAS records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement.
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2018
- Study start2 Apr 2018
- Primary completion10 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Dec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National University Hospital, SingaporeThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The recruited subjects will be divided into 2 groups through a simple randomization scheme using Microsoft Excel ("rand function"); 1) Conventional gait training (CT, control group) and 2) Gait rehabilitation with the new walker modified after 1st stage (WT, experimental group). Each subject will undergo training programs consisting of 45 minutes training session (excluding rest periods), 3 days (alternate) a week for 6 consecutive weeks.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University Hospital, Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National University of Singapore
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Santhosh Kumar Seetharaman, Principal investigator, National University Hospital, Singapore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03444688
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DSRB 2017/00696
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S, Bernhardt R. [Development of a robotic walking simulator for gait rehabilitation]. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2003 Oct;48(10):281-6. doi: 10.1515/bmte.2003.48.10.281. German.
PubMed 14606269Patton J, Brown DA, Peshkin M, Santos-Munne JJ, Makhlin A, Lewis E, Colgate EJ, Schwandt D. KineAssist: design and development of a robotic overground gait and balance therapy device. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):131-9. doi: 10.1310/tsr1502-131.
PubMed 18430678Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1786-92. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779. Epub 2008 May 8.
PubMed 18467648Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-21. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305457. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
PubMed 17876068Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, Salbach N. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;21(5-6):258-68. doi: 10.1080/096382899297684.
PubMed 10381238Forster A, Young J. Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):83-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.83.
PubMed 7613406Daly JJ, Zimbelman J, Roenigk KL, McCabe JP, Rogers JM, Butler K, Burdsall R, Holcomb JP, Marsolais EB, Ruff RL. Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of functional electrical stimulation (FES) versus no FES, with weight-supported treadmill and over-ground training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Sep;25(7):588-96. doi: 10.1177/1545968311400092. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
PubMed 21515871Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):2824-36. doi: 10.1152/jn.00870.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
PubMed 17267755Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(3):368-83. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0097-8. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
PubMed 16249912Kao PC, Srivastava S, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. Gait Posture. 2013 Jan;37(1):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.025. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
PubMed 22832470
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Portable Robotic Gait Rehabilitation Platform in Older Chronic Stroke Survivors (Phase 2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03444688
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DSRB 2017/00696
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Robotic Walker
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National University Hospital, SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National University of Singapore
- Study start
- 2 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims of this study is to test the training effects of the robotic walker. This study will compare the effectiveness of 2 different types of gait training protocols in chronic stroke patients, 1) conventional gait training (CT, control group), and 2) gait rehabilitation with the new walker modified after 1st stage (WT, experimental group).
Detailed description
This will be a prospective single blind randomized control trial where investigators propose to recruit a maximum of 100 older chronic stroke patients (age 50 years to 90 years old) with mild to severe lower limb motor function impairment.
Recruited subjects will have 19 study visits. The recruited 100 subjects will be divided into 2 groups of 50 each through a simple randomization scheme; 1) Conventional gait training (CT, control group) and 2) Gait rehabilitation with the new walker modified after 1st stage (WT, experimental group). Each subject will undergo training programs consisting of 45 minutes training session (excluding rest periods), 3 days (alternate) a week for 6 consecutive weeks.
Subjects allocated to the CT group will receive physiotherapy program, including active assisted or passive range of motion and conventional gait and balance training. The subjects will first perform active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. Subjects will then perform conventional gait and balance therapy based on the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) concept for 15 minutes. Among the PNF techniques, investigators will facilitate pelvic motion to improve control and mobility of the subjects. Subjects will be given a 5 minutes rest. Finally, the CT subjects will undergo the over-ground gait training with or without aid or orthoses and with manual assistance from senior physiotherapist for 15 minutes, depending on the individual subject's abilities.
For WT group, subjects will first go through active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. The main therapy consists of 2 parts with 5 minutes rest in between. During part 1, subjects will be trained on the robotic walker with the help of active body weight support (BWS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for 15 minutes with pelvic motion support function and lateral balance function being continuously provided. The level of BWS will be provided as much as the subjects can support his or her residual body weight (10% to 30% BWS). The BWS force will be gradually reduced as soon as the subjects can support his or her full body weight. The clinical criterion for the reduction is that the subjects show the ability to move his or her hips and are able to support his or her own body weight sufficiently on the affected lower limb and straighten their legs during the single-leg stance phase. Therapists will be able to control the level of BWS force according to the criteria mentioned above. FES will be used to stimulate the peroneal nerve in the affected side, and the intensity of the device will be painlessly controlled by allowing sufficient dorsiflexion and eversion during the swing phase. FES will be set to synchronize with the inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors and the stimulation timing for the common peroneal nerve will based on the detected gait phase by IMU sensors. During part 2, subjects will also receive resistance/assistance forces on top of the BWS and FES training for 15 minutes. The decision on providing resistance or assistance modes will be made according to the subjects' functional ambulation category (FAC) level. For subjects with FAC level less than 3, the assistive function will be implemented, otherwise resistive function will be applied. The assistance and resistance forces will be applied proportional to the BW of the subjects (2% to 7% of BW), which is determined by therapists. The rationale of dividing the WT group into 2 parts of different training is that the 1st part is to provide basic locomotive function with persistent and repetitive sensory stimulation while the 2nd part is to add task-specificity to improve weight-bearing, aerobic, functional strengthening and balance for the neurologically challenged patients by implementing a variety of walking tasks. Investigators expect that the repetitive and persistent walking with task-specific gait training will promote better functional outcomes than the conventional gait therapy.
During the session, subjects can request for a rest anytime if they experience discomfort or fatigue. Additionally, investigators will provide them with a 5 - 15 minutes of rest time. The rest period given depends on individual subjects' needs. Investigators will seek their opinion whether subjects have enough rest and are well to continue with the session. Longer rest period will be given to the subjects who require them. During the resting period and also the period where subjects are not required to participate, a chair will be provided for the subject to sit and rest.
The session will be conducted under the supervision/assistance of senior physiotherapist, research assistants and engineering group. Clinical symptoms/adverse clinical developments will be closely monitored.
Outcomes will be measured before (T0), immediately after (T1) and 1 month after the end of treatment (T2) of 6 weeks therapy session by an independent senior physiotherapist to ensure blinding.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The recruited subjects will be divided into 2 groups through a simple randomization scheme using Microsoft Excel ("rand function"); 1) Conventional gait training (CT, control group) and 2) Gait rehabilitation with the new walker modified after 1st stage (WT, experimental group). Each subject will undergo training programs consisting of 45 minutes training session (excluding rest periods), 3 days (alternate) a week for 6 consecutive weeks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CT, Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Conventional Gait TrainingConventional Gait Training |
| WT, Experimental Group | Experimental | Device: Gait rehabilitation with walkerGait rehabilitation with walker |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient is aged 50 years to 90 years old
- More than 6 months from first ever stroke but within 5 years confirmed by CT or MRI Brain
- Mild to severe unilateral motor weakness (hemiparesis has to be severe with lower extremity strength graded as 3 or less on the Medical Research Council scale in more than 2 muscle groups) and severity should be between 5 and 25 calculated according to National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
- Significant gait deficits ( Functional Ambulation Category , FAC ≤ 4 )
- Able to understand instructions and participate in rehabilitation
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patient undergoing any formal rehabilitation program
- Multiple stroke
- Intracranial bleeds
- Any chronic disabling pathologies
- Spasticity limiting lower extremity ROM to less than 80 %
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Gait TrainingSubjects allocated to the CT group will first perform active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. They will then perform conventional gait and balance therapy based on the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) concept for 15 minutes. They will be given a 5 minutes rest. Finally, the CT subjects will undergo the over-ground gait training with or without aid or orthoses and with manual assistance from senior physiotherapist for 15 minutes, depending on the individual subject's abilities. | Other | CT, Control Group |
| Gait rehabilitation with walkerFor WT group, subjects will first go through active assisted or passive range of motion of the lower limbs including ankle, knee, and hip joint in the supine position for 10 minutes. The main therapy consists of 2 parts with 5 minutes rest in between. During part 1, subjects will be trained on the robotic walker with the help of active body weight support (BWS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for 15 minutes with pelvic motion support function and lateral balance function being continuously provided. During part 2, subjects will also receive resistance/assistance forces on top of the BWS and FES training for 15 minutes. | Device | WT, Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time frame: 3 minutes
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching. It is a quick and easy measure that can help assess the efficacy of treatment. MAS is performed in the supine position (this will garner the most accurate and the lowest score as any tension anywhere in the body will increase spasticity). Scoring 0 = Normal tone, no increase in tone 1 = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2 = More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved 3 = Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult 4 = Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Medical Research Council (MRC) grading
Time frame: 5 minutes
The muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle.
Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)
Time frame: 2 minutes
FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability.
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time frame: 12 minutes
NIHSS is a tool used by healthcare providers to objectively quantify the impairment caused by a stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0.
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time frame: 8 minutes
TUG is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance.
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time frame: 15 minutes
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was developed to measure balance among older people with impairment in balance function by assessing the performance of functional tasks. It is a valid instrument used for evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions and for quantitative descriptions of function in clinical practice and research. Description: 14-item scale designed to measure balance of the older adult in a clinical setting. Equipment needed: Ruler, two standard chairs (one with arm rests, one without), footstool or step, stopwatch or wristwatch, 15 ft walkway Completion: Time: 15-20 minutes Scoring: A five-point scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function. Total Score = 56 Interpretation: 41-56 = low fall risk 21-40 = medium fall risk 0 -20 = high fall risk A change of 8 points is required to reveal a genuine change in function between 2 assessments.
Clinical Outcomes Variables Score (COVS)
Time frame: 20 minutes
The COVS assesses functional mobility across a broad range of neurologic conditions.
6 minute walk test
Time frame: 6 minutes
The 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
Temporal spatial gait analysis (Part 1)
Time frame: 10 minutes
Gait analysis is assessed by Tekscan Strideway which can provide temporospatial parameters including step length (cm), step width (cm), step time (s), step velocity (cm/s) and stride length (cm).
Temporal spatial gait analysis (Part 2)
Time frame: 10 minutes
Gait analysis is assessed by Tekscan Strideway which can provide temporospatial parameters including stride time (s), gait cycle time (s), stance time (s), swing time (s), single support time (s), and double support time (s).
Electromyography (EMG)
Time frame: 10 minutes
Electromyography (EMG) is evaluated by Delsys Trigno Wireless System which is a non-invasive method to detect muscle activity in mircoamperes. EMG sensors will be placed on Rectus Femoris, Tibilatis Anterior, Biceps Femoris, and lateral Gastrocnemius.
4 secondary outcomes
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time frame: 8 minutes
Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA)
Time frame: 15 minutes
Number of falls
Time frame: 1 year
Patient's attitudes towards the robotic walker using visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) ranging from 0 (negative) to 10 (positive).
Time frame: 5 minutes
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2018.
- Background: PubMed 14606269Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S, Bernhardt R. [Development of a robotic walking simulator for gait rehabilitation]. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2003 Oct;48(10):281-6. doi: 10.1515/bmte.2003.48.10.281. German.
- Background: PubMed 18430678Patton J, Brown DA, Peshkin M, Santos-Munne JJ, Makhlin A, Lewis E, Colgate EJ, Schwandt D. KineAssist: design and development of a robotic overground gait and balance therapy device. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):131-9. doi: 10.1310/tsr1502-131.
- Background: PubMed 18467648Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1786-92. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779. Epub 2008 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 17876068Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-21. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305457. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 10381238Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, Salbach N. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;21(5-6):258-68. doi: 10.1080/096382899297684.
- Background: PubMed 7613406Forster A, Young J. Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):83-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.83.
- Background: PubMed 21515871Daly JJ, Zimbelman J, Roenigk KL, McCabe JP, Rogers JM, Butler K, Burdsall R, Holcomb JP, Marsolais EB, Ruff RL. Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of functional electrical stimulation (FES) versus no FES, with weight-supported treadmill and over-ground training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Sep;25(7):588-96. doi: 10.1177/1545968311400092. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
- Background: PubMed 17267755Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):2824-36. doi: 10.1152/jn.00870.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 16249912Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(3):368-83. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0097-8. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 22832470Kao PC, Srivastava S, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. Gait Posture. 2013 Jan;37(1):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.025. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Santhosh Kumar Seetharaman principal investigator
National University Hospital, Singapore
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional Gait Training and Gait rehabilitation with walker in people with Stroke, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Santhosh Kumar Seetharaman (+65 6779 5555, mdcsnks@nus.edu.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (time frame: 3 minutes). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03444688, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2018.