AzTrials
AzTrials

AchalasiaNCT03450928

POEM: Long vs Short Myotomy for Achalasia. RCT

A study testing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) in people with Achalasia, run by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is increasingly used for the treatment of achalasia. In published series, a 12cm-POEM is usually performed. Surgical myotomy is typically shorter (8cm). The clinical efficacy of both procedure is comparable. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Achalasia
What is being tested?
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
6 Jun 2014to 1 Jan 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of achalasia (type I and II)
  • Age > 18
  • Signed informed consent
  • Patient accepts to undergo scheduled follow-up after POEM
  • Eckardt score > 3
  • ASA I-II-III

Who cannot join

  • Prior surgical treatment of achalasia (previous endoscopic balloon dilation or botox injection ARE NOT exclusion criteria)
  • Pregnancy or nursing
  • Current alcohol or drug addiction.
  • Mentally retarded or emotionally unstable, or exhibits psychological characteristics which, in the opinion of the investigator make the subject a poor candidate for this study.
  • Severe congenital or acquired coagulopathy or INR > 1.6
  • Participating in another ongoing clinical trial in which concomitant diagnosis or therapeutic intervention would adversely affect the integrity of the clinical trial.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Hepatic cirrhosis w/ or w/o portal hypertension w/ or w/o esophageal varices
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis or Barrett Esophagus
  • Esophageal Strictures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pietro Familiari, MD contact

00390630156580

pietrofamiliari@tiscali.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli

    Roma, RM, 00168

    Carolina Gualtieri, 00390630156580, carolina.gualtieri@policlinicogemelli.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: Long vs Short Myotomy. Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is increasingly used for the treatment of achalasia. In published series, a 12cm-POEM is usually performed. Surgical myotomy is typically shorter (8cm). The clinical efficacy of both procedure is comparable.

This study intends to investigate if clinical outcomes of POEM depends on the length of esophageal myotomy, in patients with classic-type achalasia (type I and type II according to Chicago Classification)

Read the detailed description

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy myotomy (POEM) has been recently introduced for treatment of achalasia, based on technical developments from NOTES (natural orifice translumenal surgery). The technique includes the incision of the mucosa in the esophageal body, the submucosal dissection of the distal esophagus and the creation of a submucosal tunnel in the distal esophagus and proximal gastric body, and the esophageal myotomy. The procedure is performed transorally, using a flexible endoscope.

In published series, a 12cm-POEM is usually performed. Surgical myotomy is typically shorter, being protracted for about 8cm. The clinical efficacy of POEM and surgical myotomy is more likely to be similar according to the most recent published series.

In this randomized controlled trial (non-inferiority trial) we evaluate the outcomes of POEM according to the length of the esophageal myotomy.

Patients with type I and II achalasia will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, long--myotomy (LM) and short--myotomy (SM).

Patients in the LM-group will receive a 12cm-long POEM (including 3cm on the stomach); in the SM-group patients will undergo a POEM extended for 7 cm (including 3cm on the stomach).

During follow-up, High Resolution Manometry (HRM), Esophageal pH-monitoring study and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will be regularly performed and symptoms assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (ECKs).

The main hypothesis is that the results of a SM are not inferior to the results of a LM. Calculated sample size is 200 patients

Conditions
Achalasia
Being tested
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Keywords
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy, Endoscopy, POEM, Submucosal endoscopy
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Achalasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)Procedure or surgery

    Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive intervention for the treatment of esophageal achalasia.

    POEM includes different steps:

    1. Lifting of the esophageal mucosa, with the injection of saline solution, and mucosal incision on the esophageal body (approximately 12 or 7 cm above the esophagogastric junction, for about 1-2cm)
    2. Advance of the endoscope into the submucosa, repeated submucosal injection and dissection of a submucosal tunnel into the distal esophagus up to 3 cm into the gastric wall.
    3. Myotomy of the distal esophagus, cardia and gastric wall, starting 3 cm below the mucosal incision
    4. After the completion of myotomy, and check for mucosal integrity, the mucosal incision is closed using endoscopic clips
Study groups in NCT03450928
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Short POEMActive comparatorPatients in the Short POEM-group will undergo a Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) extended for a total of 7 cm (including 4 cm above the esophago-gastric junction and 3cm on the stomach).
Receives: Procedure: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Long POEMActive comparatorPatients in the Long POEM-group will receive a 12cm-long Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), including 9 cm on the esophagus and 3cm on the gastric wall
Receives: Procedure: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Non-inferiority of a Short-POEM compared to a Long-POEM

    Treatment success, defined as an Eckard score ≤ 3.

    The Eckardt score is a clinical score for evaluating the severity of achalasia-related symptoms. Eckardt score varies between 0 and 12.

    Questions are asked about the frequency of dysphagia, regurgitation and retrosternal pressure sensation. Depending on whether any of these symptom occurrs, never, occasionally, daily or with each meal, a symptom score between 0 and 3 is applied. In addition a symptom score of 0-3 is assigned to the degree of weight loss (0 - No weight loss; 1 - weight loss < 5Kg, 2 - weight loss between 5 and 10Kg, 3- weight loss > 10Kg).

    Each symptom score (dysphagia, regurgitation, retrosternal pressure, and wieight loss) is summed to the other. Thus, a completely asymptomatic patient has a score of 0 and the most severely affected patient had a maximum score of 12.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Basal Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) pressure

    Basal LES pressure on esophageal manometry after Short-POEM compared to Long-POEM

    Measured: Before POEM, 6 months and 2 years after the procedure

  2. 4-second Integrated Relaxation Pressure (4sIRP)

    4sIRP on esophageal manometry after Short-POEM compared to Long-POEM

    Measured: Before POEM, 6 months and 2 years after the procedure

  3. Side effects and complications

    Incidence of side effect and complications after Short-POEM compared to Long-POEM

    Measured: Baseline to 2 years

  4. Gastro-Esophageal Reflux (GER) symptom assessment

    GerdQ questionnaire will be used to evaluate and compare Gastoesophageal reflux symptoms in the two groups.

    GerdQ is a 6-item, validated, easy to use questionnaire. The GerdQ questionnaire asks patients to score the number of days with symptoms and use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications during the previous 7 days. It uses a four graded Likert scale (0-3) to score the frequency of four positive predictors of GERD (heartburn, regurgitation, sleep disturbance due to reflux symptoms or use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications for reflux symptoms) and a reversed Likert scale (3-0) for two negative predictors of GERD (epigastric pain and nausea) giving a total GerdQ score range of 0-18. The sleep disturbance and use of OTC medication are also used for assessment of the impact of GERD, giving a separate 'impact score' ranging from 0 to 6

    Measured: baseline, 6 months and 2 years after POEM

  5. Esophageal pH-monitoring study

    patients will undergo esophageal pH-monitoring study during the follow-up. DeMeester score will be used for the diagnosis of GERD.

    DeMeester score is a composite score based on 6 parameters (scored in comparison to mean values in normal subjects for each category below):

    Supine reflux, Upright reflux, Total reflux, Number of episodes, Number of episodes longer than 5 min, Longest episode. A score of >14.72 shows significant reflux.

    Prevalence of GERD will be compared in the two study groups

    Measured: 6 months after POEM

  6. Operating time

    The duration of the endoscopic procedures for each patients will be calculated, in minutes, since the mucosal incision until the endoscopic closure of the mucosal entry with the last endoscopic clip.

    The average duration of the procedure in the Short-POEM group will be compared wth the dureation of the procedures in the Long-POEM-groups

    Measured: During the endoscopic procedure

  7. Quality of life

    Improvement of quality of life after Short-POEM compared to Long-POEM, assessed by using the SF-36 questionnaires' scores

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health.

    The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health

    Measured: baseline, 6 months and 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Mar 2018
  2. Study start6 Jun 2014
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03450928
Sponsor's protocol ID
POEMLvS
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
7 Nov 2017
Last updated
1 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Familiari P, Borrelli de Andreis F, Landi R, Mangiola F, Boskoski I, Tringali A, Perri V, Costamagna G. Long versus short peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: results of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2023 Aug;72(8):1442-1450. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325579. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

    PubMed 37072180

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) in people with Achalasia, run by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pietro Familiari, MD (00390630156580, pietrofamiliari@tiscali.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Non-inferiority of a Short-POEM compared to a Long-POEM (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03450928, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in