Wound InfectionNCT03461783
Activated Carbon Interphase Effect on Biofilm and Total Bacterial Load
A study testing Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing in people with Wound Infection, run by Brock Liden, DPM at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this randomized, prospective study is to evaluate how this activated carbon dressing affects the total bacterial load and biofilm in a wound bed in wounds of the lower extremity and foot. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Wound Infection
- What is being tested?
- Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2017to 1 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are at least 18 years of age.
- Patients of both genders and all races.
- Patients who are in good general health.
- Patients with ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements greater than 0.5.
- Patients with full-thickness lower extremity diabetic or venous wounds that are not currently being treated with antimicrobial products.
- Patients with full-thickness wounds that are not yet extending to the bone or tendon.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with wounds present for at least 4 weeks, but no longer than one year.
- Patients with initial bacterial load greater than or equal to 104 colony forming units (CFUs), but less than or equal to 106 CFUs.
- Patients who have voluntarily signed the informed consent form, including HIPAA Authorization.
Who cannot join
- Patients who are younger than 18 years of age.
- Patients with autoimmune conditions.
- Patients with ABI measurements less than 0.5 or with lower extremities that are non-interventional or by-passable.
- Patients with full-thickness lower extremity pressure wounds.
- Patients with diabetic or venous wounds that are being treated with antimicrobial products.
- Patients with full-thickness wounds with exposed bone or tendon.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patients with wounds present less than 4 weeks or one year or longer.
- Patients with ulcers that had an initial bacterial load less than 104 CFUs or greater than 106 CFUs.
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating.
- Patients with known allergy(ies) to any of the components of the study dressing.
- Patients who are considered by the investigator for any reason to be an unsuitable candidate.
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to follow the follow-up evaluation schedules.
- Patients who refuse to voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Circleville Foot & Ankle, LLC
Circleville, Ohio, 43113
Hocking Valley Community Hospital
Logan, Ohio, 43138
About this study
Official title: Activated Carbon Interphase Effect on Biofilm and Total Bacterial Load: A Randomized Pilot Study
The purpose of this randomized, prospective study is to evaluate how this activated carbon dressing affects the total bacterial load and biofilm in a wound bed in wounds of the lower extremity and foot. We anticipate that the use of Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth dressing will maintain the bacterial burden in the wound bed below the level of critical colonization, with potential secondary benefits of pain reduction, decrease in inflammation, and control of odor. Wound bed healing progression/acceleration also will be assessed.
Read the detailed description
Wounds located on the lower extremity and feet are caused by several conditions, including diabetes and venous insufficiency. These types of wounds may not heal quickly and can become chronic. Chronic wounds are at risk for infection and limb amputation. As such, these wounds are a serious health issue, especially in diabetics and the elderly, and pose a significant public health burden. The healing of such wounds is an ongoing challenge to clinicians, who continue to seek effective management modalities.
The study treatment evaluated in this study is Zorflex® dressing (Chemviron Carbon Cloth Carbon, West Midlands, United Kingdom; a division of Calgon Carbon Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA). According to the Instructions for Use for the product, it is a low-adherent, 100% pure activated carbon cloth dressing that highly conforms to the body contours and maintains contact with the wound surface. It provides an effective antimicrobial barrier for a minimum of 7 days per dressing, protecting the wound from invasive microorganisms, while exhibiting an antimicrobial effect against microorganisms already present in the wound. The dressing may be used either dry or moistened with sterilized water. Zorflex® is indicated as an antimicrobial dressing over dry or discharing, partial and full thickness wounds.
The following unique properties of the activated carbon dressing are believed to aid in wound healing and patient comfort when used for wound management: 1) antimicrobial; 2) odor management; and 3) conductive. The dressing is antimicrobial and manages odor because of its naturally occurring "van der Waal's" electrostatic forces. These forces draw small gas or liquid molecules, including endotoxins and odor molecules, away from the wound into the highly structured micropores of the dressing, where they become trapped. Bacteria cells also are attracted to the dressing, but are too big to enter the micropores. Instead, the microorganisms become trapped on the surface, away from the wound bed. Electrostatic tension builds up in the trapped microorganisms until the tension overcomes the tensile strength of the cell walls, at which time the cell walls of the microorganisms rupture, killing the microorganisms. Any endotoxins released in the process are drawn into the micropores and also become trapped. The conductive nature of the dressing restores the body's natural transepithelial potential across the wound bed, thereby aiding in healing. The positive effects of electrostimulation on wound healing have been previously established.
Several studies, primarily case series, have reported promising preliminary results with the use of Zorflex® as an antimicrobial dressing for wound management. In a case series involving four patients with recalcitrant venous leg ulcers that were prone to recurrent infection, treatment with this particular activated carbon cloth dressing resulted in a reduction in clinical signs of infection, such as exudate and pain levels, and improvement in wound bed appearance after 7 days. A retrospective study evaluating the use of this activated carbon cloth dressing for the management of 18 chronic wounds demonstrated 90.7% wound closure at 5 weeks. Finally, another case series examining the use of Zorflex® in chronic lower extremity and foot wounds demonstrated a reduction in odor control and progression of healing with the use of the dressing.
Studies examining the efficacy of such activated carbon dressings are limited and, therefore, more research, particularly randomized and prospective in design, is needed to better elucidate possible effects of this dressing on preventing infection and promoting healing. The purpose of this multi-center, randomized, prospective study is to evaluate how this activated carbon dressing affects the total bacterial load and biofilm in a wound bed in wounds of the lower extremity and foot. We anticipate that the use of Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth dressing will maintain the bacterial burden in the wound bed below the level of critical colonization, with potential secondary benefits of pain reduction, decrease in inflammation, and control of odor. Wound bed healing progression/acceleration also will be assessed.
- Conditions
- Wound Infection
- Being tested
- Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing, Standard of Care
- Medical subject headings
- Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Zorflex Activated Carbon DressingDevice
Antimicrobial dressing
Standard of CareDevice
foam, calcium alginate, hydrogel, or compressive dressings
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing | Experimental | Patients randomized into the experimental group will only be treated using an activated carbon dressing (Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth Dressing; Chemviron Carbon Cloth Carbon, West Midlands, United Kingdom; a division of Calgon Carbon Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA) for wet wounds or with saline and Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth Dressing for dry wounds. Receives: Device: Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing |
| Standard of Care for Wound Care | Active comparator | Patients with wet wounds randomized into the control group will be treated using foam, calcium alginate or compressive dressings, whereas those with dry wounds will be treated with hydrogel and compressive dressings. Receives: Device: Standard of Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total Bacterial Load
Total bacterial load will be measured total colony forming units (CFUs) as determined from laboratory findings
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Pain Associated with Wound
Patients will rate their pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) that consists of a 10cm (100mm) line with the descriptor "no pain" positioned at the left pole and the descriptor "worst pain imaginable" positioned at the right pole.
Measured: 4 weeks
Wound Bed Inflammation
Protease laboratory measurements of the wound bed will be use to elevate wound bed inflammation.
Measured: 4 weeks
Wound Odor
Wound odor will be assessed by both the patient and investigator using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) that consists of a 10cm (100mm) line with the descriptor "no odor" positioned at the left pole and the descriptor "extremely offensive odor" positioned at the right pole.
Measured: 4 weeks
Wound Size Progression
Wound size measurements obtained from the software utilized by the eKare inSight™ (eKare, Inc., Fairfax, VA) system will be used to determine wound bed healing progression.
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Mar 2018
- Study start26 Jun 2017
- Primary completion3 Aug 2018
- Study completion1 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Wound InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brock Liden, DPM
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Brock Liden, DPM, Liden, Brock, DPM
- Investigators
- Brock Liden, DPM, Principal investigator, Circleville Foot & Ankle LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03461783
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Carbon Dressing
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Publications
Isseroff RR, Dahle SE. Electrical Stimulation Therapy and Wound Healing: Where Are We Now? Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012 Dec;1(6):238-243. doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0351.
PubMed 24527312Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.
PubMed 14622683Kalinski CK, Schnepf M, Laboy D, Hernandez L, Nusbaum J, McGrinder B, Comfort C, Alvarez OM. Effectiveness of a Topical Formulation Containing Metronidazole for Wound Odor and Exudate Control. Wounds. 2005;17(4):84-90.
Miller MS, Markey L, Yoder R. A link to reducing the stink - use of a unique carbon based textile dressing Zorflex® to promote healing while significantly reducing wound odor in diabetic and venous ulcers - a case series of three. Presented as a poster at the Wild on Wounds (WOW) National Wound Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Aug 31-Sept 3, 2016.
Murphy N. Reducing infection in chronic leg ulcers with an activated carbon cloth dressing. Br J Nurs. 2016 Jun 23;25(12):S38-44. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.12.S38.
PubMed 27345081Young S, Gray S, and Hampton S. A retrospective study to evaluate the effect of an activated carbon dressing on chronic wounds. Presented as an e-poster at the 2016 European Wound Management Association (EWMA), Bremen, Germany, May 11-13, 2016.
Zorflex® Instructions for Use. http://zorflex.com/what-is-zorflex/, accessed on January 17, 2017.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Activated Carbon Interphase Effect on Biofilm and Total Bacterial Load: A Randomized Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03461783
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Carbon Dressing
- Conditions
- Wound Infection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brock Liden, DPM
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this randomized, prospective study is to evaluate how this activated carbon dressing affects the total bacterial load and biofilm in a wound bed in wounds of the lower extremity and foot. We anticipate that the use of Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth dressing will maintain the bacterial burden in the wound bed below the level of critical colonization, with potential secondary benefits of pain reduction, decrease in inflammation, and control of odor. Wound bed healing progression/acceleration also will be assessed.
Detailed description
Wounds located on the lower extremity and feet are caused by several conditions, including diabetes and venous insufficiency. These types of wounds may not heal quickly and can become chronic. Chronic wounds are at risk for infection and limb amputation. As such, these wounds are a serious health issue, especially in diabetics and the elderly, and pose a significant public health burden. The healing of such wounds is an ongoing challenge to clinicians, who continue to seek effective management modalities.
The study treatment evaluated in this study is Zorflex® dressing (Chemviron Carbon Cloth Carbon, West Midlands, United Kingdom; a division of Calgon Carbon Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA). According to the Instructions for Use for the product, it is a low-adherent, 100% pure activated carbon cloth dressing that highly conforms to the body contours and maintains contact with the wound surface. It provides an effective antimicrobial barrier for a minimum of 7 days per dressing, protecting the wound from invasive microorganisms, while exhibiting an antimicrobial effect against microorganisms already present in the wound. The dressing may be used either dry or moistened with sterilized water. Zorflex® is indicated as an antimicrobial dressing over dry or discharing, partial and full thickness wounds.
The following unique properties of the activated carbon dressing are believed to aid in wound healing and patient comfort when used for wound management: 1) antimicrobial; 2) odor management; and 3) conductive. The dressing is antimicrobial and manages odor because of its naturally occurring "van der Waal's" electrostatic forces. These forces draw small gas or liquid molecules, including endotoxins and odor molecules, away from the wound into the highly structured micropores of the dressing, where they become trapped. Bacteria cells also are attracted to the dressing, but are too big to enter the micropores. Instead, the microorganisms become trapped on the surface, away from the wound bed. Electrostatic tension builds up in the trapped microorganisms until the tension overcomes the tensile strength of the cell walls, at which time the cell walls of the microorganisms rupture, killing the microorganisms. Any endotoxins released in the process are drawn into the micropores and also become trapped. The conductive nature of the dressing restores the body's natural transepithelial potential across the wound bed, thereby aiding in healing. The positive effects of electrostimulation on wound healing have been previously established.
Several studies, primarily case series, have reported promising preliminary results with the use of Zorflex® as an antimicrobial dressing for wound management. In a case series involving four patients with recalcitrant venous leg ulcers that were prone to recurrent infection, treatment with this particular activated carbon cloth dressing resulted in a reduction in clinical signs of infection, such as exudate and pain levels, and improvement in wound bed appearance after 7 days. A retrospective study evaluating the use of this activated carbon cloth dressing for the management of 18 chronic wounds demonstrated 90.7% wound closure at 5 weeks. Finally, another case series examining the use of Zorflex® in chronic lower extremity and foot wounds demonstrated a reduction in odor control and progression of healing with the use of the dressing.
Studies examining the efficacy of such activated carbon dressings are limited and, therefore, more research, particularly randomized and prospective in design, is needed to better elucidate possible effects of this dressing on preventing infection and promoting healing. The purpose of this multi-center, randomized, prospective study is to evaluate how this activated carbon dressing affects the total bacterial load and biofilm in a wound bed in wounds of the lower extremity and foot. We anticipate that the use of Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth dressing will maintain the bacterial burden in the wound bed below the level of critical colonization, with potential secondary benefits of pain reduction, decrease in inflammation, and control of odor. Wound bed healing progression/acceleration also will be assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing | Experimental | Device: Zorflex Activated Carbon DressingPatients randomized into the experimental group will only be treated using an activated carbon dressing (Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth Dressing; Chemviron Carbon Cloth Carbon, West Midlands, United Kingdom; a division of Calgon Carbon Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA) for wet wounds or with saline and Zorflex® Activated Carbon Cloth Dressing for dry wounds. |
| Standard of Care for Wound Care | Active comparator | Device: Standard of CarePatients with wet wounds randomized into the control group will be treated using foam, calcium alginate or compressive dressings, whereas those with dry wounds will be treated with hydrogel and compressive dressings. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients who are at least 18 years of age.
- Patients of both genders and all races.
- Patients who are in good general health.
- Patients with ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements greater than 0.5.
- Patients with full-thickness lower extremity diabetic or venous wounds that are not currently being treated with antimicrobial products.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients who are younger than 18 years of age.
- Patients with autoimmune conditions.
- Patients with ABI measurements less than 0.5 or with lower extremities that are non-interventional or by-passable.
- Patients with full-thickness lower extremity pressure wounds.
- Patients with diabetic or venous wounds that are being treated with antimicrobial products.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Zorflex Activated Carbon DressingAntimicrobial dressing | Device | Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing |
| Standard of Carefoam, calcium alginate, hydrogel, or compressive dressings | Device | Standard of Care for Wound Care |
Primary outcome
Total Bacterial Load
Time frame: 4 weeks
Total bacterial load will be measured total colony forming units (CFUs) as determined from laboratory findings
4 secondary outcomes
Pain Associated with Wound
Time frame: 4 weeks
Wound Bed Inflammation
Time frame: 4 weeks
Wound Odor
Time frame: 4 weeks
Wound Size Progression
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 24527312Isseroff RR, Dahle SE. Electrical Stimulation Therapy and Wound Healing: Where Are We Now? Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012 Dec;1(6):238-243. doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0351.
- Background: PubMed 14622683Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.
- BackgroundKalinski CK, Schnepf M, Laboy D, Hernandez L, Nusbaum J, McGrinder B, Comfort C, Alvarez OM. Effectiveness of a Topical Formulation Containing Metronidazole for Wound Odor and Exudate Control. Wounds. 2005;17(4):84-90.
- BackgroundMiller MS, Markey L, Yoder R. A link to reducing the stink - use of a unique carbon based textile dressing Zorflex® to promote healing while significantly reducing wound odor in diabetic and venous ulcers - a case series of three. Presented as a poster at the Wild on Wounds (WOW) National Wound Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Aug 31-Sept 3, 2016.
- Background: PubMed 27345081Murphy N. Reducing infection in chronic leg ulcers with an activated carbon cloth dressing. Br J Nurs. 2016 Jun 23;25(12):S38-44. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.12.S38.
- BackgroundYoung S, Gray S, and Hampton S. A retrospective study to evaluate the effect of an activated carbon dressing on chronic wounds. Presented as an e-poster at the 2016 European Wound Management Association (EWMA), Bremen, Germany, May 11-13, 2016.
- BackgroundZorflex® Instructions for Use. http://zorflex.com/what-is-zorflex/, accessed on January 17, 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Related trials for Wound Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Integrating Next Generation Sequencing for Treatment of Surgical Site Infection After Fracture Fixation:
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
RecruitingPhase 4
Antibiotic Tissue Penetration and Tissue Response in Head and Neck Infection and Reconstructive Surgery
Surgical Wound Infection, Neck Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brock Liden, DPM principal investigator
Circleville Foot & Ankle LLC
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Zorflex Activated Carbon Dressing in people with Wound Infection, run by Brock Liden, DPM at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total Bacterial Load (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03461783, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2019.