AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT03464877

Prognostic Factors of a Favorable Outcome Following an Exercise Program for Soldiers With Low Back Pain

A study testing Multi-station full-body supervised exercise program in people with Low Back Pain, run by Marc Perron at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Low back pain (LBP) encompasses heterogeneous patients unlikely to respond to a unique treatment. Identifying sub-groups of low back pain may help to improve treatment outcomes. Our objective was to identify variables associated with a favorable outcome in soldiers with sub-acute and chronic LBP participating in a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Multi-station full-body supervised exercise program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
104 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
19 Mar 2013to 27 Apr 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • episode of subacute or chronic LBP with or without radiation to the lower limbs
  • minimal score of 17% on the Modified Oswestry Disability Index

Who cannot join

  • previous surgery to the spinal column,
  • lumber spine injection in the past two weeks
  • signs of upper motor neuron lesions
  • serious medical conditions (e.g. tumor, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis)
  • unavailability to participate in the 6-week exercise program

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Laval University

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 0A6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Prognostic Factors of a Favorable Outcome Following a Supervised Exercise Program for Soldiers With Sub-acute and Chronic Low Back Pain

Low back pain (LBP) encompasses heterogeneous patients unlikely to respond to a unique treatment. Identifying sub-groups of low back pain may help to improve treatment outcomes. Our objective was to identify variables associated with a favorable outcome in soldiers with sub-acute and chronic LBP participating in a multi-station full-body supervised exercise program. The results obtained may permit generation of potential treatment effect modifiers that will eventually have to be validated before being recommended for clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

All participants took part in the 6-week exercise program, as well as in the two evaluation sessions (pre- and post- exercise program). At the initial evaluation, subjects completed forms and questionnaires on sociodemographics, symptomatology, comorbidities, work restrictions, pain and functional limitations and fear-avoidance beliefs. A physiotherapist measured their lumbar and hip mobility, conducted diagnostic and pain provocation tests and assessed endurance of the trunk muscles. Following the initial evaluation, subjects took part in the 6-week multi-station full-body supervised exercise program (2 to 3 sessions per week). The Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODI) was completed at the initial and at the final evaluations. The change in ODI score following the program was considered the principal measure reflecting favorable or unfavorable outcome.

An improvement of 50% in the initial ODI score was considered the reference standard to determine a favorable outcome. Univariate associations with favorable outcome were tested using chi-square or paired t-tests. Variables that showed between-group (favorable/unfavorable) differences were entered into a logistic regression after determining the sampling adequacy. Finally, continuous variables were dichotomized and the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios were determined for the model and for each variable.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
Multi-station full-body supervised exercise program
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Multi-station full-body supervised exercise programOther

    The exercise program was 6-week duration, 2-3 visits per week. It was composed of 7 stations, each consisting of numerous exercises of increasing difficulty. The exercises were grouped together as follows: Hip strengthening and control (Station 1); The squat and its variants (Station 2); Elastic bands and the Bodyblade (Station 3); Abdominal planks and their variants (Station 4); Abdominal strengthening (Station 5); Back extensor strengthening (Station 6); and Lifting techniques (Station 7).

Study groups in NCT03464877
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalStandardized six-week duration multi-station full-body supervised exercise program. The frequency was 2-3 sessions per week. The duration of each session was 60 minutes.
Receives: Other: Multi-station full-body supervised exercise program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in the degree of disability in persons with Low back pain at 6 weeks

    The Modified Oswestry Disability Index is a self-administered questionnaire (10 questions with numerical scale 0-5) whose purpose is to evaluate the severity of the limitations and restrictions suffered by patients with LBP

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks after the start of the exercises program

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Height of participants

    Tape measure graduated in meter (m)

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Weight of participants

    On a scale graduated in kilogram (kg)

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Body mass index

    Weight (kg) divided by the square of the height (m^2) of the participants. Units : Kg/m^2

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire

    Self-administered questionnaire that consists of 16 questions (numerical scale 0-6) pertaining to patients' beliefs regarding the effect of their physical activities and work on low back pain

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Length of employment in the army

    Number of months - (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  6. History of Low Back pain

    Dichotomous scale (yes/No) - (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Time since last onset of low back pain

    Number of months (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Number of treatments received before initial evaluation in the study

    Number of visits (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Referred pain in lower limbs

    Dichotomous scale (yes/No) - (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Work restrictions

    Nominal scale - three levels (None, less than 6 months, six months or more) - obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Sensation of tingling or numbness

    Dichotomous scale (yes/No) - (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Use of antidepressant

    Dichotomous scale (yes/No) - (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  13. Use of anti-inflammatory drugs

    Dichotomous scale (yes/No) - (obtained from participants interview)

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Pain in sitting position

    Visual analog scale graduated 0-100

    Measured: Baseline

  15. Pain in lying position

    Visual analog scale graduated 0-100

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Pain in standing position

    Visual analog scale graduated 0-100

    Measured: Baseline

  17. Pain during walking

    Visual analog scale graduated 0-100

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Pain when coughing or sneezing

    Visual analog scale graduated 0-100

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Mean pain perceived in the last 48 hours

    Visual analog scale graduated 0-10

    Measured: Baseline

  20. Worst pain perceived in the last 48 hours

    Visual analog scale graduated 0-10

    Measured: Baseline

  21. Lumbar and Hip Mobility

    Goniometric measurements in degree

    Measured: Baseline

  22. Screening or diagnostic tests of lumbar instability

    Clinical tests. Dichotomous scale (+/-)

    Measured: Baseline

  23. Endurance of the extensor muscles of the trunk

    Biering-Sorensen test. Holding time in second

    Measured: Baseline

  24. Endurance of the anterior abdominal muscles of the trunk

    Abdominal endurance test. Holding time in second

    Measured: Baseline

  25. Endurance of the lateral muscles of the trunk

    Lateral plank test. Holding time in second

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Mar 2018
  2. Study start19 Mar 2013
  3. Primary completion14 Mar 2015
  4. Study completion27 Apr 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Prospective cohort study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
104 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03464877
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012-13-#14
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
26 Feb 2018
Last updated
15 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The dataset used and/or analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on request

Publications

  • Perron M, Gendron C, Langevin P, Leblond J, Roos M, Roy JS. Prognostic factors of a favorable outcome following a supervised exercise program for soldiers with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 2;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2022-x.

    PubMed 29606114

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Multi-station full-body supervised exercise program in people with Low Back Pain, run by Marc Perron at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in the degree of disability in persons with Low back pain at 6 weeks (time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after the start of the exercises program). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03464877, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in