Diverticulosis, ColonicNCT03465293
Influence of Mechanical Bowel Preparation on GI Microbiota
An observational study of Diverticulosis, Colonic and Microbiota, run by University of Reading.
Trial summary
The mechanical bowel preparation (BP) used to clean the colon prior to colonoscopy frequently results in a significant but temporary reduction in patient's symptoms for a number of bowel disorders including symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease. The cause of this improvement is unknown. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Diverticulosis, Colonic, Microbiota
- What is being tested?
- Bacterial composition and activity after bowel preparation
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 May 2018to 30 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Post-menopausal women with non-specific left side pain and an altered bowel habit who are due to be investigated by colonoscopy
Who may be able to join
- Suspected symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease
- Requires colonoscopy for investigation of symptoms
Who cannot join
- Under 18yo
- Previous bowel resection
- Antibiotics use in the last 6 months
- Medical condition precluding colonoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Philip Conaghan, MA DM FRCS contact
About this study
Official title: Does Mechanical Bowel Preparation Destabilise the Gut Microbiota and Provide a Window of Opportunity in Which to Influence the Re-establishing Microbiota in Diverticulosis?
The mechanical bowel preparation (BP) used to clean the colon prior to colonoscopy frequently results in a significant but temporary reduction in patient's symptoms for a number of bowel disorders including symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease. The cause of this improvement is unknown.
We hypothesise that changes to the gut microbial population (microbiota) are responsible for this improvement and that the repopulation of the GI tract with bacteria following colonoscopy results in a return of their normal symptoms. This pilot study will test this in a preliminary way by examining the stool, urine and blood of patients before and after bowel preparation to detect any destabilising effect that BP has on the gut microbiota and to what extent the microbiota repopulates at 3 months If the hypothesis is proven, this study will show that BP generates a 'window of opportunity' in which to influence the subsequent re-establishment of the microbiota. This is with the eventual aim of correcting potential dysbiosis and preventing the progression of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD).
Read the detailed description
The mechanical bowel preparation (BP) procedure, which directly precedes colonic endoscopy, results in a significant reduction in reported symptoms for several bowel disorders (eg irritable bowel syndrome (IBS )), but as yet, there is little research-based supporting evidence. This proposal will use a robust experimental design to explore both the composition of the microbiota, and importantly, its metabolic activity to assess interactions with human hosts following BP. The aim of this pilot study is to generate data demonstrating the destabilising effects of BP on both the composition and metabolic activity of the gut microbiota.
If the hypothesis is proven, this study will show that BP generates a 'window of opportunity' in which to influence the subsequent re-establishment of the microbiota. This is with the eventual aim of correcting dysbiosis and preventing the development of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease in patients with diverticulosis.
Background Diverticular disease, characterised by weakness of the supporting connective tissue of the wall of the colon leading to the formation of diverticula1, is somewhat neglected and does not receive scientific attention that other inflammatory gut disorders have. Despite this condition affecting 50% of our aging population, approximately 1/5 of which will develop debilitating symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD)2, there is a paucity of knowledge in this field.
The factors determining the transition from asymptomatic diverticulosis to SUDD are unclear. However, the gut microbiota has been implicated in a recent small-scale study which correlated diverticulosis with depletion of Clostridium cluster IV. Clostridium cluster IX, Fusobacterium and Lactobacillaceae, all of which can exert an anti-inflammatory effects. Patients who present with left-side non-specific abdominal pain and diarrhoea are assessed by colonic endoscopy. A small-scale study showed that this procedure also resulted in a significant reduction in Lactobacillaceae in the control population after 1 month (n=10).
BP is received 14 and 20 hours prior to colonoscopy and involves oral administration with a variety of stimulant laxatives (eg Moviprep - polyethylene glycol) resulting in severe diarrhoea and complete clearance of faecal matter from the bowel. It is likely that this BP is implicated in any reduction in reported symptoms as opposed to the endoscopic procedure itself, although putative underlying mechanisms have yet to be identified.
Hypothesis: Bowel preparation for endoscopy will destabilise the gut microbiota in patients with diverticulosis. Re-establishment of this microbiota follows an altered developmental trajectory resulting in sustained changes to the composition of the microbiota. Furthermore, these observed changes will have functional consequences as identified through altered metabolic interactions at the microbe-host interface.
Aims and objectives:
- Quantify sustained observational changes which occur within the functional groups of the gut microbiota following BP (HTP FISHflow technology).
- Functional consequences of such changes to host metabolism, host-microbe co-metabolism and short chain fatty acid production will be assessed (nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and gas chromatography respectively).
- Statistical data integration techniques will identify links between the altered microbiota and metabolic profiles to begin to determine the mechanisms underlying the influence of the gut microbiota in diverticulosis .
- The outputs above will identify whether a 'window of opportunity' occurs following BP which could be exploited to rectify dysbiosis as a basis for a later larger-scale study.
Experimental design
In order to assess the effects of BP on the colonic microbiota in diverticulosis, post-menopausal women with mild non-specific left sided abdominal pain and diarrhoea, who have been referred to the colorectal unit at the Royal Berkshire Hospital , will be recruited by the applicants (KT, PC). Patients who have not received antibiotics in the previous 3 months will complete a questionnaire to assess gastrointestinal symptoms, which will be based on those used in our previous human Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) trials. Urine will be collected at t=0 (before BP), t=2d (24h after BP), t=8d (1 week after BP) and t=3 months (when recalled to the hospital). Faeces will be collected at the same timepoints except t=2d, instead the first void following BP will be requested. Patients are sent oral BP by post or collect them from the endoscopy unit, and we will exploit this to deliver faecal sample pots. Samples will be provided either at the hospital and immediately frozen, or patients will be asked to freeze and bring with them to their appointment . Later samples (t-8d, t=3 months), will be kept frozen at home then collected by University of Reading staff once both samples have been collected. Upon collection, patients will be provided with the questionnaire (and self-addressed envelope) to allow comparison of their symptoms 2 weeks and 3 months post BP with those reported beforehand (t=0).
- Conditions
- Diverticulosis, Colonic, Microbiota
- Being tested
- Bacterial composition and activity after bowel preparation
- Keywords
- Symptomatic diverticulosis, Microbiota, Bowel preparation
- Medical subject headings
- Diverticulosis, Colonic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bacterial composition and activity after bowel preparationOther
Bacterial composition and activity and patient's symptoms will be assessed pre and post bowel preparation taken as part of the preparation to have a pre-planned colonoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SUDD post-menopausal female | Post-menopausal women with non-specific left side pain and altered bowel habit who are having mechanical bowel preparation for a colonoscopy Receives: Other: Bacterial composition and activity after bowel preparation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composition of the colonic microbiota pre and post bowel preparation
Quantify sustained observational changes which occur within the functional groups of the gut microbiota following BP (HTP FISHflow technology)
Measured: 6 months
Activity of the microbiota pre and post bowel preparation
Functional consequences of observed changes to host metabolism, host-microbe co-metabolism and short chain fatty acid production. This will be assessed by NMR spectroscopy and gas chromatography respectively
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2018
- Study start1 May 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Oct 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diverticulosis, ColonicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Reading
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Berkshire Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marie Lewis, University of Reading
- Investigators
- Marie Lewis, PhD, Principal investigator, Reading University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03465293
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FNSML1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Drago L, Toscano M, De Grandi R, Casini V, Pace F. Persisting changes of intestinal microbiota after bowel lavage and colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;28(5):532-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000581.
PubMed 27015015Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):220-30. doi: 10.1038/nature11550.
PubMed 22972295Merrifield CA, Lewis MC, Claus SP, Pearce JT, Cloarec O, Duncker S, Heinzmann SS, Dumas ME, Kochhar S, Rezzi S, Mercenier A, Nicholson JK, Bailey M, Holmes E. Weaning diet induces sustained metabolic phenotype shift in the pig and influences host response to Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818. Gut. 2013 Jun;62(6):842-51. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301656. Epub 2012 Jun 3.
PubMed 22661492
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Mechanical Bowel Preparation Destabilise the Gut Microbiota and Provide a Window of Opportunity in Which to Influence the Re-establishing Microbiota in Diverticulosis?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03465293
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FNSML1
- Conditions
- Diverticulosis, Colonic, Microbiota
- Keywords
- Symptomatic diverticulosis, Microbiota, Bowel preparation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ReadingUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Berkshire Hospital
- Study start
- 1 May 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The mechanical bowel preparation (BP) used to clean the colon prior to colonoscopy frequently results in a significant but temporary reduction in patient's symptoms for a number of bowel disorders including symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease. The cause of this improvement is unknown.
We hypothesise that changes to the gut microbial population (microbiota) are responsible for this improvement and that the repopulation of the GI tract with bacteria following colonoscopy results in a return of their normal symptoms. This pilot study will test this in a preliminary way by examining the stool, urine and blood of patients before and after bowel preparation to detect any destabilising effect that BP has on the gut microbiota and to what extent the microbiota repopulates at 3 months If the hypothesis is proven, this study will show that BP generates a 'window of opportunity' in which to influence the subsequent re-establishment of the microbiota. This is with the eventual aim of correcting potential dysbiosis and preventing the progression of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD).
Detailed description
The mechanical bowel preparation (BP) procedure, which directly precedes colonic endoscopy, results in a significant reduction in reported symptoms for several bowel disorders (eg irritable bowel syndrome (IBS )), but as yet, there is little research-based supporting evidence. This proposal will use a robust experimental design to explore both the composition of the microbiota, and importantly, its metabolic activity to assess interactions with human hosts following BP. The aim of this pilot study is to generate data demonstrating the destabilising effects of BP on both the composition and metabolic activity of the gut microbiota.
If the hypothesis is proven, this study will show that BP generates a 'window of opportunity' in which to influence the subsequent re-establishment of the microbiota. This is with the eventual aim of correcting dysbiosis and preventing the development of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease in patients with diverticulosis.
Background Diverticular disease, characterised by weakness of the supporting connective tissue of the wall of the colon leading to the formation of diverticula1, is somewhat neglected and does not receive scientific attention that other inflammatory gut disorders have. Despite this condition affecting 50% of our aging population, approximately 1/5 of which will develop debilitating symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD)2, there is a paucity of knowledge in this field.
The factors determining the transition from asymptomatic diverticulosis to SUDD are unclear. However, the gut microbiota has been implicated in a recent small-scale study which correlated diverticulosis with depletion of Clostridium cluster IV. Clostridium cluster IX, Fusobacterium and Lactobacillaceae, all of which can exert an anti-inflammatory effects. Patients who present with left-side non-specific abdominal pain and diarrhoea are assessed by colonic endoscopy. A small-scale study showed that this procedure also resulted in a significant reduction in Lactobacillaceae in the control population after 1 month (n=10).
BP is received 14 and 20 hours prior to colonoscopy and involves oral administration with a variety of stimulant laxatives (eg Moviprep - polyethylene glycol) resulting in severe diarrhoea and complete clearance of faecal matter from the bowel. It is likely that this BP is implicated in any reduction in reported symptoms as opposed to the endoscopic procedure itself, although putative underlying mechanisms have yet to be identified.
Hypothesis: Bowel preparation for endoscopy will destabilise the gut microbiota in patients with diverticulosis. Re-establishment of this microbiota follows an altered developmental trajectory resulting in sustained changes to the composition of the microbiota. Furthermore, these observed changes will have functional consequences as identified through altered metabolic interactions at the microbe-host interface.
Aims and objectives:
- Quantify sustained observational changes which occur within the functional groups of the gut microbiota following BP (HTP FISHflow technology).
- Functional consequences of such changes to host metabolism, host-microbe co-metabolism and short chain fatty acid production will be assessed (nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and gas chromatography respectively).
- Statistical data integration techniques will identify links between the altered microbiota and metabolic profiles to begin to determine the mechanisms underlying the influence of the gut microbiota in diverticulosis .
- The outputs above will identify whether a 'window of opportunity' occurs following BP which could be exploited to rectify dysbiosis as a basis for a later larger-scale study.
Experimental design
In order to assess the effects of BP on the colonic microbiota in diverticulosis, post-menopausal women with mild non-specific left sided abdominal pain and diarrhoea, who have been referred to the colorectal unit at the Royal Berkshire Hospital , will be recruited by the applicants (KT, PC). Patients who have not received antibiotics in the previous 3 months will complete a questionnaire to assess gastrointestinal symptoms, which will be based on those used in our previous human Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) trials. Urine will be collected at t=0 (before BP), t=2d (24h after BP), t=8d (1 week after BP) and t=3 months (when recalled to the hospital). Faeces will be collected at the same timepoints except t=2d, instead the first void following BP will be requested. Patients are sent oral BP by post or collect them from the endoscopy unit, and we will exploit this to deliver faecal sample pots. Samples will be provided either at the hospital and immediately frozen, or patients will be asked to freeze and bring with them to their appointment . Later samples (t-8d, t=3 months), will be kept frozen at home then collected by University of Reading staff once both samples have been collected. Upon collection, patients will be provided with the questionnaire (and self-addressed envelope) to allow comparison of their symptoms 2 weeks and 3 months post BP with those reported beforehand (t=0).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SUDD post-menopausal female | – | Other: Bacterial composition and activity after bowel preparationPost-menopausal women with non-specific left side pain and altered bowel habit who are having mechanical bowel preparation for a colonoscopy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Post-menopausal women with non-specific left side pain and an altered bowel habit who are due to be investigated by colonoscopy
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Suspected symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease
- Requires colonoscopy for investigation of symptoms
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Under 18yo
- Previous bowel resection
- Antibiotics use in the last 6 months
- Medical condition precluding colonoscopy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial composition and activity after bowel preparationBacterial composition and activity and patient's symptoms will be assessed pre and post bowel preparation taken as part of the preparation to have a pre-planned colonoscopy | Other | SUDD post-menopausal female |
Primary outcome
Composition of the colonic microbiota pre and post bowel preparation
Time frame: 6 months
Quantify sustained observational changes which occur within the functional groups of the gut microbiota following BP (HTP FISHflow technology)
Activity of the microbiota pre and post bowel preparation
Time frame: 6 months
Functional consequences of observed changes to host metabolism, host-microbe co-metabolism and short chain fatty acid production. This will be assessed by NMR spectroscopy and gas chromatography respectively
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 27015015Drago L, Toscano M, De Grandi R, Casini V, Pace F. Persisting changes of intestinal microbiota after bowel lavage and colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;28(5):532-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000581.
- Results publication: PubMed 22972295Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):220-30. doi: 10.1038/nature11550.
- Results publication: PubMed 22661492Merrifield CA, Lewis MC, Claus SP, Pearce JT, Cloarec O, Duncker S, Heinzmann SS, Dumas ME, Kochhar S, Rezzi S, Mercenier A, Nicholson JK, Bailey M, Holmes E. Weaning diet induces sustained metabolic phenotype shift in the pig and influences host response to Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818. Gut. 2013 Jun;62(6):842-51. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301656. Epub 2012 Jun 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diverticulosis, Colonic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Analysis of the Role of the Microbiota in Diverticular Disease
Diverticular Disease of Colon, Acute Diverticulitis
RecruitingObservational study
Advanced Endo-therapeutic Procedure : Registry-based Observational Study
Zenker Diverticulum, Polyp of Colon
RecruitingObservational study
Quality of Life and Surgery in Diverticular Disease
Diverticulitis Colon, Quality of Life
RecruitingObservational study
Single-Stapled Technique for Colorectal Anastomosis
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Anastomosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Diverticulitis Study
Colonic Diverticulitis, Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philip Conaghan, MA DM FRCS contact
Marie Lewis, PhD principal investigator
Reading University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diverticulosis, Colonic and Microbiota, run by University of Reading.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marie Lewis, PhD (0118 378 8708, marie.lewis@reading.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composition of the colonic microbiota pre and post bowel preparation (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03465293, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2018.