AzTrials
AzTrials

Lymph Node DissectionPhase 2NCT03474926

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract

A Phase 2 study testing Routine Template-based lymphadenectomy and LND only for lymph nodes enlargement found in preoperative image or during surgery in people with Lymph Node Dissection, run by RenJi Hospital at 2 sites in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recent studies showed the therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy in advanced stage urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract, but there is still a lack of prospective studies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Lymph Node Dissection
What is being tested?
Routine Template-based lymphadenectomy and LND only for lymph nodes enlargement found in preoperative image or during surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
504 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
22 Feb 2018to 22 Feb 2023
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • clinically diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma
  • have no distant metastasis
  • have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0 to 2
  • expected to receive radical nephroureterectomy

Who cannot join

  • a prior history of bladder cancer
  • administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • deny to receive long term follow-up
  • patients with contralateral UTUCs
  • patients with synchronous muscle invasive bladder cancer

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

jiwei huang, M.D. contact

8613651682825

huangjiwei@renji.com

China2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Peking University First Hospital

    Beijin, Beijin, 100034

    Xuesong Li, M.D

    Recruiting
  • Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200123

    Jiwei Huang, M.D

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Prospective Randomized Phase II Trial: Comparing the Prognostic Value of Routine Lymphadenectomy Versus Lymphadenectomy Only for Lymph Nodes Enlargement Found in Preoperative Imaging or During Surgery Undergoing Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Primary Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Recent studies showed the therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy in advanced stage urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract, but there is still a lack of prospective studies. Thus, the current guideline recommends lymph node dissection for invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) on the basis of insufficient evidence. Also, the preoperative judgment of muscle invasive pathological stage T 2+,or N+ is difficult from preoperative imaging. In the investigators' clinical practice, the surgeons performed dissection of regional lymph nodes only in patients with enlargement of lymph nodes found in preoperative imaging or during surgery. The aim of this multi-institutional study was to examine the role of lymphadenectomy in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Being tested
Routine Template-based lymphadenectomy, LND only for lymph nodes enlargement found in preoperative image or during surgery
Keywords
urothelial cancer, nephroureterectomy, Upper urinary tract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Routine Template-based lymphadenectomyProcedure or surgery

    Template-based LND was carried out in all patients in this group. The anatomical extent of LND is described in previous study. Lymph node specimens were sampled "en bloc" with surrounding adipose tissue, and were sent to pathological examination as individual packets with the surrounding adipose tissue.

  • LND only for lymph nodes enlargement found in preoperative image or during surgeryProcedure or surgery

    LND was carried out only in patients who have lymph nodes enlargement in preoperative imaging (e.g. CTU or enhanced MRI) or who were found lymph nodes enlargement during surgery

Study groups in NCT03474926
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Routine lymph node dissection (LND) during nephroureterectomyExperimentalTemplate-based LND was carried out in all patients in this group. The anatomical extent of LND is described in previous study. Lymph node specimens were sampled "en bloc" with surrounding adipose tissue, and were sent to pathological examination as individual packets with the surrounding adipose tissue.
Receives: Procedure: Routine Template-based lymphadenectomy
LND for lymph nodes enlargement found before or during surgeryActive comparatorLND was carried out only in patients who have lymph nodes enlargement in preoperative imaging (CTU or enhanced MRI) or who were found lymph nodes enlargement during surgery.
Receives: Procedure: LND only for lymph nodes enlargement found in preoperative image or during surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease free survival

    Disease free survival rate in the 36 month following nephroureterectomy

    Measured: 36 month

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Cancer specific survival

    Cancer specific survival rate in the 36 month following nephroureterectomy

    Measured: 36 month

  2. Overall survival

    Overall survival rate in the 36 month following nephroureterectomy

    Measured: 36 month

  3. The recurrence rate of bladder cancer in the 36 month following nephroureterectomy

    The recurrence rate of bladder cancer in the 36 month following nephroureterectomy

    Measured: 36 month

  4. Perioperative complications rate

    Perioperative complications were evaluated up to 90 days after surgery, and were graded by Clavien-Dindo classification

    Measured: 90 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2018
  2. Study start22 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion22 Feb 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion22 Feb 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
504 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03474926
Sponsor's protocol ID
UTUC-LND collaboration 1
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
27 Feb 2018
Last updated
22 May 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Routine Template-based lymphadenectomy and LND only for lymph nodes enlargement found in preoperative image or during surgery in people with Lymph Node Dissection, run by RenJi Hospital at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact jiwei huang, M.D. (8613651682825, huangjiwei@renji.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disease free survival (time frame: 36 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in