AzTrials
AzTrials

TechnologyPEDSNCT03479034

Patients Empowered With Digital Scripts: ScalaMed

An observational study of Technology, run by Holdsworth House Medical Practice.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective qualitative and quantitative controlled study, exploring the impact of patient centred digital prescriptions on health, in patients with chronic health conditions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Technology
What is being tested?
ScalaMed ePrescription application
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2019to Oct 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients of Holdsworth House Medical Practice

Who may be able to join

  • Ages 18-85
  • Cognitively able to understand instructions and care for themselves
  • Lives in the community (not institutionalised)
  • Owner of a smartphone and able to use Apps
  • On 3 or more chronic prescription medications
  • Informed consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Has had experience with prescriptions in Australia for at least 1 year
  • For the clinicians - any clinician who is using the ScalaMed prescription system in the Holdsworth House
  • For pharmacists - who are utilising the ScalaMed system in one of the four clinics

Who cannot join

  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia of the participant
  • Previous enrolment into the current study

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Controlled Study, Exploring the Impact of Patient Centred Digital Prescriptions on Health, in Patients With Chronic Health Conditions

A prospective qualitative and quantitative controlled study, exploring the impact of patient centred digital prescriptions on health, in patients with chronic health conditions.

Read the detailed description

ScalaMed is an innovative new consumer centred solution for securing prescriptions through a blockchain solution - a cryptographic distributed database, that can give consumer access to their prescriptions at all times. It aims to solve interoperability challenges that exist in healthcare, by creating a ledger of prescriptions, and giving consumers access to this information to own and share as they need. The solution will be accessed through an application available on a smart phone, will be fully compliant with security and privacy laws, and will be made available to consumers, clinicians, and pharmacies enrolled in this study free of charge. The system also allows patients to monitor the usage of their prescriptions - eg when they need a new one, and allows them to choose how and where they want to use their prescriptions like with paper.

This study will explore whether empowering consumers with their digital prescriptions in a digital format through a blockchain based methodology of storing and accessing their data, will improve the flow of clinically important information, improve the frequency of data sharing, improve the self-management of the patient, improve adherence to treatments, reduce interactions and adverse events associated with medications, reduce the burden on clinical practice, improve efficiency, reduce the amount of paper, increase consumer engagement and improve patient satisfaction.

Conditions
Technology
Being tested
ScalaMed ePrescription application
Keywords
digital, prescription, Application

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ScalaMed ePrescription applicationOther

    Mobile phone application (Android and Apple) for storing electronic prescriptions

Study groups in NCT03479034
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1* Ages 18-85 * Cognitively able to understand instructions and care for themselves * Lives in the community (not institutionalised) * Owner of a smartphone and able to use Apps * On 3 or more chronic prescription medications * Has had experience with prescriptions in Australia for at least 1 year * Current patient attending Holdsworth House Medical Practice Willing to use the ScalaMed ePrescription application
Receives: Other: ScalaMed ePrescription application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient preference

    Primary outcome is the change from baseline in patient preference for ScalaMed over previous prescription management tools after 3-months, determined through a questionnaire using a 4 point Likert scale.

    1. I prefer Scalamed to my previous system of managing prescriptions
    2. Strongly agree
    3. Somewhat agree
    4. somewhat disagree
    5. strongly disagree

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Clinician prefence

    The change from baseline in clinician preference for ScalaMed over previous prescription management tools after 3-months, determined through a questionnaire using a 4 point Likert scale.

    1. I prefer ScalaMed over paper for helping patients manage their prescriptions
    2. Strongly agree
    3. Somewhat agree
    4. somewhat disagree
    5. strongly disagree

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Prescriber satisfaction

    Outcome will be determined through a questionnaire and will describe prescriber satisfaction in managing patient's prescriptions at 6 months 19 questions in relation to the impact of electronic prescriptions on the patient's journey, from when a prescription is required to when their medicines are received with the options: Strongly Disagree, Slightly Disagree, Slightly Agree, Strongly Agree. For example:

    1. Easier for me to send patients prescriptions when they are not in the clinic
    2. Patients have increased control and understanding of their medicines
    3. Electronic prescriptions are more patient centric

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Clinical Implications

    Determined through a questionnaire, a description of the clinical implications associated with consumers utilizing digital prescriptions at 6 months Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements about the impact of ScalaMed electronic prescriptions on patient care: Strongly Disagree, Slightly Disagree, Slightly Agree, Strongly Agree

    1. Reduces the likelihood of prescription errors
    2. Makes it easier for patients to have their prescriptions dispensed
    3. Empowers patients with their data
    4. Reduces admin burden in the clinic
    5. Reduces fraud
    6. Helps patients adhere to their medicine
    7. Integrates data across providers
    8. Reduces workload
    9. Reduced lost of missing prescriptions

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Patient measures

    Description of clinically relevant patient measures affected by proper utilization of medication information, measured through repeat questionnaires over 6 months

    1. Which of the following features of ScalaMed do you value? (Tick all that apply)
    2. No paper
    3. Value for patient - ease and convenience and source of truth data
    4. Ability to view patient's prescribing across doctors
    5. Ability to view patient's dispensing history
    6. Potential for interaction and allergy alerts
    7. Ability to send prescriptions to patients remotely (prescriber) / patients can send me prescriptions remotely (pharmacy)

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Digital sharing

    To describe the relationship of digitally sharing data and communications between the consumer and their care team, measured through repeat questionnaires over 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Care implications

    A description of the relationship between shared data and efficient and relevant care measured through a Combination of patient and clinical questionnaires over 6 months.

    Patients questionnaires:

    1. Did you find a mistake, or issue with a prescription that you were sent BECAUSE of ScalaMed - that is, ScalaMed helped you see that you received an incorrect medicine or dosage? Yes/No
    2. Did you see another health care practitioner since you last completed a questionnaire? Yes /No Did you show them your prescription data on ScalaMed? Yes/No Clinician Questions

    1.Which of the following features of ScalaMed do you value? (Tick all that apply) 2.Electronic prescriptions have the potential to reduce miscommunication between health professionals: Strongly Disagree, Slightly Disagree, Slightly Agree, Strongly Agree

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Pharmacy engagement

    A description of consumer engagement and experience at the pharmacy over 6 months, as measured by repeat questionnaires.

    Pharmacyexamples: 4 questions in relation to the impact of electronic prescriptions on the patient's journey, from when a prescription is required to when their medicines are received with the options: Strongly Disagree, Slightly Disagree, Slightly Agree, Strongly Agree. For example:

    1. Electronic prescriptions are more legible e. Has potential to reduce miscommunication between health professionals Patient examples:Since you last completed a questionnaire have you arrived in a pharmacy to find you had no more prescriptions/repeats available? Yes/no At the moment do you know where all your prescriptions are stored/kept? Yes/no

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2018
  2. Study startJan 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJul 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2019 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Investigator decided not to proceed in Australia at this stage.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03479034
Sponsor's protocol ID
SCALA001
Acronym
PEDS
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
21 Jan 2018
Last updated
12 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Technology, run by Holdsworth House Medical Practice.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient preference (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in