Capsule EndoscopyNCT03482661
Magnetic Steering Improves Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Completion Rate
A study testing magnetic steering in people with Capsule Endoscopy and Small Bowel Disease, run by Zhuan Liao at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Patients referred for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) in the participating center from June 2017 to November 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic steering of MCE was performed after standard gastric examination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Capsule Endoscopy, Small Bowel Disease
- What is being tested?
- magnetic steering
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 227 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 30 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged over 18
- With gastrointestinal complaints
- Scheduled to undergo a capsule endoscopy for both stomach and small bowel
Who cannot join
- No surgical condition or refusing abdominal surgery to take out the capsule in case of capsule retention
- Implanted pacemaker, except the pacemaker is compatible with MRI
- Other implanted electromedical devices or magnetic metal foreign bodies
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Magnetic Steering of Capsule Endoscopy Improves Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Completion Rate
Patients referred for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) in the participating center from June 2017 to November 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic steering of MCE was performed after standard gastric examination. Capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR), gastric transit time (GTT), pyloric transit time (PTT) and rapid gastric transit rate (GTT ≤ 30 min) were compared with the historical control group enrolled from January 2017 to May 2017.
Read the detailed description
Background and aims: Capsule endoscopy is currently available as a noninvasive and effective diagnostic modality to identify small bowel abnormalities, while the completion rate ranged from 75.1% to 95.6%. A novel magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system could facilitate the capsule to pass through pylorus thereby reducing the gastric transit time (GTT). The investigators perform this study to determine the potential improvement in capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR) under magnetic steering vs standard mode.
Methods: Patients referred for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) in the participating center from June 2017 to November 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic steering of MCE was performed after standard gastric examination. Capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR), gastric transit time (GTT), pyloric transit time (PTT) and rapid gastric transit rate (GTT ≤ 30 min) were compared with the historical control group enrolled from January 2017 to May 2017.
- Conditions
- Capsule Endoscopy, Small Bowel Disease
- Being tested
- magnetic steering
- Keywords
- Magnetic steering, MCE, CECR
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
magnetic steeringOther
The capsule was controlled to pass through the pylorus by magnet steering.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | The patients swallowed the capsule with water in the supine position. When the capsule reached the stomach, the capsule was lifted away from the posterior wall, rotated and advanced to the fundus and cardiac regions, and then to the gastric body, angulus, antrum and pylorus. After completing the stomach examination, the capsule moved automatically without magnetic control and entered the duodenum under physiological conditions. The position of the capsule was verified through real-time viewer. |
| Magnetic steering | Experimental | After finishing the stomach examination as the control protocol, the capsule was lifted with the magnetic control, then rotating the capsule until the camera end oriented toward the pylorus . Next, the endoscopist could drag the capsule close to the pylorus with the guidance magnet robot, waiting for the open of pylorus. Once the pylorus opened, the capsule could enter the duodenum with gastric peristalsis. Receives: Other: magnetic steering |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CECR
Capsule endoscopy completion rate
Measured: Two weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Diagnostic cases by MCE
Esophageal, gastric, small bowel and colon diseases diagnosed by MCE
Measured: Two weeks
Transit time
Esophageal/gastric/pyloric/small bowel/total transit time
Measured: Two weeks
Rapid gastric transit rate
Rate of patients with a gastric transit time of ≤ 30 min
Measured: Two weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion30 Nov 2017
- Study completion30 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Capsule EndoscopyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 227 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhuan Liao
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Zhuan Liao, Changhai Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03482661
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MCE-CECR
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 5 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 3 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: We may share IPD when we finish this research
Publications
Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Dimitriadis GD, Triantafyllou K. Long-term effects of video capsule endoscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(9):196. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.80.
PubMed 28567376Kopylov U, Yung DE, Engel T, Vijayan S, Har-Noy O, Katz L, Oliva S, Avni T, Battat R, Eliakim R, Ben-Horin S, Koulaouzidis A. Diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy versus magnetic resonance enterography and small bowel contrast ultrasound in the evaluation of small bowel Crohn's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug;49(8):854-863. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
PubMed 28512034Cheung DY, Kim JS, Shim KN, Choi MG; Korean Gut Image Study Group. The Usefulness of Capsule Endoscopy for Small Bowel Tumors. Clin Endosc. 2016 Jan;49(1):21-5. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.21. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
PubMed 26855919Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R, Keuchel M, May A, Mulder CJ, Rondonotti E, Adler SN, Albert J, Baltes P, Barbaro F, Cellier C, Charton JP, Delvaux M, Despott EJ, Domagk D, Klein A, McAlindon M, Rosa B, Rowse G, Sanders DS, Saurin JC, Sidhu R, Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Gralnek IM. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Apr;47(4):352-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391855. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PubMed 25826168Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li ZS. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031.
PubMed 20152309Koulaouzidis A, Giannakou A, Yung DE, Dabos KJ, Plevris JN. Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Sep;29(9):1171-85. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.818532. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
PubMed 23790243Prichard D, Ou G, Galorport C, Enns R. Sham Feeding with Bacon Does Not Alter Transit Time or Complete Examination Rate During Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Feb;63(2):422-428. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4901-7. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
PubMed 29302875Ou G, Svarta S, Chan C, Galorport C, Qian H, Enns R. The effect of chewing gum on small-bowel transit time in capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr;79(4):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.038. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
PubMed 24112594Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, Sheng JQ, Ge ZZ, Jiang B, Hou XH, Liu JY, Li Z, Huang QY, Zhao XJ, Li N, Gao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhou JQ, Wang XY, Liu J, Xie XP, Yang CM, Liu HL, Sun XT, Zou WB, Li ZS. Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;14(9):1266-1273.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 20.
PubMed 27211503Zou WB, Hou XH, Xin L, Liu J, Bo LM, Yu GY, Liao Z, Li ZS. Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy vs. gastroscopy for gastric diseases: a two-center self-controlled comparative trial. Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):525-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391123. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
PubMed 25590177Zhu SG, Qian YY, Tang XY, Zhu QQ, Zhou W, Du H, An W, Su XJ, Zhao AJ, Ching HL, McAlindon ME, Li ZS, Liao Z. Gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: A prospective, randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jan;50(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.09.129. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
PubMed 29110963Albrecht H, Vetter M, Dauth W, Zoicas F, Neurath MF, Hagel AF. The impact of hospitalization on the performance of capsule endoscopy (CE). Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Jun;49(6):647-650. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
PubMed 28258930Luo YY, Pan J, Chen YZ, Jiang X, Zou WB, Qian YY, Zhou W, Liu X, Li ZS, Liao Z. Magnetic Steering of Capsule Endoscopy Improves Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Completion Rate. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jul;64(7):1908-1915. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-5479-z. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
PubMed 30725289
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Magnetic Steering of Capsule Endoscopy Improves Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Completion Rate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03482661
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MCE-CECR
- Conditions
- Capsule Endoscopy, Small Bowel Disease
- Keywords
- Magnetic steering, MCE, CECR
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 227 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhuan LiaoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients referred for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) in the participating center from June 2017 to November 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic steering of MCE was performed after standard gastric examination. Capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR), gastric transit time (GTT), pyloric transit time (PTT) and rapid gastric transit rate (GTT ≤ 30 min) were compared with the historical control group enrolled from January 2017 to May 2017.
Detailed description
Background and aims: Capsule endoscopy is currently available as a noninvasive and effective diagnostic modality to identify small bowel abnormalities, while the completion rate ranged from 75.1% to 95.6%. A novel magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system could facilitate the capsule to pass through pylorus thereby reducing the gastric transit time (GTT). The investigators perform this study to determine the potential improvement in capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR) under magnetic steering vs standard mode.
Methods: Patients referred for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) in the participating center from June 2017 to November 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic steering of MCE was performed after standard gastric examination. Capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR), gastric transit time (GTT), pyloric transit time (PTT) and rapid gastric transit rate (GTT ≤ 30 min) were compared with the historical control group enrolled from January 2017 to May 2017.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –The patients swallowed the capsule with water in the supine position. When the capsule reached the stomach, the capsule was lifted away from the posterior wall, rotated and advanced to the fundus and cardiac regions, and then to the gastric body, angulus, antrum and pylorus. After completing the stomach examination, the capsule moved automatically without magnetic control and entered the duodenum under physiological conditions. The position of the capsule was verified through real-time viewer. |
| Magnetic steering | Experimental | Other: magnetic steeringAfter finishing the stomach examination as the control protocol, the capsule was lifted with the magnetic control, then rotating the capsule until the camera end oriented toward the pylorus . Next, the endoscopist could drag the capsule close to the pylorus with the guidance magnet robot, waiting for the open of pylorus. Once the pylorus opened, the capsule could enter the duodenum with gastric peristalsis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients aged over 18
- With gastrointestinal complaints
- Scheduled to undergo a capsule endoscopy for both stomach and small bowel
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- No surgical condition or refusing abdominal surgery to take out the capsule in case of capsule retention
- Implanted pacemaker, except the pacemaker is compatible with MRI
- Other implanted electromedical devices or magnetic metal foreign bodies
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| magnetic steeringThe capsule was controlled to pass through the pylorus by magnet steering. | Other | Magnetic steering |
Primary outcome
CECR
Time frame: Two weeks
Capsule endoscopy completion rate
3 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic cases by MCE
Time frame: Two weeks
Transit time
Time frame: Two weeks
Rapid gastric transit rate
Time frame: Two weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 28567376Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Dimitriadis GD, Triantafyllou K. Long-term effects of video capsule endoscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(9):196. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.80.
- Background: PubMed 28512034Kopylov U, Yung DE, Engel T, Vijayan S, Har-Noy O, Katz L, Oliva S, Avni T, Battat R, Eliakim R, Ben-Horin S, Koulaouzidis A. Diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy versus magnetic resonance enterography and small bowel contrast ultrasound in the evaluation of small bowel Crohn's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug;49(8):854-863. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 26855919Cheung DY, Kim JS, Shim KN, Choi MG; Korean Gut Image Study Group. The Usefulness of Capsule Endoscopy for Small Bowel Tumors. Clin Endosc. 2016 Jan;49(1):21-5. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.21. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
- Background: PubMed 25826168Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R, Keuchel M, May A, Mulder CJ, Rondonotti E, Adler SN, Albert J, Baltes P, Barbaro F, Cellier C, Charton JP, Delvaux M, Despott EJ, Domagk D, Klein A, McAlindon M, Rosa B, Rowse G, Sanders DS, Saurin JC, Sidhu R, Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Gralnek IM. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Apr;47(4):352-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391855. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 20152309Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li ZS. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031.
- Background: PubMed 23790243Koulaouzidis A, Giannakou A, Yung DE, Dabos KJ, Plevris JN. Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Sep;29(9):1171-85. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.818532. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
- Background: PubMed 29302875Prichard D, Ou G, Galorport C, Enns R. Sham Feeding with Bacon Does Not Alter Transit Time or Complete Examination Rate During Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Feb;63(2):422-428. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4901-7. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
- Background: PubMed 24112594Ou G, Svarta S, Chan C, Galorport C, Qian H, Enns R. The effect of chewing gum on small-bowel transit time in capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr;79(4):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.038. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
- Background: PubMed 27211503Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, Sheng JQ, Ge ZZ, Jiang B, Hou XH, Liu JY, Li Z, Huang QY, Zhao XJ, Li N, Gao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhou JQ, Wang XY, Liu J, Xie XP, Yang CM, Liu HL, Sun XT, Zou WB, Li ZS. Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;14(9):1266-1273.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 25590177Zou WB, Hou XH, Xin L, Liu J, Bo LM, Yu GY, Liao Z, Li ZS. Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy vs. gastroscopy for gastric diseases: a two-center self-controlled comparative trial. Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):525-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391123. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
- Background: PubMed 29110963Zhu SG, Qian YY, Tang XY, Zhu QQ, Zhou W, Du H, An W, Su XJ, Zhao AJ, Ching HL, McAlindon ME, Li ZS, Liao Z. Gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: A prospective, randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jan;50(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.09.129. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
- Background: PubMed 28258930Albrecht H, Vetter M, Dauth W, Zoicas F, Neurath MF, Hagel AF. The impact of hospitalization on the performance of capsule endoscopy (CE). Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Jun;49(6):647-650. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. We may share IPD when we finish this research
Related trials for Capsule Endoscopy
Not yet recruiting
Sodium Bicarbonate Solution Enhances Lens Cleanliness in Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy
Health Adults
Recruiting
Feasibility of a Wireless Thermal Capsule Endoscopy to Detect Gastrointestinal Thermal Variance
Crohn Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Recruiting
Feasibility of a Minimally Invasive Diagnostic Algorithm in Suspected Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Accurately Profiling the Changes and Functions of Key Microflora in the Whole Intestinal Microenvironment Based on the Visual Sampling Capsule Endoscopy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Crohn's Disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison Between Artificial Intelligence and Standard Reading to Investigate Suspected Crohn Disease: the SCAI STUDY
Crohn Disease (CD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing magnetic steering in people with Capsule Endoscopy and Small Bowel Disease, run by Zhuan Liao at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CECR (time frame: Two weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03482661, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2018.