Circulatory ShockPhase 2/3VANCSIIINCT03483753
Vasopressin or Norepinephrine in Vasoplegic Shock After Non-cardiac Surgery
A Phase 2/3 study testing Vasopressin and Norepinephrine in people with Circulatory Shock and Non-cardiac Surgery, run by University of Sao Paulo.
Trial summary
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of vasopressin compared to norepinephrine on the clinical complications of patients with vasospastic shock after noncardiac surgeries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Circulatory Shock, Non-cardiac Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Vasopressin and Norepinephrine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2019to 2 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age greater than 18 years;
- Patients undergoing high-risk non-cardiac surgery;
- vasopressor need within 24 hours after surgery, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg after volume resuscitation with at least 1 liter of crystalloid solution (Ringer's lactate) and maintaining a cardiac index> 2.2 ml / min / m²;
- Signature of the informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Allergy to vasoactive drugs;
- Previous use of vasopressor;
- Gestation;
- Presence of Raynaud's phenomenon, altered Allen's test, systemic sclerosis or vasospastic diathesis;
- Severe hyponatremia (Na <130 mEq / L);
- Acute mesenteric ischemia;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Acute coronary syndrome;
- Participation in another study;
- Refusal to participate in the study.
About this study
Official title: Vasopressin or Norepinephrine in Vasoplegic Shock After Non-cardiac Surgery: a Randomized and Controlled Trial
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of vasopressin compared to norepinephrine on the clinical complications of patients with vasospastic shock after noncardiac surgeries.
Read the detailed description
The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) is a common complication after non-cardiac surgery, impacting negatively on patient outcome and with high incidence rates. Vasoplegic syndrome is the most serious complication of SIRS and can happen after any type of surgery. The etiology of the vasoplegic syndrome has not yet been fully elucidated, but is known to occur more frequently in patients at high surgical risk, submitted to major surgeries, or in the presence of perioperative complications and patients with comorbidities. In this circumstance, the depletion of vasopressin stocks is described, which may contribute to the refractoriness of the shock and the lack of response to the catecholaminergic drugs. The standard treatment of perioperative vasoplegia has been adequate volume replacement and administration of vasopressors, with norepinephrine being the most commonly used. However, it is known that norepinephrine may have deleterious effects on the body and in 20% of patients with vasospastic shock it is ineffective. Previous studies have suggested benefits of adding vasopressin in refractory situations, especially in septic shock. Recently the VANCS study (Vasopressin or norepinephrine in the vasopregic shock after cardiac surgery: double-blind, controlled and randomized study) demonstrated superiority of vasopressin in the reversion of vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery, as well as a lower incidence of renal insufficiency, atrial fibrillation and shorter hospitalization time. (Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):85-93.)
- Conditions
- Circulatory Shock, Non-cardiac Surgery
- Being tested
- Vasopressin, Norepinephrine
- Keywords
- Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, Post-operative, Critical Care
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Diabetes Insipidus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VasopressinDrug
Also called Blinded Vasopressin
Blinded Vasopressin will be started if there is persistent hypotension, characterized by mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg after fluid replacement.
Continuous infusion of the drug at doses ranging from 0.01 U / min to 0.06 U / min
NorepinephrineDrug
Also called Blinded Norepinephrine
Blinded Norepinephrine will be started if there is persistent hypotension, characterized by mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg after fluid replacement. Continuous infusion of the drug at doses ranging from 0.1 mcg / kg / min to 1.0 mcg / kg / min.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vasopressin group | Experimental | Blinded vasopressin Receives: Drug: Vasopressin |
| Norepinephrine group | Active comparator | Blinded norepinephrine Receives: Drug: Norepinephrine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence between groups of a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and renal complications after high-risk non-cardiac surgeries
Cardiovascular complications include: stroke, acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, nonfatal myocardial injury, and ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias.
Renal complications: Acute renal failure with AKIN stage 1 or higher or renal support therapy.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (14)
All-cause mortality
mortality rate of any cause
Measured: 30 days after randomization
Acute myocardial infarction
to compare between groups the incidence of acute myocardial infarction
Measured: 30 days after randomization
Cardiogenic shock
to compare between groups the incidence of cardiogenic shock
Measured: 30 days after randomization
Ventricular and / or supraventricular arrhythmia
to compare between groups the incidence of Ventricular and / or supraventricular arrhythmia
Measured: 30 days
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
to compare between groups the incidence of Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Measured: 30 days
Stroke and transient ischemic attack
to compare between groups the incidence of Stroke and transient ischemic attack
Measured: 30 days
Delirium
to compare between groups the incidence of Delirium
Measured: 30 days
Acute renal failure (AKIN 1 or more)
to compare between groups the incidence of Acute renal failure (AKIN 1 or more)
Measured: 30 days
Length of time in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital
Length of time in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital
Measured: 30 days
Length of mechanical ventilation
Length of mechanical ventilation
Measured: 30 days
Septic shock
to compare between groups the incidence of septic shock
Measured: 30 days
hospital and ICU readmission rate
hospital and ICU readmission rate
Measured: 30 days
Reoperation
number of patients who required reoperation
Measured: 30 days
Incidence of severe adverse events
to compare the incidence of severe adverse outcomes defined as mesenteric ischemia, digital ischemia, hyponatremia (Na<130mEq/L), myocardial infarction or stroke
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2018
- Study startJan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion2 Oct 2023
- Study completion2 Oct 2023
Why it stopped: no funding for the study
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Circulatory ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao PauloThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tais Felix Szeles, University of Sao Paulo
- Investigators
- Juliano P Almeida, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Sao PauloTais F Szeles, MD, Principal investigator, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03483753
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 62586316.6.0000.0065
- Acronym
- VANCSIII
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Levin MA, Lin HM, Castillo JG, Adams DH, Reich DL, Fischer GW. Early on-cardiopulmonary bypass hypotension and other factors associated with vasoplegic syndrome. Circulation. 2009 Oct 27;120(17):1664-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814533. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
PubMed 19822810Landry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):588-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra002709. No abstract available.
PubMed 11529214Gkisioti S, Mentzelopoulos SD. Vasogenic shock physiology. Open Access Emerg Med. 2011 Jan 6;3:1-6. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S10388. eCollection 2011.
PubMed 27147845Teboul JL, Monnet X. Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: two different problems, only one solution. Crit Care. 2009;13(4):175. doi: 10.1186/cc7979. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
PubMed 19678915Brown SM, Lanspa MJ, Jones JP, Kuttler KG, Li Y, Carlson R, Miller RR 3rd, Hirshberg EL, Grissom CK, Morris AH. Survival after shock requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):664-671. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1106.
PubMed 22911566Morales D, Madigan J, Cullinane S, Chen J, Heath M, Oz M, Oliver JA, Landry DW. Reversal by vasopressin of intractable hypotension in the late phase of hemorrhagic shock. Circulation. 1999 Jul 20;100(3):226-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.3.226.
PubMed 10411844Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, Gordon AC, Hebert PC, Cooper DJ, Holmes CL, Mehta S, Granton JT, Storms MM, Cook DJ, Presneill JJ, Ayers D; VASST Investigators. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373.
PubMed 18305265Russell JA. Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock after Cardiac Surgery: Another "VASST" Difference? Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):9-11. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001435. No abstract available.
PubMed 27841820Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Barbosa Gomes Galas FR, Rhodes A, Landoni G, Osawa EA, Melo RR, Sundin MR, Grande SM, Gaiotto FA, Pomerantzeff PM, Dallan LO, Franco RA, Nakamura RE, Lisboa LA, de Almeida JP, Gerent AM, Souza DH, Gaiane MA, Fukushima JT, Park CL, Zambolim C, Rocha Ferreira GS, Strabelli TM, Fernandes FL, Camara L, Zeferino S, Santos VG, Piccioni MA, Jatene FB, Costa Auler JO Jr, Filho RK. Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery: The VANCS Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):85-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001434.
PubMed 27841822Takenaka K, Ogawa E, Wada H, Hirata T. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and surgical stress in thoracic surgery. J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;21(1):48-53; discussion 53-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.07.001.
PubMed 16616623Haga Y, Beppu T, Doi K, Nozawa F, Mugita N, Ikei S, Ogawa M. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction following gastrointestinal surgery. Crit Care Med. 1997 Dec;25(12):1994-2000. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199712000-00016.
PubMed 9403749Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Palizas F Jr, Murias G, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Palizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R92. doi: 10.1186/cc7922. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
PubMed 19534818
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vasopressin or Norepinephrine in Vasoplegic Shock After Non-cardiac Surgery: a Randomized and Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03483753
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VANCSIII / 62586316.6.0000.0065
- Conditions
- Circulatory Shock, Non-cardiac Surgery
- Keywords
- Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, Post-operative, Critical Care
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: no funding for the study
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 2 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of vasopressin compared to norepinephrine on the clinical complications of patients with vasospastic shock after noncardiac surgeries.
Detailed description
The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) is a common complication after non-cardiac surgery, impacting negatively on patient outcome and with high incidence rates. Vasoplegic syndrome is the most serious complication of SIRS and can happen after any type of surgery. The etiology of the vasoplegic syndrome has not yet been fully elucidated, but is known to occur more frequently in patients at high surgical risk, submitted to major surgeries, or in the presence of perioperative complications and patients with comorbidities. In this circumstance, the depletion of vasopressin stocks is described, which may contribute to the refractoriness of the shock and the lack of response to the catecholaminergic drugs. The standard treatment of perioperative vasoplegia has been adequate volume replacement and administration of vasopressors, with norepinephrine being the most commonly used. However, it is known that norepinephrine may have deleterious effects on the body and in 20% of patients with vasospastic shock it is ineffective. Previous studies have suggested benefits of adding vasopressin in refractory situations, especially in septic shock. Recently the VANCS study (Vasopressin or norepinephrine in the vasopregic shock after cardiac surgery: double-blind, controlled and randomized study) demonstrated superiority of vasopressin in the reversion of vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery, as well as a lower incidence of renal insufficiency, atrial fibrillation and shorter hospitalization time. (Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):85-93.)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vasopressin group | Experimental | Drug: VasopressinBlinded vasopressin |
| Norepinephrine group | Active comparator | Drug: NorepinephrineBlinded norepinephrine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age greater than 18 years;
- Patients undergoing high-risk non-cardiac surgery;
- vasopressor need within 24 hours after surgery, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg after volume resuscitation with at least 1 liter of crystalloid solution (Ringer's lactate) and maintaining a cardiac index> 2.2 ml / min / m²;
- Signature of the informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Allergy to vasoactive drugs;
- Previous use of vasopressor;
- Gestation;
- Presence of Raynaud's phenomenon, altered Allen's test, systemic sclerosis or vasospastic diathesis;
- Severe hyponatremia (Na <130 mEq / L);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VasopressinAlso: Blinded VasopressinBlinded Vasopressin will be started if there is persistent hypotension, characterized by mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg after fluid replacement. Continuous infusion of the drug at doses ranging from 0.01 U / min to 0.06 U / min | Drug | Vasopressin group |
| NorepinephrineAlso: Blinded NorepinephrineBlinded Norepinephrine will be started if there is persistent hypotension, characterized by mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg after fluid replacement. Continuous infusion of the drug at doses ranging from 0.1 mcg / kg / min to 1.0 mcg / kg / min. | Drug | Norepinephrine group |
Primary outcome
Incidence between groups of a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and renal complications after high-risk non-cardiac surgeries
Time frame: 30 days
Cardiovascular complications include: stroke, acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, nonfatal myocardial injury, and ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias. Renal complications: Acute renal failure with AKIN stage 1 or higher or renal support therapy.
14 secondary outcomes
All-cause mortality
Time frame: 30 days after randomization
Acute myocardial infarction
Time frame: 30 days after randomization
Cardiogenic shock
Time frame: 30 days after randomization
Ventricular and / or supraventricular arrhythmia
Time frame: 30 days
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Time frame: 30 days
Stroke and transient ischemic attack
Time frame: 30 days
Delirium
Time frame: 30 days
Acute renal failure (AKIN 1 or more)
Time frame: 30 days
Length of time in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital
Time frame: 30 days
Length of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 30 days
Septic shock
Time frame: 30 days
hospital and ICU readmission rate
Time frame: 30 days
Reoperation
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of severe adverse events
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 19822810Levin MA, Lin HM, Castillo JG, Adams DH, Reich DL, Fischer GW. Early on-cardiopulmonary bypass hypotension and other factors associated with vasoplegic syndrome. Circulation. 2009 Oct 27;120(17):1664-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814533. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 11529214Landry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):588-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra002709. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27147845Gkisioti S, Mentzelopoulos SD. Vasogenic shock physiology. Open Access Emerg Med. 2011 Jan 6;3:1-6. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S10388. eCollection 2011.
- Background: PubMed 19678915Teboul JL, Monnet X. Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: two different problems, only one solution. Crit Care. 2009;13(4):175. doi: 10.1186/cc7979. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 22911566Brown SM, Lanspa MJ, Jones JP, Kuttler KG, Li Y, Carlson R, Miller RR 3rd, Hirshberg EL, Grissom CK, Morris AH. Survival after shock requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):664-671. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1106.
- Background: PubMed 10411844Morales D, Madigan J, Cullinane S, Chen J, Heath M, Oz M, Oliver JA, Landry DW. Reversal by vasopressin of intractable hypotension in the late phase of hemorrhagic shock. Circulation. 1999 Jul 20;100(3):226-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.3.226.
- Background: PubMed 18305265Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, Gordon AC, Hebert PC, Cooper DJ, Holmes CL, Mehta S, Granton JT, Storms MM, Cook DJ, Presneill JJ, Ayers D; VASST Investigators. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373.
- Background: PubMed 27841820Russell JA. Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock after Cardiac Surgery: Another "VASST" Difference? Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):9-11. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001435. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 27841822Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Barbosa Gomes Galas FR, Rhodes A, Landoni G, Osawa EA, Melo RR, Sundin MR, Grande SM, Gaiotto FA, Pomerantzeff PM, Dallan LO, Franco RA, Nakamura RE, Lisboa LA, de Almeida JP, Gerent AM, Souza DH, Gaiane MA, Fukushima JT, Park CL, Zambolim C, Rocha Ferreira GS, Strabelli TM, Fernandes FL, Camara L, Zeferino S, Santos VG, Piccioni MA, Jatene FB, Costa Auler JO Jr, Filho RK. Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery: The VANCS Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):85-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001434.
- Results publication: PubMed 16616623Takenaka K, Ogawa E, Wada H, Hirata T. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and surgical stress in thoracic surgery. J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;21(1):48-53; discussion 53-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.07.001.
- Results publication: PubMed 9403749Haga Y, Beppu T, Doi K, Nozawa F, Mugita N, Ikei S, Ogawa M. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction following gastrointestinal surgery. Crit Care Med. 1997 Dec;25(12):1994-2000. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199712000-00016.
- Results publication: PubMed 19534818Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Palizas F Jr, Murias G, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Palizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R92. doi: 10.1186/cc7922. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Circulatory Shock
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
RecruitingObservational study
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) Evaluation and Research of Clinical, ImmUnoLogic and TranscriptomE Study
Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic, Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juliano P Almeida, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
Tais F Szeles, MD principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Vasopressin and Norepinephrine in people with Circulatory Shock and Non-cardiac Surgery, run by University of Sao Paulo.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence between groups of a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and renal complications after high-risk non-cardiac surgeries (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03483753, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2023.