AzTrials
AzTrials

Impulsive BehaviorCDIC-tDCSNCT03484377

Cortical Dynamics of Inhibitory Control: A Concurrent tDCS-MEG Study

A study testing Anodal tDCS in people with Impulsive Behavior, run by Najat Khalifa at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to use concurrent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) with measures of impulsivity to examine the neurobiological underpinnings of rapid response impulsivity (RRI) and how these can be modified using tDCS in healthy subjects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Impulsive Behavior
What is being tested?
Anodal tDCS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
15 Sep 2018to 28 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • University students and staff
  • Aged 18-40

Who cannot join

  • Individuals with epilepsy and other neurological conditions, history of significant head injury, substance misuse, major mental disorder and those receiving psychotropic medication.
  • Contraindications to use of Magnetic Resonance (pacemakers, metal implants, aneurysm clips)
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • University of Nottingham

    Nottingham, Notts, NG7 2TU

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Measuring Cortical Dynamics of Inhibitory Control Before, During and After Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

This study aims to use concurrent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) with measures of impulsivity to examine the neurobiological underpinnings of rapid response impulsivity (RRI) and how these can be modified using tDCS in healthy subjects.

Read the detailed description

Concurrent tDCS-MEG parallel arms single-blinded experimental design (right anodal v sham tDCS) will be employed in this study. The study will be conducted at the University of Nottingham, using a sample of student volunteers. This study aims to examine the influence of anodal tDCS on beta-band and alpha-band oscillatory activities, using an anti-saccade task administered before, during and after tDCS stimulation. It can potentially help understand the neurobiological mechanisms underpinning rapid response impulsivity and how these can be influenced by tDCS.

The research hypotheses are that (i) a generalised mechanism for top-down inhibitory control will play a vital role, whereby prefrontal beta-band activity initiates alpha-band activity for functional inhibition over the frontal eye fields and other areas in the neurocircuitry involved in RRI; (ii) anodal tDCS (as opposed to sham) delivered over the right DLPFC will enhance this mechanism; and (iii) there will be no significant correlations between measures of self-report impulsivity and performance on the anti-saccade task and measures of oscillatory activity.

Being tested
Anodal tDCS, Sham tDCS
Medical subject headings
Impulsive Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anodal tDCSDevice

    The experimental condition will use a constant current of 2mA for 20 minutes, delivered via gradual increase and decrease over 10 seconds at the onset and offset of stimulation (current ramps), respectively.

  • Sham tDCSDevice

    The anodal electrode will be placed over the supreorbital ridge. The current will be delivered only in the first 10 seconds, after which the stimulation will cease but with the electrodes still in place throughout the session. The session will last for 20 minutes.

Study groups in NCT03484377
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anodal tDCSExperimentalThe anodal tDCS electrode will be placed over the area corresponding to the right DLPFC (F4 of the EEG10-20 international system). The anodal tDCS condition will use a constant current of 2mA, delivered via gradual increase and decrease over 10 seconds at the onset and offset of stimulation (current ramps), respectively.
Receives: Device: Anodal tDCS
Sham tDCSSham comparatorThe sham (cathodal) electrode will be placed over the left supraorbital ridge. The current will be delivered only in the first 10 seconds, after which the stimulation will cease but with the electrodes still in place throughout the session.
Receives: Device: Sham tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total number of correct anti-saccade (AS) trials

    A measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)

    Measured: Change from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCS

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Total number of correct pro-saccade (PS) trials

    A behavioral measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)

    Measured: Change from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCS

  2. Saccade latency for anti-saccade (AS) trials

    A behavioral measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)

    Measured: Change from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCS

  3. Saccade latency for pro-saccade (PS) trials

    A behavioral measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)

    Measured: Change from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCS

  4. Total Scores on the UPPS+P Impulsive Behaviour Scale

    A self-report measure of impulsivity

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Alpha and Beta band activity

    A Cortical measure of inhibitory control recorded using Magnetoencephalography (MEG). MEG is a brain imaging technique.

    Measured: Change from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCS

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2018
  2. Study start15 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion14 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Concurrent tDCS-MEG parallel arms single-blinded experimental design (right anodal v sham tDCS).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03484377
Sponsor's protocol ID
CiC2017051
Other IDs
199-1801
Acronym
CDIC-tDCS
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
14 Mar 2018
Last updated
25 Feb 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anodal tDCS in people with Impulsive Behavior, run by Najat Khalifa at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total number of correct anti-saccade (AS) trials (time frame: Change from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in