AzTrials
AzTrials

Headache, MigraineS100NCT03490500

Using the S100B Protein for Emergency Headache Management Care (S100)

An observational study of Headache, Migraine and Hemorrhage, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer at 3 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the negative predictive value of protein S100B that could exclude subarachnoid and intracranial haemorrhage for patient that present severe headache within the last 3 hours. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Headache, Migraine, Hemorrhage
How many people
63 participants
Where
3 sitesFrance
Study dates
24 Oct 2018to 24 Jan 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The population will be recruited in the emergency unit

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female over 18 years-old
  • Patient presenting at the Emergency Service a non-traumatic severe headache lasting for less than 3 hours. The severity is defined as a VAS ≥ 6/10
  • Blood sample can be taken within 1 hour following the emergency admission
  • VAS > 6 or Glasgow < 8
  • Signed and dated informed consent by patient, or trusted person, or family

Who cannot join

  • Patient presenting headache after head trauma
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patient with a pathology causing the elevation of PS100B's rate such as Alzheimer's disease, Creuzfeld-Jacob's disease, Multiple Sclerosis, cerebral tumour, trisomy 21, melanoma (diabetes excluded)
  • Patient covered by social security regimen or equivalent
  • Patient under guardianship (legal protection)
  • Patient deprived of liberty by court or administrative order
  • Any condition that could influence PS100B's dosage results according to the physician.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

France3 sites
  • Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Laveran

    Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhône, 13000

  • Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte Anne

    Toulon, Var, 83000

  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne-sur-Mer

    Toulon, Var, 83056

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Improving the Headache Management Care in the Emergency Unit by Using a Biological Marker: S100B Protein.

The purpose of this study is to determine the negative predictive value of protein S100B that could exclude subarachnoid and intracranial haemorrhage for patient that present severe headache within the last 3 hours.

Read the detailed description

This study will be proposed to every patient that correspond to eligibility criteria, such as presenting a severe headache (Visual Analog Scale ≥ 6/10) within 3 hours before arriving to the emergency.

After signing the informed consent, a blood sample will be taken in order to dosage S100B protein of each patient, and then they will have a brain scan.

The trial ends after the brain scan for each patient. Results of brain scans will be compared with results of S100B dosage.

Keywords
protein S100B, negative predictive value, headache, intracranial hemorrhage
Medical subject headings
Migraine Disorders, Hemorrhage, Headache, Intracranial Hemorrhages

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03490500
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
S100B protein dosageBiological

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate the interest of PS100B dosage in the severe headache therapeutic management

    Negative predictive value of PS100B dosage below the reference value of 0.10 µG/L for intracerebral haemorrhage lesion

    Measured: 15 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Frequency of Intracranial Bleeding in patient with severe headache

    Incidence of intracranial bleeding in patient with severe headache

    Measured: 15 months

  2. Frequency of subarachnoid hemorrhage in patient with severe headache

    Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage in patient with severe headache

    Measured: 15 months

  3. Frequency of intracranial haemorrhage in migraine patient with severe headache at inclusion

    Incidence of intracranial haemorrhage in migraine patient with severe headache at inclusion

    Measured: 15 months

  4. Evaluate the number of lumbar puncture that could have been avoided

    The ratio of patient with a normal scan and a PS100 dosage < 0.10µg/L, on patient eligible for lumbar puncture according to the usual practice

    Measured: 15 months

  5. Evaluate the number of cerebral scan that could have been avoided

    The ratio of patient with a normal scan and a PS100 dosage < 0.10 µg/L, on patient eligible for cerebral scan according to the usual practice

    Measured: 15 months

  6. Evaluate the number of lumbar puncture's complications that could have been avoided.

    The ratio of patients with PS100 < 0.10µg/L and normal cerebral scan on the total number of patients included

    Measured: 15 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2018
  2. Study start24 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion24 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion24 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
63 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03490500
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017-CHITS-07
Other IDs
2018-A00070-55
Acronym
S100
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
26 Mar 2018
Last updated
13 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is no IPD sharing plan

Publications

  • Latinovic R, Gulliford M, Ridsdale L. Headache and migraine in primary care: consultation, prescription, and referral rates in a large population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;77(3):385-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073221.

    PubMed 16484650
  • Edlow JA, Panagos PD, Godwin SA, Thomas TL, Decker WW; American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;52(4):407-36. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.001.

    PubMed 18809105
  • Biberthaler P, Linsenmeier U, Pfeifer KJ, Kroetz M, Mussack T, Kanz KG, Hoecherl EF, Jonas F, Marzi I, Leucht P, Jochum M, Mutschler W. Serum S-100B concentration provides additional information fot the indication of computed tomography in patients after minor head injury: a prospective multicenter study. Shock. 2006 May;25(5):446-53. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000209534.61058.35.

    PubMed 16680008
  • Gilbert JW, Johnson KM, Larkin GL, Moore CL. Atraumatic headache in US emergency departments: recent trends in CT/MRI utilisation and factors associated with severe intracranial pathology. Emerg Med J. 2012 Jul;29(7):576-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200088. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

    PubMed 21856709
  • Morgenstern LB, Huber JC, Luna-Gonzales H, Saldin KR, Grotta JC, Shaw SG, Knudson L, Frankowski RF. Headache in the emergency department. Headache. 2001 Jun;41(6):537-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006537.x.

    PubMed 11437887
  • Edlow JA, Caplan LR. Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 6;342(1):29-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001063420106. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10620647
  • Muller P, Mitri F, Houlle A, Vidal PO, Gasperini G, Cazes N, Renard A. S100ss protein for non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jul;57:39-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.04.030. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

    PubMed 35500528

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Headache, Migraine and Hemorrhage, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer at 3 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate the interest of PS100B dosage in the severe headache therapeutic management (time frame: 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03490500, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in