AzTrials
AzTrials

Smoking CessationNCT03500965

Pictorial Warning Labels and Memory for Relative and Absolute Cigarette Health-risk Information Over Time in Teens

A study testing text-only PWL, graphic PWL and absolute risk in people with Smoking Cessation and Smoking, Cigarette, run by Ohio State University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pictorial cigarette warning labels (PWLs) are thought to increase risk knowledge, but experimental research has not examined PWLs' longer term effects on memory for health risks. In this study, teens who have experimented with smoking or are considered vulnerable to smoking are repeatedly exposed to text-only vs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Smoking Cessation, Smoking, Cigarette
What is being tested?
text-only PWL, graphic PWL and absolute risk
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
422 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
25 May 2016to 9 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • have ever tried smoking
  • report vulnerability to smoking (i.e., report that they might smoke in the next year or would try a cigarette if a friend offered one)
  • parents give permission to participate

Who cannot join

  • not vulnerable to smoking (i.e., report they will definitely not smoke a cigarette in the next year and definitely would not try a cigarette if one was offered
  • parents do not provide permission to participate

About this study

Pictorial cigarette warning labels (PWLs) are thought to increase risk knowledge, but experimental research has not examined PWLs' longer term effects on memory for health risks. In this study, teens who have experimented with smoking or are considered vulnerable to smoking are repeatedly exposed to text-only vs. graphic warning labels paired with numeric risk information. This study will allow us to assess the extent to which reactions to warnings remain consistent over time and influence future smoking intentions. We will also assess the impact of graphic images on memory for smoking risk information presented in absolute and (a smokers lifetime risk of getting a smoking related disease), or relative (a smokers risk of getting a smoking related disease, compared to the risk of non-smokers) formats.

Being tested
text-only PWL, graphic PWL, absolute risk, relative risk
Keywords
pictorial warning labels, risk knowledge, emotion, memory, risk perceptions, quit intentions
Medical subject headings
Smoking Cessation, Cigarette Smoking

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • text-only PWLBehavioural

    control condition (no image)

  • graphic PWLBehavioural

    pictorial warning

  • absolute riskBehavioural

    Percentage risk information for smoking-related diseases for smokers

  • relative riskBehavioural

    Percentage risk information for smoking-related diseases for smokers and non-smokers

Study groups in NCT03500965
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Text-only PWL, absol riskExperimentalExposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
Receives: Behavioral: text-only PWL; Behavioral: absolute risk
text-only PWL, relative riskExperimentalExposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
Receives: Behavioral: text-only PWL; Behavioral: relative risk
graphic PWL, absol riskExperimentalExposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
Receives: Behavioral: graphic PWL; Behavioral: absolute risk
graphic PWL, relative riskExperimentalExposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
Receives: Behavioral: graphic PWL; Behavioral: relative risk

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. numeric risk recognition

    Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers for each label (e.g., ____% of smokers die before age 85). For each question, there were four decoy responses.

    Measured: measured immediately following last exposure

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. numeric risk recognition

    Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers for each label (e.g., ____% of smokers die before age 85). For each question, there were four decoy responses.

    Measured: measured after 6-week delay

  2. relative risk recognition

    Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers vs. nonsmokers for each health risk (e.g., a smoker is ____ as likely to die from heart disease as a nonsmoker). For each question, there were three decoy responses (e.g., for heart disease, response options were: "about as likely," "1.75 times," "4.1 times," "10.4 times").

    Measured: measured immediately following last exposure

  3. relative risk recognition

    Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers vs. nonsmokers for each health risk (e.g., a smoker is ____ as likely to die from heart disease as a nonsmoker). For each question, there were three decoy responses (e.g., for heart disease, response options were: "about as likely," "1.75 times," "4.1 times," "10.4 times").

    Measured: measured after 6-week delay

  4. smoking risk perceptions

    Participants completed several scale items about how much risk they perceived smoking posed to them (e.g., "If a person smokes at your age, how likely are they to get a life-threatening illness from smoking someday ?" [1=very unlikely; 5=extremely likely])

    Measured: measured immediately following last exposure

  5. smoking risk perceptions

    Participants completed several scale items about how much risk they perceived smoking posed to them (e.g., "If a person smokes at your age, how likely are they to get a life-threatening illness from smoking someday ?" [1=very unlikely; 5=extremely likely])

    Measured: measured after 6-week delay

  6. quit intentions (for next 30 days)

    Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next 30 days" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

    (only for those teens who currently smoked)

    Measured: measured immediately following last exposure

  7. quit intentions (for next 30 days)

    Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next 30 days" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

    (only for those teens who currently smoked)

    Measured: measured after 6-week delay

  8. quit intentions (for next year)

    Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next year" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

    only for those teens who currently smoked

    Measured: measured immediately following last exposure

  9. quit intentions (for next year)

    Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next year" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

    only for those teens who currently smoked

    Measured: measured after 6-week delay

  10. risk recognition

    Participants were given a list of 9 warnings and asked to select which ones they'd been previously exposed to

    Measured: measured immediately following last exposure

  11. risk recognition

    Participants were given a list of 9 warnings and asked to select which ones they'd been previously exposed to

    Measured: measured after 6-week delay

  12. feelings about smoking

    Participants completed several scale items about their feelings towards smoking (e.g., "How good or bad do you feel about smoking?" -2=very bad; +2=very good; "How much do you feel confused about the harms vs. benefits of smoking?" 0=not at all confused; 4=very confused)

    Measured: measured immediately following last exposure

  13. feelings about smoking

    Participants completed several scale items about their feelings towards smoking (e.g., "How good or bad do you feel about smoking?" -2=very bad; +2=very good; "How much do you feel confused about the harms vs. benefits of smoking?" 0=not at all confused; 4=very confused)

    Measured: measured after 6-week delay

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2018
  2. Study start25 May 2016
  3. Primary completion9 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion9 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
422 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03500965
Sponsor's protocol ID
P50CA180908A2a-T
Other IDs
P50CA180908
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
14 Feb 2018
Last updated
18 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing text-only PWL, graphic PWL and absolute risk in people with Smoking Cessation and Smoking, Cigarette, run by Ohio State University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

numeric risk recognition (time frame: measured immediately following last exposure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in