ObesityNCT03502096
Portion Size and To-go Container on Dinner Intake
A study testing To-Go container in people with Obesity and Eating Behavior, run by Penn State University.
Trial summary
This study investigated whether the provision of a to-go container influenced the portion size effect at a meal. Following a screening visit, women came to the lab once a week for 4 weeks to eat a meal of multiple foods. At each visit, the portion size of the meal was varied in a counterbalanced order. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Eating Behavior
- What is being tested?
- To-Go container
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2016to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Regularly eats 3 meals/day
- Willing to avoid alcohol the day before and during test days
- Likes foods offered at test meals
- Body mass index 18 - 36 (kg/m*m)
Who cannot join
- Smokes
- Athlete in training
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Taking medication that may affect appetite or food intake
- Food allergies or dietary restrictions
- Currently have or recently been diagnosed with disease or disorder known to affect appetite
About this study
Official title: The Influence of the Provision of a To-go Container on the Portion Size Effect in Women
This study investigated whether the provision of a to-go container influenced the portion size effect at a meal. Following a screening visit, women came to the lab once a week for 4 weeks to eat a meal of multiple foods. At each visit, the portion size of the meal was varied in a counterbalanced order. Prior to their first meal, women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a group that would have their leftovers packaged to go (to-go group) and a group that did not have leftovers packaged (control group). Women were instructed to eat ad libitum at the meals. They also answered questions about hunger and fullness as well as food characteristics before and after each meal. Following the final meal, subjects completed a series of questionnaires assessing subject characteristics as well as food characteristics. It was hypothesized that the effect of portion size on intake would be attenuated in subjects who received a to-go container with the meal. In addition, we aimed to identify any subject characteristics that moderated or exacerbated the portion size effect. It was also of interest to determine whether the portion size effect on individual foods were influenced by food characteristics such as perceived value.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Eating Behavior
- Being tested
- To-Go container, Control
- Keywords
- portion size, food intake, energy intake, food choice
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Feeding Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
To-Go containerBehavioural
Subjects were provided a to-go container in which leftover foods would be packaged
ControlOther
Subjects were not provided a to-go container with the meal
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 100% portion size | Experimental | 100% portion sizes of all foods served (baseline). To-go container and controls received this meal. Receives: Behavioral: To-Go container; Other: Control |
| 125% portion size | Experimental | 125% of baseline portions served. To-go container and controls received this meal. Receives: Behavioral: To-Go container; Other: Control |
| 150% portion size | Experimental | 150% of baseline portions served. To-go container and controls received this meal. Receives: Behavioral: To-Go container; Other: Control |
| 175% portion size | Experimental | 175% of baseline portions served. To-go container and controls received this meal. Receives: Behavioral: To-Go container; Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the weight of food consumed
Change in the weight of food consumed (in grams) across experimental conditions and intervention groups.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Change in energy intake
Change in energy intake (in kcal) across experimental conditions and intervention groups.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in energy density consumed
Change in food energy density consumed (in kcal/g) across experimental conditions and intervention groups.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Change in intake of individual foods
Change in both the weight (g) and energy (kcal) consumed of individual foods served at the meal across experimental conditions and intervention groups.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Changes in post-meal measures of satiety
Changes in post-meal measures of satiety across experimental conditions and intervention groups using 100-mm visual analog scales.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Changes in post-meal ratings of meal characteristics
Changes in post-meal ratings of meal characteristics across experimental conditions and between subject groups using 100-mm visual analog scales.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Changes in ratings of food properties
Changes in post-meal ratings of food properties across experimental conditions and subject groups using 100-mm visual analog scales.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2018
- Study startOct 2016
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- The two factors were meal portion size and provision of a to-go container. The portion size factor was within-subjects (crossover). All subjects received each of the 4 portions served (the order in which portions were served was counterbalanced). The container factor was between-subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: one group had uneaten food packaged to take home, the other group (control) did not.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Penn State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Jenny Craig, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Barbara J. Rolls, Penn State University
- Investigators
- Barbara J. Rolls, PhD, Principal investigator, The Pennsylvania State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03502096
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PortionSize105
- Other IDs
- R01DK059853, NIFA Grant 2011-67001-30117
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Influence of the Provision of a To-go Container on the Portion Size Effect in Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03502096
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PortionSize105
- Conditions
- Obesity, Eating Behavior
- Keywords
- portion size, food intake, energy intake, food choice
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Penn State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Jenny Craig, Inc.
- Study start
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigated whether the provision of a to-go container influenced the portion size effect at a meal. Following a screening visit, women came to the lab once a week for 4 weeks to eat a meal of multiple foods. At each visit, the portion size of the meal was varied in a counterbalanced order. Prior to their first meal, women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a group that would have their leftovers packaged to go (to-go group) and a group that did not have leftovers packaged (control group). Women were instructed to eat ad libitum at the meals. They also answered questions about hunger and fullness as well as food characteristics before and after each meal. Following the final meal, subjects completed a series of questionnaires assessing subject characteristics as well as food characteristics. It was hypothesized that the effect of portion size on intake would be attenuated in subjects who received a to-go container with the meal. In addition, we aimed to identify any subject characteristics that moderated or exacerbated the portion size effect. It was also of interest to determine whether the portion size effect on individual foods were influenced by food characteristics such as perceived value.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- The two factors were meal portion size and provision of a to-go container. The portion size factor was within-subjects (crossover). All subjects received each of the 4 portions served (the order in which portions were served was counterbalanced). The container factor was between-subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: one group had uneaten food packaged to take home, the other group (control) did not.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 100% portion size | Experimental | Behavioral: To-Go container, Other: Control100% portion sizes of all foods served (baseline). To-go container and controls received this meal. |
| 125% portion size | Experimental | Behavioral: To-Go container, Other: Control125% of baseline portions served. To-go container and controls received this meal. |
| 150% portion size | Experimental | Behavioral: To-Go container, Other: Control150% of baseline portions served. To-go container and controls received this meal. |
| 175% portion size | Experimental | Behavioral: To-Go container, Other: Control175% of baseline portions served. To-go container and controls received this meal. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Regularly eats 3 meals/day
- Willing to avoid alcohol the day before and during test days
- Likes foods offered at test meals
- Body mass index 18 - 36 (kg/m*m)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Smokes
- Athlete in training
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Taking medication that may affect appetite or food intake
- Food allergies or dietary restrictions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| To-Go containerSubjects were provided a to-go container in which leftover foods would be packaged | Behavioural | 100% portion size, 125% portion size, 150% portion size, 175% portion size |
| ControlSubjects were not provided a to-go container with the meal | Other | 100% portion size, 125% portion size, 150% portion size, 175% portion size |
Primary outcome
Change in the weight of food consumed
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Change in the weight of food consumed (in grams) across experimental conditions and intervention groups.
Change in energy intake
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Change in energy intake (in kcal) across experimental conditions and intervention groups.
5 secondary outcomes
Change in energy density consumed
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Change in intake of individual foods
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Changes in post-meal measures of satiety
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Changes in post-meal ratings of meal characteristics
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Changes in ratings of food properties
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2018.
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingPhase 4
Translational Health Research Into Vascular and Neurocognitive Effects of Weight Loss
Class I/II Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2a Study of WVE-007 in Adults Living With Overweight or Obesity
Overweight and Obesity
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Natural History of Genetic and Environmental Predictors of Pubertal Timing Among Youth With Obesity
Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barbara J. Rolls, PhD principal investigator
The Pennsylvania State University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing To-Go container in people with Obesity and Eating Behavior, run by Penn State University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the weight of food consumed (time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2018.