Urinary IncontinenceBUDINCT03509038
BUDI (Bariatric UroDynamic Improvement)
A study testing Exploratory pathophysiology Study in people with Urinary Incontinence and Obesity, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
In the population of obese women, the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) is around 70%. It was shown in the literature that weight loss by bariatric surgery allowed a significant improvement in the symptoms and impact on the quality of life of the IU. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Incontinence, Obesity, Urodynamics
- What is being tested?
- Exploratory pathophysiology Study
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 13 Mar 2018to Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The research protocol will be proposed to all patients requiring bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) and describing urinary incontinence according to the definition of the International Continence Society (ICS)
Who cannot join
- minors under the age of 18
- pregnant or lactating women
- women not speaking French (important to understand and respond to questionnaires)
- women who have not given their written consent
- neurological diseases,
- patients who have benefited from urinary incontinence surgery, prolapse treatment or pelvic surgery at risk of urodynamic modifications (extensive resection of deep endometriosis, pelvic wound surgery, pelvic radiation therapy).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Pizzoferato
Caen, 14000
Anne Cecile Pizzoferrato, MD, +33231272336, pizzoferrato-ac@chu-caen.fr
About this study
Official title: Urodynamic Evaluation of Incontinent Obese Women Before and After Weight Reduction by Bariatric Surgery : What Urodynamic Healing Factors? BUDI (Bariatric UroDynamic Improvement)
In the population of obese women, the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) is around 70%. It was shown in the literature that weight loss by bariatric surgery allowed a significant improvement in the symptoms and impact on the quality of life of the IU. However, no prognostic factor for recovery has yet been identified and the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning this improvement are not fully elucidated.
The main objective of this study is to highlight the urodynamic changes associated with the improvement of the symptom and quality of life scores in a population of incontinent obese women before and after bariatric surgery.
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Obesity, Urodynamics, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- Exploratory pathophysiology Study
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exploratory pathophysiology StudyOther
Urodynamic tests before and after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women before and after bariatric surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Urinary incontinence before bariatric surgery | Experimental | All patients with urinary incontinence before bariatric surgery will be addressed for a urodynamic exam Receives: Other: Exploratory pathophysiology Study |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
to highlight the changes in urodynamic vesical pressure (cmH2O) associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
Measured: 24 months
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
to highlight the changes in urodynamic vesical sensations (cmH2O) associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
Measured: 24 months
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
to highlight the changes in urodynamic bladder-to-urethra pressure transmission (%) with cough associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
Measured: 24 months
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
to highlight the changes in urodynamic maximum urethral cloture pressure (cmH2O) associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Urinary incontinence symptom improvement after bariatric surgery
Changes in ICIQ-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form) scores (assessing frequency and quantity of urinary loss, ranging from 0 to 21) after weight loss in incontinent obese women
Measured: 24 months
Quality of life improvement after bariatric surgery
Measuring changes in Quality of life after weight loss with the Contilife questionnaire which specifically measures the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life : activity of daily life
Measured: 24 months
Quality of life improvement after bariatric surgery
Measuring changes in Quality of life after weight loss with the Contilife questionnaire which specifically measures the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life : self-image and emotional impact and sexuality)
Measured: 24 months
Quality of life improvement after bariatric surgery
Measuring changes in Quality of life after weight loss with the Contilife questionnaire which specifically measures the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life : sexuality
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2018
- Study start13 Mar 2018
- Primary completionJan 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Caen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University hospital of Caen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03509038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-A02121-52
- Acronym
- BUDI
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: study protocol statistical analysis plan informed consent form analytic code clinical study report
Publications
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available.
PubMed 11857671Legendre G, Fritel X, Capmas P, Pourcelot AG, Fernandez H. [Urinary incontinence and obesity]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Jun;41(4):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Apr 17. French.
PubMed 22516035Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Dec;47(6):497-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.6.497.
PubMed 8120507Subak LL, Richter HE, Hunskaar S. Obesity and urinary incontinence: epidemiology and clinical research update. J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.071.
PubMed 19846133Elia G, Dye TD, Scariati PD. Body mass index and urinary symptoms in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):366-9. doi: 10.1007/pl00004043.
PubMed 11795637Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2004;6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3-9.
PubMed 16985863Neels JG, Olefsky JM. Inflamed fat: what starts the fire? J Clin Invest. 2006 Jan;116(1):33-5. doi: 10.1172/JCI27280.
PubMed 16395402Agur W, Rizk DE. Obesity and urinary incontinence in women: is the black box becoming grayer? Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):257-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1293-z. Epub 2010 Oct 6. No abstract available.
PubMed 20924556Lose G, Tanko A, Colstrup H, Andersen JT. Urethral sphincter electromyography with vaginal surface electrodes: a comparison with sphincter electromyography recorded via periurethral coaxial, anal sphincter needle and perianal surface electrodes. J Urol. 1985 May;133(5):815-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49238-x.
PubMed 4039373Sapsford RR, Hodges PW. Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;82(8):1081-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24297.
PubMed 11494188Banerjea R, Findley PA, Sambamoorthi U. Disparities in preventive care by body mass index categories among women. Women Health. 2008;47(4):1-17. doi: 10.1080/03630240802099261.
PubMed 18843937Elliott V, de Bruin ED, Dumoulin C. Virtual reality rehabilitation as a treatment approach for older women with mixed urinary incontinence: a feasibility study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Mar;34(3):236-43. doi: 10.1002/nau.22553. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
PubMed 24415577Chen CC, Gatmaitan P, Koepp S, Barber MD, Chand B, Schauer PR, Brethauer SA. Obesity is associated with increased prevalence and severity of pelvic floor disorders in women considering bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jul-Aug;5(4):411-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
PubMed 19136310Knepfler T, Valero E, Triki E, Chilintseva N, Koensgen S, Rohr S. Bariatric surgery improves female pelvic floor disorders. J Visc Surg. 2016 Apr;153(2):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
PubMed 26678846Kuruba R, Almahmeed T, Martinez F, Torrella TA, Haines K, Nelson LG, Gallagher SF, Murr MM. Bariatric surgery improves urinary incontinence in morbidly obese individuals. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Nov-Dec;3(6):586-90; discussion 590-1. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
PubMed 17950043
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Urodynamic Evaluation of Incontinent Obese Women Before and After Weight Reduction by Bariatric Surgery : What Urodynamic Healing Factors? BUDI (Bariatric UroDynamic Improvement)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03509038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BUDI / 2017-A02121-52
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Obesity, Urodynamics, Quality of Life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, CaenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the population of obese women, the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) is around 70%. It was shown in the literature that weight loss by bariatric surgery allowed a significant improvement in the symptoms and impact on the quality of life of the IU. However, no prognostic factor for recovery has yet been identified and the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning this improvement are not fully elucidated.
The main objective of this study is to highlight the urodynamic changes associated with the improvement of the symptom and quality of life scores in a population of incontinent obese women before and after bariatric surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Urinary incontinence before bariatric surgery | Experimental | Other: Exploratory pathophysiology StudyAll patients with urinary incontinence before bariatric surgery will be addressed for a urodynamic exam |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The research protocol will be proposed to all patients requiring bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) and describing urinary incontinence according to the definition of the International Continence Society (ICS)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- minors under the age of 18
- pregnant or lactating women
- women not speaking French (important to understand and respond to questionnaires)
- women who have not given their written consent
- neurological diseases,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exploratory pathophysiology StudyUrodynamic tests before and after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women before and after bariatric surgery | Other | Urinary incontinence before bariatric surgery |
Primary outcome
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
Time frame: 24 months
to highlight the changes in urodynamic vesical pressure (cmH2O) associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
Time frame: 24 months
to highlight the changes in urodynamic vesical sensations (cmH2O) associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
Time frame: 24 months
to highlight the changes in urodynamic bladder-to-urethra pressure transmission (%) with cough associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women
Time frame: 24 months
to highlight the changes in urodynamic maximum urethral cloture pressure (cmH2O) associated with the improvement of urinary incontinence after bariatric surgery
4 secondary outcomes
Urinary incontinence symptom improvement after bariatric surgery
Time frame: 24 months
Quality of life improvement after bariatric surgery
Time frame: 24 months
Quality of life improvement after bariatric surgery
Time frame: 24 months
Quality of life improvement after bariatric surgery
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 11857671Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22516035Legendre G, Fritel X, Capmas P, Pourcelot AG, Fernandez H. [Urinary incontinence and obesity]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Jun;41(4):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Apr 17. French.
- Background: PubMed 8120507Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Dec;47(6):497-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.6.497.
- Background: PubMed 19846133Subak LL, Richter HE, Hunskaar S. Obesity and urinary incontinence: epidemiology and clinical research update. J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.071.
- Background: PubMed 11795637Elia G, Dye TD, Scariati PD. Body mass index and urinary symptoms in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):366-9. doi: 10.1007/pl00004043.
- Background: PubMed 16985863Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2004;6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3-9.
- Background: PubMed 16395402Neels JG, Olefsky JM. Inflamed fat: what starts the fire? J Clin Invest. 2006 Jan;116(1):33-5. doi: 10.1172/JCI27280.
- Background: PubMed 20924556Agur W, Rizk DE. Obesity and urinary incontinence in women: is the black box becoming grayer? Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):257-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1293-z. Epub 2010 Oct 6. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 4039373Lose G, Tanko A, Colstrup H, Andersen JT. Urethral sphincter electromyography with vaginal surface electrodes: a comparison with sphincter electromyography recorded via periurethral coaxial, anal sphincter needle and perianal surface electrodes. J Urol. 1985 May;133(5):815-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49238-x.
- Background: PubMed 11494188Sapsford RR, Hodges PW. Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;82(8):1081-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24297.
- Background: PubMed 18843937Banerjea R, Findley PA, Sambamoorthi U. Disparities in preventive care by body mass index categories among women. Women Health. 2008;47(4):1-17. doi: 10.1080/03630240802099261.
- Background: PubMed 24415577Elliott V, de Bruin ED, Dumoulin C. Virtual reality rehabilitation as a treatment approach for older women with mixed urinary incontinence: a feasibility study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Mar;34(3):236-43. doi: 10.1002/nau.22553. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. study protocol statistical analysis plan informed consent form analytic code clinical study report
Related trials for Urinary Incontinence
Active, not recruiting
EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ADJUSTABLE CONTINENCE THERAPY BALLOONS IN BLADDER EXSTROPHY AND INCONTINENT EPISPADIAS PATIENTS
Bladder Exstrophy
Recruiting
Ambulatory Long Length URodynamics Evaluation
Urology, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Active, not recruiting
APPROVE Trial: Evaluating a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Treatment of OAB in Women
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urinary Urgency
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato, MD, PhD principal investigator
University hospital of Caen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exploratory pathophysiology Study in people with Urinary Incontinence and Obesity, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato, MD, PhD (+33682176675, pizzoferrato-ac@chu-caen.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Urodynamic changes after bariatric surgery in obese incontinent women (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03509038, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2021.